RadLola

Public Key

npub1tn9a6xfd8sfxyvnn64f3qcld73dpu2e90zjgqyz4dxeajakd78qqn69ghu

NIP-05 Address

RadLola_at_spinster.xyz@mostr.pub

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9ej7arykncynzxfea25csv0klgks79vjh3fyqzp2knv7ewmxlrsqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmdqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kytnhdel

Publishing to

relay.noswhere.com

relay.mostr.pub

Author Public Key

npub1tn9a6xfd8sfxyvnn64f3qcld73dpu2e90zjgqyz4dxeajakd78qqn69ghu

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-08-09 20:15:57

- reply

Russia banned transgenderism entirely

2024-08-03 23:40:51

https://media.spinster.xyz/2dc9fd7131b3f2763c42d0f885e67a3443192e415feb08b79b6555d249f29ff5.jpeg

2024-08-03 10:56:10

I thought the difference between men and women would be bigger on this one? Turns out it isn't that much, lol. Men are also tranny supporters
https://media.spinster.xyz/71c0260ea0bf0b4de6facc593f2dfef68783c4e96262683fad37f80568b59512.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/167dd4d7bbfa67e7ddfd8582814b0a96667c8f4232ed4224b75ef1cc6aae3f3a.jpeg

2024-07-22 17:25:59

https://media.spinster.xyz/fbbd4b152a3029035034e66e7c0a0757550093037a1e38a3f010ecf5f934ea01.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/fb457c071cd5394767d00cd81c8201c331596772376fce9a8e3181e2b65fb320.png

2024-06-27 15:14:06

https://media.spinster.xyz/1123b87cfc512deece75bf8bfcda932c1b221782f6be70afc08960a3889ec7e5.jpeg

2024-06-06 17:51:15

Bitch please. Lesbians haven't gone through 1/3 of the discimination gay men were subjected to.
https://media.spinster.xyz/3b958b512bcc6484e920d65f4e1acaeeda8d08e9930a8462251b12db1d8c49ba.jpeg

2024-05-07 22:30:51

https://media.spinster.xyz/b6f15e69250e02240a274d7cd7602b10019dd9df8bed582a25a8b3d3d5613b95.jpeg

2024-05-01 22:56:31

This is not true just for AGPs. This is true for both AGPs and HSTS as I can say from experience living in a country with mostly the second type. They both absolutely seethe way more about women spousing anti-trans views. They're much more afraid of women becoming anti-trannies than men
https://media.spinster.xyz/2173ee234587edb810ff30d0ed8a08dd3a3721e7f932ba46d47c854cf99f5885.png

2024-04-27 19:34:34

https://www.the-sun.com/news/3657105/prostitute-orangutan-pony-tragic-story/

2024-04-05 21:13:17

If you haven't realized the major problem with transgenderism are the surgical and pharmacological developments that aim to usurp female ness, you haven't really realized why transgenderism is bad
https://www.the11thhourblog.com/post/the-industry-of-artificial-sex-characteristics-and-the-dissolution-of-our-human-boundaries

2024-04-05 21:09:27

https://www.the11thhourblog.com/post/women-are-the-spoils-in-the-tech-driven-gender-war-against-biological-reality

2024-02-10 03:31:06

- reply

I think those are all excuses and yada yada. Radical feminists, GCs, etc have been witch hunting AGP men who aren't even "trans", who promote the truth about AGP and who denounce TRA abuse simply because they are AGP. What do they expect with this?
>Andrew Doyle is concerned that GC feminists are biased against gay men
He is objectively wrong. This movement is mostly composed of gay ̶s̶u̶p̶r̶e̶m̶a̶c̶y̶ rights militant lesbians who created a very convient narrative around trans that spouses that gay men who do X misogynistic act are victims but straight men who do the same X misogynistic act are vile.
>FWIW, I would like to see a lot more focus on government and institutions. I don't even like to focus too much on the low-level "worst ones" (e.g., criminals). I will take a moment to comment on those here and there, but I mostly want government, employers, universities, and other entities to have laws and policies that reflect reality.
Agree 100%

2024-02-08 19:03:15

Yes. A LOT of gender criticals/radfems are simply cowards, like many people in every movement. They rather target the least harmful, instead of the worst ones. Isn't it interesting how if Hayton was a homosexual man, radfems and gender criticals would have a completely different treatment towards him? Shapeshifter is a poor gay man who was a victim of homophobia meanwhile Hayton is a vile monster AGP who deserves nothing other than to be murdered. Thats their logic
https://media.spinster.xyz/38a117dd913adccbc99bdf17adf86745883df1aeb3284be523593aa64e2a3ad2.jpeg

2024-01-27 05:12:25

Is the internet mostly good or mostly bad in your opinion?

2024-01-15 02:25:53

- reply

It would be something online!

