Yapper
Wise Wanderer

An intellectual noticer

Public Key

npub1g0qv8k55c04ud8htdedxr88xjr4v0jz55tpl9ujeqsjrxth8exdsu3z6rs

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy8sxrm22v867xnm4kuknpnnnfp6k8ep229slj7fvsgfpn9mnunxc6duyjy

Author Public Key

npub1g0qv8k55c04ud8htdedxr88xjr4v0jz55tpl9ujeqsjrxth8exdsu3z6rs

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-02-14 22:10:45

"MASS EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIALISATION"
“On the topic of education, there are people who say that, 'We need mass education to industrialise so we can get a few people in technical positions such as engineering etc.' What they don't realize is that they're assuming that theoretical knowledge is usually applied at job positions. In a lot of cases even in professional positions such as accounting and even programming, you usually don't really apply the theoretical knowledge you have that much. In fact many uni students have forgotten the technical knowledge they had before after they've been involved in jobs that haven't reinforced the remembrance of such technical knowledge. In other words, what you've ended up with an excess supply of 'qualified' people who don't have the practical skills and who don't what they did in even high school. Looking at the jobs of today, even people in elementary school are capable of doing the jobs that many adults are doing now. Even in the technical positions, a lot of employers do actually train their employees. Therefore the utility of mass worldly education is in question. Some traditionalists have compared modern schools to what prussia did where they believed modern schools are training camps of state-loyalists. Some others argue that modern schools are training children to become loyal workers. Yet in the case of modern schools this isn't even the case where teachers are attacked by the children and modern schools are actually training children to become researchers or professors rather than someone who works at engineering or some applied field where modern schools focuses a lot on the theoretical knowledge. So the argument that you need mass education to get into highly technical positions isn't entirely accurate. Now this isn't to say that 'theoretical knowledge is useless', you do need know basic arithmetic, literacy etc. Now some are saying, 'What do you suggest?'. There are multiples things that have been suggested by other people which are the following: make sure young children have basic level of education (basic arithmetic, basic literacy and basic general knowledge), privatize schools (Even in south korea, people pay high amount of tuitions fees meaning there are parents willing to pay their child's education), encourage a certificate system of different levels (which could involve exemptions of exams for those who left a specific level of schooling such as high school etc), change the perception towards universities from being associated with STEM jobs towards it being more associated with intellectualism and research, encourage and improve the reputation of trade schools.”

2025-02-05 18:05:37

"The internet is an ever-changing gallery."

2025-02-02 09:37:49

- reply

I think people underestimate the influence of rapper culture on especially non-white men where some non-white men believe they can move up the ladder via "thugmaxxing".

2025-02-01 22:03:36

"You see a lot of rappers wearing chains, necklaces and rings where they want to show their "masculinity". Meanwhile muslim scholars believe that a man wearing jewellery with the exception of the silver ring, is a man who is imitating a woman."

