twofish

not of this 🤡🌎 insanity.

Public Key

npub1ncxn5tzmmackrdhjfrj94ayq5026my3esntsefpp0x6jtcnu42uqye29r0

NIP-57 Address

twofish@minibits.cash

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsfurf693da7utpkmey3ez67jq284ddjgucf4cv5sshndf9uf724wqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3gamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvw7u3h6

Publishing to

nostr.mom

nostr.oxtr.dev

Author Public Key

npub1ncxn5tzmmackrdhjfrj94ayq5026my3esntsefpp0x6jtcnu42uqye29r0

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-05-29 00:18:50

- reply

Isn't that just gold with extra steps?

2025-05-28 23:34:43

- reply

Yes and I'm stating that I believe the reason why the people who are not holding bitcoin in self custody IS because they don't see it as pure money.
That is my perspective, and my original line of questioning was an attempt to draw that out as an example.

2025-05-28 23:27:29

- reply

So that you can see the perspective of the wall this guy is talking to.
#nevent1q…v3ma

2025-05-28 23:22:21

- reply

Play this loop out recursively. If you do, you should find people as an underlying layer correct? If that is apparent then within the mind is the trusted third party. If that is the case, then if the answer isn't "Bitcoin is pure money", the you found a security hole.
#nevent1q…8gz3

2025-05-25 15:01:56

- reply

I will provide the market outcome (IMHO).
I have no idea how the sale of DNA works, but let's assume it's spit (mucas).
Banning spit for sale will only make it more prevalent. The value for spit will go up, and exacerbate the problem because the cost to produce is nearly 0. Data brokers would love a ban, and would be incentivised to honor such a thing.
I think of physical power (watts) and abstract power (logic) reinforce each other in either a vicious or virtuous cycle. Both need to be considered.

2025-05-25 05:30:25

- reply

My go to is confirmation bias with respect to sheep and the website.

2025-05-23 17:57:32

- reply

>You have a tendency to either assume too much in the minds of other people, or to not consider it adequately so as to have a successful communication.
I do unfortunately, and I will do it again unfortunately.
This concept you invoke maps to the following, and as a game theory fren, I invoke, a smooth game called 'A Location Game':
https://timroughgarden.org/f13/l/l14.pdf
And to provide the lecture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYd7VxtITrE
And then map it to bitcoin's proof of work mempool assumptions when mining with the network's mempools' containing high entropy or low entropy relative to each others with centralized and decentralized mining.
And to ease up on this distance I will provide the mechanics of 'mining with the network's mempool containing high or low entropy when a race condition exists' here:
https://video.nostr.build/d63026f71b9ab3455d846690d93879413f5db9a85db6d1abd71eb732c8e191cc.mp4
The full video provided (section starts at 0:34:37)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ-nD9hSaeg

2025-05-23 15:39:23

- reply

If you study bats, per Robert Sapolsky's research, he identified a consequence of what society might call selfishness, but with the right sunglasses on, you would see 'tit for tat that allows for mistakes'.
Tit for tat that allows for mistakes does exist in nature. We call it a solution to the tragedy of the commons.

2025-05-23 15:30:03

- reply

A strictly human construct is something not found in nature outside of human abstract thought.

2025-05-22 18:12:05

- reply

Sure.
An anarchist would change their prospective. There is no spoon, and the spoon will bend to their will.
When you repress desire, it explodes in your face.

2025-05-22 17:42:53

- reply

Ad hominem factory more like.

2025-05-22 04:52:25

- reply

It may seem tedious to slow down communication like this. And it is, indeed, slow going to use this technique. However, using “I create” sentences, a pair intent on heart-felt communication can wend its way carefully through the subject at hand. When we really need to hear each other, it is a very helpful technique. In beginning each sentence with “I,” the two communicators are kept from accusing each other, as in “You did this” or “You said that.” If we need to share a concern with another, we can say, “I feel badly about something I thought you said. This is what I thought I heard.” Then we can share our tender feelings and find out if we heard the other person correctly without accusing the other person or separating him from us in our hearts.

