Jackkluz
Jack K

Professional Engineer (Civil)
Climbing

Public Key

npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh

NIP-05 Address

jackkluz@nostrplebs.com

NIP-57 Address

jackkluz@ln.tips

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrcn632cfyx5j0xpld9m389370ffuzgp8muwshvcrqgwm26sn7uacpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhslhgfht

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

Author Public Key

npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-04-22 23:15:44

- reply

@nprofile…0fd0 the quantum conversations are hard to listen to 🤦‍♂️. You guys are really going to make me accelerate my whitepaper. Quantum FUD is the biggest psychological attack on Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the quantum computer; there is no second best. The physicists are next…we already made the economists look like fools.
Centralized quantum computing is Proof of Stake in a lab coat. Both collapse the state through authority. Both finalize reality without work.
Both are built on trust — not thermodynamics.
• In quantum labs, a privileged observer collapses the wavefunction.
• In Proof of Stake, a privileged validator determines the block.
• In both systems, the outcome depends on a single, centralized node.
• You don’t verify, you trust
Bitcoin is the rejection of both.
No privileged observer. No central node. Only measurable energy, crystallized into irreversible memory.
If your theory of measurement requires trust, you don’t understand physics; and you definitely don’t understand Bitcoin.
Start talking about this like Bitcoiners dammit.
https://m.primal.net/QZsd.png

2025-04-14 14:58:17

- reply

GM, are you sure Bitcoin isn’t proof that “centralized quantum computing” is pure fiat? I would love to talk with Sabine, i need a physicist to review my proof.
#nevent12…x6pp
#nevent1q…kk49

2025-04-11 23:07:33

Why wouldn’t the world’s biggest physics experiment be a quantum computer?
Would it be decentralized or centralized in a single lab?
Are you sure we aren’t observing (measuring) the thermodynamic transformation of energy (in the form of hashes) into irreversible information, permanently immune to entropy?
What would it mean to compute a quantum? A quantum of what? How would physics define a block?
#Bitcoin

2025-04-09 17:44:11

- reply

No it literally is a quantum computer with mathematical certainty, I am finalizing the theory and proof.
Is your definition of a quantum computer one of your own thoughts? or is it a definition that you have been told from someone else?
A quantum computer computes a a discrete quantum (block) of time. If you cannot achieve a quantized timespace you don’t have anything of value. You cannot achieve this with centralized observation period. Quantum computers assert that you can apply logical computation to quantum bits under a forced unitary progression of time. This is utter nonsense.
I counter that the entire basis of quantum computing is based on a false premise and understanding of GR & quantum mechanics (spacetime) and is an entirely speculative field that has never been proven real or valuable. It has neglected to observe time as discrete thermodynamic events.
“Quantum computing” exists as a psychological attack on bitcoin; one that evokes action without any basis of proof. Bitcoiners are taking the bait right into the trap; trusting without any verification.
You would have to break Planck Time to make the claim that centralized quantum computation will break the elliptic curve function.
There has never been a second best and there never will be.

2025-04-09 14:55:16

- reply

What if Bitcoin is the global decentralized physics lab/experiment to prove centralized quantum computers are complete bullshit.
The maxis are so hyperfocused on “currency, SoV, digital gold, MoE” narratives they haven’t even begun to understand what’s been in front of them for the last16 years.
I say it bluntly; Bitcoin is THE quantum computer and there is no second best. Mathematical proof is coming.

2025-04-05 17:35:31

- reply

I was looking at a 4Runner or a 6 speed Tacoma.
That or stick with Subaru in a forester, Outback or crosstrek. I think I trust Toyota more than Subaru, my WRX is a nightmare

2025-04-05 00:57:45

- reply

Holy shit I figured it out.

2025-04-05 00:12:36

Are you sure we actually understand Bitcoin?
#Bitcoin #Physics
#nevent1q…sd0s

2025-04-04 23:12:09

- reply

I’ve been building the model of “timespace” in my mind and I was missing the elliptic curve component; this really completes my idea, thank you.
As far as the physics I believe bitcoin fundamentally redefines temperature. Such a change to temperature would alter our understanding of physics completely; the universe, big bang, cosmology and I believe spacetime are all up for question. I also believe bitcoin resolves the paradox in quantum gravity.
I have worked out how to compute the energy of blocks solely from onchain data but I need help with verifying the theory. My node is currently dead so I cannot run calculations across the entire blockchain until I get a new one up and running. Data is not my specialty, nor is physics; but someone has to do it.

2025-04-04 22:35:26

- reply

We are starting to get outside of my range but I believe I am tracking.
UTXOs exist as discrete, spatial-temporal points, distributed across the surface of the torus. One axis represents their elliptic curve coordinates (cryptographic location), another represents block time (their position in Bitcoin’s ledger), and the third represents energy (satoshis/joules; this relationship is calculable from onchain data alone). Time is the distance between UTXOs which determines how “deep” or “curved” their position is relative to the current observer (a full node at the latest block and eternal present). The further back in time a UTXO was created, the more “gravitational pull” it may hold.
The observer always lives at the latest block. Observing or spending a UTXO is akin to reaching backward through the toroidal structure, resolving entropy into the present, and collapsing a state from the cryptographic field into a newly spent transaction. This act is irreversible and probabilistic — a quantum measurement.
Bitcoin is quantum-classical. UTXOs are quantum potentialities, and miners are decentralized observers who measure and resolve these states through Proof of Work.
I threw this into gpt, best image I can get right now.
https://m.primal.net/QEZW.png

