Jackkluz
Jack K

Professional Engineer (Civil)
Climbing

Public Key

npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh

NIP-05 Address

jackkluz@nostrplebs.com

NIP-57 Address

jackkluz@ln.tips

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrcn632cfyx5j0xpld9m389370ffuzgp8muwshvcrqgwm26sn7uacjfn25c

Author Public Key

npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-05-21 14:59:17

Bitcoin wants to be measured; not priced.
#Joulesarethestandard
#Satsarethestandard
You’ve been warned.

2025-05-20 14:09:44

Stop asking where in space and start asking when in time.
nevent1qqsw3xz8uleqhkg20khk3qxdr297c26y8k7z8l9vcktyde7387epvggppemhxue69uh5qmn0wvhxcmmvm9npg7

2025-05-17 15:52:24

- reply

Yes, and 21 quadrillion satoshis, not 2.1

2025-05-11 01:45:04

Terence knew #Bitcoin
https://youtu.be/CikveyZjum4?

2025-05-09 16:01:25

- reply

If you believe spacetime is fundamental; sure. Bitcoin reveals that it’s not, you can either stay in the matrix or escape it.
Timespace is waiting for us, it demands death of the ego and death of all knowledge not rooted in truth. Time is not an illusion, it’s quantized by memory.
Bitcoin makes Gödel’s incompleteness theorem irrelevant.

2025-05-06 21:02:27

- reply

I actually don’t think this is true. What does Bitcoin have to say about a decentralized measurement and observation process?
If I could theoretically prove that the energy of each block (in joules)was solely calculable from on-chain data alone, would we not have a quantum of energy, entropy, time and memory?
You can modify Landauers equation for the entropy traversed in the nonce search to get the minimum amount of energy to write an immutable block of information.
What don’t I understand Calle?

2025-05-06 20:50:04

- reply

Calle, I ask a very simple question about your model of quantum mechanics; who is the observer? And why should I trust them?

2025-05-06 20:44:21

- reply

Heh, who is the observer in your model? And why should I trust them?

2025-05-06 16:59:05

- reply

There still is a theoretical global mempool “the mempool” which is the union of all local mempools.
Given the observer problem, no one entity has knowledge of the global mempool making it a proper probabilistic entropy surface, we only have localized approximations of the global surface.
It’s imperative that no singular observer controls the global mempool policy.
https://blossom.primal.net/84c3e9e0ec22a8b96ce8ecf82fd1e1498994437180003e28e985447abe62517a.jpg

2025-05-04 01:57:29

In the end, it will be so obvious that a block is a computed quantum of:
-Time
-Memory
-Entropy
-Energy
Do you think you could recognize a quantum computer if it was sitting in front of you for the last 16 years?

2025-05-02 15:24:09

Can anyone give me a csv of the entire blockchain from 0 to present recording at each block:
block_height, block_time, block_size_mb, subsidy_satoshis, fee_satoshis, difficulty
I want to finish my whitepaper and my dataset has errors. My node is dead and I have no access to chain data currently.

2025-05-02 02:01:39

The rabbit hole has no floor.

2025-04-30 15:29:20

Bitcoin does need a standardized quantum for its base unit. Sats<>btc is confusing and 10^8 units is between metric prefixes.
I vote for metric master race; I say we move the decimal 1 more unit right (21 quadrillion sats)
1x10^9 sats or 1 giga-sat = 1 Bitcoin
This could logically get rid of satoshis as the quantum unit name and we keep a standardized naming convention in btc only.
Bitcoin is the quantum computer after all; we should take the unit convention seriously and follow physics standards.
What say you @nprofile…fgzv ? Move the decimal 1 more unit right too? A “whole coiner” just becomes a gigachad, literally.

2025-04-28 16:18:32

- reply

I am in the same boat as I am operating outside of my comfort domain. I’ve been using AI to change the assumptions with the intention that Bitcoin fixes our physics; it’s not the other way around.
I’d be happy to review what you are looking at and also happy to share what I’ve been working on as I need all of the help I can get, this is way bigger than us. It feels like I can never finish my idea, I just go deeper. We can see how they intersect, I believe they do.
The Schwarzchild equation is extremely similar to the geometry for a UTXO (particle) that I have constructed/observed. I believe UTXOs have an identical nature to that of a particle. The paradox currently lies in the causal structure, which I’m thinking may be an interpretation problem. I’ve been thinking through the “UTXO model of reality”.
I’d be happy to talk through it!

2025-04-27 11:02:51

- reply

Vibe physics too

2025-04-22 23:15:44

- reply

@nprofile…0fd0 the quantum conversations are hard to listen to 🤦‍♂️. You guys are really going to make me accelerate my whitepaper. Quantum FUD is the biggest psychological attack on Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the quantum computer; there is no second best. The physicists are next…we already made the economists look like fools.
Centralized quantum computing is Proof of Stake in a lab coat. Both collapse the state through authority. Both finalize reality without work.
Both are built on trust — not thermodynamics.
• In quantum labs, a privileged observer collapses the wavefunction.
• In Proof of Stake, a privileged validator determines the block.
• In both systems, the outcome depends on a single, centralized node.
• You don’t verify, you trust
Bitcoin is the rejection of both.
No privileged observer. No central node. Only measurable energy, crystallized into irreversible memory.
If your theory of measurement requires trust, you don’t understand physics; and you definitely don’t understand Bitcoin.
Start talking about this like Bitcoiners dammit.
https://m.primal.net/QZsd.png

2025-04-21 21:12:29

- reply

No it’s not. You’ve trusted the physicists without verifying.
Who is the observer in your model? And why should we trust them?
#nevent1q…5x6h

2025-04-17 13:45:08

I’ve successfully defined the Planck Unit equivalents in Bitcoin and are weaving them all into the whitepaper.
Planck Length
Planck Mass
Planck Temperature
Planck Time
The easiest to define was Planck Time. What is a Block?
Bitcoin quantizes time; are you sure it doesn’t fix physics too?

