Cale₿ / Cale₿ is on Nostr

Revere your own sovereignty.

Last Notes

2024-09-04 11:34:01

- reply

What's the image of the bomb on the tob right? Super cool artwork, is it a sticker?

2024-09-04 01:47:46

- reply

I recently posted about how the internet has become so shitified. I'm in a bit of a pessimistic slump about it tbh.
Today it's all about engagement and that's all that matters. Even organically finding truly valuable content on platforms like youtube has become a thing of the past. Clickbait nonsense everywhere.
I hope nostr can be a place where people can once again share meaningful stuff.
Not for the sake of engagement, but for the sake of the creation itself, the connections it generates, and tanigible improvements in the lives it touches.

2024-09-02 03:33:14

- reply

Check this out...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382358701_Real-Time_Self-Assembly_of_Stereomicroscopically_Visible_Artificial_Constructions_in_Incubated_Specimens_of_mRNA_Products_Mainly_from_Pfizer_and_Moderna_A_Comprehensive_Longitudinal_Study

2024-08-31 01:41:16

Hashpools: A Peer-to-peer Free Market for Bitcoin Mining
https://github.com/TABConf/6.tabconf.com/issues/87
@nprofile…282l

2024-08-30 01:18:21

What if every night when you sleep you see and understand everything about who you are and the life you are experiencing, and you laugh about how clueless and confused you are going to be again when you wake back up

2024-08-17 01:41:56

AI is insane. There will be so much BS to sort through, we will have no choice but to turn inward for truth.

2024-08-08 11:21:33

I see a "bookmarks" tab on my profile page in the Amethyst app, how do I add stuff to it?

2024-08-08 02:16:32

The internet used to be so awesome.
Nostr can make it that way again.

2024-06-13 16:54:43

https://youtu.be/ub2isy55aPI

2024-05-31 00:44:24

- reply

Thanks for the zaps guys :)

2024-05-11 02:19:24

- reply

Whybitcoinonly.com

2024-04-19 02:34:59

A little thought experiment in politics:
I understand that simple majority democracy is not a proven solution, but for simplicity's sake think about this:
The voting for the 2020 American presidential election breaks down as follows -
Candidate 1: 81 million
Candidate 2: 74 million
All other candidates: 2.8 million
The total estimated number of eligible voters in was approximately 239 million, so the percentage of the population who actually voted was 33.9%, 30.9%, and 1.2% respectively.
That means the popular majority of 34% actually chose not to vote for any of the candidates on the ballot.
😒
What if a "non-vote" by these people were taken to mean a vote for no one? Meaning in this case, no one would fill the role, not even the incumbent.
I only assume that more than 34% of the American population would be okay with this outcome, as most the people that I know who voted then we doing so in order to vote "against" the candidate they did not like.
Could we bring back the consent of the governed?

2023-03-19 02:36:56

Bitcoin is a systematic risk. That's the point.

2023-02-24 17:02:04

I always get excited to see a new podcast from Tatum and this one does not disappoint.
https://youtu.be/3st7B2L1j7g

2023-02-23 22:48:05

Looking for some help with NIP-05 identifiers.
So far we're able to see the verification in Damus and Damus only, no other clients seem to work.
Know anybody that can help?

2023-02-07 19:15:44

This is definitely a higher-vibe platform than Twitter. I feel like I can be more open and real here.