tank
Tankred Hase

Founder Coach • #Bitcoin, Security, Cryptography

Public Key

npub1xyd5ja34s4nk0l6urnh69wx9ep6uuxz2ujrkm2f8n6pfhgqa6y5s2xn6n2

NIP-05 Address

tank@tankredhase.com

NIP-57 Address

nippyhen31@walletofsatoshi.com

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzx6fwc6c2em8lawpemazhrzusawwrp9wfpmd4yneaq5m5qwaz2gpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgewaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmp0v9yqpm

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.snort.social

Author Public Key

npub1xyd5ja34s4nk0l6urnh69wx9ep6uuxz2ujrkm2f8n6pfhgqa6y5s2xn6n2

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-02-08 11:31:26

- reply

Yeah. There are ways to run short background tasks now even on iOS. This is basically how Phoenix handles signing and releasing the preimage to receive in the background. The device just has to be online…

2025-01-29 19:32:23

- reply

Lol, yeah. I see liquid as my pocket money where I can side-step onchain fee spikes like we had during the halving. I’m not religious about any particular tech though and will use whatever has the best trade-offs and UX. If we can solve zaps with self-custody tech, that would be ideal obv.

2025-01-29 19:20:35

- reply

Yeah, async payments would require broad BOLT12 support if I understand correctly. Basically the sender LSP would hold the payment until the receiving device came online.

2025-01-27 13:17:32

- reply

Congrats! Nice and simple api. Lightning payments will happen via boltz swaps I presume? Will SDK users be able to configure the swap server?

2025-01-21 11:18:52

- reply

I wonder if that id unique to Uvita. Costa Rica seems expensive in general https://nomads.com/costa-rica

2025-01-14 21:37:17

- reply

So many people “should” all over themselves.

2025-01-09 10:46:01

It’s so important to be able to disagree respectfully i.e. distinguish between an idea (on which we can disagree) and a person holding an idea (which we can respect despite a disagreement).
Perhaps this could be a podcast format, where the moderator invites two people with opposing views and starts with the question of what each respects about the other person. After mutual respect has been established, the discussion is moved towards dissecting the opposing ideas.
Other ground rules could be to encourage nonviolent communication practices from Marshall Rosenberg’s book. In his book Rosenberg describes how he has defused decades long conflicts using these practices. I try (and often fail) at using his techniques in various relationships. Perhaps the moderator could call out mistakes and encourage each guest to reword something they’ve said to reestablish mutual respect.
At the end of the podcast the moderator could ask the two where they agree with the other person’s perspective and whether they have found a mistake in their own thinking. This gives an opportunity for growth and normalizes the practice of admitting mistakes.
This format would probably diffuse so many of the conflicts lingering in society and allow us to get closer to a truth based in first principles thinking.

2025-01-07 12:59:32

Love this discussion around building ethical for-profit services using non-custodial open source.
And great to see podcasts with bootstrapped founders 🔥 #note1jjh…yrup

2025-01-03 18:09:12

Happy Jan 3rd!
StashPay 0.1.7 is here for iOS & Android.
Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Update NPM dependencies
* Add: Switch RNG to a maintained module
* Add: Reduce min on-chain amount to 25k sats
* Add: Handle lightning: and bitcoin: URLs
* Fix: Remove button margin in seed backup

2025-01-03 10:19:51

Bullish on the UX becoming easier to get paid in bitcoin directly to your own wallet than buying and withdrawing.
Sure, we can accept payment in fiat and buy into a lobster trap. But that’s on each of us to change. #note1uwh…384f

2025-01-01 13:59:58

Privacy must happen on the protocol level. This is why BOLT12 is important. This is why ECash is important.
Any entity or service provider that becomes too big will become a pressure point. It doesn’t matter if it’s a major LSP, a large submarine swap server, a large custodian, or a large ECash mint.
Regulatory pressure will act as a decentralization function and ultimately reduce pressure points to a local/community level. It is here on the local level where privacy has a chance.
Services, protocols and products that plan ahead to give end users control to configure their own servers have a chance at staying resilient in the coming years.