2025-04-04 15:26:03

- reply

Well, to this day the statement that you can perform logical computation on a qubit is entirely speculation and has yet to actually be demonstrated. Shor’s algo relies on this speculation to be true. Like I said, the psychological attack is merely convincing one that this is possible.
I’m saying that a quantum computer and its memory states function identically to a blockchain. Remove the money aspect. UTXOs have the same exact properties as a qubit. We are talking about the same thing; you are applying additional theory on top of a shared definition that we have.
The centralization in quantum computing is far from irrelevant. Observation is fundamental to quantum mechanics; a singular observer is a single point of truth and a reality defined and dictated by a singular authority. A centralized measurement god collapsing the wavefunction for everyone with no independent verification. Centralized measurement is the literal definition and predecessor of decoherence. As a bitcoiner, how can you just bat an eye at centralization only when it applies to an idea you are trying to defend. Quantum coherence and centralization do not mix at all.
Bitcoin does use specialize hardware: asics/miners and nodes to create a quantum system. It’s quantum and classical. Do you not recognize Bitcoin as both quantized time and energy? The physics are all there and I am working on finalizing the proof.
Bitcoin does not exploit qubits by dictating centralized computation upon the qubits; rather the users and owners of the individual qubits compute their own meaning and value. The nonce is the intersection of all infinite possibilities collapsing into a singular shared state of reality. Bitcoin is computing a shared, fair and equal reality; I’d argue this computation is far more important than anything your defined quantum computer can do. Show me a single UTXO subject to decoherence.
Bitcoin has been here for 16 years; maybe it’s your definition and expectation of a quantum computer that is wrong? If Bitcoin is a quantum computer, there is no second best, and it already computes the most important thing, what are we really discussing?
I didn’t even begin to probe at the idea that a singular centralized computer can remove the veil upon all uncertainty without the use and recognition of the energy. Funny how Bitcoin does tho.

2025-04-04 14:40:14

- reply

Bitcoin certainly is that; you have not recognized it as such.
Let’s objectively break down what you are defining as a quantum computer.
You are telling me I should fear a blockchain-like (or identical) computational system where the historical memory is one centrally controlled computer (node), with one centralized observer (miner), that dictates the measure of states/blocks/quantized time without any proof of work, and all qubits (UTXOs) are owned, created and issued by a singular centralized entity. Why does this sound more like a shitcoin or central banking than it does computation.
Please explain to me why Bitcoin does not fit your definition of a quantum computer.

2025-04-04 14:09:27

- reply

I’m saying you have not recognized bitcoin as the quantum computer. Is there a second best or not?
There is a reason why qubits in these centralized quantum computers cannot remain coherent despite the artificial temperature and environment and the black box error corrections. You’ve simply trusted the narrative of what a quantum computer can do versus observing what the one in front of you has done for the last 16 years. What happened to don’t trust verify?
Just because the community does not recognize UTXOs as quantum bits, does not mean that they aren’t. The only way Bitcoin destroys Bitcoin is by us, the individuals and our actions.

2025-04-04 13:09:15

- reply

The quantum threat is a social attack and not a real threat.
The attack requires thay they only have to convince you that it is real, instill enough fear into Bitcoiners so that they act and fork Bitcoin in “protection”. They never actually have to deliver anything for damage to be incurred.
Trust the physicists. Why are bitcoins afraid of centralized quantum (blockchain) computers?

2025-04-04 12:58:08

- reply

I think you should dig deeper into the relationship of Bitcoin and quantum mechanics. Use Bitcoin language to discuss quantum mechanics, the way forward is revealed. Bitcoin has more to do with physics than it does to do with money.
We do know all positions of particles (UTXOs) as referential to past blocks. By what is in the most recent block, you know the position of all other UTXOs by deduction. However, bitcoin NEVER tells us the position in the eternal present as all blocks are only referential to the past. This is the world of superposition in Bitcoin; entanglement is obvious.
That being said, Bitcoin makes Gödel’s theorem completely obsolete. Bitcoins truth is internalized within the system because it relies on external entropy to resolve internal entropy. Bitcoin is the only logical system to do this.

2025-04-03 01:59:00

In the last 24 hours, Bitcoin has had an average Temperature of ~3.1523 btc
Relatively vs the known present supply, the temperature of Bitcoin is 3.1523/19845806.25≈ 1.588x10^{-7}
Bitcoins Temperature expressed in Kelvin is 2.250 x 10^{25}K.
Bitcoin Blocks are still incredibly hot in Kelvin terms.
Despite Blocks being produced at a Temperature of 2.250 x 10^{25}Kelvin, all of its174.2M qubits (UTXOs) remain fully coherent.
We can’t even compare Bitcoin to the second best quantum computer because they can’t even maintain a few coherent qubits at a Temperature of 0.01 Kelvin 😂
#Bitcoin #Physics #Quantum