2025-05-20 19:56:16

- reply

Welcome sir

2025-05-20 04:57:11

- reply

Some light reading 😂
"physical power is still the primary means through which they settle territory disputes and resolve conflicting abstract beliefs about property rights. They write rules of law to define property rights, but then they use physical power to solve disputes about what the “legitimate” rule of law is, or what the “right” property rights should be. While there are many examples in everyday life where law successfully settles human intraspecies property disputes, what people often overlook is the long history of physical disputes that were used to instantiate those laws (in other words, our property rights exist because of the wars fought to establish those property rights)."
- Softwar
"Every organism can be attacked; therefore, every organism has a BCRA. An organism’s BCRA is a simple fraction determined by two variables: the benefit of attacking it (BA) and the cost of attacking it (CA). BA is a function of how resource abundant an organism is. Organisms with lots of precious resources have high BA. Organisms with less precious resources have lower BA. On the flip side of the equation, CA is a function of how capable and willing an organism is at imposing severe physical costs on attackers. Organisms capable of and willing to impose severe physical costs on neighboring organisms have high CA. Organisms that are not capable of or willing to impose severe physical costs on neighboring organisms have low CA. Higher BCRA organisms are more vulnerable to attack than lower BCRA organisms because they offer a higher return on investment for hungry neighbors to devour. Organisms therefore have an existential imperative to lower their BCRA as much as they can afford to do so by increasing their capacity and inclination to impose severe physical costs on neighboring organisms. An organism can’t just devote all their time and energy towards increasing their resource abundance and expect to prosper for long, because doing so would cause their BCRA to climb"...
-Softwar
And it goes on and on about organisms adapting to this law of nature, among other things.
I think depending on property rights as the fundamental mechamsims is ignoring the watts aspect of what it takes to control a resource.
As far as other people's property, the BCRA is fundamental, and libertarian property rights is abstract power. I just like having this perspective rather than assuming that if I respect other people's property that the reverse will be true. There is so much to think about here, but if I am a plant, and I grow above another plant (using the watts that I collected already), taking light away from the below plant, did I infring on the lower plant's property rights? In a court case, that may be the case. Water rights for example has rules to account for this. As humans we have to deal with both physical power and abstract power. Nature doesn't care about abstract power.

2025-05-19 20:40:02

- reply

Right, which is why I reference softwar. The book defines energy capture at the cellular level, but begins at the origin of life, and expands all the way to nation states. For example, the evolution of a mouth. It not only defeats your opponent, but you claim it's resources as an atomic action.
So without providing all the context, it states bitcoin or proof of work (I forget which) is like a mouth. And explains why this is the case. I think it defines information as a form of energy first, which never existed as energy until bitcoin. I can't rewrite the chapters well enough from my passing glance of it. Sorry.

2025-05-19 18:08:14

- reply

They say in quantum physics:
"The wave function collapses to a single photon when it is observed or measured"
So if what I call myself in this moment as being a single photon, it (me aka the photon) is only because it was being observed or measured.
Had it not been measured, then nothing is influencing the, what I would define as the unconscious, objective self.

2025-05-19 00:28:29

- reply

I don't know if this is relevant to what he said about area, but you can't make a plane out of a single point.

2025-05-19 00:22:30

- reply

For what it's worth... Even though I doubt that this is not what he had in mind:
Python
def f(x):
return x * 2
def g(x):
return x + 3
def h(x):
return f(x) * g(x)

2025-05-18 00:41:59

- reply

Terrance Howard needs to learn about floating point arithmetic on a computer that only knows binary, and common calculators need to be upgraded to the latest libraries that exist in say, Python, that knows what to do with real numbers.