2024-12-31 13:57:27

- reply

I lived in Madeira for a few months in 2023. Very beautiful island and amazing hiking. Beaches are better on other islands like the Canaries. But Portugal is better for bitcoiners.
Re homeschooling @npub1tdc…8r0y can probably hook you up.

2024-12-31 09:15:44

- reply

Ob es pro Einundzwanzig meetup bald einen Boltz server gibt, um das Bier zu finanzieren?

2024-12-26 11:53:31

https://youtu.be/njYciFC7mR8

2024-12-24 16:29:24

- reply

Advanced data protection doesn’t encrypt iCloud key-value-store only certain app data that use the new CloudKit apis: https://support.apple.com/en-al/102651
The BitKey whitepaper does point out that a government adversary can steal user funds in this case with access to iCloud/GDrive and a legal request to Block (disabling delay and notify).
FWIW I agree funds are safer likely from loss/theft for most users with Block and a trusted contact’s Apple/Google cloud storage (especially compared to the threat of getting a Coinbase account SIM swapped).
I’m just wondering how to describe the trust model with social recovery activated in plain english.

2024-12-24 08:28:33

- reply

I’ve recommended BitKey to a few friends and family. I’ve gotten surprisingly good questions about social recovery from a nontechnical friend:
“Who am I trusting here? Can my coins be seized by the government?”
I pointed to the whitepaper which names Google Drive, iCloud key-value-store and Block’s servers. But what’s a plain english version to explain the trust model in this case?

2024-12-21 16:24:24

Good read. I’d also recommend Luke Gromen’s analysis. He points out that a commodity based reserve asset would favor countries with a trade surplus.
https://youtu.be/Woqq2mchXjw #note1f2q…fd86

2024-12-18 11:50:38

- reply

Yeah, unfortunately the wallet is currently bound by Breez/Boltz SDK limits (1000 sats for Lightning and 50,000 sats for Onchain).
I currently don’t see a way to bridge these limits without some kind of custodial system like ecash. But that would open up a whole new can of worms for users to move sats between two balances. Doing this automatically under the hood would require trusting a preconfigured ecash mint (which one to chose?) and then moving sats between the mint and Liquid automatically while managing dust amounts in each :/
/cc @npub1jug…fc28 @npub1psm…8970

2024-12-17 10:06:38

StashPay 0.1.6 is here for iOS & Android.
Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Redesign home, send & receive screens
* Add: Set receive amount before displaying invoice QR code
* Add: Use Breez Liquid Electrum server for instant P2P payment notifications
* Add: „BTC“ or „LN“ to receive copy button
* Fix: text input alignment on Android

2024-12-13 17:15:23

https://image.nostr.build/35ddb945d3bde71872cce282adb060381c12609792e821cd2b4d6a23f3fe403c.jpg

2024-12-11 11:00:06

- reply

Yeah it‘s early days. I also assume that as sats are priced appropriately over the coming years that signal-to-noise goes up too.

2024-12-11 10:47:39

A strategy that Nostr users could use to prevent spam through zapvertising is to use a lightning address that only accepts zaps that above a certain threshold e.g. 100 sats.
Since StashPay only accepts lightning payments above 1000 sats (boltz swap minimum) this might actually be a selling point for StashPay lightning addresses (an upcoming feature).
Is this something nostr users would find useful? What zap limit would users prefer? 100 sats or 1000 sats? #note1lve…5423

2024-12-11 10:34:48

- reply

I‘ve been pondering this question as well. Where I end up is that in contrast to email marketing (which is free and infinitely scalable) zapvertising requires proof of work and brilliantly showcases the spam prevention concept from HashCash. So the marketer must target potential customers that are more likely to gain value from an ad to not waste money. Feels more like a win-win scenario to me than current marketing models.

2024-12-06 10:33:25

3rd day water fasting while everyone is posting 100k dinners. AMA.