2025-04-02 23:40:30

- reply

Thank you for listening; it feels like there’s not many people to talk to about this. Everyone’s mind is closed that Bitcoin is just money. Try the world’s largest ongoing decentralized physics experiment. Try a complete restructuring of reality.
When blocks hit a cap on block size (4MB but ~2.5ish MB), a block mined at a difficulty of 50T is way more energy dense than a block mined at 100 given an identical size in MB. It’s a unitless proxy.
As far as temperature here is my definition. Relating this to Boltzmanns constant, which has a dimensionality of joules per kelvin; we notice that the temperature in bitcoin has no dimensionality, yet measured in satoshis. Look at Genesis, what do you see?
Are you certain what you see in Space or what we may call memory is not a crystallized past of transactions? How else could we gather anything about the “Big Bang”otherwise? Oh yeah, Bitcoin and temperature breaks the Big Bang theory….
#Bitcoin #Bigbang #Physics
https://image.nostr.build/121a448c8da1e628763479d80b63d5139590c0e72dcbb58452c03dc55b25f677.jpg

2025-04-02 18:12:43

- reply

I think bitcoin poses threat to the idea of “spacetime” and introduces the reciprocal of “timespace” as being fundamental reality (crystalized past). We live in the eternal present (always waiting for the next block; probability). Blocks only reference past states, never the present state.
The temperature component of a block poses a new definition of temperature and would completely redefine classical physics and all of our assumptions. This is what has held me back; focus on Bitcoin or fix classical physics. Bitcoin is the missing language to quantum mechanics. THE quantum computer (we’ll save that for later discussion).
But yes indeed distance becomes blocks or the number of blocks between events.
Mass is memory (mb)
Density is currently defined as memory x difficulty.
I’ve also introduced the speed of memory has the actual block size/1 block. It’s funny because the max speed of memory (in a vacuum) is 4MB/block; but also 4MB/600 seconds is the idealized maximum speed of memory. It can go faster or slower depending on block time in seconds.
Bitcoin reveals temperature is general relativity. The literal definition of both 0 & 1 and the space between. We have classical temperature all wrong. Bitcoin is a model of a universe. The UTXO model of reality.
Given the realm of entropy; how would you relate Boltzmanns constant (joules per kelvin) to Satoshis? I have the answer, curious what you think.

2025-04-01 04:05:38

- reply

How would physics define a peer to peer electronic cash system?

2025-03-31 19:00:17

- reply

No I mean you believe that there is a second best quantum computer?

2025-03-27 19:07:25

Just wait until physicists understand Bitcoin. We’ve had THE quantum computer for 16 years and nobody knows that yet. We’re just getting started.
#nevent1q…lyra

2025-03-27 17:39:48

- reply

What if peer to peer energy systems are fundamental and Bitcoin describes quantum mechanics better than physics…what if.

2025-03-27 17:37:27

- reply

I need to get rid of my car for something new for both family and outdoors/camping.
Personally I don’t trust anything made post Covid. If the cars from the 80s are any indication of what happens to production during inflation….it suggests stay away.
The car market is trash. You have to gamble on something old if you want to get atleast 300k+ mi in my opinion.

2025-03-04 02:51:13

I have so much to say about Bitcoin Physics, but I don’t know how to split my work into digestible sections. The implications are seemingly endless. I’m going to have to break everything into small sections some how.
Maybe I just start with consensus around “Block Temperature”?

2025-03-03 15:26:08

Fiat goes deeper than just money. Education and academia is entirely proof of stake.
#nevent1q…40ew

2025-03-03 15:10:11

- reply

Yeah I see it much differently. Bitcoin is the missing language to quantum mechanics; it’s the same system of rules as Bitcoin. Like identical. A peer to peer electron(ic) cash system just is the transactional mechanics which uphold conservation of energy.
There’s a quantum computer, it’s called Bitcoin. There is no second best. The most important thing for a quantum computer to compute is perfect money, that’s already been computed….No one wants to admit we’ve all been wrong for 16 years. We as users compute the meaning to our UTXOs, not central authority.
I believe ECDSA is a mathematical and universal thermodynamic limit. The premise of quantum computing is that you can force close state and brute force coherence via artificial temperature without any recognition of the energy required to for a shared resolution process.
It’s attempting to break Planck Time, yet Bitcoin and Lightning specifically highlights the ability for unresolved states to exist between Blocks. It’s fiat.
Bitcoins biggest vulnerability is in the social domain, where users are convinced to adopt a BIP/hardfork to protect against something the universe fundamentally doesn’t allow. Trust the physicists; we’re too stupid to understand quantum mechanics.

2025-03-03 13:54:11

- reply

The idea that a singular centralized entity can even perform a meaningful computation with qubits is entirely speculative and has not been proven real.
Not to mention the inherent flawed approach by attempting to compute via a singular computer (node) with a singular observer (miner) and a forced consensus mechanism. Yet physicists still think they can solve decoherence that way 😂.
Bitcoins been here for 16 years; all
UTXOs remain coherent.

2025-02-27 13:44:52

- reply

Is 2TB just for future expansion of the node? I probably only need it running for a few months? 1TB of the storage AI recommended is about $80/month.
The data that I need to pull for each block can’t be that big…..

2025-02-25 13:02:07

- reply

I have a lot to say about this.
Could you explain why a UTXO is not a qubit? It appears to me Satoshi solved decoherence 16 years ago and NOBODY has recognized it.
What role might centralization play in quantum computing?