2025-01-31 19:53:08

"TECHNO-GYNOCRACY AND THE INCEL QUESTION"
"Whilst talks about AI is still ongoing, the normie who wishes to continue pursuing his routine has already been pushed down by not only the recent recession associated with COVID but also with CHATGTP and forms of AI where there are forms of AI that does coding. A lot of people are seriously considering the possibility of mass unemployment where not only AI could displace workers who engage in manual tasks but also workers who engage in thinking tasks. Now the governments are probably are preparing for this especially if unemployment becomes widespread what is likely to happen to the public finances of governments who obtain money from their citizens via income tax, corporation tax and 'VAT'. Some have suggested a universal basic income. Yet let's assume the government plans not to intervene in the labour market and it doesn't plan to save people from unemployment. What kind of jobs could be available? What technology cannot do is give you a personalized interaction which the human desires. The experience of interacting with a robot requesting what you want to eat is not the same thing as interacting with a human being requesting a meal. Whilst some might not understand, if you've seen the pornographic industry which has undergone multiple technological changes, despite the fact a lot of people being addicted to pornography it has not negated the desire of the man to be with a real woman where the experience of masturbating in front of a screen is not the same as the experience of having sex with a real woman. Now do you understand the importance of a personalized experience? Technology has not abolished the markets yet it has shifted the demand curves and the supply curves of the labour market. In other words, the question arises, does the consumer really want? Now this isn't to say that consumers could be manipulated by advertising and marketing yet there is limit to how much you are able to manipulate consumers. For example, there have been attempts in promoting men who are relatively shorter towards the woman, yet these marketing attempts has failed. Meaning there is a strong desire amongst humans towards having a personalized interaction. When the lockdowns eased, loads of people fled the house and yearned for personalized interaction. To keep this relatively short if you were unable to comprehend what is being conveyed: jobs that involve personalized interactions have more job security than jobs that don't involve personalized interactions. Meaning the job of a WAITER has more job security than the job of a PROGRAMMER. While this sounds to you as 'insane', this is a possibility of what could possibly come after what we've seen recently with CHATGTP and DEEPSEEK. Now what has this got to with women exactly? Women are generally more sociable than men where majority of people who are anti-social are men. Also men yearn for the attention of the woman more than the man. The woman is relatively more emotional than the man. Do you ever wonder why the majority of receptionists tend to be women? It is probable that the woman is more likely to be involved in a job which involves personalized interactions than men. Whilst it could be the case that men who are attractive and are sociable are able to obtain these jobs. Yet this possibly raises the incel question? There is a possibility that the number of unemployed unsociable men could possibly increase. If it did happen, what could be possibly the response of the government. Whilst some concieve of a nation-state response in this hypothetical scenario, it is possible that the megamachine (not the nation-state) cracks down where it is possible that a megamachine invented by nerds who hate socialisation cracks down on the incel population. Is it possible that the nerds invent a 'gynocentric megamachine'?"

2025-01-30 09:30:49

- reply

“To effectively engage in tassawuf involves decreasing the usuage of technology. Do you bring your phone into the mosque?”

2025-01-29 09:28:04

What some privacy enthusiasts don’t understand is that people yearn to dox themselves (posting images of themselves online, sending CVs etc.)
What you are actually asking is similar to what the government asked their citizens in 2020 when covid was around. #note1tlg…rd2v

2025-01-28 21:16:29

- reply

Sam Altman wants something similar to what Elon wants.

2025-01-28 20:35:47

"THE TENSIONS BETWEEN THE NATION-STATE AND TECHNOLOGY"
"It's quite interesting that a lot of people who emphasizes on the necessity of technology in the context of politics and governance especially when there is tensions between the nation-state and technology. In the book with the name, 'Machine and Sovereignty: For a Planetary Thinking' which is a book written by Yuk Hui, it says: 'We have emphasized that sovereignty is that which dwells in the megamachine and that which attempts to take control of it from within. When the sovereign loses control of the megamachine, there is no longer sovereignty...The megamachine evolves, and sovereignty has to renew itself in order to catch up with new types of machinery. The sovereign is always in tension with the megamachine while, at the same time, it cannot do without the megamachine.' This isn't a promotion of the luddite approach, at the same time, maintaining a degree of aversion towards technology is needed whilst 'riding the tiger' where these new forms of technologies have impacted us."

2025-01-27 19:33:05

"TECHNO-DIVERSITY AND MULTIPOLARISM"
"Despite the seemingly implicit antagonism that Yuk Hui has towards 'Alexander Dugin' especially when he perceives him as a traditionalist (which isn't really correct). Yet nonetheless, Yuk Hui's proposal of techno-diversity is actually compatible with multipolarism where it's conceivable that different poles consist of different megamachines. Yuk Hui fears the homogenization of technology whilst "dugin" he fears the spread of post-modernity across the globe. Recently with the new DeepSeek AI which is now considered as chinese technology, China itself has differentiated itself as a separate pole from the west."

2025-01-27 18:40:40

- reply

So far the Egyptians (both the military and the civilian population) are resisting his threats. I think people underestimate Egypt a lot. Recently “trump” cut off foreign aid to all countries except to the zionist state and Egypt. The Americans are trying to bribe Egypt where they don’t want them attacking the zionist state.
In the case of Jordan, I don’t think Jordan wants the Palestinians to come to Jordan, at the same time, are the Jordanians capable of resisting the Americans?