2025-05-17 20:50:51

- reply

What Carl Jung has to say about illusions in relationships (more details on the YouTube channel)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ0IC1cmMcY
On a more personal note about the general force behind your awakening (IMHO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HNkx7X5jdE

2025-05-13 02:21:37

@nprofile…45up
When I saw your YouTube video, the first thing I thought about was this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VPfZ_XzisU

2025-05-12 17:25:45

- reply

Never forget

2025-05-09 20:19:19

You can't give away what you don't have.
https://video.nostr.build/de8b31dfdf3e7bafdabbcd8f25b6e98a932c6a3274398633556b13e656bcf452.webm

2025-05-09 17:09:01

- reply

Which to me, given your statement, the proposal to remove the OP_RETURN limit is bike shedding at best.

2025-05-07 22:46:54

- reply

And we've gone full circle into Hooke's law 😂👏.

2025-05-07 20:54:45

- reply

Identifying out of band tx is a way to identify spam. It means they couldn't find a way to get the tx through otherwise.

2025-05-07 20:34:55

Much like the old Zuckerburg app 'Hot or Not', I would like to see an app called 'CIA or Not' in the bitcoin community.

2025-05-05 19:27:16

- reply

Could you explain more? Like in what situation would that be the case? Everyone makes their own independent decision to choose which fork to install, and each developer independently chooses which PR to accept in their own repo, except core, and those with more than one maintainer who has the burden of coordination. Common wisdom in software development is to keep teams no larger than 6 devs for that reason (coordination). So if that wisdom holds, then the most he could be is an army of 6.

2025-05-05 19:08:43

- reply

I would agree if his repo exists in a vacuum.

2025-05-03 18:09:04

- reply

Yes, the intention of this tool (now website, but I imagine this will get integrated into nostr apps) is discoverability. People complaining about how only bitcoin bros exist on nostr.

2025-05-03 17:59:35

- reply

Persistence is a deadly weapon.

2025-05-03 17:57:24

- reply

Sure. Here is an example. I use this example because it's kind of weird. Maybe some people don't want to be added.
#nevent1q…u6qd

2025-05-03 17:38:46

- reply

Trained since a small child to coddle that ego.

2025-05-03 16:14:10

- reply

It may be attachment that causes suffering. Then fear of losing said attachment. You don't let go of your fears, you let go of your attachments, and the fear goes away in its own.

2025-05-02 00:56:11

- reply

Glad I could help.

2025-05-02 00:48:30

- reply

I'm a big fan of Bull Bitcoin, but they also have liquid. I'm indifferent to it being there because I get why. Of course, I don't have a use case for liquid, and it took 2 seconds to send you the address.

2025-05-01 23:24:38

- reply

I mean, there is probably a transcription in the video, but my understanding is that spam filters do work sufficiently (without a hardfork) if core would accept the pull request of the spam filter. It doesn't catch everything, but it creates an environment where only the most sophisticated spammers can get through. The fact that this option is being ignored, and then stating because we can't stop it we must do x, is an attack on bitcoin. It's a form of gas lighting by disregarding solutions that address the spam directly. He addresses what I think is core's central point: The proposed spam filter won't stop x so we won't merge it (back in 2023). Mechanic relates it to essentially x being at the tail end of a normal distribution, meaning it doesn't work 100% of the time. Now fast forward to now and the proposed change by core is: Because we can't stop the spam then why should we have one. Which can be rephrased to: Because we can't stop 100% of the spam then why should we have one.
It's the fallacy of composition and division: https://www.logicalfallacies.org/fallacy-of-composition-and-division.html
Here is the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15biQH1H140

2025-05-01 22:21:33

- reply

Yeah, as stayed after core sat on their hands in 2023 when all this started. The proposal that was 'contentious' was to address the spam with a spam filter.
Their like lala I'm not listening. And then:
Since we can't filter 100% of spam, our only action is to just lower the drawbridge and let it all in. It's fine because now they aren't trying to climb the castle walls anymore.
And I expected the response to that be more: lala we can't stop all spam.
Can you even refute Bitcoin Mechanics central point?
Like, rewind back to 2023 when the problem started.

2025-05-01 19:12:26

I couldn't make an incoming astroid go viral, but here you go.
#nevent1q…du4s

2025-05-01 17:35:10

- reply

This is survivorship bias that valid arguments must only exist in their domain where they have the power to censor.