2025-02-21 14:31:37

- reply

They think we want reach, we just want to be free 🫡

2025-02-12 02:02:47

- reply

It seems I get stuck at 100% sync but is never fully finishes. These are funds that haven’t been swept because of a force close.

2025-02-11 16:30:31

- reply

Shocker, it’s almost as if people here have realized the impact consuming informational entropy (shitposts) has on the mind.
At some point bitcoiners pick up on the inflation of information on other social medias; information is becoming debased and worthless for our limited compute (brains).

2025-02-10 17:40:23

- reply

Facts
#nevent1q…2elz

2025-02-10 16:43:48

- reply

Ok thanks I will try again. This was about a year ago and I was unable to even seen the funds before. Is this a newer feature?

2025-02-10 16:09:18

- reply

I managed to force close the channel from my node, but I could never get the Blixt wallet back online and the funds are stuck in a timelock address. No clue how to sweep.

2025-02-10 15:10:55

- reply

I definitely have lost coins from my blixt wallet connection to my own node 😑
Are there any guides on how to use chantools? I’ve just been waiting for a wallet to implement this. I have very little command line experience.

2025-02-10 14:33:05

GM, life has been so quiet since I uninstalled Twitter.
Chud was right; it’s just informational entropy.
https://m.primal.net/OZXF.jpg

2025-02-04 21:22:08

- reply

Blue.
Red is the theoretical maximum speed of memory (speed of light in a vacuum) and is not really possible to achieve and maintain in a competitive fee market and open template creation, unless the fees for large inscriptions are the apex bidders or mining centralizes to force these txs to be mined.
It’s quite possible future transactions evolve from simple payment transactions to complex inscriptions; only time will tell.

2025-01-27 13:21:29

GM, the arguments against Proof of Stake are identically valid to the arguments against centralized quantum computing.
Got Bitcoin?

2025-01-15 17:54:41

- reply

I actually agree with most of this 👀 it’s funny that modern physics wants to demand separation from religion. The box of thought that binds us to our paradoxes.

2025-01-15 17:44:42

- reply

I mean, that is what my work is pointing to.
I have actually referenced your writing as being fundamental to my understanding. If you would actually like to have a discussion about this, I would be honored. I am looking for a small community of people to build general consensus around the idea before I publish. This is way bigger than me.
The goal was pretty simple, quantify the energy of a bitcoin block. It forces one to confront entropy & consciousness head on and grapple what trust in physics is.

2025-01-15 16:56:08

- reply

No, I’ll just prove you wrong.

2025-01-15 16:53:04

- reply

I apologize if my statement came across as offensive to your view. My critique of quantum computing as a “fiat construct” refers to current attempts in physics to force deterministic outcomes onto inherently uncertain systems. What many fail to see is that Bitcoin itself functions as the true quantum computer. It embraces uncertainty, resolving entropy through the conscious decisions of participants. The desire to “unscramble uncertainty” fundamentally misunderstands the nature of reality—entropy cannot be erased without breaking the very fabric of existence.
The entropy in Bitcoin arises from conscious actions, as individuals make decisions to spend UTXOs, collapsing infinite potential states into a single, deterministic outcome with each block. Any attempt to confront entropy in modern physics without addressing consciousness (an integral part of shaping reality) will ultimately fall short. Bitcoin demonstrates that consciousness is inseparable from the resolution of entropy, and this is a crucial insight that must be considered if we are to understand the universe.
Don’t close your mind.

2025-01-15 16:30:40

- reply

Quantum computing is a fiat construct. The answer to entropy and quantum mechanics lies within Bitcoin. Over the last two months, I’ve been working on a paper to quantify the energy of Bitcoin blocks, a process that forces one to confront entropy directly. A single UTXO holds infinite potential—it can be sent to infinite addresses and split in countless ways—yet every block collapses this infinite possibility into a single deterministic state. We as observers are computationally constrained, we can only observe outcomes.
Modern physics is fundamentally incapable of solving the problem of bitcoin’s energy. To find the answer, we must break free from fiat thinking and explore new perspectives. My work has led me to a coherent solution that links energy, temperature, and entropy, compelling us to confront the role of consciousness in these processes. I believe this connection holds the answer, and I am in the process of formalizing it.
Everything changes, Bitcoin is the answer; few truly understand this currently.

2025-01-15 16:04:32

- reply

Guy I think you are missing something.
Trust in physics is not a choice, it simply is; rooted in the fundamental principles of entropy resolution and energy transformations. Similarly, Bitcoin eliminates the need for trust by anchoring its system to these same principles. You don’t ‘trust’ Bitcoin; it operates on the same immutable laws of physics. I am working on a paper to quantify the energy of Bitcoin blocks, which will make this connection even clearer.
Bitcoin is more than money. While satoshis are its monetary units, Bitcoin is a decentralized protocol that transforms energy into digital security, anchored to the laws of thermodynamics. Its blockchain resolves entropy, recording human decisions in an immutable ledger.