2025-01-26 22:43:49

- reply

I heard a European country that arrested more people for things they have said than Russia.

2025-01-26 21:14:56

"THE THEOLOGIAN PERSPECTIVE: LIMITS OF TECHNOLOGY"
"With the rise of AI technology and talks of an AI race, it is disappointing that there has been an absence of theologians within the discussions of AI. Now some people view theologians as similar to mathematicians who focus on the abstract. At the same time, those who neglect the theologians struggle to understand the limits of technology. Bryan Johnson said: 'God didn't create us, we are creating God in our image by building superintelligent AI.' There are a lot of topics that theologians do need to discuss in response to the rise of technology such as the topic of the human intellect and the topic of the soul. What the theologian needs to affirm is that technology cannot become divine. If the transhumanist asks, 'Why?', Respond to him: Technology is a dependent existence where it requires space to exist. Something that exists in space must have length, meaning that thing is divisible which can be broken into parts which it depends on. The theologians themselves have said it is impossible for god to have a body. (When theologians are talking about a body they're talking about something that is at least composed of two particles). Technology can be classified as a body according to the theologians. Something that has a body has a size which can be conceivably smaller or larger and the specification of the size of that body requires a determiner. Meaning something that has a body needs God. If the transhumanist persists in spreading his doubts, ask him, 'Do you believe that a created thing can become uncreated?' Are you now aware of the irrational beliefs of the transhumanists?"

2025-01-25 20:33:11

Yuk Hui seems averse towards what Keiji Nishitani believed in. Keiji Nishitani was part of the Kyoto school where the kyoto school had specific views towards war.
In the book, "The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics" which is a book written by Yuk Hui, it mentions: "War, for the Kyoto school philosophers, is the force that defines history and therefore world history."

2025-01-25 19:32:09

"The non-muslim (who was influenced by secularists and legal positivists), he believes you need to obey the laws of the nation-state which he believes are neither moral or just."

2025-01-24 18:52:24

- reply

Where is he?

2025-01-24 18:51:27

Yuk Hui is an interesting person where he suggests cosmo-localism and techno-diversity in response to the current technological changes that are undergoing. He sees the homogeneity of the technology we have as a problem.
https://m.primal.net/NyPL.jpg .

2025-01-24 13:27:58

- reply

Interesting.

2025-01-23 20:44:04

If you believe that fiat currency isn't valid money, you believe that engaging in interest transactions in fiat currency is not riba.

2025-01-23 20:41:37

"THE CONVERGENCE BETWEEN FEMINISM AND WHITE NATIONALISM"
"I came across a post claiming that a lot of white nationalists liked 'RFH'. I did wonder why especially when she was a radical feminist. Yet someone told me that a lot of white nationalists liked her critiques on non-white men. They disliked that she extended the critique upon white men. If you haven't noticed there are a lot of similarities between how white nationalists talk about non-white men and how feminists talk about men in general. 'Non-white men are violent'. 'Non-white men are rapists'. 'Non-white man oppress their women'. If you really notice what white nationalists really say, a lot of the racism they espouse is really directed at mainly non-white men. Even with the recent rise of racism against 'indians', majority of it is directed at 'indian' men and not at 'indian' women (I've seen cases of racism against 'indian' women). Even the 'they are taking our jobs' narrative is directed at non-white men who are engaging in cheap labour. In other words, it's not really surprising when you see feminists and white-nationalists collaborating with each other especially when they have similar views of non-white men."

2025-01-23 14:16:18

- reply

Hmm…I don’t think I’ve seen turkish restraunts sell these types of food.

2025-01-23 10:48:09

- reply

Your views on “texhnolyze”?

2025-01-23 08:53:20

- reply

“A lot of people say ‘It’s the algorithms fault’ whilst the algorithm feeds on the informations and the patterns they see on posts and people do generally like people who smile often.”

2025-01-22 21:42:50

"Women are cozy with murtads of the social issues. Men are cozy with murtads of political issues."

2025-01-21 22:39:31

- reply

*do you know any other "mainstream" accounts that have come on here?

2025-01-21 22:38:59

- reply

Do you any other "mainstream" accounts that have come on here?