2024-01-11 16:57:32

- reply

It would be interesting to see more radfem content on youtube, social media, radfem websites, etc I have some ideas. Hopefully this would inform and attract women to the movement and help us come out of the shadows. I hope I can develop at least one of these ideas in the near future

2024-01-11 13:55:08

- reply

I don't know but personally I think thats true of feminists in the west in general. Unfortunately, academic feminists and wealthy non-profits represent us in society. If they fail do to a good job, feminists get a bad rep. I think its true for feminists in general because on one hand we have liberal feminists who promote the idea of "islamophobia": That islamic people are unfairly discriminated and that the hijab and other misogynistic features of islam can actually be "feminist". On the other, we have radical feminists, who at worst agree with libfems to some degree and at best completely ignore the whole issue. Both are failing to tackle the issue. One would think that topics such as mass muslim immigration to certain western countries and its impact is a very important topic for feminists, but in reality thats barely talked about. The only opposition to pro-islam discourse comes from some cancervatives. In fact, feminists are failing to tackle a lot of issues IMO. The movement needs to be more organized, to strive more for representation, etc even unhinged online teenage masculinists have a bigger presence on social media plataforms than we do. Radical feminism remains a very underground thing. That article also said something along the lines of feminists spending too much time and effort attacking the most trivial acts of sexism but ignoring the bigger stuff. This is something I definitely agree

2024-01-11 12:12:34

Ugly men get married
Deformed men get married
Disabled men get married
And with conventionally attractive women
And yet, they talk about the "Incel epidemics". "Poor guys" they say. "Women nowadays only want the 20%". Truth is "incels" are disgusting people with insufferable personalities. Ugly, disabled, deformed women are the ones who are rejected regardless of their personalities. Yet, we don't see such women perpetrating terrorists attacks or being insufferable.
https://media.spinster.xyz/2d226cc5662a809c7df905fc18bc5e7193530a03977cf3a83bdf67fbb08227e4.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/9af8de8c1e95d3a87a316d562f923b16f58664d1b0f2b2890534899ec31181b6.jpeg

2024-01-02 17:31:54

"Indeed, Western feminists’ unwillingness to condemn Islamist violence against women extends beyond Hamas’s rape and mutilation of Jews. They have also shown themselves incapable of standing up for women persecuted by Islamist regimes in Iran and Afghanistan."

2024-01-01 21:52:14

- reply

Yes. What irritates me is that the women I see saying this the most are exactly the kinds who most look conventially attractive. They wear conventially attractive clothes, makeup, hairstyles, etc. They accentuate the very features that men find attractive. They cater to most men's taste. They hit the gym to get bigger butts and some go as far as to get implants. Why the fuck would a woman want a bigger butt or breasts for herself?

2024-01-01 21:16:03

Yes. Women who say this shit should quit the bullshit.
https://media.spinster.xyz/af74010695b0f5018658eb36d363d81e8d5cd8634dd846687a8b3489071ccf52.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/98cb98ccafaedb57aa3535e9c4e7124b87ba0cd381421d39317c3352cda5de50.jpeg

2023-12-28 18:22:40

Imagine selecting men who are high IQ, monogamous, empathetic, attractive and without mental illnesses/paraphilias and have women who want kids get pregnant with their sperm. Prohibit all other men from reproducing.
https://media.spinster.xyz/df3e979c7218eaebfcae27e60727484d26e67913becc3b99ac6be57ae1e2ddef.jpeg

2023-12-27 18:15:48

I never understood why gay couples want blessings from abrahamic religions. I think it is just some sort of dominance exercise where they force religions that clearly are against them to bow down to them. It won't change whats written in the bible
https://www.reuters.com/world/vatican-approves-blessings-same-sex-couples-under-certain-conditions-2023-12-18/

2023-12-27 04:48:19

- reply

Which research has been debunked? He says he wants non-offending pedophiles to be more "accepted". I asked him once why and he replied saying that this would help researchers study pedos and develop a "cure" or a way to prevent them from being born by understanding the mechanisms behind pedophilia. He also has arguments about how tolerance of non-offending pedos could prevent child abuse. I do remember reading other researchers complain they can't study pedos other than the imprisoned ones because most are obviously hiding. But honestly, I lean way more towards thinking that this is a bad idea. I don't see how it is necessary for society to "accept" non-offeding pedos in order to study them and I think this would be a giant slippery slope. Granting them that psychiatrists and researchers won't disclose that their non-offending pedo patient is a pedo seems to be enough in my view and I think this is already a thing among these professionals

2023-12-27 04:33:52

- reply

>no u
You gotta be a special kind of scum to think a dog is a vile and disgusting creature. Who do you think would gather more sympathy: Your ugly ass, worthless existence or that dog?

2023-12-26 23:27:21

- reply

James Cantor apparently has a very interesting theory on paraphilias. I wish he would elaborate on that in a video or at least a blog post.
https://www.iatso.org/index.php/iatso-database/8th-iatso-conference/category/2-iatsodatabase?download=442:cantor-j-neurobiology-of-pedophilia-or-paraphilia-towards-a-grand-unified-theory-of-sexual-interests
https://media.spinster.xyz/17be8facd1e972296cdae8bacc4fef409e62c2839b5f298c0455eeddce8f97b8.jpeg

2023-12-26 23:22:15

- reply

I think (and I think I've read a sexologist saying this) that paraphilic people tend to have more than one paraphilia. Serial Killers are paraphilic people, they kill because it is sexually arousing to them. Therefore, it would make sense a lot of them are AGP (and have other paraphilias) too

2023-12-26 23:15:38

People who have negative attitudes towards animals, all animals, are dysfunctional and mentally ill. I'm not talking about people who are not fond of animals but also don't hate them nor people who don't want to be near animals that can be dangerous, but people who profess hatred against animals and/or mistreats them. Its a sign of mental illness. If you don't a like a dog or a cat, how the fuck can you like humans?