2025-01-14 01:15:11

- reply

Connecticut, we have 4 gyms in my local area. It’s pretty corporate, but we get weekly rotational setting which is nice.
Despite my anti-slab shirt, my favorite style is slab 😂

2025-01-12 13:36:17

Super fun V7 sequence from yesterday’s session. This problem definitely feels like my hardest completed boulder to date I the gym. Starting crimp is probably ~12mm on overhang. Everything is tiny until the big jug at the cut loose; including the undercling pinch (crux move). A very rewarding problem that took me 2 sessions of beta optimization. #climbing #bouldering #ptcol
https://m.primal.net/NdRI.mov

2025-01-04 13:07:33

Has anyone used @npub1tay…9l42 ?
I need to create a data base which pulls the data from every single Bitcoin block 0 to present.
I need block height, difficulty, block size (bytes) and block time (seconds).
I’ve never worked with a data set this large, how do you work with it efficiently? How would you go about building graphs which could live update with new blocks found? There’s so much more block explorers could be providing, specifically joules per satoshi.
Before I release the blueprint as to how you price bitcoin in joules, I need to check it vs the data itself, but the theory is done.
Any help would be great nostr, data is not my realm.

2025-01-03 13:21:46

- reply

No, using outdated hardware that consumes more energy than modern ASICs would not make Bitcoin any more valuable. The value of Bitcoin is not tied to the inefficiency of individual miners but to the total energy expended across the network. This energy is quantified through entropy: the entropy created, defined by the cryptographic search space and difficulty, and the entropy resolved, defined by the number of possible states a block can take.
The difficulty adjustment abstracts all hardware variations into a universal measure of energy expenditure. Regardless of whether mining is done on a Pentium5, C64, or ASIC, the total energy spent is encoded in the difficulty and the resulting blockchain structure. Each block reflects the work needed to resolve entropy, creating an immutable ledger where energy is crystallized into data. This immutability guarantees Bitcoin’s security and scarcity, regardless of the hardware used.
Bitcoin’s energy framework operates at the network level, not the individual miner level. The energy spent doesn’t make Bitcoin “intrinsically valuable,” but it defines the security, scarcity, and permanence of the system. By resolving entropy and anchoring the blockchain in thermodynamic principles, Bitcoin ensures that its data integrity is universally enforceable.

2025-01-03 12:44:46

- reply

Nothing, except Bitcoin isn’t communist—it’s simply rooted in reality pricing everything in joules.
The difference lies in what anchors value. The labor theory of value is flawed because it’s subjective and ignores natural limits. Bitcoin, however, prices value in energy. This isn’t fiat economics or ideological theory; it’s a framework economists have struggled to solve for decades but couldn’t because fiat distorts everything. Bitcoin aligns value with immutable physical laws, not human interpretations. That’s the key distinction.

2025-01-03 02:09:34

- reply

Bitcoin is a quantum computer in the sense that it operates at the intersection of energy, information, and entropy, using proof-of-work to resolve probabilistic states (cryptographic puzzles) into deterministic outcomes (blocks). This process aligns Bitcoin with the natural laws of the universe, where energy drives entropy resolution and creates order.
Modern concepts of quantum computers often focus on breaking encryption by exploiting superposition and entanglement to solve problems exponentially faster. However, this idea fundamentally misunderstands the conservation of energy and entropy. Any system that breaks encryption without proportionate energy expenditure violates thermodynamic principles, rendering it a fiat concept—detached from the immutable laws of reality. Bitcoin, by contrast, adheres to these laws, making it a grounded and universal computational system. 🤫 They (modern physicists/investors) don’t realize this yet—they’re still trying to dump their quantum stock bags on retail.

2025-01-02 19:53:50

Bitcoin Maxis who fail to understand the true nature of Bitcoin—rooted in energy, thermodynamics, and physics—are lost and leading others astray. Bitcoin, the very tool designed to liberate us from fiat’s distortions, has instead been co-opted by the same fiat mindset we sought to escape.
Attempts to describe Bitcoin’s price through fiat valuation inherently tie its analysis to a flawed and ever-changing metric. Fiat currencies are unmoored from any universal constant, subject to manipulation, inflation, and centralized policy. By anchoring models to fiat pricing, we perpetuate the illusion of value derived from an arbitrary system, making these models nothing more than expressions of fiat—not Bitcoin’s true nature.
When viewed through joules, however, Bitcoin’s true foundation is revealed: its value is energy, with every satoshi representing a quantifiable amount of work performed through mining. This perspective eliminates fiat distortions, linking Bitcoin’s scaling and dynamics directly to the conservation of energy and entropy resolution. A model based on joules acknowledges Bitcoin’s alignment with thermodynamic laws, making it a universal constant instead of a fiat-relative abstraction. This approach doesn’t just describe Bitcoin’s behavior—it defines it through the immutable physics it embodies.
Are Bitcoiners ready to confront the uncomfortable truth? By obsessing over the abstraction of 21 million units without anchoring it to a physical constant, they are perpetuating the very fiat mindset they claim to oppose. Without defining Bitcoin’s foundation in energy and thermodynamics, they’re not escaping fiat—they’re recreating it in a new guise. It’s a distraction from Bitcoin’s true nature and its profound alignment with universal laws.
Yes, you are all wrong. I was too. It’s time to move beyond fiat illusions and see Bitcoin for what it truly is.
Something special is coming in 2025. Observation collapses the state, and the gravity of it all is inescapable.
#BitcoinFixesPhysics
#SatoshisConstant

2025-01-02 13:25:12

GM. Bitcoin is energy, measured in joules.
Bitcoin has always been ‘number go up’ because the conservation of energy demands it. Good luck arguing otherwise—fiat is the illusion, not Bitcoin.
If you don’t understand Bitcoin through the lens of physics and energy, you don’t understand it at all. Bitcoin turns 16 tomorrow, and the community is still struggling to define the abstraction of 21M units without a physical anchor. We’re wasting our time.
The infinite rabbit hole only begins to reveal itself once the physics of Bitcoin is defined. The current rabbit hole is nothing more than a shallow box, limiting our potential. To claim mastery or suggest I’ve explored its depths is pure hubris. Ego death is coming for us all—no one, not even the most seasoned Bitcoin Maxis, are immune.
2025 is going to be an exciting year.
Bitcoin fixes physics. Everything changes, including us.