2025-01-21 21:46:05

"POST-INCELISM"
"Whilst this might sound to you 'ludicrous' that such a 'movement' (which really isn't) has transformed into the 'post-phase' especially when mainly you hear from incels talking about 'chad' taking the 'stacies', the emphasis on looks being a big factor in intrasexual competition and the incels telling their side of the story of how they've given up where they have a very pessimistic view of life. The incel question has brought up questions about on how to approach these sexless men where such sexless men were usually involved in rebelling and looting during the pre-modern era where they had this 'I've got nothing to lose' mentality. Where now such men have been seduced by pornography and comfort where they rage across the internet. Yet from the whispers I hear, has incelism gone through the 'post' phase? These people are what are referred to as 'Post-incels'. The 'Post-incel' movement is not entirely united yet they're somewhat united on shifting their hatred from women towards men associated with chad. This might not sound much of a departure from what incels usually say but if you've listened to what they usually say, they focus much of their anger and their emotional reactions on women and not on 'chad'. Another difference between incel and post-incel is their view of the nation-state. In particular the men who are part of the police of the nation-state and the violence used by the police. Whilst you do hear a lot about the critiques of the nation-state by incels where they repeat the claims about western laws about divorce, 50% of the wealth of the man taken away and other things. The post-incel focuses on more on the men who enforces these laws whom they see as protecting chad and the beautiful men from being hurt whilst chad talks about genetics and looks whilst he does not entertain the idea of a duel. Interestingly post-incels critiques a liberal belief that 'nation-state should have a monopoly of violence' and they believe the low-value man has been been constrained where they believe he has been coerced into 'peacocking' whilst he is mocked by other women. In other words, post-incelism is a movement that has shifted from critiquing women towards critiquing men and has shifted its criticism from cultural criticism towards criticism of the nation-state which might not sound different from 'MRA' yet post-incels not only comment on the feministic 'laws', they also comment on the usage of violence of the nation-state in protecting the 'upper-class' men whom they see as 'chad' who are protected by the police who use violence."

2025-01-21 19:29:45

- reply

If he wants to invade panama, mexico, greenland and canada, it's probable that the americans get less involved in middle east, africa and asia.

2025-01-20 21:31:27

- reply

Orange pill?

2025-01-20 21:21:54

"HINDUISM AND OCCULTISM"
"Recently there have been a few tweets by 'Alexander Dugin', where he has praised 'india' and he has said, 'India for hindus'. What some might not know is that he is an occultist. He does not say this publicly where he wants to build a multipolar world consisting of poles of different civilizations. He was trying to imply that he is against satanism when he claimed that russia was fighting against satanism in ukraine out of his desire to fool the traditionalists. At the same time, he has some interesting critiques about technics (where his critiques about technology was inspired by Heidegger) where he said the following: 'Technic is something modern, not traditional. That is alienation. It could be tamed but still it as riding the tiger. Technic is a kind of damnation.' One does wonder if he is aware of the occultists that have been associated with transhumanists and that infamous transhumanists were associated with the freemasons. One of the infamous occultists known as 'Aleister Crowley' who was someone that 'Dugin' knows a lot about... It was mentioned in the book, 'Transhumanism: The History of a Dangerous Idea' which was written by 'David Livingstone' where the book says: 'Crowley travelled to Mexico and then India and Buddhist practices.' 'Alexander Dugin' who has praised 'India', he has praised it out of his inclination towards hinduism where it endorses devil-worship. Something that occultists are fond of."

2025-01-19 21:32:39

https://m.primal.net/NoVa.png

2025-01-19 21:30:42

https://image.nostr.build/332ea358e2001bb73b469b144bb86f81b86229f1c855451512ca85ca348cd94b.png

2025-01-17 19:44:50

"Realism".
https://image.nostr.build/e7a7521ae21ce711000a4c04744f9e8dbe62ad3ca420c992c3e10e9d98d1b0c7.png