2023-12-26 23:09:33

- reply

Have you looked in the mirror? When people look at you they think the same: What compels humans to breed such a disgusting, vile creature? You're a waste to the planet

2023-12-19 18:35:30

- reply

>Why would you try to claim that there's somethig "contradictory" in pointing out obvious facts?
Because when people claim X tranny doesn't pass, they are usually implying that passing is some sort of good quality or something that trannies should strive to do. They are shaming the tranny for not looking indistinguishable from people of the opposite sex. These sort of arguments feed transsexual ideology.
>Why is it "attacking" poor little Bobby to point out the obvious?
I don't care if you wanna attack Robert, I don't like him. I attack him myself
>Has it escaped your notice that Blaire White is held up as THE "trans woman" who is able to pass and "fool" all the TERFs?
What if he did pass? Would it make him some sort of better tranny? In what sense? If he was able to pass and fool people than that would be one more negative thing about him.
>It's a fact that no male skeleton can be successfully disguised to "pass" as a woman to anyone with a passaing aquaintance with human anatomy.
Most trannies where I live are homosexual men and one of the characteristics of homosexual transsexuals is that they put more effort into passing. Most still do not pass but I have seen a few transsexuals in person whom I didn't clock as trans, I knew they were trans because they disclosured this info later. Usually they were people who started hormone therapy very early on, in their pre teen years and some got an extensive list of cosmetic procedures. These did pass and there are women with a higher presence of masculine features than they did. This doesn't change anything about their sex, its just about their looks. Radfems are being stupid and irrational by claiming no transsexuals whatsover is able to visually pass and giving importance to the looks of trannies

2023-12-19 17:22:06

- reply

It doesn't matter. "Passing" isn't a good quality on a transsexual or something that deserves praise. Its a matter of amount of cosmetic procedures, hormone intake and desire to fool others. In fact, "passing" is something morally reprehensible. Its contradictory to try to attack transsexuals with arguments related to their looks and for not passing. You're essentially pushing for wrong

2023-12-12 18:28:32

A weird and annoying thing that happens to me is that I could be very hungry but for some reason I lose my appetite entirely after cooking my own food.

2023-12-10 20:02:16

- reply

T. gondii is sexually transmitted? I thought I could get it from birds or cats

2023-12-04 19:33:59

- reply

I don't remember that study and I can't find a link for it right now but "Zucker has published over 300 articles in peer-reviewed journals. These articles have been cited over 23,000 times".
Also, he did a follow up with his patients. No, such study isn't unethical. "Feminists" such as yourself are part of the reason why we live in tranny society

2023-12-04 19:16:51

- reply

Its not his "belief". Last I read, his approach worked a lot of times.
>He should do this and that
You should speak only after reading the study

2023-12-04 19:05:45

- reply

I put an emphasis on the father's role on this because fathers are male figures and therefore are important in this context. Mothers also tend, on average, to tolerate and sometimes even encourage cross-dressing for their sons. Its obvious that this requires a sane father, if the child is unlucky enough to have one of these "alpha male" ideas upholder retard who shames his son for stuff like crying, the child may grow up problematic.
The research is by Kenneth Zucker:
"Zucker thinks that an important goal of treatment is to help the children accept their birth sex and to avoid becoming transsexual. His experience has convinced him that if a boy with GID becomes an adolescent with GID, the chances that he will become an adult with GID and seek a sex change are much higher. And he thinks that the kind of therapy he practices helps reduce this risk. Zucker emphasizes a three-pronged treatment approach for boys with GID. First, he thinks that family dynamics play a large role in childhood GID—not necessarily in the origins of cross-gendered behavior, but in their persistence. It is the disordered and chaotic family, according to Zucker, that can’t get its act together to present a consistent and sensible reaction to the child, which would be something like the following: “We love you, but you are a boy, not a girl. Wishing to be a girl will only make you unhappy in the long run, and pretending to be a girl will only make your life around others harder.” So the first prong of Zucker’s approach is family therapy. Whatever conflicts or issues that parents have that prevent them from uniting to help their child must be addressed.
The second prong is therapy for the boy, to help him adjust to the idea that he cannot become a girl, and to help teach him how to minimize social ostracism. Zucker does not teach boys how to walk in a manly fashion, but he does give them feedback about the likely consequences of taking a doll to school.
The third prong is key. Zucker says simply: “The Barbies have to go.” He has nothing against Barbie dolls, of course. He means something more general. Feminine toys and accoutrements—including Barbie dolls, girls’ shoes, dresses, purses, and princess gowns—are no longer to be tolerated at home, much less bought for the child. Zucker believes that toleration and encouragement of feminine play and dress prevents the child from accepting his maleness. Common sense says that a boy who wants to play with dolls so much that he is willing to risk his father’s wrath and his peers’ scorn is unlikely to change his behavior due to inconsistent feedback, sometimes forbidding, sometimes tolerating, and sometimes even encouraging it. Inconsistent parenting like this is ineffective in stamping out any kind of unwanted behavior.
Failure to intervene increases the chances of transsexualism in adulthood, which Zucker considers a bad outcome. … Why put boys at risk for this when they can become gay men happy to be men?"