2025-01-01 01:33:48

@npub16c0…6nvr “2025 OG” yet it’s still 2024 on the east coast 😔 rugged

2025-01-01 00:50:22

- reply

Lmao I was just looking at a label with this.

2024-12-31 00:51:05

- reply

Congrats! That’s quite the grade.

2024-12-31 00:45:40

- reply

You ok?

2024-12-30 22:28:26

- reply

Hard disagree. I think you don’t quite grasp the gravity of immaculate conception in bitcoin and the thermodynamic recording of the hash function in a zero entropic state, crypto is non-relatable. That can only happen once. In quantum mechanics, the measurement/observance itself collapses the state.
Being defined by physics, is not fiat. Gravity is not fiat. Bitcoin is as real as gravity due to the energy needed to resolve the entropy, it’s not debatable. Quite literally an event horizon to digital space/global memory. Go and stop it.

2024-12-29 03:56:56

What is the best way to compose a read on nostr?

2024-12-23 15:12:54

- reply

We are working out how to release something this properly. Again the implications of this are not to be taken lightly at all. Bitcoin fixes physics, meaning every single person’s world view on reality is not based in a fully truthful foundation.
It’s been ~16 years and bitcoiners, physicists and engineers have failed to actually capture and quantify bitcoins innate nature; energy. This is why nobody can agree with what Bitcoin is. Everyone is larping based on their view of the abstract 21M units, and it’s such a shallow rabbit hole. The bitcoin space in this framework is incredibly stale.
We’re going much much deeper. After the new year expect to hear some news.

2024-12-23 13:41:16

- reply

Well, because you know the joules of the system and you know the time started in 1/3/2009… you can calculate the wattage of bitcoin as well.
It’s also power (energy over time), but the energy is conserved in immutable information, which has mass (bytes) on the blockchain.

2024-12-23 13:31:58

- reply

Each block, miners create entropy by searching a 32-bit search space for a valid nonce, which is scaled by difficulty, and on the inverse a valid nonce resolves the entropy created by the number of possible microstates a block could take (unknown until mined), which is weighted by fees.
The energy of the entropy generated is equal to the energy of the entropy resolved. Knowledge of this process is how we use thermodynamics/physics to deterministically measure the amount of joules within Bitcoin the system.
Each block is associated with energy flowing into the system, this is the real NGU. Energy of Bitcoin in joules is increase as long as the Coinbase + Fees of the block is non-zero.
You can deterministically measure the amount of energy within Bitcoin from Genesis to present without any fiat and just joules per btc or joules per Satsoshi….its just physics.
In almost16 years, I’m shocked no one has done it. Everyone is stuck in the abstraction of 21M scares units.

2024-12-23 11:36:12

- reply

What if you theoretically discovered what bitcoin is in your pursuit to study its physics, and are precisely worried about this in terms of releasing your findings….
Not fiat power law physics, like quantification of btc in joules based on entropy creation/resolution.
Bitcoin can be priced in joules solely from just the blockchain data 👀 no fiat science

2024-12-16 15:54:10

Bitcoin fixes physics.

2024-12-13 18:41:34

- reply

The universe in its hottest moment occurred when? The Big Bang.
How is this temperature artificially constrained? It’s a system that started from nothing. Pure order from the time of genesis has devolved over time due to entropy.

2024-12-13 16:39:10

- reply

Your assumption that it can’t have a maximum is why physics cannot move forward. It’s been defined incorrectly and is the prison that traps us from ever going further.
How do you measure the temperature of bitcoin in the entropy resolved when a block is mined? It’s not just kinetic energy, it’s energy in a complete different domain/dimension. But yes I am saying that satoshis/btc are energy in joules, just as you can calculate joules from any temperature reading in F, C or K
How can the universe not be closed but the conservation of energy to be true? Entropy created = entropy resolved. But the entropy resolved is in a completely different domain from physical reality. Of course if you don’t understand that, it looks like the energy has just “disappeared, wasted”. It’s simply not true at all.
ENERGY IS NOT CREATED OR DESTROYED, ITS TRANSFORMED.