2025-01-16 21:24:21

"TECHNOLOGY AND PHENOMENOLOGY"
"Have you ever wondered what you felt online isn't the same what you felt offline? I remember quite a while ago that I visited a reddit in dealing with pornographic addiction where there are people who like the experience of watching a specific pornographic fetish whilst in reality it's not something they INSTINCTIVELY even consider. The pornographic industry was one of the industry that went through massive technological changes where it shifted from CDs hidden away to now pornography being widespread where it's now difficult to hide it from children (who were given ipads by the lazy ones). The pornography industry is one of the first 'transhumanist' industry where it seeks to imitate the sexual pleasure of sexual intercourse where it uses algorithms and imagery to 'imitate' reality via technology. The pornographic industry attempts wants to turn the mechanical to become like an 'organism' where it uses the videos of young women having sex with another man. The man sees the woman twerking in a video. He's pleased with it. Yet when he saw it in real life, he was disgusted. Why is there such a gap between the two? One of the differences is that the man undergone two different experiences. One involved watching a video of a thing whilst the other involved watching the actual thing. The transhumanist tries to get the mechanical object to function 'similarly' to an organism yet it cannot become an organism, whilst the organism continues to function as usual. Meaning there is a barrier between the organism and the mechanical. In other words the interaction the mechanical that is 'similar' to the organism is not the same as the interaction with the real organism. Now what does this mean? One of the limits of technology is that it cannot transform the experience you have with technic (that imitates the real thing) as the same as the experience you have with the real thing. Even with the widespread use of pornography it has not impeded the male desire for a real women. What pornographic industries did with technology was that it tried to nudge the consumer to different experiences. 'Bored with one sexual fetish? Have you tried this one?'. In other words technology could be used to nudge human beings into interacting with other things which leads to different experiences."

2025-01-14 21:08:14

This is the difference between "AGI" and "generative A.I.": https://image.nostr.build/3047b6226b692b040281445e749db898c403076de761cc0462edd39df43ca0d7.png

2025-01-14 21:00:39

Heard a lot of hype around "AGI" then I found it's really a recursive neural network...

2025-01-14 20:19:46

On a podcast, Riaz Hussain talked about "generative A.I."(chatgtp etc)
Riaz Hassan: "...people think it understands language but it really doesn't, it just understands statistics."
https://image.nostr.build/77cc20273e4cb764117a5656bd84ba8a380a4dcd5b956bba7834f481c4fdfb47.png."

2025-01-13 21:05:36

**INTERNET AND CLASS**
"It's quite interesting seeing people talk about elitism where they believe the 'elites' have the ability to push more changes in comparison to the masses. Some of you may know about the elite theory which claims that power of nation-states is within a small concentration of elites. Yet with the rise of the internet does this theory face a major rethinking? In a world where we are able to communicate in seconds from one place to another, much of the behaviors between the upper classes and lower classes have changed where they are almost converging. For example, what is really the difference between a middle class person and an upper class person in the current era we live in. Without mentioning the wealth differences, what other real differences are there? In the pre-modern era, 'elites' tended to be very literate whilst the masses weren't much so. Not only was there a difference between the lower classes and upper classes in terms of the ability of writing and reading. Even in terms of speech where the masses tended to use informal words whilst the upper class tended to use formal words. Now some might claim this convergence of speech more associated with the introduction of mass literacy to the masses via state education. Whilst this might be the case, I think the internet has accelerated the convergence of speech between the two classes as now a poor man residing in 'india' is able to communicate directly to someone living in the british palace via twitter or other forms of social media. Now this might sound insignificant as that person is probably going to ignore that person but communicating both directly and frequently to someone like that...there are not a lot of events that bear similarities to those events that occurred during the medieval period. Now that the language of the upper classes and the language of the lower classes have already started to converge, it becomes quite probable that the masses are not only able to influence the 'elites' but also the other masses where the rise of podcasts and youtube has given the masses access to communicate with other masses. Now let me give you 3 examples which have changed the media discourse in recent years: the gaming community, the redpill community and the incel community. In all of these communities they consist of social rejects within the masses itself and yet now no-one denies the influence that these communities now have over the masses of today. Now some have been captured by the 'elites' (gaming community), some are somewhat in a middle-ground (the redpil community) whilst others are rejected by the 'elites' (incel community). Now you might be wondering how the the incel community has influenced language of the masses. Have you heard of the words, 'moids' and 'foids'? Whilst in this article I'm not focusing the influence these communities have on the masses, it is notable that some communities that consist of social rejects are able to influence the media discourse today that the 'elites' of today have not been able to do in recent years. Now some might mention elon musk changing the algorithm where it promoted stories about the 'grooming gangs' but yet it's undeniable that this happened after the backlash he received from nationalists. In other words what he did happened after he interacted with the some of the masses associated with the nationalists."

