Yapper on Nostr: "TECHNO-GYNOCRACY AND THE INCEL QUESTION" "Whilst talks about AI is still ongoing, ...

"TECHNO-GYNOCRACY AND THE INCEL QUESTION"

"Whilst talks about AI is still ongoing, the normie who wishes to continue pursuing his routine has already been pushed down by not only the recent recession associated with COVID but also with CHATGTP and forms of AI where there are forms of AI that does coding. A lot of people are seriously considering the possibility of mass unemployment where not only AI could displace workers who engage in manual tasks but also workers who engage in thinking tasks. Now the governments are probably are preparing for this especially if unemployment becomes widespread what is likely to happen to the public finances of governments who obtain money from their citizens via income tax, corporation tax and 'VAT'. Some have suggested a universal basic income. Yet let's assume the government plans not to intervene in the labour market and it doesn't plan to save people from unemployment. What kind of jobs could be available? What technology cannot do is give you a personalized interaction which the human desires. The experience of interacting with a robot requesting what you want to eat is not the same thing as interacting with a human being requesting a meal. Whilst some might not understand, if you've seen the pornographic industry which has undergone multiple technological changes, despite the fact a lot of people being addicted to pornography it has not negated the desire of the man to be with a real woman where the experience of masturbating in front of a screen is not the same as the experience of having sex with a real woman. Now do you understand the importance of a personalized experience? Technology has not abolished the markets yet it has shifted the demand curves and the supply curves of the labour market. In other words, the question arises, does the consumer really want? Now this isn't to say that consumers could be manipulated by advertising and marketing yet there is limit to how much you are able to manipulate consumers. For example, there have been attempts in promoting men who are relatively shorter towards the woman, yet these marketing attempts has failed. Meaning there is a strong desire amongst humans towards having a personalized interaction. When the lockdowns eased, loads of people fled the house and yearned for personalized interaction. To keep this relatively short if you were unable to comprehend what is being conveyed: jobs that involve personalized interactions have more job security than jobs that don't involve personalized interactions. Meaning the job of a WAITER has more job security than the job of a PROGRAMMER. While this sounds to you as 'insane', this is a possibility of what could possibly come after what we've seen recently with CHATGTP and DEEPSEEK. Now what has this got to with women exactly? Women are generally more sociable than men where majority of people who are anti-social are men. Also men yearn for the attention of the woman more than the man. The woman is relatively more emotional than the man. Do you ever wonder why the majority of receptionists tend to be women? It is probable that the woman is more likely to be involved in a job which involves personalized interactions than men. Whilst it could be the case that men who are attractive and are sociable are able to obtain these jobs. Yet this possibly raises the incel question? There is a possibility that the number of unemployed unsociable men could possibly increase. If it did happen, what could be possibly the response of the government. Whilst some concieve of a nation-state response in this hypothetical scenario, it is possible that the megamachine (not the nation-state) cracks down where it is possible that a megamachine invented by nerds who hate socialisation cracks down on the incel population. Is it possible that the nerds invent a 'gynocentric megamachine'?"