2024-12-13 13:18:46

Satoshi‘s constant is wrong. I need to run an experiment. It’s time to run a miner at a difficulty of 1, just for the data.
Boltzmann’s constant is incomplete. I will fix it. Temperature has a maximum limit, thus C, F or K readings are really a percentage of the maximum, unchanging after a specific time, akin X btc of 21M btc in 2140. My guess is that “supply” of Kelvin reached its max long before humans. Prior physics proves this by our constants unchanging with time. After 21M is mined, the expression of temperature in bitcoin remains unchanging with time, all 21M are in existence.
Boltzmanns constant is correct, you just need to understand maximum Kelvin for it to be complete.
Boltzmanns constant multiplied by Kmax would give you the amount of joules in a state of pure order, only seen in Genesis/Big Bang. Bitcoin and its genesis is how we actually understand the Big Bang, it’s literally the same thing, a repeating fractal
Thus any Temperature in K is really K/Kmax <1. By multiplying temperature times “entropy & revised boltzman” you still get joules.
This is a wholistic picture, giving full information of the duality of both order and joules and chaos in joules at any given time. Together, they always equal the maximum joules in 100% pure order condition. This must be true for the conservation of energy in thermodynamics.
The universe is a closed system…. Bitcoin is a closed system. We have a model. Now it’s time to measure.

2024-12-11 00:30:11

Quantum computers are not a problem for Bitcoin .
The physicists building them literally don’t even understand Temperature or entropy. Lol, try resolving the paradoxes in quantum theory and relativity first.
Its funny, you can’t resolve them without bitcoin. If only you had pure entropy.

2024-12-04 17:51:27

- reply

@npub1a2c…w83a Lyn have you thought about this at all?
I have all the physics equations to bring it all together, but I need peer review of the idea before I finalize my white paper and release publicly.
I am way outside of my experience with this white paper….and it implies we also need a BIP.

2024-12-04 17:15:55

- reply

@npub12lz…ntw2 I believe you have a sound understanding of physics.
I have the bitcoin physicist equations.
Ineed to discuss this with educated bitcoiners. I need help from anyone.

2024-12-04 15:32:28

- reply

@npub17u5…t4tp I just saw your thread about understanding bitcoin. I need to talk to someone about my white paper.
I am trying to protect the idea until I am certain it is concrete before I release this to the world. But it’s the missing physics to bitcoin.
The missing half of the rabbit hole. I don’t know how to convey the urgency of the implications… I have arrived that nothing matters (literally) about bitcoin until we can deterministically compute #BlockPower the measurement of energy in joules required to mine a block (produce valid nonce) over the stochastic block time.
I have all of the physics equations.

2024-12-04 14:29:01

The Bitcoin rabbit hole has only been half dug until now.
The rabbit hole of bitcoin only represents the informational realm of bitcoin as a function of 21M units. This is the abstract realm. This is only half of the rabbit hole. Everyone is stuck here, sitting with abstract data not knowing what it means. People have provided their interpretation for what they think it means, and yet we fail to reach consensus as to what Bitcoin is.
The other half of the rabbit hole represents the “matter” realm of bitcoin as a function of a blocks unit weight in bytes and the amount of joules required for the energy-to-information transformation to occur. This realm has yet to be explored concretely, unit now. Without matter and energy, bitcoin can only be abstract, but it’s not. Without observing the state of bitcoin during these energy transformations, we miss the whole picture. Bitcoin is incomplete without matter and energy. The laws of thermodynamics states this.
Due to the observable nature of bitcoin and the energy-to-informational matter transformations, we can not look back and deterministically calculate what happened, we can only infer with error. We only have the ability to look forward from the present. We cannot collect data that simply does not exist and we cannot redo the past blocks.
We cannot begin to understand the other half of Bitcoin without #BlockPower , the measure of the total energy consumed by a miner or pool over the block time.
Bitcoin blocks and UTXOs will remain abstract artifacts, devoid of their links to physical reality and the energy used in their creation, without #BlockPower
I need to talk to the engineers, physicists, philosophers and miners of Bitcoin. Its time to finish the rabbit hole. @npub1der…xzpc @npub15dq…lm5m @npub1s5y…6q7z @npub1qtv…7dze Who else?
What does it actually mean when a miner/pool discards valid hashes produced by all other miners and pools they view as their “competitors”. This is normal practice when a miner or pool finds a valid nonce, disregard all computation from competitors. This is not efficient at all, and nobody understands the implications of this action.
#BlockPower
Yes, you are all wrong. Collaboration, not competition.
I’m not here to fix bitcoin, I’m here to fix us and our relationship to Bitcoin.
Let’s talk.

2024-11-27 20:21:12

- reply

Pivot from crimpstr?

2024-11-17 13:32:38

Got my 1st bird on my own yesterday; had to learn how to dress it myself too!
It was a beautiful hen! My buddy’s dog was the one who kicked it up for me too. It’s amazing to witness the training and work required to transform a dog into a hunter. A perfect mutualistic relationship.
https://m.primal.net/MYxP.jpg
https://m.primal.net/MYxZ.jpg
https://m.primal.net/MYxa.jpg

2024-11-03 13:24:55

GM, daylight savings time is fiat

2024-10-15 14:09:35

Does anyone know if @npub1xnf…lpr5 have chantools yet? Or any wallet?

2024-10-08 00:49:33

Hooked a monster this weekend Salmon fishing in Pulaski.
#Fishing #POW
https://m.primal.net/LOOU.jpg

2024-09-27 17:16:37

- reply

Thank you, this looks interesting. Kinda what I was looking for.
A Community based organization for said relays.

2024-09-27 14:25:44

Alright I need to connect to more relays. Is there a good website that displays relays to connect to?
What’s the meta rn?