2025-04-29 17:31:50

- reply

I think your next homework assignment should be to easily and effortlessly identify ai tone so that this question becomes unnecessary.
Sorry, not sorry.

2025-04-26 04:20:30

- reply

Which is the best client for grandma on iOS?

2025-04-13 11:17:58

- reply

Having to lock and unlock threads is always a bad experience for the developer.

2025-04-10 20:51:26

- reply

Well defined, but in terms of measurement, here is one way we could go about measuring our openness. Ideally, the psychological value between gains and losses are symmetrical, and given the magnitude of the gain or loss, the psychological value gets skewed. To provide an example based on your definition, swap out money with time. Time is more universal. This is why children feel more open to the teacher. The humble may be humble because they have very little to lose. If they do have a lot to lose, and they are still open, I would imagine they feel the stakes are in their favor (They are willing to risk it). So you could define openness based on the mathematical term 'expected value' witj how well they adhere to it, and their ability to calculate it effectively.
The graph above is a measurement taken based on this.
Thinking Fast and Slow
Loss Aversion
Problem 5:
You are offered a gamble on the toss of a coin.
If the coin shows tails, you lose $100.
If the coin shows heads, you win $150.
Is this gamble attractive? Would you accept it?
To make this choice, you must balance the psychological benefit of getting it? Although the expected value of the gamble is obviously positive, because you stand to gain more than you can lose, you probably dislike it the critical inputs are emotional responses that are generated by System.
1. For most people, the fear of losing $100 is more intense than the hope of gaining $150. We concluded from many such observations that “losses loom larger than gains” and that people are loss averse.
You can measure the extent of your aversion to losses by asking yourself a question: What is the smallest gain that I need to balance an equal chance to lose $100? For many people the answer is about $200, twice as much as the loss. The “loss aversion ratio” has been estimated in several experiments and is usually in the range of 1.5 to 2.5. This is an average, of course; some people are much more loss averse than others. Professional risk takers in the financial markets are more tolerant of losses, probably because they do not respond emotionally to every fluctuation. When participants in an experiment were instructed to “think like a trader,” they became less loss averse and their emotional reaction to losses (measured by a physiological index of emotional arousal) was sharply reduced.
In order to examine your loss aversion ratio for different stakes...

2025-04-08 21:18:21

- reply

Is MoE the 2nd or 3rd order derivative of SoV?

2025-04-08 15:41:27

- reply

And @nprofile…45up, I just wanted to mention this, as we talked about this earlier:
It was just as I predicted. I couldn't stop. I stayed up until 3 am the night before working on this, and it took a great deal of effort to stop. The moment I woke up I was back at it, and, the only thing that could pull me away was bathroom breaks until it was finished. This scares me.
It's the monkey tree trap:
https://teachthesoul.com/2012/02/the-monkey-trap/

2025-04-06 14:30:34

- reply

It seems to me that if the intent is to meet them where they're at, then that would be, unfortunately, with confirmation bias. This is of course dogmatic.
The alternative, as far as I can tell, is from a product based approach. Give it utility, and preferability in an open source model. Of course that comes in all forms, even music. If it requires attention, unless it's pleasure based, then one's goal is usually to abstract that away.

2025-04-05 22:23:24

- reply

Yes. In linear algebra I mentioned a system of equations where there is only one right answer represented as a single point. So deeper in the book they mention a 'determinant', which is the 'area' of the right answer. So no longer as single point. Then a little further down, the eigenvector, which is where, unfortunately I get lost in the weeds. 3blue1brown can do circles around me in that regard, but early in the book, in the basics, I built this visual for a problem that transforms the matrix to reveal a different perspective hidden right in front of your face. First we see an 'L' shape, and after we collapse the 3d space into 2d, we get the sum of the two vectors.
https://image.nostr.build/d3ed1e5cf6bf34b136196f6cc56be6ec379bd5a990c6f34de1ba85617d2e88b1.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/68ab7ccb85ccba1854bd4db961c1cc3135c88bbfa4c95967722b746ff2fd1d05.gif

2025-04-05 21:55:06

- reply

🙂
Yes, and a movement or experiment with all the sliders of each component provides wisdom/experience in that space. I haven't talked much about such interactions because I am still working out how to exclude methods of parallel reconstruction. The bitcoin blockchain will be a major component of this due to it's immutability. I guess I'll find out how immutable it really is.