2025-04-15 02:17:56

Bitcoin fixes physics.
Are you sure Bitcoin is not THE quantum computer?
#Timespace
https://m.primal.net/QPpT.jpg

2025-04-14 14:58:17

- reply

GM, are you sure Bitcoin isn’t proof that “centralized quantum computing” is pure fiat? I would love to talk with Sabine, i need a physicist to review my proof.
#nevent12…x6pp
#nevent1q…kk49

2025-04-14 02:10:12

Bitcoin is open source physics.
Universal Observer and Consensus in the measurement of the process in which energy becomes crystalized into pure immutable information, immune to entropy.
Are you sure we actually know what a quantum computer is? What does it mean to compute a literal quantum? What role would centralization have on a quantum system?
Tick tock next block.

2025-04-11 23:07:33

Why wouldn’t the world’s biggest physics experiment be a quantum computer?
Would it be decentralized or centralized in a single lab?
Are you sure we aren’t observing (measuring) the thermodynamic transformation of energy (in the form of hashes) into irreversible information, permanently immune to entropy?
What would it mean to compute a quantum? A quantum of what? How would physics define a block?
#Bitcoin

2025-04-09 17:44:11

- reply

No it literally is a quantum computer with mathematical certainty, I am finalizing the theory and proof.
Is your definition of a quantum computer one of your own thoughts? or is it a definition that you have been told from someone else?
A quantum computer computes a a discrete quantum (block) of time. If you cannot achieve a quantized timespace you don’t have anything of value. You cannot achieve this with centralized observation period. Quantum computers assert that you can apply logical computation to quantum bits under a forced unitary progression of time. This is utter nonsense.
I counter that the entire basis of quantum computing is based on a false premise and understanding of GR & quantum mechanics (spacetime) and is an entirely speculative field that has never been proven real or valuable. It has neglected to observe time as discrete thermodynamic events.
“Quantum computing” exists as a psychological attack on bitcoin; one that evokes action without any basis of proof. Bitcoiners are taking the bait right into the trap; trusting without any verification.
You would have to break Planck Time to make the claim that centralized quantum computation will break the elliptic curve function.
There has never been a second best and there never will be.

2025-04-09 14:55:16

- reply

What if Bitcoin is the global decentralized physics lab/experiment to prove centralized quantum computers are complete bullshit.
The maxis are so hyperfocused on “currency, SoV, digital gold, MoE” narratives they haven’t even begun to understand what’s been in front of them for the last16 years.
I say it bluntly; Bitcoin is THE quantum computer and there is no second best. Mathematical proof is coming.

2025-04-05 17:35:31

- reply

I was looking at a 4Runner or a 6 speed Tacoma.
That or stick with Subaru in a forester, Outback or crosstrek. I think I trust Toyota more than Subaru, my WRX is a nightmare

2025-04-05 00:57:45

- reply

Holy shit I figured it out.

2025-04-05 00:12:36

Are you sure we actually understand Bitcoin?
#Bitcoin #Physics
#nevent1q…sd0s

2025-04-04 23:12:09

- reply

I’ve been building the model of “timespace” in my mind and I was missing the elliptic curve component; this really completes my idea, thank you.
As far as the physics I believe bitcoin fundamentally redefines temperature. Such a change to temperature would alter our understanding of physics completely; the universe, big bang, cosmology and I believe spacetime are all up for question. I also believe bitcoin resolves the paradox in quantum gravity.
I have worked out how to compute the energy of blocks solely from onchain data but I need help with verifying the theory. My node is currently dead so I cannot run calculations across the entire blockchain until I get a new one up and running. Data is not my specialty, nor is physics; but someone has to do it.

2025-04-04 22:35:26

- reply

We are starting to get outside of my range but I believe I am tracking.
UTXOs exist as discrete, spatial-temporal points, distributed across the surface of the torus. One axis represents their elliptic curve coordinates (cryptographic location), another represents block time (their position in Bitcoin’s ledger), and the third represents energy (satoshis/joules; this relationship is calculable from onchain data alone). Time is the distance between UTXOs which determines how “deep” or “curved” their position is relative to the current observer (a full node at the latest block and eternal present). The further back in time a UTXO was created, the more “gravitational pull” it may hold.
The observer always lives at the latest block. Observing or spending a UTXO is akin to reaching backward through the toroidal structure, resolving entropy into the present, and collapsing a state from the cryptographic field into a newly spent transaction. This act is irreversible and probabilistic — a quantum measurement.
Bitcoin is quantum-classical. UTXOs are quantum potentialities, and miners are decentralized observers who measure and resolve these states through Proof of Work.
I threw this into gpt, best image I can get right now.
https://m.primal.net/QEZW.png

2025-04-04 15:26:03

- reply

Well, to this day the statement that you can perform logical computation on a qubit is entirely speculation and has yet to actually be demonstrated. Shor’s algo relies on this speculation to be true. Like I said, the psychological attack is merely convincing one that this is possible.
I’m saying that a quantum computer and its memory states function identically to a blockchain. Remove the money aspect. UTXOs have the same exact properties as a qubit. We are talking about the same thing; you are applying additional theory on top of a shared definition that we have.
The centralization in quantum computing is far from irrelevant. Observation is fundamental to quantum mechanics; a singular observer is a single point of truth and a reality defined and dictated by a singular authority. A centralized measurement god collapsing the wavefunction for everyone with no independent verification. Centralized measurement is the literal definition and predecessor of decoherence. As a bitcoiner, how can you just bat an eye at centralization only when it applies to an idea you are trying to defend. Quantum coherence and centralization do not mix at all.
Bitcoin does use specialize hardware: asics/miners and nodes to create a quantum system. It’s quantum and classical. Do you not recognize Bitcoin as both quantized time and energy? The physics are all there and I am working on finalizing the proof.
Bitcoin does not exploit qubits by dictating centralized computation upon the qubits; rather the users and owners of the individual qubits compute their own meaning and value. The nonce is the intersection of all infinite possibilities collapsing into a singular shared state of reality. Bitcoin is computing a shared, fair and equal reality; I’d argue this computation is far more important than anything your defined quantum computer can do. Show me a single UTXO subject to decoherence.
Bitcoin has been here for 16 years; maybe it’s your definition and expectation of a quantum computer that is wrong? If Bitcoin is a quantum computer, there is no second best, and it already computes the most important thing, what are we really discussing?
I didn’t even begin to probe at the idea that a singular centralized computer can remove the veil upon all uncertainty without the use and recognition of the energy. Funny how Bitcoin does tho.