2023-12-04 17:57:29

Research indicates that when parents (especially fathers) raise their effeminate gay son to be "masculine" and prohibit them from engaging in activities such as playing with dolls or dressing up as a girl, it diminishes the chances the boy will grow up to become a tranny. This goes against radfems theories on "gender"

2023-12-04 04:28:59

https://www.rt.com/russia/588267-russia-bans-lgbt-movement/amp/

2023-12-02 12:54:12

- reply

Cruise looked specially good as a blond vampire. And this is all I remember about this movie he was in with Brad Pitt.
As for his height, this may be strange, but I'm pretty indifferent to that. I think I would personally rather a 5'6 man over a super tall one, like 7ft tall and I guess its because I would have trouble reaching a man this tall
https://media.spinster.xyz/58902e6ee946649d04cfa6892a257320a5f2b6c0c9b4bcf00e4331f2cfb00939.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/9783d8bb732e67de68a232de3e2bb41eebe89988b84fbb882e47fb70dc9e74d0.jpeg

2023-12-02 05:37:09

- reply

Yes but thats more true of right wing men than left wing, ironically

2023-12-02 03:43:58

The most apparent but at the same time masked truth of our society is that right wing men are the most homosexual men there are

2023-12-02 03:11:51

Newborn baby mice eaten alive. What the fuck is wrong with asians?
https://media.spinster.xyz/59b8b8173b0d4b720bf9eacd2fc8c4413b2205cc19c0a3d351ebc8b9cef1d0c7.jpeg

2023-12-02 00:59:52

- reply

I think he looks like a mix of Elliot Rodgers and that actor from peaky blinders and something about their faces is quite unattractive to me. I suspect it is the combination of high cheekbones and thick lips, although I like these things separately in men I guess. Skaarsgard is fine but nothing special imo. I find Jared Leto and young Tom Cruise handsome, although they are too "standardized"(?) looking? I like the most the kind of beautiful men that are beautiful but wouldn't be in GQ magazine because they are not generic or perfect enough I guess

2023-11-28 21:16:43

An envious woman is ugly but an envious man is something much uglier

2023-11-25 08:33:02

- reply

Really? Elaborate

2023-11-25 08:24:45

- reply

Women and men have different inclinations, *on average*. For example, both men and women are violent but men tend to be more violent. It would be utterly stupid to ignore the role of hormones in discussing the reasons why. People originally came up with the terms "feminine" and "masculine" just to indicate the sex which certain behavior/characteristics are more common among. I agree its problematic though, a lot of times. For the most part, they are abused and misused. But in this case, it is not

2023-11-25 08:11:09

- reply

This is the hypothesis to explain what happens in utero: "The mechanism is thought to be a maternal immune response to male fetuses, whereby antibodies neutralize male Y-proteins thought to play a role in sexual differentiation during development"
This explain the feminine inclinationa of their behavior. Gay men are, on average, more feminine than straight men

2023-11-25 07:16:54

- reply

Take male homosexuality for instance. This is just one of the evidences. Its been replicated several times cross culturally.
"Scientists have attributed the effect to a prenatal biological mechanism, since the association is only present in men with older biological brothers, and not present among men with older step-brothers and adoptive brothers."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation

2023-11-25 06:29:18

- reply

There is evidence that points to sexual tastes being innate, especially in men. Much more evidence than social theories

2023-11-25 02:42:56

And what is your evidence for this? Have you studied it or did you pull it out of your ass like many radfems do?
https://media.spinster.xyz/a0fc4a13b1d655108f271a1a050e2db335f473c582496956a20bad76949710cb.jpeg

2023-11-23 21:44:16

True
https://media.spinster.xyz/3edcde504c2e4c10b5901cd6d2c4062b05551b1283ac4315f13ebfaa2f4eb3e6.jpeg

2023-11-16 20:04:13

- reply

The distinction actually seems to be way more blurred than that to me. Also this idea implies there is barely no heterosexual men

2023-11-16 18:14:25

- reply

Post a single study that a man is born with a woman brain or that "true transexual" exists, that control for homosexuality. You won't find. I haven't. This isn't even debatable

2023-11-16 17:20:28

- reply

"Schizophrenic loser men vs those who honestly are having some kind of gender dysphoria" This distinction doesn't exist. If by schizophrenic men you mean AGPs, some professionals would argue they actually have more "gender dysphoria" than gays

2023-11-15 04:14:18

- reply

One of the things that I find strange is the difference in attitude towards shapeshifter and phil illy by radfems.