2025-01-12 18:45:28

"HINDUISM AND PROSTITUTION"
"Recently after Elon promoted the 'pakistani grooming gangs' narrative after he had disputes with the white nationalists over the 'H1B visa' which involved them mocking him and the 'indians'. Elon promoted that narrative out of his desire to distract his fans (which he was able to do). A lot of british muslims reacted, british nationalists reacted and the 'indians' reacted. Some people were gleeful that the white nationalists were now focusing their aggression against the pakistanis and they kept focusing on the 'grooming' claims.
What it seems they're not aware of is hinduism endorses temple prostitution. It is mentioned in the padma purana: 'O revered sir, all of us have been perforce enjoyed by the evil beings; we have slipped from (i.e. erred in) our duty. You are our refuge. O brahmana, you have been formerly instructed by the intelligent Kesava. Why have we become prostitutes after having come in contact with the lord? O you, whose wealth is penance, explain to us the duties of the prostitutes.' Hindu texts says a lot about women which some people prefer it not being widely known about."

2025-01-12 17:49:45

https://image.nostr.build/e8f4bf5bb2751f90401ed30ad4284a7eb3b819ec9ce010180ad87d1876b174ee.png

2025-01-11 22:10:17

Around 10% of american women aged between 18-25 have an "onlyfans" account (1.2 million women).
Around 50% of american men subscribe to an "onlyfans" account (82 million men).

2025-01-11 19:59:03

People who expect saudi arabia to invest in a local arms industry aren't aware of their methodology of "coup-proofing" which involves them undermining the local military with the purchase of american and other western weaponry.

2025-01-11 19:41:15

A lot of people are talking about grooming gangs these days.
https://m.primal.net/NcRO.png https://m.primal.net/NcRQ.webp

2025-01-11 19:36:36

- reply

Do you not use paypal?

2025-01-11 19:31:34

- reply

A lot of banks do question about large transfers of money.

2025-01-11 19:22:55

**Liberalism and Contracts**
"One of the misunderstandings some people have of liberalism is that liberals believe in an arbitrary form of freedom similar to how anarchists view freedom. Hegel (who believed freedom was important) he believed that there was a contradiction between an arbitrary form of freedom and the law. Hegel believed that the modern state is the reconciliation between freedom and the law. Liberals adopted the hegelian view of the modern state whilst they pushed "social contract theory" which was promoted by John Locke. Liberals believe there is social contract between the citizens and the modern state where they believe the modern state provides them some forms of freedom in exchange for their affirmation of the modern state's monopoly to commit violence. Liberals understood that the modern state did prevent the freedoms of people to an extent. Quite interestingly that John Locke was no fan of atheists where he believed atheists aren't to be trusted to uphold an agreement. In other words, liberals do strongly believe in some forms of contracts. Now you might be wondering which liberal talks about contracts. Have you heard of a liberal talking about "consent"? If you've realised that the liberal believes in a contract between the citizens and the modern nation-state, you've probably realised that the major difference between the muslim and the liberal is over who is the legislator. The muslim believes god is the sole legislator. The liberal believes the modern state is the legislator."

2025-01-11 17:14:36

2025-01-11 11:29:23

What happened to iris nostr?

2025-01-10 22:09:42

Jews believe edomites are the enemy of the jewish people.
Jews believe edom refers to western civilisation (america).