2025-04-04 14:40:14

- reply

Bitcoin certainly is that; you have not recognized it as such.
Let’s objectively break down what you are defining as a quantum computer.
You are telling me I should fear a blockchain-like (or identical) computational system where the historical memory is one centrally controlled computer (node), with one centralized observer (miner), that dictates the measure of states/blocks/quantized time without any proof of work, and all qubits (UTXOs) are owned, created and issued by a singular centralized entity. Why does this sound more like a shitcoin or central banking than it does computation.
Please explain to me why Bitcoin does not fit your definition of a quantum computer.

2025-04-04 14:09:27

- reply

I’m saying you have not recognized bitcoin as the quantum computer. Is there a second best or not?
There is a reason why qubits in these centralized quantum computers cannot remain coherent despite the artificial temperature and environment and the black box error corrections. You’ve simply trusted the narrative of what a quantum computer can do versus observing what the one in front of you has done for the last 16 years. What happened to don’t trust verify?
Just because the community does not recognize UTXOs as quantum bits, does not mean that they aren’t. The only way Bitcoin destroys Bitcoin is by us, the individuals and our actions.

2025-04-04 13:09:15

- reply

The quantum threat is a social attack and not a real threat.
The attack requires thay they only have to convince you that it is real, instill enough fear into Bitcoiners so that they act and fork Bitcoin in “protection”. They never actually have to deliver anything for damage to be incurred.
Trust the physicists. Why are bitcoins afraid of centralized quantum (blockchain) computers?

2025-04-04 12:58:08

- reply

I think you should dig deeper into the relationship of Bitcoin and quantum mechanics. Use Bitcoin language to discuss quantum mechanics, the way forward is revealed. Bitcoin has more to do with physics than it does to do with money.
We do know all positions of particles (UTXOs) as referential to past blocks. By what is in the most recent block, you know the position of all other UTXOs by deduction. However, bitcoin NEVER tells us the position in the eternal present as all blocks are only referential to the past. This is the world of superposition in Bitcoin; entanglement is obvious.
That being said, Bitcoin makes Gödel’s theorem completely obsolete. Bitcoins truth is internalized within the system because it relies on external entropy to resolve internal entropy. Bitcoin is the only logical system to do this.

2025-04-03 01:59:00

In the last 24 hours, Bitcoin has had an average Temperature of ~3.1523 btc
Relatively vs the known present supply, the temperature of Bitcoin is 3.1523/19845806.25≈ 1.588x10^{-7}
Bitcoins Temperature expressed in Kelvin is 2.250 x 10^{25}K.
Bitcoin Blocks are still incredibly hot in Kelvin terms.
Despite Blocks being produced at a Temperature of 2.250 x 10^{25}Kelvin, all of its174.2M qubits (UTXOs) remain fully coherent.
We can’t even compare Bitcoin to the second best quantum computer because they can’t even maintain a few coherent qubits at a Temperature of 0.01 Kelvin 😂
#Bitcoin #Physics #Quantum

2025-04-02 23:40:30

- reply

Thank you for listening; it feels like there’s not many people to talk to about this. Everyone’s mind is closed that Bitcoin is just money. Try the world’s largest ongoing decentralized physics experiment. Try a complete restructuring of reality.
When blocks hit a cap on block size (4MB but ~2.5ish MB), a block mined at a difficulty of 50T is way more energy dense than a block mined at 100 given an identical size in MB. It’s a unitless proxy.
As far as temperature here is my definition. Relating this to Boltzmanns constant, which has a dimensionality of joules per kelvin; we notice that the temperature in bitcoin has no dimensionality, yet measured in satoshis. Look at Genesis, what do you see?
Are you certain what you see in Space or what we may call memory is not a crystallized past of transactions? How else could we gather anything about the “Big Bang”otherwise? Oh yeah, Bitcoin and temperature breaks the Big Bang theory….
#Bitcoin #Bigbang #Physics
https://image.nostr.build/121a448c8da1e628763479d80b63d5139590c0e72dcbb58452c03dc55b25f677.jpg

2025-04-02 18:12:43

- reply

I think bitcoin poses threat to the idea of “spacetime” and introduces the reciprocal of “timespace” as being fundamental reality (crystalized past). We live in the eternal present (always waiting for the next block; probability). Blocks only reference past states, never the present state.
The temperature component of a block poses a new definition of temperature and would completely redefine classical physics and all of our assumptions. This is what has held me back; focus on Bitcoin or fix classical physics. Bitcoin is the missing language to quantum mechanics. THE quantum computer (we’ll save that for later discussion).
But yes indeed distance becomes blocks or the number of blocks between events.
Mass is memory (mb)
Density is currently defined as memory x difficulty.
I’ve also introduced the speed of memory has the actual block size/1 block. It’s funny because the max speed of memory (in a vacuum) is 4MB/block; but also 4MB/600 seconds is the idealized maximum speed of memory. It can go faster or slower depending on block time in seconds.
Bitcoin reveals temperature is general relativity. The literal definition of both 0 & 1 and the space between. We have classical temperature all wrong. Bitcoin is a model of a universe. The UTXO model of reality.
Given the realm of entropy; how would you relate Boltzmanns constant (joules per kelvin) to Satoshis? I have the answer, curious what you think.