2023-11-13 23:53:30

"I think it's erroneous to boil this down to "presenting" as if we're just talking about appearance. The presentation entails intent to decieve. More importantly, it entails demand for special privileges that for good reason, nobody else has. And that absolutely IS relevant."
"The idea that medical practitioners thought it was a good idea to have a man dressed as a woman try to pass in society was one of the most misogynistic decisions ever made in “health care”. We weren’t asked. Had we been we would have said no. We do not consent."
"100%! It's a social contract that's beyond the scope of medicine. And either way, it never was medicine to begin with. It's alchemy, not science."
"Imagine how much more productive and happier everyone - *everyone* - would be right now is psychologists focused on getting a distressed patient to cope with reality, instead of using the delusion as treatment."
"Trying to make a man pass as woman is not a treatment to his disease. Its like saying you're treating an anorexic by starving them to death. Nothing is being treated at all. And the practice of medical "transition" is based on deceiving society"
"Women are much unhappier when men are indulged in that way.
Wives and children are extremely unhappy. "
Best responses
https://media.spinster.xyz/ca671048dda148693ca39b15404da2ac65af9e06b26b9fa79f17318a03c61c7b.jpeg

2023-11-13 04:04:48

- reply

Not really. Childfree people haven't stopped having sex, they just have access to contraceptive methods today that didn't exist in the past

2023-11-13 04:02:22

- reply

No data, I admit. Some articles say human population should be around 2 billion at most, though

2023-11-13 03:52:06

- reply

Because separatism will and could never be adopted by even a significant number of women

2023-11-13 03:49:17

- reply

There shouldn't even be 1 billion people on earth. Thats already too much

2023-11-13 03:40:47

- reply

You're not worried about 8 billion people in the world and the fact there will be billions more in the future?

2023-11-13 03:24:31

- reply

I originally meant pro-choice but you're correct, I'm pro-abortion actually. Too many people in the world

2023-11-12 17:31:19

Whenever I'm feeling very dissatisfied with my life, I think "Well, at least I'm not pregnant". I'm pro-abortion but I think aborting my child would be something very difficult to me

2023-11-10 18:08:43

- reply

Right now, Illy's work may help us with these goals

2023-11-10 18:06:48

- reply

Frankly, what I want to see, and won't rest until I see it, is a law that entirely bans medical and legal transition: Hormones and surgeries. Sex changes on documents. I also want an entire ban towards research thats aims to develop further sex change procedures and artificial reproduction. For everyone, not just kids. In the meantime, I would like to see all women focusing on making this a reality and not wasting their time minding a dude wearing a dress

2023-11-10 17:56:34

- reply

This law kind existed already. It wasn't really a law but a cultural strongly enforced rule. Up until a few decades ago it wasn't acceptable for men to wear female clothing or object to gender conformity. Society was always more tolerant towards gender non conforming women than gender non-conforming men. The LGB (Yes, gays and lesbians) popularized men wearing female clothing and radfems loved that and supported that. Religious folks were against but they lost. Now, ironically, many in our movement are expressing the same arguments and feelings religious folks did towards men who wear female clothing

2023-11-10 17:11:09

- reply

I'm not sure if I agree with the people who say he was getting off on that. I'm not trying to play the "good agp" card here but I have been reading what Phil Illy says on twitter for a while now and I don't get the impression he wore a dress to get off, he seems to be very self-aware of his condition with the plus of not trying to pass as a female, which is something the VAST majority of trannies aren't and don't. On top of that, if you employ dress codes, aren't you going against radical feminism's anti-gender thing? We would be forcing gender conformity in a way. Not saying a disagree but it seems to be contradictory to one of the most fundamental principals of radical feminism

2023-11-10 16:52:02

I'm not sure if I see a problem with Phil Ily wearing a dress. I don't think I do. He is very visibly a man and doesn't pretend or try to pass as anything else. I'm not even sure he claims to be trans, I think he just claims to be AGP, which he factually is. You can't really prohibit this, I guess. I find the appropriation of women's biology (Like taking hormones for instance) far worse

2023-11-04 19:53:15

- reply

They are more consistent with the whole idea of "trans" than those who try to pass

2023-10-31 22:28:11

I like the work of Blanchard very much and that of Bailey too. However, both come across as morally questionable people. I get it they need to have empathy and understanding for perverts in order to study them, but the fact their empathy and understanding is apparently limited to perverts and do not extend to the rest of society, especially women, made me realize that the political opinions of scientists are much of the time personal or limited and not based on some sort of objective good or truth or a better understanding of reality, society and humans. Even though they know transgenderism doesn't exist, MTFs are gay men and AGPs not "women in the wrong bodies", the brains of homosexual MTFs is no different from non-trans homosexual men in terms of feminization, there is no evidence of gender identity in the brain, etc they still support gender transition for adults so "they have more life satisfaction" and support (at least Blanchard does) transgenderism as a legal fiction where trannies are legally considered women in certain situations but not in others (like womens sports) and argue that this won't affect anyone's lives. Blanchard once claimed women and trannies "will both have to concede" in the issue and that women should accept trannies in our bathrooms because men don't want trannies in theirs! The argument that transgenderism is not inherently harmful to women and society if carried out differently (no child transitioning, no trannies in womens prisons, etc) is extremely disingenuous. It is disingenuous in face of the existing goal of the medical/pharmaceutical/technological industry of stealing every part of womens biology and turn men into a "new kind of women". It is disingenuous in face of the fact that medical transition is inherently aimed at deceiving society by making males pass as females of the species and vice-versa through synthetic hormones and plastic surgery and then, insert these people in society, who will then navigate unsuspecting through womens spaces, etc This is an attack on all normal people by doctors. These practices will continue to be pursued and carried out and fed as long as medical transition is a thing, as long as there is a single tranny. Transgenderism, especially medical and legal transition, need to be abolished entirely