2024-12-05 21:28:24

- reply

Congrats! Very happy to hear

2024-12-05 10:19:59

Regarding definitions…
A bitcoin layer 2 requires unilateral exit. And I agree Liquid does not meet that definition. However self-custody is a very nuanced topic in the context of mobile wallets. Mobile Lightning wallets today rely on trusted third parties in the form of watchtowers to not lose money. In many cases no watchtower is used and wallets rely on the trust and incentives of a single LSP. Relying on the trust and incentives of 11/15 Liquid functionaries that watch over each other is similar in some ways and arguable superior in others. Not the least of which is that there are more parties required to collude to steal user funds in a fully auditable blockchain. Another advantage that is underestimated is the lower complexity of Liquid wallets, which results in a smaller attack surface for users. There are many protocol level threats to consider in Lightning due to the protocol’s vast complexity. Liquid wallets are not exposed to these threats while the funds are being held offline. Furthermore these wallets can be held in cold storage and secured via geographically redundant multi-sig, something researchers are still attempting for Lightning in the context of the VLS project. That would however require consensus logic for channel-state among cosigners, further increasing client complexity.
As such I believe it is absolutely valid to label a Liquid wallet non-custodial in the context of the Liquid trust model. Just as a Lightning wallet can be considered non-custodial in the context of the LSP/watchtower trust model (nevermind that there are fully custodial elements for smaller amounts in Lightning wallets today to improve UX).
What does that mean for users? FWIW I personally feel more comfortable holding spending sats in a Liquid wallet than an ECash mint or even a self-custody Lightning wallet, especially for larger business transactions. Some users, especially those in areas with human rights violations might prefer ECash due its superior privacy. But every user should make that decision for themselves based on their needs. Security is about economics and there is no one size fits all.
I suspect the underlaying issue that people are trying to point out is that Liquid is a single federation and as such a potential point of centralization for bitcoin. A totally valid argument. While this is true today, I believe we will see multiple sidechains and other federations such as Fedimints, Cashu mints and Ark based wallets all competing with each other as fees go up and as demand for bitcoin as a medium of exchange increases. I suspect all these solutions will find their own market niches.
I am also hopeful for further decentralization of Boltz servers as multiple companies can now host the open source code and provide interoperable submarine swap apis for client apps using the various layers of bitcoin.
All these experiments are good for bitcoin and the cross pollination of ideas will further strengthen the network. Some of these experiments will fail, and I appreciate critical discussion. They keep us honest. And some people even have vested interests to see certain experiments fail. That’s fine. But we should be careful to not adopt cancel culture if we don’t like an experiment. Especially if that experiment does not require an action or a soft-fork from our part. If you down that path, you start acting like a little tyrant, making demands of others. If you were really in favor of freedom, you’d allow others to take responsibility based on their own needs, not yours.
Just my 2 sats worth. Thanks for reading ⚡️

2024-12-05 07:49:00

< 10 sats per cent is such a UX boost

2024-12-03 16:58:58

„Creative tension is the force that comes to play at the moment when we acknowledge a vision is at odds with current reality“ - Peter Senge

2024-12-01 11:15:41

- reply

🔥🔥🔥

2024-11-29 16:23:53

- reply

99% of users haven’t downloaded Zapstore yet. It would be easier to onboard users if an app vendor could put a single link on the website that gives instructions to:
1. Install Zapstore
2. Download the app (with deeplink to the zapstore listing)
Similar to how TestFlight does it. They assume most users don’t have it installed yet. For example see: https://testflight.apple.com/join/HcmDhGAA

2024-11-29 15:28:39

Survey: how are you being paid in Bitcoin? https://x.com/tankredhase/status/1862516182785397008

2024-11-27 14:06:37

Nice! People understand wifi passwords already. Should make it much easier to run a mint for family and friends. #note1rmw…30kg

2024-11-26 20:49:10

The @npub10r8…t2p8 listing for StashPay is also updated to the open source repo ( https://github.com/onionmill/stashpay ). So you can update to version 0.1.5 there now too.