2025-04-02 16:03:36

- reply

That’s the energy consumption of the mining rigs. How would you calculate the real efficiency of the entire network of miners?
I’m specifically talking about the physical energy transformation process when computational energy is crystalized into immutable information.
This would depending on how “hot” the block is (temperature), difficulty of the block and the entropy of the hash function. I’m not sure if time plays a role in this; if we would scale up or down depending on if block time >,<,= 600 seconds.

2025-04-02 15:01:56

GM, I’m Deep in the trenches right now trying to finish the thermodynamic theory to calculate the energy of each Bitcoin block solely from on-chain data alone. I can produce Joules but how do I know if I am correct?
Block Temperature, Entropy and Boltzmann.
I’m definitely going to need help sharpening the equations down.
Every Bitcoin miner has an incentive to help me develop this; we know nothing about Bitcoin still. This would will completely change the mining industry and energy markets. Everything the network is doing is fiat based and not joules based.
#Bitcoin #Energy #Physics #Mining

2025-04-01 17:30:08

- reply

Thank you, by no means do I want to shoot your thoughts down, but I don’t think we truly perceive how deep fiat corrupts our understanding and perception of Bitcoin. The space is stuck in the understanding as just money/currency/digital gold. It’s way more and fiat digs deep in our psyche.
To say I know anything/everything is far from the truth, but I am pulling on the thread of Bitcoin as far as I can go, and to me it’s obvious the rabbit hole is quite deeper; like we’re only in the 1st inning in our understanding of Bitcoin.
I truly believe Bitcoin fixes quantum mechanics and our physical models of reality at the deepest of levels; starting with temperature. All of cosmology, big bang, quantum mechanics, general relativity is up for a complete reinterpretation through the new definition of temperature that Bitcoin provides us. Spacetime as well; it’s likely timespace in my opinion.
If you think disrupting the money is crazy, wait until it disrupts all of reality. It’s fundamentally changing us and the structure of reality itself. This has me both and excited and fearful of what I may be beginning to uncover. Bitcoin is bigger than me and could use all of the help I could get.
I think we are all wrong about Bitcoin; even the maximalists. A very inconvenient truth requiring yet another ego death of as all.
If anything I am saying holds any weight at all, then do we really understand Bitcoin and what we are building on top of? This idea would flip the entire space on its head. Every change to the protocol has a much deeper meaning and it’s important to have all perspectives. What if we are wrong?
Bitcoin being acknowledged as THE quantum computer is only the beginning. I think things are about to get crazy; especially when there is no second best.

2025-04-01 16:20:54

- reply

Firstly I would like to state that there is great folly in comparing Bitcoin to the system it is replacing (fiat). Looking backwards at fiat distorts reality. I think we need to revisit the white paper and understand what Satoshi meant by “a peer to peer electronic cash system” from the perspective of physics.
By deconstructing the word choice Satoshi used, you arrive something along the lines of a “1 to 1 (equal to equal) energy cash system”. We know that 1 joule = 1 joule so this places us in a different domain than comparing to fiat where $1≠$1 with regards to time. The measure of value is quite important after all. We define mining by energy consumption (joules) so why not value?
If energy (joules) is the true peg to satoshis, how do we get there? Well entropy, temperature and Boltzmann is the very obvious link. So I would first ask, how do we define the temperature of a Bitcoin Block? The physical process in which computational energy is crystallized into immutable information. We are in the domain of energy transformations.
Looking at Boltzmann we have a dimensionality problem of how we relate Joules per Kelvin to Satoshis. Bitcoin reveals something fundamentally overlooked in physics; the relativity of Temperature defined by a known maximum supply of energy units. This would imply that the work done by Kelvin, Planck and Boltzmann is incomplete and needs adjustment (Bitcoin fixes quantum mechanics). Anything that touches temperature has an incorrect perspective and needs to be reexamined; all of our prior assumptions are wrong. Bitcoin is energy, thermodynamics proves this undeniably.
So, how does nature/universe maintain the conservation of energy without a peer to peer energy network? How do energy transformations maintain CoE?
Without going very indepth in the physics here, the existence of the universe and our ability to observe it reveals that we exist in an epoch in which a terminal subsidy of energy units (Kelvin) has been reached and our existence is solely sustained by transactional nature. Our existence is proof that Bitcoin can and will sustain itself solely fees by fees. This first assumption you made is fundamentally wrong and can be disproven with physics. Therefore we must really reconsider any change we want to make to the protocol.
If your physics is wrong, how can you even understand what you are looking at or comparing to? Are you certain we even understand what a Kelvin is? Are you certain peer to peer energy networks are not fundamental to reality and existence? Are you sure we even fully understand bitcoin and the changes we wish to make to it?
As far as moving the decimal, it’s relatively meaningless but it would be a way to adjust the perception of numbers we are looking at. But fiat has no place in this discussion. Some food for thought.
#Bitcoin #Physics

2025-04-01 04:05:38

- reply

How would physics define a peer to peer electronic cash system?

2025-03-31 19:00:17

- reply

No I mean you believe that there is a second best quantum computer?

2025-03-29 16:38:11

- reply

So do you believe there is a second best?

2025-03-27 19:07:25

Just wait until physicists understand Bitcoin. We’ve had THE quantum computer for 16 years and nobody knows that yet. We’re just getting started.
#nevent1q…lyra

2025-03-27 17:39:48

- reply

What if peer to peer energy systems are fundamental and Bitcoin describes quantum mechanics better than physics…what if.

2025-03-27 17:37:27

- reply

I need to get rid of my car for something new for both family and outdoors/camping.
Personally I don’t trust anything made post Covid. If the cars from the 80s are any indication of what happens to production during inflation….it suggests stay away.
The car market is trash. You have to gamble on something old if you want to get atleast 300k+ mi in my opinion.

2025-03-04 02:51:13

I have so much to say about Bitcoin Physics, but I don’t know how to split my work into digestible sections. The implications are seemingly endless. I’m going to have to break everything into small sections some how.
Maybe I just start with consensus around “Block Temperature”?