2023-10-26 10:33:28

Spot on
https://media.spinster.xyz/5725c93602c974934628c453991a90563790127e20ecfefc8b049135c7f4d876.jpeg

2023-10-24 05:49:37

https://media.spinster.xyz/474d98cecb0b6ceb5a01e2718062c110ee8e88850205ac4a24587969bba8a645.jpeg

2023-10-22 17:55:53

Listen to this, see the work this woman has done and remember men saying "Men protect women and children!!"
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA Never in the history of this planet!! there was ever a more pathetic, despicable kind of creature such as MEN. I never despised something so much. You are cowards, you're worth nothing, you are abominations, dysgenic
https://youtu.be/eNq7dYOdQyQ?si=guUf6IuCD1GrJvmd

2023-10-22 09:29:59

Gender dysphoria is simply a person's desire to be the opposite sex. People who are pro-medical transitioning argue that TIMs need to transition to alleviate gender dysphoria and lead more satisfying lives. Why are the wantings of one group of people favored over the wantings of everybody else? If we are gonna give special rights to TIMs and TIFs, grant them free medical services to fulfill their desire to mascarade as the opposite sex, give them special treatment and have a political movement representing them and their wishes, why don't we offer the same to everybody else? Why is this group of people put above all the rest?

2023-10-20 23:47:09

Forgive me for what might an internalized misogyny (?) post but I just watched a sequence of videos of women talking about how much they want a man that will pay for everything. I don't know if thats the mindset of most gen z girls/women or if its just the algorithm but I'm left amazed by how stupid they are. I think I can understand women who say "all men are shit so I better date one who is at least rich" alright, if you want a transactional relationship where you offer youth, beauty and submission and he offers money, even though you can get the money by yourself, ok. At least you're getting something out of it? But to demand and think you'll get a man who is rich & pays for everything and ON TOP of that is handsome, 6ft tall, faithful, "funny" and "nice... is a delusional stretch. You won't even find a man who is faithful alone LMAO. Until now I thought they knew how these things worked but I watched a video of a russian woman talking about how "amazing" russian men are because they pay for shit and another woman commented "At first I admired Russian men for that but then I found out they are huge cheaters and want total submission in return" Oh really??? Who could have guessed? They come across as men with their delusions, stupidity and entitlement and they are dangerous. These retards literally demand a comeback of traditional gender roles and the erasure of women's rights just for the HOPES some male will pay their bills. Also noticeable Its rarely if ever german/scandinavian/nordic women saying this type of shit, its always women from the rest of the world that is backwards in comparison when it comes to women's emancipation

2023-10-20 21:43:01

People who believe in "true trans" are part of the enemy, even if they claim to be against predators in women's bathrooms or claim to be gender critical. They are perhaps worse than the people who support all trannies

2023-10-13 03:27:13

- reply

You have no arguments to argue against my point. You asked me to provide info and I posted some sources/articles.
Your response? "I don't believe it", Oh this is the arabs and the ""monkeys"" they are different","African culture is different"
What kind of argumentation is that? Where is YOUR explanation for the sambian, arabs and greeks? Where is the evidence/sources that back your explanation?
>the Bible also prohibits murder
You agree if there were no laws that punish murder a lot more people would probably murder others, right? A LOT more than today
> i'm not sure what your point is other than like i said, muh GayS hAve alWays eXiSTed
No, my point is that in certain contexts the sexual expression and desire of most people can get pretty twisted
>just basically promoting gay stuff for your own self serving reasons most likely
As if I wanted a gay pedophilic society where women have no rights

2023-10-13 03:14:47

- reply

>define common
Among the bonobos, humans' closest relatives along with chimps, homosexual behavior is more practiced among females than heterosexual
https://phys.org/news/2019-09-insights-same-sex-sexual-interactions-important.amp

2023-10-13 03:03:21

- reply

>this is about arabs. they still have bochi boys and whatever in afghanistan. i really don't feel like reading this whole article
Incredible
>your're inflating the numbers and not providing any evidence.
No evidence huh?
>according to the new testament of the Bible this is strictly forbidden. and i am not ready to accept that it was simply a part of being a male in ancient greece
I wonder why would the bible need to prohibit that if only a small percentage of people have a capacity for homosexual behavior and attraction
>in monkey people and arabs, yes it is probably more common, i will grant you that. but don't lump western cultures in with that.
Were ancient greeks "western"? What is your evidence to say africans and arabs are biologically more inclined to homosexuality or pedophilia than westerns?
>what i want is something from the archaeological record that you can point to that demonstrates that all men of ancient greece and rome were pederasts. it's not supported by evidence.
LOL and how would that archaelogical evidence be like? Please explain what kind of "archaelogical evidence" would prove to you homosexual pederasty was very common among the greeks? Aren't the drawings, writings, depictions in ceramics enough?
Btw, there are VERY RARE societies, which are primitive, where there is no homosexual or pedophilic behavior. Not even masturbation. All sex is PIV
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/12/where-masturbation-and-homosexuality-do-not-exist/265849/
https://media.spinster.xyz/20d167cf99f548f246e75d195566a35370da8e7915eeae6a5570401c81f997dc.jpeg