2025-04-05 06:15:33

@nprofile…p3f3
What do you think about an opentimestamp based python app that captures frames from your chosen stream, signs them, and then timestamps them on opentimestamps.org?
Would that break your site? I would imagine throttling is already baked into your site so the app would die within the first few moments.

2025-04-04 17:41:02

- reply

Confirmation bias needs mass. You played your part. 👏
But I fucking hate confirmation bias.

2025-04-04 16:45:10

- reply

Remove the time factor from your learning iteration, but do iterate often.

2025-04-04 15:34:45

- reply

RIP

2025-04-04 15:31:39

- reply

What generation dismantled this?

2025-04-04 05:02:55

- reply

Here are more examples of moving in latent space that demonstrates movements based on information density.
https://video.nostr.build/1c0b2362d218a6796fded3afca4e93b2b4b3de90625ba300988613f9b30e2573.mp4
Full video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VAkrUNLKSo

2025-04-04 01:17:01

- reply

In stalking the wild pendulum, information density is talked about, e.g.
https://image.nostr.build/49dfda903e7786b651b2eed9185fc519429789b33b05e7f4b31d49a383f44932.jpg
But also in other parts of the book.
I just have this perspective based on my background in data science that maps the spirit to these sets of components in latent space, which are basically these components built from eigenvectors sorted by their variance or information density.
The way this works mathematically is well explained here, where the author starts out with:
Imagine a big family dinner where everybody starts asking you about PCA. First, you explain it to your great-grandmother; then to your grandmother; then to your mother; then to your spouse; finally, to your daughter (a mathematician). Each time the next person is less of a layman. Here is how the conversation might go.
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/2691/making-sense-of-principal-component-analysis-eigenvectors-eigenvalues#140579
And then finally in the video above the talks about correlation vs causality, which talks about movements in latent space, which is to say, given a set of components, say you had the pca algorithm generate 5 components. Now the set is sorted by information density, and say each one is represented as a slider. As you move the slider from left to right, each slider represents a move in latent space that changes the output and/or outcome, in the form of a transformation.
When applied to a dataset of faces for example, the first slider might be the hair style, the second my be their smile, third might be their eye expression, the last one might not do anything noticeable because of its low information density meaning that it has no real impact on the output and/or outcome.
Why does this matter?
In the second video he talks about moving your x and nothing happens on y, which is the output and/or outcome. Let's add some detail to that.
We observed a doll move, and we are trying to understand how it works based on our observations. We haven't built a map yet of what makes the doll move (the latent space).
Let's say we want a smile. We've seen an example of smiling so we know it's possible, but we can't find the dimension that applies to that. We try changing various input vectors, but nothing happens to the output and/or outcome that produces a smile. So we begin mapping out this black box, trying to change different inputs to see what happens on the output.
We write down what we learn, e.g.
https://image.nostr.build/95d9d9eea4c597c66b564cfae2656142b5147e85b7ed6ea2bb580226daabe421.jpg
We still don't understand the coord.
Then, somehow, someway, we get that ah hah moment. We discover the cord.
https://image.nostr.build/571a24bb44f1d5d62be71ce3c6a86f79f2dc7122d5d933e4c5bb8fb6484d99ea.jpg
It was in another dimension, a higher dimension.
This is what it feels like to me learning about your work. You have found the cord!

2025-04-03 17:17:13

- reply

They never claimed it was sound money.
They claim it's ultrasound.money
https://image.nostr.build/8f4dc224c24c979b85193deb1f0ac62bc346e129c76f36d1675dae26ed8b21ee.jpg

2025-04-03 17:08:22

- reply

If you come across a phone that does support esim, give it a try. The 'minutes' don't expire.