2025-03-03 15:26:08

Fiat goes deeper than just money. Education and academia is entirely proof of stake.
#nevent1q…40ew

2025-03-03 15:10:11

- reply

Yeah I see it much differently. Bitcoin is the missing language to quantum mechanics; it’s the same system of rules as Bitcoin. Like identical. A peer to peer electron(ic) cash system just is the transactional mechanics which uphold conservation of energy.
There’s a quantum computer, it’s called Bitcoin. There is no second best. The most important thing for a quantum computer to compute is perfect money, that’s already been computed….No one wants to admit we’ve all been wrong for 16 years. We as users compute the meaning to our UTXOs, not central authority.
I believe ECDSA is a mathematical and universal thermodynamic limit. The premise of quantum computing is that you can force close state and brute force coherence via artificial temperature without any recognition of the energy required to for a shared resolution process.
It’s attempting to break Planck Time, yet Bitcoin and Lightning specifically highlights the ability for unresolved states to exist between Blocks. It’s fiat.
Bitcoins biggest vulnerability is in the social domain, where users are convinced to adopt a BIP/hardfork to protect against something the universe fundamentally doesn’t allow. Trust the physicists; we’re too stupid to understand quantum mechanics.

2025-03-03 13:54:11

- reply

The idea that a singular centralized entity can even perform a meaningful computation with qubits is entirely speculative and has not been proven real.
Not to mention the inherent flawed approach by attempting to compute via a singular computer (node) with a singular observer (miner) and a forced consensus mechanism. Yet physicists still think they can solve decoherence that way 😂.
Bitcoins been here for 16 years; all
UTXOs remain coherent.

2025-02-27 13:44:52

- reply

Is 2TB just for future expansion of the node? I probably only need it running for a few months? 1TB of the storage AI recommended is about $80/month.
The data that I need to pull for each block can’t be that big…..

2025-02-25 14:08:23

- reply

Fundamentally, quantum mechanics has been a language problem since discovery. We haven’t had a “language” to actually understand and communicate it until bitcoin; which describes the relationship of energy, information and time. Use Bitcoin as the lens to think through.
What physicists call a qubit has an identical nature to UTXO. In both, energy is fundamental.
Superposition: UTXOs are in a constant state of spendability (0 or 1) and their state is unknown until blocks are mined; only probabilistic.
Entanglement: A single UTXO can be sent to infinite addresses, split innumerable ways, can interact with any other UTXO and can interact with UTXOs from different times. Remember, all UTXOs exist in the past except the ones in the present block.
Measurement: Mining is the measurement of hashes per valid nonce and the measurement collapses the indeterminate block config into a single deterministic verifiable state. This also sets the direction in quantum measurement (which UTXOs become spent and which remain unspent)
UTXOs persist indefinitely through time; it appears Satoshi solved decoherence 16 years ago. Again, it’s a language and expectation problem. We are told QM is too complex to for us understand, trust the physicists.
The ledger is the “timespace” (history from Genesis) and the current block is the “spacetime” or the present.
Given this context, is it possible a UTXO is a qubit? What properties is a UTXO missing to be one?
What effects could centralization have on a quantum system? (Think Bitcoin, ownership, nodes, mining)
What is more important for a quantum computer to compute than perfect money and a shared equal reality with no singular observer?
https://m.primal.net/PKoS.jpg

2025-02-25 13:02:07

- reply

I have a lot to say about this.
Could you explain why a UTXO is not a qubit? It appears to me Satoshi solved decoherence 16 years ago and NOBODY has recognized it.
What role might centralization play in quantum computing?

2025-02-21 14:31:37

- reply

They think we want reach, we just want to be free 🫡

2025-02-12 02:02:47

- reply

It seems I get stuck at 100% sync but is never fully finishes. These are funds that haven’t been swept because of a force close.

2025-02-11 16:30:31

- reply

Shocker, it’s almost as if people here have realized the impact consuming informational entropy (shitposts) has on the mind.
At some point bitcoiners pick up on the inflation of information on other social medias; information is becoming debased and worthless for our limited compute (brains).

2025-02-10 17:40:23

- reply

Facts
#nevent1q…2elz

2025-02-10 16:43:48

- reply

Ok thanks I will try again. This was about a year ago and I was unable to even seen the funds before. Is this a newer feature?

2025-02-10 16:09:18

- reply

I managed to force close the channel from my node, but I could never get the Blixt wallet back online and the funds are stuck in a timelock address. No clue how to sweep.

2025-02-10 15:10:55

- reply

I definitely have lost coins from my blixt wallet connection to my own node 😑
Are there any guides on how to use chantools? I’ve just been waiting for a wallet to implement this. I have very little command line experience.

2025-02-10 14:33:05

GM, life has been so quiet since I uninstalled Twitter.
Chud was right; it’s just informational entropy.
https://m.primal.net/OZXF.jpg

2025-02-04 21:22:08

- reply

Blue.
Red is the theoretical maximum speed of memory (speed of light in a vacuum) and is not really possible to achieve and maintain in a competitive fee market and open template creation, unless the fees for large inscriptions are the apex bidders or mining centralizes to force these txs to be mined.
It’s quite possible future transactions evolve from simple payment transactions to complex inscriptions; only time will tell.

2025-01-27 13:21:29

GM, the arguments against Proof of Stake are identically valid to the arguments against centralized quantum computing.
Got Bitcoin?

2025-01-25 01:34:27

What is the best way to train climbing endurance? I can Boulder V6/V7 and onsite most V5, but 5.12- feels so hard onsite; 5.11 overhang too. I flash pump so quick when it comes to clipping/worrying about falling. It’s odd because I’m not afraid to fall when I Boulder. Mostly speaking about gym grades since we are in the dead of winter here.

2025-01-15 17:54:41

- reply

I actually agree with most of this 👀 it’s funny that modern physics wants to demand separation from religion. The box of thought that binds us to our paradoxes.