2024-11-26 20:16:20

- reply

Freelancers. Once premium features are there, which will be paid.

2024-11-26 15:23:01

Make sure to change your Obtainium source to this link to get APK updates from now on: #note1yuv…zmkq

2024-11-26 15:14:19

- reply

Github. Link is here: #note1gc0…87xj

2024-11-26 14:38:00

⚡️BOLT12 & Open Source
StashPay 0.1.5 is here for iOS & Android.
Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Upgrade to Liquid SDK 0.5.1
* Add: Send to BOLT12 offer
* Fix: App is now open source (GPLv3)

2024-11-26 12:06:55

StashPay is now Open Source. I wrote about licensing, business models and removing myself and 3rd party vendors as single points of failure: https://blog.onionmill.com/p/stashpay-is-now-open-source

2024-11-25 15:54:09

Nice! Already tested paying the first BOLT12 offer from Phoenix last week. Can't wait to get this out to StashPay testers ⚡️🙌 #note1fkz…nv75

2024-11-25 14:22:32

If you’re building stuff to please/impress others you’ll burn out and resent them.
Building products for yourself is extremely rewarding. If others find them useful too, great. If they’re willing to pay, even better.
But don’t go out trying to rescue the world. Otherwise you’ll get stuck in the drama triangle.
And be grateful for your haters. It means you’re doing something people care about.

2024-11-24 15:39:57

“I’m not here to fit in. I’m here to be who I am.” https://youtu.be/SyWC8ZFVxGo

2024-11-23 12:36:10

- reply

Yes, that order makes sense to me.

2024-11-23 09:12:22

- reply

Mmmh. I’d label it a self-custody Liquid wallet with Onchain/Lightning swaps. Breez uses the marketing term “nodeless” for the Liquid SDK that StashPay uses. But I personally find that term a bit unclear.

2024-11-22 15:08:12

- reply

I’m hesitant to expose liquid addresses to users as a third receive option. IMHO it will take time for users to grasp the difference between onchain and lightning, much less understand what’s actually going on under the hood. For me liquid is an implementation detail that enables low fees and removes a lot of the liquidity headaches we know from LSP based wallets.
And since you asked, I wrote about fees and limits here: https://blog.onionmill.com/p/introducing-stashpay-a-bitcoin-wallet

2024-11-22 08:05:37

- reply

Yep, sending bitcoin from StashPay is a swap-out:
Liquid -> Onchain
Liquid -> Lightning
Depending on which QR code the user scans. If the user scans a lightning invoice from another StashPay or Aqua user, the wallet will do a direct liquid payment to save fees:
Liquid -> Liquid
Liquid low ball fees are currently around 26 sats, so peer-to-peer payments are quite cheep.

2024-11-21 11:59:43

- reply

Sure, you can pay via onchain, lightning or liquid.

2024-11-20 18:57:11

- reply

Yep, it’s a liquid wallet and incoming swaps are swapped to liquid. Btw it’s a standard BIP39 seed phrase that can be imported into any Liquid wallet using a BIP84 derivation path e.g. Blockstream Green.

2024-11-19 20:59:52

- reply

I’m watching rn too. Amazing results in 6 months.

2024-11-16 07:53:40

Building and learning out in the open is extremely rewarding if you can put your ego aside. You can iterate quickly. You also get real time signals whether your ideas are any good. If people copy them, it means you’re onto something. This is particularly interesting in bitcoin where everyone basically holds the same equity. You can move the industry in a direction you think is worth exploring as a single bootstrapped indie hacker.

2024-11-15 19:23:09

- reply

Thank you for sharing. I wish you a lot of strength. You’re an inspiration to many. Mein herzliches Beileid.

2024-11-15 16:03:45

- reply

What do you like better about Graphene over Lineage? I looked at installing Graphene but 3a wasn’t supported anymore.

2024-11-15 15:48:52

- reply

Just tried. Works like a charm!