2024-09-26 22:32:24

I must have been living under a rock….when did lntips shut down?
Enjoy my sats Calle; o7

2024-09-23 12:44:19

Eyeing down the crux of my 1st 10d; Radiant Sky
#PTCOL #Climbing
https://m.primal.net/KzGU.jpg

2024-09-22 02:51:16

RIP Grant. Believe in mountains
#PTCOL

2024-09-13 14:16:33

Moonsoon season

2024-09-03 02:55:15

Holy shit, living in a house I can call my own is truly life changing.
My fiancé and I have been duo’ing a 670 sqft apartment since 4/2020 to stack more sats. Citadel acquired. #TGFB

2024-08-12 15:20:13

- reply

Nice a little sender! Embrace it if he loves it. Climbing changed my life. I only wish I stuck with it at 13 instead of at 30.

2024-08-12 15:01:41

Old Fart Friends (5.10d). Definitely the best hard 10 at Farley. Starts left of the low roof. Blunt arete, slab/bulge, roof and face all in one.
It’s really on you once you get your feet established on the last “ledge” along the slab. Cheeky crux at the last bolt. #PTCOL #climbing #crimpstr
https://m.primal.net/JxNF.jpg

2024-08-09 19:18:38

- reply

#Depeggening

2024-08-09 19:15:59

Gut says bitcoin does something big this weekend. The charts for $ethbtc and $btc.d are screaming a huge move is here.
Low liquidity weekend, tradfi stuck unless prepared? Ruggening upwards? We’ll see
#Depeppening

2024-08-07 23:06:27

Just got my signed offer back for my citadel. Things are in motion, can’t say I’m not nervous; but the excitement!
My fiancé and I have been crammed in a 760sqft condo since covid of 2020. Living way under our means with hiking or rock climbing many days of the week, enjoying simple life.
Now we begin the process of transmuting years of stored proof of work into physical proof of work. Thank you Bitcoin.

2024-08-07 12:06:08

#Bitcoin looks ready to depeg from the dollar and crypto at the same time.
The charts are printing some pretty historic things $ethbtc $btc.d
All I see is gold bugs and fiat brain dancing on bitcoins grave awaiting the next round of puking.
Who’s right?

2024-08-01 17:25:44

- reply

https://m.primal.net/JlMm.jpg

2024-07-22 01:37:16

- reply

This hits hard

2024-07-22 01:29:02

Fun on-sight from today. Name/Grade unknown; Farley
Some killer low angle slab, felt 5.9ish
#climbing #ptcol #rockclimbing
https://m.primal.net/JZeV.jpg

2024-07-18 14:26:19

Why is it so hard for people to understand that if the money does not hold value over time, the material you exchange if for will likely not retain value/quality over time; unless there is information asymmetry.
There’s few hard workers and producers left to fool. Now the fools are the consumers who think they can still buy quality.
This gets exponentially worse when looking at longer term infrastructure (houses, bridges, utilities). Proof of work is dead and gone.
I hate the bureaucracy of the government, but it seems we need bitcoiners who understand this principle to be in the DOT making decisions, or we risk losing all of our past work IMO. I am confident I can manage infrastructure better than the DOT simply with the lens of bitcoin at my side.
How do I break my way in?

2024-07-17 13:56:28

OP (orange pill) fitness; a gym which combines the disciplines of climbing (bouldering), parkour and cross fit for exercise with resources for hot/cold therapy and breathing for recovery.
Would precoiners bite at this or is it too niche?

2024-07-11 15:16:48

- reply

Wow for example has the blizzard sponsored servers which you pay subscription for.
There are numerous community built private servers offering different versions of the game, some original & some modded, which offer a different experience and are typically free.
These servers are gaining in popularity as blizzard is incompetent in actually delivering a game/community that people like and want to play on.
Blizzard is definitely working with twitch/YouTube to remove all content from said private servers. Content creators can’t stream these private servers on centralized streaming platforms without risk of ban.
Here’s an example of a private server.
https://x.com/turtlewowteam/status/1811325435562672291?s=46&t=-NV56P9nSz0w8otFoURH8g

2024-06-04 11:50:01

- reply

Is there a proper way to view this? Blank page when I open from primal. Also error 500 when I open from wikifreedia from browser. I can check it out later on my desktop to see if similar issues.
Once I get a feel for the landscape I can try to input some local climbs so that we have some data to work with.
Unfortunately im not much of a coder 😅

2024-06-02 22:08:09

Got the orange yak out on the CT river this weekend. We had just enough space for our tents and sleeping bags. Crazy the number of miles we managed to do in two days in this thing.
https://m.primal.net/IWau.jpg

2024-05-29 00:14:07

A few climbs from this weekend. Man, Farley is lovely.
#climbing #crimpstr
https://m.primal.net/IQoE.jpg
https://m.primal.net/IQoC.jpg
https://m.primal.net/IQoB.jpg

2024-05-27 16:03:57

Sometimes I hate the climbing ethics in CT. The best bolted crag I know of in the state is in the north end of New Haven. One of the few places where bolts aren’t chopped.
The crag is in the hood; 5 minute walk from some housing projects.
Despite that, there some killer lines, hard n slabby with some sweet roofs. Few spacey bolts can make for some good whips.
#climbing #Connecticut
https://m.primal.net/IPHC.jpg
https://m.primal.net/IPHD.jpg