2025-01-15 17:44:42

- reply

I mean, that is what my work is pointing to.
I have actually referenced your writing as being fundamental to my understanding. If you would actually like to have a discussion about this, I would be honored. I am looking for a small community of people to build general consensus around the idea before I publish. This is way bigger than me.
The goal was pretty simple, quantify the energy of a bitcoin block. It forces one to confront entropy & consciousness head on and grapple what trust in physics is.

2025-01-15 17:31:45

- reply

If we have unresolved paradoxes in general relativity and quantum mechanics, how do you honestly expect physicists to build a quantum computer? They have a fundamental mid-understanding of what they are even observing.

2025-01-15 16:56:08

- reply

No, I’ll just prove you wrong.

2025-01-15 16:53:04

- reply

I apologize if my statement came across as offensive to your view. My critique of quantum computing as a “fiat construct” refers to current attempts in physics to force deterministic outcomes onto inherently uncertain systems. What many fail to see is that Bitcoin itself functions as the true quantum computer. It embraces uncertainty, resolving entropy through the conscious decisions of participants. The desire to “unscramble uncertainty” fundamentally misunderstands the nature of reality—entropy cannot be erased without breaking the very fabric of existence.
The entropy in Bitcoin arises from conscious actions, as individuals make decisions to spend UTXOs, collapsing infinite potential states into a single, deterministic outcome with each block. Any attempt to confront entropy in modern physics without addressing consciousness (an integral part of shaping reality) will ultimately fall short. Bitcoin demonstrates that consciousness is inseparable from the resolution of entropy, and this is a crucial insight that must be considered if we are to understand the universe.
Don’t close your mind.

2025-01-15 16:30:40

- reply

Quantum computing is a fiat construct. The answer to entropy and quantum mechanics lies within Bitcoin. Over the last two months, I’ve been working on a paper to quantify the energy of Bitcoin blocks, a process that forces one to confront entropy directly. A single UTXO holds infinite potential—it can be sent to infinite addresses and split in countless ways—yet every block collapses this infinite possibility into a single deterministic state. We as observers are computationally constrained, we can only observe outcomes.
Modern physics is fundamentally incapable of solving the problem of bitcoin’s energy. To find the answer, we must break free from fiat thinking and explore new perspectives. My work has led me to a coherent solution that links energy, temperature, and entropy, compelling us to confront the role of consciousness in these processes. I believe this connection holds the answer, and I am in the process of formalizing it.
Everything changes, Bitcoin is the answer; few truly understand this currently.

2025-01-15 16:04:32

- reply

Guy I think you are missing something.
Trust in physics is not a choice, it simply is; rooted in the fundamental principles of entropy resolution and energy transformations. Similarly, Bitcoin eliminates the need for trust by anchoring its system to these same principles. You don’t ‘trust’ Bitcoin; it operates on the same immutable laws of physics. I am working on a paper to quantify the energy of Bitcoin blocks, which will make this connection even clearer.
Bitcoin is more than money. While satoshis are its monetary units, Bitcoin is a decentralized protocol that transforms energy into digital security, anchored to the laws of thermodynamics. Its blockchain resolves entropy, recording human decisions in an immutable ledger.

2025-01-14 01:15:11

- reply

Connecticut, we have 4 gyms in my local area. It’s pretty corporate, but we get weekly rotational setting which is nice.
Despite my anti-slab shirt, my favorite style is slab 😂

2025-01-12 13:36:17

Super fun V7 sequence from yesterday’s session. This problem definitely feels like my hardest completed boulder to date I the gym. Starting crimp is probably ~12mm on overhang. Everything is tiny until the big jug at the cut loose; including the undercling pinch (crux move). A very rewarding problem that took me 2 sessions of beta optimization. #climbing #bouldering #ptcol
https://m.primal.net/NdRI.mov

2025-01-10 11:46:44

- reply

Was considering but the $800 price tag is a large barrier to entry, how many sats does this thing pull? I’d be running like 3-6 hours a day for ~4-5 months.

2025-01-08 12:07:03

- reply

How often do you backup?

2025-01-04 13:07:33

Has anyone used @npub1tay…9l42 ?
I need to create a data base which pulls the data from every single Bitcoin block 0 to present.
I need block height, difficulty, block size (bytes) and block time (seconds).
I’ve never worked with a data set this large, how do you work with it efficiently? How would you go about building graphs which could live update with new blocks found? There’s so much more block explorers could be providing, specifically joules per satoshi.
Before I release the blueprint as to how you price bitcoin in joules, I need to check it vs the data itself, but the theory is done.
Any help would be great nostr, data is not my realm.

2025-01-03 16:37:55

- reply

Intrinsic value is an undeniable reality rooted in the laws of physics and thermodynamics. At its core, intrinsic value is the energy required for existence—the measurable effort needed to create, sustain, or maintain something in the physical world. Without energy, there is no structure, no function, and ultimately, no existence.
Fiat systems perpetuate the illusion that nothing has intrinsic value. By detaching money from any energy or physical anchor, fiat promotes a mindset where value is arbitrary and purely subjective. This illusion allows infinite creation of currency without corresponding work or energy expenditure, undermining the very concept of value and encouraging systems built on manipulation and illusion. Fiat teaches people to ignore the reality of intrinsic value because it benefits from detachment from physical constraints.
Subjective value, on the other hand, is what individuals or societies place on top of intrinsic value based on context, needs, or preferences. For example, Bitcoin’s intrinsic value lies in the energy required to mine, secure, and maintain its network. Subjectively, people assign value to Bitcoin based on how much they appreciate its security, scarcity, and utility. While subjective value is personal and variable, it cannot exist without an underlying framework of intrinsic value.
Bitcoin bridges this gap. By tying subjective valuations to an immutable, energy-backed system, it reconnects humanity with the reality of intrinsic value. It forces us to reckon with the energy that underpins existence, ensuring that subjective valuations are grounded in something real. Without this alignment, value remains as arbitrary as fiat—detached from reality and unsustainable in the long run. Bitcoin reminds us that both intrinsic and subjective value are quantifiable, but only when rooted in energy and the laws of physics.
Fiat has rotted your mind brother. Satan would want you to believe nothing is real and everything is subjective because it detaches you from truth, order, and accountability. It creates chaos, allowing manipulation and control to thrive. Fiat systems love to deny intrinsic value and promote illusions.