2025-04-03 14:16:09

- reply

You should experiment with silent.link
If you can get a connection with silent.link, you can potentially save a ton of money depending on your usage.

2025-04-02 21:53:27

- reply

So that was an explanation without using terms like eigenvectors. Technically I think the correct contrast is higher ordered eigemvectors vs lower ordered eigenvectors, in a practical sense with the PCA, SVD algorithm, or some form of factor analysis.

2025-04-01 16:21:34

- reply

Damn it Luke 😂

2025-03-31 21:53:48

- reply

Yes, you can draw a contrast between moving in latent space and moving in null space, although they represent different concepts and serve different purposes. Here’s how they can be compared:
### Moving in Latent Space
- **Nature of Movement**: When you move in latent space, you are navigating through a learned, lower-dimensional representation of data. This movement typically corresponds to meaningful changes in the generated outputs, such as interpolating between different data points or manipulating specific features.
- **Purpose**: The goal is to explore variations in the data, generate new samples, or control specific attributes of the output. The movement is often guided by the structure of the latent space, which is designed to capture the underlying relationships in the data.
### Moving in Null Space
- **Nature of Movement**: Moving in the null space of a matrix involves navigating through a set of vectors that are mapped to the zero vector by the matrix. This means that any movement in the null space does not change the output of the linear transformation represented by the matrix.
- **Purpose**: The null space represents directions in which the transformation collapses to zero. Movement in this space does not yield new or meaningful outputs; instead, it reflects the inherent redundancy or lack of information in the system. For example, if you have a system of linear equations, moving in the null space corresponds to finding different solutions that do not affect the outcome of the equations.
### Key Contrasts
1. **Meaningfulness of Movement**:
- **Latent Space**: Movement is meaningful and corresponds to variations in the generated data.
- **Null Space**: Movement is not meaningful in terms of generating new outputs; it represents redundancy in the system.
2. **Output Impact**:
- **Latent Space**: Changes in position lead to different outputs, reflecting the learned features of the data.
- **Null Space**: Changes in position do not affect the output of the transformation; they remain mapped to the zero vector.
3. **Dimensionality**:
- **Latent Space**: Typically designed to be lower-dimensional and structured to capture essential features of the data.
- **Null Space**: Can also be lower-dimensional but is defined by the properties of the matrix and may not have a meaningful structure related to the original data.
### Conclusion
While both latent space and null space involve navigating through vector spaces, they serve fundamentally different purposes. Moving in latent space is about exploring and generating meaningful variations in data, while moving in null space reflects the inherent properties of a linear transformation where certain directions do not contribute to the output. Thus, they represent contrasting concepts in terms of their implications and applications.

2025-03-31 04:54:35

- reply

My node says the same thing.
https://image.nostr.build/61663434fed6ef9ce55dcff96cf08b04e00a69130e1f121163ca24b4a1f89a1c.jpg

2025-03-30 18:43:00

@nprofile…45up
Full video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyW4fySXWvQ
#nevent1q…nsvw
#nevent1q…r9ek

2025-03-30 15:55:24

- reply

Go big or go home.

2025-03-26 00:13:42

- reply

Nostr is the first legitimate social media protocol we've ever had.
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

2025-03-14 13:00:32

- reply

Be the change, my man.

2025-03-14 12:53:53

- reply

Energy is fungible 😂

2025-03-13 16:58:01

- reply

I have learned to convert my beliefs into ideas so that I can reason with them from first principles. Either I can develop a mental model around it or I can't.

2025-03-13 14:17:02

- reply

Sus

2025-03-12 23:48:10

- reply

Me 😂

2025-03-12 18:21:48

I still don't know if I trust #Molly the Signal clone. I'm switching back to Signal.

2025-03-12 03:06:35

- reply

And meaningless if you are not in tune with nature. (vs in tune with society).
Being outside is required.

2025-03-12 02:51:01

- reply

Does your women tend to children?

2025-03-12 02:47:59

- reply

And remember: You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.

