Well, to this day the statement that you can perform logical computation on a qubit is entirely speculation and has yet to actually be demonstrated. Shor’s algo relies on this speculation to be true. Like I said, the psychological attack is merely convincing one that this is possible.
I’m saying that a quantum computer and its memory states function identically to a blockchain. Remove the money aspect. UTXOs have the same exact properties as a qubit. We are talking about the same thing; you are applying additional theory on top of a shared definition that we have.
The centralization in quantum computing is far from irrelevant. Observation is fundamental to quantum mechanics; a singular observer is a single point of truth and a reality defined and dictated by a singular authority. A centralized measurement god collapsing the wavefunction for everyone with no independent verification. Centralized measurement is the literal definition and predecessor of decoherence. As a bitcoiner, how can you just bat an eye at centralization only when it applies to an idea you are trying to defend. Quantum coherence and centralization do not mix at all.
Bitcoin does use specialize hardware: asics/miners and nodes to create a quantum system. It’s quantum and classical. Do you not recognize Bitcoin as both quantized time and energy? The physics are all there and I am working on finalizing the proof.
Bitcoin does not exploit qubits by dictating centralized computation upon the qubits; rather the users and owners of the individual qubits compute their own meaning and value. The nonce is the intersection of all infinite possibilities collapsing into a singular shared state of reality. Bitcoin is computing a shared, fair and equal reality; I’d argue this computation is far more important than anything your defined quantum computer can do. Show me a single UTXO subject to decoherence.
Bitcoin has been here for 16 years; maybe it’s your definition and expectation of a quantum computer that is wrong? If Bitcoin is a quantum computer, there is no second best, and it already computes the most important thing, what are we really discussing?
I didn’t even begin to probe at the idea that a singular centralized computer can remove the veil upon all uncertainty without the use and recognition of the energy. Funny how Bitcoin does tho.
Jackkluz / Jack K
npub183…faslh
2025-04-04 15:26:03
in reply to nevent1q…swys
Author Public Key
npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslhSeen on
wss://lnbits.papersats.io/nostrclient/api/v1/relaywss://a.nos.lolwss://primus.nostr1.comwss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2025-04-04 15:26:03Event JSON
{
"id": "0829c558d45a53471ad49afea073ad905135cf4139f9252f1ec22207e2cbb3b4",
"pubkey": "3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77",
"created_at": 1743780363,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"16e7b8c91a1f87b4968ce2cb0482b2e2690090ab24bda4896af2679f882dc8bc",
"ws://192.168.18.7:7777",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"78fb242e1aab21f4c5cec3c5855329d6ea1980a844430132020a052ecf92b2ce",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"26aac0b4915196aad4a71ee303439f332347fff166139099e25e92c5ef87d959",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Well, to this day the statement that you can perform logical computation on a qubit is entirely speculation and has yet to actually be demonstrated. Shor’s algo relies on this speculation to be true. Like I said, the psychological attack is merely convincing one that this is possible.\n\nI’m saying that a quantum computer and its memory states function identically to a blockchain. Remove the money aspect. UTXOs have the same exact properties as a qubit. We are talking about the same thing; you are applying additional theory on top of a shared definition that we have.\n\nThe centralization in quantum computing is far from irrelevant. Observation is fundamental to quantum mechanics; a singular observer is a single point of truth and a reality defined and dictated by a singular authority. A centralized measurement god collapsing the wavefunction for everyone with no independent verification. Centralized measurement is the literal definition and predecessor of decoherence. As a bitcoiner, how can you just bat an eye at centralization only when it applies to an idea you are trying to defend. Quantum coherence and centralization do not mix at all.\n\nBitcoin does use specialize hardware: asics/miners and nodes to create a quantum system. It’s quantum and classical. Do you not recognize Bitcoin as both quantized time and energy? The physics are all there and I am working on finalizing the proof.\n\nBitcoin does not exploit qubits by dictating centralized computation upon the qubits; rather the users and owners of the individual qubits compute their own meaning and value. The nonce is the intersection of all infinite possibilities collapsing into a singular shared state of reality. Bitcoin is computing a shared, fair and equal reality; I’d argue this computation is far more important than anything your defined quantum computer can do. Show me a single UTXO subject to decoherence.\n\nBitcoin has been here for 16 years; maybe it’s your definition and expectation of a quantum computer that is wrong? If Bitcoin is a quantum computer, there is no second best, and it already computes the most important thing, what are we really discussing?\n\nI didn’t even begin to probe at the idea that a singular centralized computer can remove the veil upon all uncertainty without the use and recognition of the energy. Funny how Bitcoin does tho.",
"sig": "be593b8329c421d1a7a83f8546adb1236293aabd3a707c7039a25d1b0f57ca3925d6de828efd8b231f843ddc86868c0a865ae07fe82f88c077cc4ba4983c1ac2"
}