2025-01-03 13:21:46

- reply

No, using outdated hardware that consumes more energy than modern ASICs would not make Bitcoin any more valuable. The value of Bitcoin is not tied to the inefficiency of individual miners but to the total energy expended across the network. This energy is quantified through entropy: the entropy created, defined by the cryptographic search space and difficulty, and the entropy resolved, defined by the number of possible states a block can take.
The difficulty adjustment abstracts all hardware variations into a universal measure of energy expenditure. Regardless of whether mining is done on a Pentium5, C64, or ASIC, the total energy spent is encoded in the difficulty and the resulting blockchain structure. Each block reflects the work needed to resolve entropy, creating an immutable ledger where energy is crystallized into data. This immutability guarantees Bitcoin’s security and scarcity, regardless of the hardware used.
Bitcoin’s energy framework operates at the network level, not the individual miner level. The energy spent doesn’t make Bitcoin “intrinsically valuable,” but it defines the security, scarcity, and permanence of the system. By resolving entropy and anchoring the blockchain in thermodynamic principles, Bitcoin ensures that its data integrity is universally enforceable.

2025-01-03 12:44:46

- reply

Nothing, except Bitcoin isn’t communist—it’s simply rooted in reality pricing everything in joules.
The difference lies in what anchors value. The labor theory of value is flawed because it’s subjective and ignores natural limits. Bitcoin, however, prices value in energy. This isn’t fiat economics or ideological theory; it’s a framework economists have struggled to solve for decades but couldn’t because fiat distorts everything. Bitcoin aligns value with immutable physical laws, not human interpretations. That’s the key distinction.

2025-01-03 02:09:34

- reply

Bitcoin is a quantum computer in the sense that it operates at the intersection of energy, information, and entropy, using proof-of-work to resolve probabilistic states (cryptographic puzzles) into deterministic outcomes (blocks). This process aligns Bitcoin with the natural laws of the universe, where energy drives entropy resolution and creates order.
Modern concepts of quantum computers often focus on breaking encryption by exploiting superposition and entanglement to solve problems exponentially faster. However, this idea fundamentally misunderstands the conservation of energy and entropy. Any system that breaks encryption without proportionate energy expenditure violates thermodynamic principles, rendering it a fiat concept—detached from the immutable laws of reality. Bitcoin, by contrast, adheres to these laws, making it a grounded and universal computational system. 🤫 They (modern physicists/investors) don’t realize this yet—they’re still trying to dump their quantum stock bags on retail.

2025-01-02 19:53:50

Bitcoin Maxis who fail to understand the true nature of Bitcoin—rooted in energy, thermodynamics, and physics—are lost and leading others astray. Bitcoin, the very tool designed to liberate us from fiat’s distortions, has instead been co-opted by the same fiat mindset we sought to escape.
Attempts to describe Bitcoin’s price through fiat valuation inherently tie its analysis to a flawed and ever-changing metric. Fiat currencies are unmoored from any universal constant, subject to manipulation, inflation, and centralized policy. By anchoring models to fiat pricing, we perpetuate the illusion of value derived from an arbitrary system, making these models nothing more than expressions of fiat—not Bitcoin’s true nature.
When viewed through joules, however, Bitcoin’s true foundation is revealed: its value is energy, with every satoshi representing a quantifiable amount of work performed through mining. This perspective eliminates fiat distortions, linking Bitcoin’s scaling and dynamics directly to the conservation of energy and entropy resolution. A model based on joules acknowledges Bitcoin’s alignment with thermodynamic laws, making it a universal constant instead of a fiat-relative abstraction. This approach doesn’t just describe Bitcoin’s behavior—it defines it through the immutable physics it embodies.
Are Bitcoiners ready to confront the uncomfortable truth? By obsessing over the abstraction of 21 million units without anchoring it to a physical constant, they are perpetuating the very fiat mindset they claim to oppose. Without defining Bitcoin’s foundation in energy and thermodynamics, they’re not escaping fiat—they’re recreating it in a new guise. It’s a distraction from Bitcoin’s true nature and its profound alignment with universal laws.
Yes, you are all wrong. I was too. It’s time to move beyond fiat illusions and see Bitcoin for what it truly is.
Something special is coming in 2025. Observation collapses the state, and the gravity of it all is inescapable.
#BitcoinFixesPhysics
#SatoshisConstant

2025-01-02 13:25:12

GM. Bitcoin is energy, measured in joules.
Bitcoin has always been ‘number go up’ because the conservation of energy demands it. Good luck arguing otherwise—fiat is the illusion, not Bitcoin.
If you don’t understand Bitcoin through the lens of physics and energy, you don’t understand it at all. Bitcoin turns 16 tomorrow, and the community is still struggling to define the abstraction of 21M units without a physical anchor. We’re wasting our time.
The infinite rabbit hole only begins to reveal itself once the physics of Bitcoin is defined. The current rabbit hole is nothing more than a shallow box, limiting our potential. To claim mastery or suggest I’ve explored its depths is pure hubris. Ego death is coming for us all—no one, not even the most seasoned Bitcoin Maxis, are immune.
2025 is going to be an exciting year.
Bitcoin fixes physics. Everything changes, including us.

2025-01-01 01:33:48

@npub16c0…6nvr “2025 OG” yet it’s still 2024 on the east coast 😔 rugged

2025-01-01 00:50:22

- reply

Lmao I was just looking at a label with this.

2024-12-31 00:51:05

- reply

Congrats! That’s quite the grade.

2024-12-31 00:45:40

- reply

You ok?