2025-03-12 02:46:23

- reply

2025-03-12 02:44:44

- reply

I've developed a game to connect with these folk:
Battleship:
Describe an event that is shared amungs your opponent. 1/2 credit if you remember the voice, full credit if you remember the face expression.
If your opponent produces an event that you share in you memory with at least voice or face expression: Hit
Otherwise: Miss
Keep dialog to a minimum until game is complete.

2025-03-12 02:37:52

- reply

Learn permaculture, agorism, and either start farming, or play middle man.

2025-03-12 02:34:57

- reply

Proof of work is key.

2025-03-12 02:32:47

- reply

Madonna

2025-03-12 02:31:37

- reply

Go big or go home

2025-03-12 02:25:11

- reply

Look up the first time: sun is directly above me
Look up the second time: sun is at ~65 degree angle
FTFU
Cheers

2025-03-12 02:13:08

If you didn't crash, you didn't learn anything.

2025-03-11 20:53:54

- reply

You know it brother

2025-03-11 19:38:17

- reply

I came from Signal

2025-03-11 19:36:14

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUHEMoVmWZs

2025-03-11 19:31:55

- reply

Pendulum right?

2025-03-11 05:30:13

- reply

What it proves is that memory isolation exists, and it's a way to test the actual connection between you and your opponent.

2025-03-11 05:26:49

- reply

I've even formed a method to prove this exists. It's a game like battleship. I describe a shared moment where we were both present, and your response is either hit or miss.
1/2 credit if you only remember the voice, full credit if you also remember the face expression.

2025-03-06 04:04:37

- reply

ROFL 😂

2025-03-06 04:00:26

- reply

Funny. I graciously accept advice from people all the time who I would never offer advice to.

2025-03-06 03:57:25

- reply

He is like a keyboard on a writing desk.

2025-03-05 20:05:01

- reply

OK. I applied this theory and exposed like 4 or 5 different 'personalities'. I had a nice conversion with each of them for like an hour. Some were honest gentlemen, and he told me he was a cop, others were very trolly. My friend was in there too. The only one willing to look outside and see the sunlight was my friend.

2025-03-05 16:10:04

- reply

If you understand sympathetic resonance and rhythm entrainment, ask yourself why a cats purr is so soothing.

2025-03-05 15:26:56

- reply

Is this like, a warrant canary?

2025-03-05 13:51:28

- reply

Hopefully it won't matter by the time it happens.

2025-03-05 13:22:01

- reply

OK. I will attempt to explain the underlying mechanism in a way that explains how easy this 'severance' is to repair in theory.
1. Understand sympathetic resonance
2. Understand rhythm entrainment
3. Use something like the provided video WITH HEADPHONES from whichever 'half' you are currently conscious of, to allow the other 'half' to become 'sympathetic' of your conscious self.
4. Rhythm entrainment will take effect just like the video provided between the two sections.
5. Continue this therapy until the two sections remain rhythm entrained naturally.
https://video.nostr.build/17480cb24e7852ff8a189c961ff8fe1b9148d48c193cdfeeab1c89cfa48ac584.webm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T58lGKREubo

2025-03-05 05:34:26

- reply

I was stopped by a game warden in South Louisiana recently with two ice chests of keys. I was leaving a bayou well known for its fishing.
The game warden asked me, 'Do you have a license for those keys?'
'Naw, ma fren, I ain't got none of dem, no. Dese here are my pet keys.'
'Pet keys?'
'Ya. Avery night I take dese here keys down to de bayou and let dem swim 'round for a while. Den I whistle and dey jump rat back inta dis here ice chest and I take dem home.'
'That's a bunch of hooey. Keys can't do that.'
The Cajun looked at the game warden for a moment and then said, 'It's de truth ma' fren. I'll show you. It really works.'
'Okay, I've GOT to see this.'I poured the keys into the bayou and stood and waited.
After several minutes, the game warden turned to me and said, 'Well?'
'Well, what?'
'When are you going to call them back?'
'Call who back?'
'The keys.'
'What keys?'

2025-03-05 05:26:33

- reply

Like my boating accident 😂

2025-03-05 04:53:35

- reply

Rising tides raise all ships.