2023-10-12 21:58:46

- reply

What kind of reference do you want?
About what? I read many articles, some papers and a few books about human sexuality. About different societies, just articles and papers. I'm not sure if I have a particular reference about Ancient greece, its what all articles and papers about the topic of sexuality there say: That pederasty was commonly practiced
https://www.greek-love.com/near-east-north-africa/arab-islamic-loved-boy-age-pederasty
>As he points out, this was generally typical of the pre-modern world, in which it was assumed that men were usually attracted to both women and boys

2023-10-12 21:37:07

- reply

"your one concrete example that you actually provided a reference for is cannibals living in mud huts. "
I have no idea how this is related to the topic or my point. I don't understand how this is an argument against what I said.

2023-10-12 21:32:30

- reply

You blamed the chems in the water and I gave you examples of societies that didn't have "chems in the water" where homosexual pederasty was widely practiced among men according to anthropologists. More practiced than in modern western society. And when it comes to the Sambian, unlike with the Ancient greeks, anthropologists had direct contact with the people they were researching.

2023-10-12 20:15:39

- reply

I gave you other examples too.
How can there be societies where most men engage in homossexual pederasty if most men don't/can't have such inclinations?

2023-10-12 20:07:55

- reply

All I'm saying is that things are more complex than most people are capable of noticing.
>i think your numbers are absurdly off base. you're basically saying that "most" men are gay pedophiles.
I'm saying most men are capable of attraction to males who are not overly masculine, which includes male children. Especially male children. I just told you about many societies where most men engage in homossexual pederastic behavior. Even if you're an ancient greece fanboy who says that such claims about the greeks is a "jewish conspiracy" or whatever, I told you about another, primitive society where adult-child homosexual behavior is practiced by all males.
The more "perspicacious" people will notice that these existing inclinations in men are increasingly coming to suface when they used be repressed. These inclinations are very noticible among overt misogynistic men and in overtly masculine and misogynistic spaces. Notice the correlation between homossexual pederasty being widespread and overt misogyny:
>This process allows for the detachment of the boys from their mothers who it is believed to have contaminated blood. Women are also said to possess powers (tingu) that make them easily manipulate men. The woman’s tingu is reinforced every time she undergoes her menstrual circle.
Now go read about how men perceived women in Ancient greece and the other societies I mentioned. Its the same thing.
Now pay attention:
>However, in the 1960s, things began to take another turn. As migration began and men sought to work on cocoa and rubber plantations, the desire for initiation decreased. By the 1970s, western missionaries and traders arrived and introduced western education. For the first time in Sambia, women and men would come together under one building with no male or female distinction to receive an education. As Herdt put it, “schools began to displace initiation as a primary means for gaining access to valued positions within the expanding society.”
>Then in the 1990s, a concept known as “luv” marriage came into play. Luv marriage meant that women were no longer seen as possessed by evil or having evil powers but as equals, thus giving rise to romance.
The more men's perception of women became less misogynistic, and women were given equal rights, the less homossexual pederasty was practiced or vice-versa, and society took a more heterosexual direction
https://guardian.ng/life/the-sambian-boys-initiation-rites/amp/

2023-10-12 17:03:46

- reply

The world isn't divided between "homossexuals" and "heterossexuals" in the way most people think. Thats why people are so confused about certain things happening today. The study of sexology is interesting because it explains a lot about humans and human behavior that isn't erotic to the "naked eye" but is rooted in sexuality. There are different people with different biological profiles that represent many different sexualities. Many men (and I believe perharps most men) for instance are attracted to women but also capable of attraction to "femininity" and neoteny in males, their attraction to males don't include masculine adult men. There are men who are attracted to the image of themselves as women, attraction to women directed towards one self. These men often engage in homossexual behavior and are classified as homossexuals sometimes but their sexuality is different from the ~5% of males who are exclusively attracted to masculine men

2023-10-12 16:43:39

- reply

I know the claims already, they are wrong. Adult men who wanted to be anally penetrated were stigmatized. However, most men would engage in penetration of other men, especially of "neotenous" males (kids and teens before they grew beards and other over masculine features). This was expected from men. They didn't think in terms of homossexual behavior vs heterosexual behavior, these concepts didn't exist, "homossexual" and "heterosexual" didn't even exist in the christian period, these terms were invented recently to describe a percentage of the population who would have strong homossexual tendencies even in environments that would strongly discourage this. They used to be called "sexual inverts" before that. Many ancient people, including the greeks, only thought in terms of who penetrates and who is penetrated instead. Those who penetrated were men and those who were penetrated were not men. These were societies centered around adult masculine men. Kids (of both sexes) slaves (of both sexes) and women were all considered "non-men" and thus were part of a lower social category

2023-10-12 16:25:02

- reply

Homossexual pederasty was institutionalized by the greeks. Why can't I say that? It is a fact only denied by greek fans that don't want to believe their idols were molesting male children lol. This used to be common among many societies, not only the greeks, but also ancient China, ancient Japan, it was and IS common among the middle easterns, etc. Why do you think christianity and all major religions focus a lot on controlling human sexual behavior? Why the strong instance specifically against male homossexual behavior? Read about the Sambian, a primitive society where ALL men force ALL male children from 9yo and above to practice oral sex on them until they reach their 30s and turn to the receiving end.