2024-12-30 22:28:26

- reply

Hard disagree. I think you don’t quite grasp the gravity of immaculate conception in bitcoin and the thermodynamic recording of the hash function in a zero entropic state, crypto is non-relatable. That can only happen once. In quantum mechanics, the measurement/observance itself collapses the state.
Being defined by physics, is not fiat. Gravity is not fiat. Bitcoin is as real as gravity due to the energy needed to resolve the entropy, it’s not debatable. Quite literally an event horizon to digital space/global memory. Go and stop it.

2024-12-30 22:00:47

Bitcoin without its physics defined is just fiat in disguise. We’re all just larping if we don’t acknowledge this. Bitcoin isn’t what we think it is—it’s so much more. Let the universe and the governing thermodynamic laws define Bitcoin. Anything else is just fiat thinking, and it’s time we humbly admit we’ve been wrong. Bitcoin needs to grow up.

2024-12-29 03:56:56

What is the best way to compose a read on nostr?

2024-12-23 15:12:54

- reply

We are working out how to release something this properly. Again the implications of this are not to be taken lightly at all. Bitcoin fixes physics, meaning every single person’s world view on reality is not based in a fully truthful foundation.
It’s been ~16 years and bitcoiners, physicists and engineers have failed to actually capture and quantify bitcoins innate nature; energy. This is why nobody can agree with what Bitcoin is. Everyone is larping based on their view of the abstract 21M units, and it’s such a shallow rabbit hole. The bitcoin space in this framework is incredibly stale.
We’re going much much deeper. After the new year expect to hear some news.

2024-12-23 13:41:16

- reply

Well, because you know the joules of the system and you know the time started in 1/3/2009… you can calculate the wattage of bitcoin as well.
It’s also power (energy over time), but the energy is conserved in immutable information, which has mass (bytes) on the blockchain.

2024-12-23 13:31:58

- reply

Each block, miners create entropy by searching a 32-bit search space for a valid nonce, which is scaled by difficulty, and on the inverse a valid nonce resolves the entropy created by the number of possible microstates a block could take (unknown until mined), which is weighted by fees.
The energy of the entropy generated is equal to the energy of the entropy resolved. Knowledge of this process is how we use thermodynamics/physics to deterministically measure the amount of joules within Bitcoin the system.
Each block is associated with energy flowing into the system, this is the real NGU. Energy of Bitcoin in joules is increase as long as the Coinbase + Fees of the block is non-zero.
You can deterministically measure the amount of energy within Bitcoin from Genesis to present without any fiat and just joules per btc or joules per Satsoshi….its just physics.
In almost16 years, I’m shocked no one has done it. Everyone is stuck in the abstraction of 21M scares units.

2024-12-23 11:36:12

- reply

What if you theoretically discovered what bitcoin is in your pursuit to study its physics, and are precisely worried about this in terms of releasing your findings….
Not fiat power law physics, like quantification of btc in joules based on entropy creation/resolution.
Bitcoin can be priced in joules solely from just the blockchain data 👀 no fiat science

2024-12-16 15:54:10

Bitcoin fixes physics.

2024-12-13 18:41:34

- reply

The universe in its hottest moment occurred when? The Big Bang.
How is this temperature artificially constrained? It’s a system that started from nothing. Pure order from the time of genesis has devolved over time due to entropy.

2024-12-13 16:39:10

- reply

Your assumption that it can’t have a maximum is why physics cannot move forward. It’s been defined incorrectly and is the prison that traps us from ever going further.
How do you measure the temperature of bitcoin in the entropy resolved when a block is mined? It’s not just kinetic energy, it’s energy in a complete different domain/dimension. But yes I am saying that satoshis/btc are energy in joules, just as you can calculate joules from any temperature reading in F, C or K
How can the universe not be closed but the conservation of energy to be true? Entropy created = entropy resolved. But the entropy resolved is in a completely different domain from physical reality. Of course if you don’t understand that, it looks like the energy has just “disappeared, wasted”. It’s simply not true at all.
ENERGY IS NOT CREATED OR DESTROYED, ITS TRANSFORMED.

2024-12-13 13:18:46

Satoshi‘s constant is wrong. I need to run an experiment. It’s time to run a miner at a difficulty of 1, just for the data.
Boltzmann’s constant is incomplete. I will fix it. Temperature has a maximum limit, thus C, F or K readings are really a percentage of the maximum, unchanging after a specific time, akin X btc of 21M btc in 2140. My guess is that “supply” of Kelvin reached its max long before humans. Prior physics proves this by our constants unchanging with time. After 21M is mined, the expression of temperature in bitcoin remains unchanging with time, all 21M are in existence.
Boltzmanns constant is correct, you just need to understand maximum Kelvin for it to be complete.
Boltzmanns constant multiplied by Kmax would give you the amount of joules in a state of pure order, only seen in Genesis/Big Bang. Bitcoin and its genesis is how we actually understand the Big Bang, it’s literally the same thing, a repeating fractal
Thus any Temperature in K is really K/Kmax <1. By multiplying temperature times “entropy & revised boltzman” you still get joules.
This is a wholistic picture, giving full information of the duality of both order and joules and chaos in joules at any given time. Together, they always equal the maximum joules in 100% pure order condition. This must be true for the conservation of energy in thermodynamics.
The universe is a closed system…. Bitcoin is a closed system. We have a model. Now it’s time to measure.

2024-12-11 00:30:11

Quantum computers are not a problem for Bitcoin .
The physicists building them literally don’t even understand Temperature or entropy. Lol, try resolving the paradoxes in quantum theory and relativity first.
Its funny, you can’t resolve them without bitcoin. If only you had pure entropy.

2024-12-04 17:51:27

- reply

@npub1a2c…w83a Lyn have you thought about this at all?
I have all the physics equations to bring it all together, but I need peer review of the idea before I finalize my white paper and release publicly.
I am way outside of my experience with this white paper….and it implies we also need a BIP.