2025-01-10 20:21:23

**Discussion on freedom**
Whilst it is the case that DH is not against freedom in of itself, it is interpreted by others in his unapologetic affirmation of patriarchy, that he is against freedom.
At the moment, usually when someone talks about freedom, a lot of people have the liberal interpretation of freedom.
Now some others suggest associating freedom with tiredness where the woman is sick of being a "bossbabe" and she wants to be told what to do by her loving husband.
Whilst even the alleged anti-modernist "Alexander Dugin", he said in his book with the name, "The Fourth Political Theory":
"Yet, is there anything that we can could take away from liberalism – from liberalism that was hypothetically defeated and has lost its axis? Yes, there is. It is the idea of freedom."
The liberal says: "The individual is free from patriarchy..."
What if a muslim says, "The muslim who resides in an islamic country is free from oppressive taxes being imposed on him."
What if a muslim says, "The muslim who resides in an islamic country is free from sexual degeneracy."
What if a muslim says, "The muslim man who resides in an islamic country is free from being humiliated by the male gaze on his wife."
What if a muslim says, "The muslim female who resides in an islamic country is free from the male gaze."
I've heard from a european businessman who resides in the UAE is that he believes he is free from the large corporation taxes of europe.

2025-01-10 19:34:32

- reply

I think a lot of people who have studied economics (specifically microeconomics) have probably come across the terms "Luxury goods" and "inferior goods" where the demand of "luxury goods" usually increases if consumer's income increases whilst and the demand of "inferior goods" usually increases if consumer's income decreases.

2025-01-09 21:36:54

Yuk Hui said the following in his book which he called it "Machine and Sovereignty: For a Planetary Thinking":
"The machine will not be the same as an organism, for an organism is already concrete, while a machine is always in the process of becoming more and more concrete."

2025-01-09 20:48:33

One of the weaknesses of A.I. is that it cannot distinguish between true patterns and false patterns.
What I mean by this is that if you were to give some data where it suggests that the face of a nigerian goes under the category of "ethnically japanese", this could lead to the A.I. "computing" a false pattern.
Despite claims of others, A.I. needs human input to identify true patterns.

2025-01-09 19:51:12

Quite notable is that very few people even believe that canadians are even willing to resist an american invasion.

2025-01-09 19:14:52

Recently the American military branded a Chinese video games company as part of the Chinese military.
Whilst this sound ludicrous to you as what interest does the chinese military have in a video games company?
However video games companies have developed a lot and it has now inclined towards pushing stuff they call "VR".
You may have heard people talked about what other people call, "VR headsets".
Video games companies did try to push "VR headsets" (The stuff they call "VR headsets" were not profitable).
Graphics have also improved to the extent it is actually very difficult to tell the difference between a real video and a fake video.
I'm not sure why these companies are pushing this, yet if you played the video game with the name, "The Evil Within", that probably gives you a hint of what the military wants to do with video game companies.

2025-01-08 22:43:54

- reply

"History rhymes."

2025-01-08 22:41:20

Apparently North Korea has sent a hypersonic missile.
Remember north korea has received a lot of Russian technology.

2025-01-08 22:30:34

"The european fears the bluntness of the south asian."

2025-01-08 22:12:28

- reply

Try to get more to come.
Focus on iris nostr for now.
I don't want to get it to become too complicated.

2025-01-08 21:56:40

A lot of people are questioning how to get nostr to be more popular.
A lot of people focus on using the "decentralised social media platform" argument while it could interest them, it doesn't really push them to move towards nostr.
I think mentioning the relay system is actually more effective. I myself was very interested in the relay system which actually differentiates itself from other "mainstream" platforms.
Another method to get to become popular is to get some sort of celebrity (similar to Adin Ross) to come on to this platform.
Kick, rumble got more popular after famous people with their followers entered those platforms.

2025-01-08 21:45:02

- reply

I'll try to get some famous muslims to come on nostr.
At the moment twitter has a lot more information that is being transmitted there in comparison to nostr.

2025-01-08 21:42:29

- reply

Tell them, "How many of your followers even interact with your tweets?"
Despite the fact that I have around 315 followers on twitter, I barely get more than 80 views on average.
And of those 80 views, less than 10% of them even interact with the tweet.

2025-01-08 21:23:21

- reply

What kind of programs do you use?

2025-01-08 21:21:26

- reply

Tell your followers to come on nostr.

2025-01-08 21:20:58

- reply

Someone famous needs to come on nostr.
Kick got famous after adin ross came to kick.
Rumble got famous after andrew tate went on rumble.
Telegram got famous after twitter pursued their censorship policy.

2025-01-08 19:56:14

Interesting site. Anyone interested?