2023-10-12 16:10:01

- reply

I don't disagree with you, it is a reasonable theory, it might be a possibility, but personally I wouldn't bet as much in that as an explanation as I see people betting. I personally tend towards believing in other causes. I did not only said homossexuals always existed, I said expression of homosexual behavior and desire was even *more* prevalent in the past.

2023-10-12 15:48:35

- reply

I think it is wishful thinking because "chems in the water" offer an easy explanation and solution to the problem, when I think it is much more complex than that. But who knows. If we look at many ancient societies, for example, homosexual behavior, especially in a pederastic form, used to be much more common and widespread than it has been up to now. They weren't exposed to the chems in the water we are. Also for example, gay men have been masculinized by our culture up until now in comparison with our ancestral environment
https://psmag.com/social-justice/the-old-way-to-be-gay-couples-love-evolution-67337

2023-10-12 15:29:38

- reply

I think this is wishful thinking. Trannies have always existed, they exist even in primitive societies. Difference is we now have tranny acceptance, tranny visibility and medical/technological surgeries and HRT available to them (which is what causes dysphoria. If there were no surgeries and HRT available, they would settle and be in peace with their bodies) thats why they are coming out of the shadows now

2023-10-12 15:15:39

- reply

There are people researching that. They know its a sexual thing. However, there is only few researchers studying that and there is very little funding for them. Also, I think that there are people out there that don't want the answers to be found. Thats what Gregory Cochran said. These people are afraid that once the causes are found, we will develop methods to prevent trannies from being born and they say thats "eugenics".

2023-10-10 19:40:52

Female TRAs should be publicly punished and shamed by other women. Trying to argue peacefully with misogynists never worked out and will never work out. Explaining reality to them will never work out. Traitors should be treated as traitors and be put in their rightful place

2023-10-09 07:39:16

You are the captious, manipulator, disingenous, ill-intended kind. These are the kind of women who will put on a disgusting act, make an over-dramatized show, twist things to portrait themselves as victims or to try to harm someone. The fact I hate men doesn't mean I'll give snakey women like you a pass, you act just like TRAs and incels. In fact, all the women who say "believe all women blindly ortherwise you support patriarchy" are exactly like TRAs and wokies with their "you're literally genociding trannies for opposing kids on HRT" dishonest type of argumentation
https://media.spinster.xyz/0b0c00cfff11c20e923da9e660220061b6a8a1f69e08ad8cac678db2f61065ef.jpeg
https://media.spinster.xyz/fcd4c2d036826a3bf4c7eaa7048697f82946102a20745d169f1e35f3f8b332cd.jpeg

2023-10-08 18:04:09

Is it just my impression or do many of the patients in "My 600-lb Life" claim they were sexually assaulted as a child?

2023-10-08 16:54:15

- reply

I think thats hungarian

2023-10-07 21:09:13

- reply

And they are amazing live. The brits and their talent for music should be studied, almost all of my favorite artists are british

2023-09-25 18:31:04

- reply

I'm a latina too. Same here

2023-09-24 21:54:53

- reply

It doesn't create trannies. It is merely a reflection of autogynephilia. Sissy porn is a reflection of how masochistic/AGP men see women and the experience of being a woman, it is not the creator of these perceptions. These men see being a woman as an inherently masochistic experience, which proves men hate women and women are disadvantaged in society

2023-09-24 12:27:08

"If you pass you're allowed in the women's bathroom. If you don't, you're not"
Even the TRAs who are pro-self ID are more consistent and logical than the idiots who say stuff like the above. We do not ban men from our bathroom because of how they look. Having a deceiving costume or not doesn't make any difference on whether a tranny should or shouldn't be allowed in the women's bathroom. NO man should allowed there. No matter the amount of plastic surgery a man has got, he will never be a woman. The people who say stuff like that are stupid women and men who are into passing trannies

2023-09-20 02:48:15

If you care about women and feminism in the long term, you shouldn't support cancelling of scrotes accused of rape without prior investigation. IMO this is very stupid. Yeah, false rape accusations are the minority but they do exist and I've seen them. And if I have seen them, you can be rest assured the most raging misogynists have seen them too, they love to use them to the fullest against us. Dont think the media who pretends to believe literally all women actually does, that they are pro women. This is the same media who supports trannysm; Trannies in our lockrooms, trannies in our prisons and trannies in our bathrooms. I'm convinced at this point that they are actually trying to make things worse for women in the long term. The more scrotes are accused of something against women and then proven innocent later, the more the public will hate feminism, because misogynists will "capitalize" on this cases 24/7 forever to spread the word women are liars and feminism is le evil. The less the public will believe women who say they were raped. Don't support the misogynistic propaganda machine