2024-11-15 15:08:12

Just flashed LineageOS on my old Pixel 3a and installed StashPay via Zapstore. I'm amazed how fast the device is now and not a single Google App in sight 😌 https://image.nostr.build/12a7453f0e2c98442b13462597cf4344ab0c9db59a57d0e89275add8adb69fe0.gif

2024-11-15 06:49:38

- reply

It’s built with React Native (an open source project developed by facebook) and Breez Liquid SDK (which uses Boltz submarine swaps). You can read more about it here: https://blog.onionmill.com/p/introducing-stashpay-a-bitcoin-wallet

2024-11-14 07:59:21

Now also on @npub10r8…t2p8 💜
StashPay 0.1.4 is here for iOS & Android. Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Fix: Font color in dark mode

2024-11-13 18:29:26

- reply

It’s fixed in 0.1.4 … update via Obtainium or here: https://stashpay.me

2024-11-13 14:19:26

- reply

Good catch! Thanks, will fix dark mode in the next release.

2024-11-13 14:07:41

StashPay for Android is here 🤖🧡⚡️
https://blog.onionmill.com/p/stashpay-for-android-is-now-in-beta

2024-11-13 08:46:16

- reply

I sent you a DM re Zapstore

2024-11-12 14:55:29

- reply

So I tested Optainium and it worked fine. Do people usually copy/paste a github url themselves when installing a new app?

2024-11-11 21:30:05

- reply

Thanks for all the feedback. That all makes sense. I’ll try and get an APK on github releases in a second repo (until I open source the app repo). Then test how that works with the different app stores. It might break updates once I change the repo though. But I’ll see what works 👍🏼

2024-11-11 18:51:39

- reply

I was big on bits back in the day. But alas people loved sats more 🤷‍♂️
And you’re right. Flipping to USD was next on my todo list after Android. I’ll probably just display local fiat by default like this: https://x.com/lightning/status/1039605395856084992

2024-11-11 16:52:35

- reply

The first wallet we built at Lightning Labs displayed USD by default and flipped to sats when users tapped the amount label. Many wallets do that now: https://blog.lightning.engineering/announcement/2019/06/19/mobile-app.html
I’m kind of experimenting how long I can get away with displaying just sats rn. I don’t like displaying both fiat and sats at the same time. What do you prefer?

2024-11-11 16:28:20

- reply

Do you mean UoA should be USD until we have sat/cent parity? 😁

2024-11-11 16:08:03

Some thoughts regarding open source, business models and @npub10r8…t2p8 … feedback welcome 🙏🏼 #note12an…t8vy

2024-11-11 15:56:14

- reply

Thank you for the info. Really appreciate it!
I’m not so worried about pushing updates from the developer side. I can automate with Fastlane, npm scripts and Github Actions doing the heavy lifting there. I’m more concerned about the install/update UX for users… there are quite a few more steps required to download a third party app store and then navigate to install/update the app vs just clicking “Download APK” on the StashPay website. Users come to the website and TestFlight mostly via my tweets.
I haven’t gotten much traction on Nostr so far unfortunately. Not sure if it’s because people don’t like Liquid over Ecash or if it’s because StashPay isn’t open source? I’ve built open source stuff for 12 years and have not found a viable business model there yet. So I’m self-funding and trying to figure out if I can find customers with a proprietary app+service for businesses. I’m open to open sourcing though once I understand my customer better and the app is out of beta. But I’m also open to feedback in this regard in case closed source is absolutely a no-go for folks.
When I tried zap.store I needed to update apps manually. I know auto-updates are frowned upon by many bitcoiners. And this is understandable for onchain/savings wallets and consensus updates for bitcoin core. But auto-updates seem appropriate to me for more complex apps holding smaller amounts like lightning spending wallets (especially for security updates). It seems like I can get that with auto-updates on Google Play and manual APK installs via my website.
Also, which nsec do developers generally use to sign APKs in zap.store? I assume they don’t paste their primary nsec into a CI?

2024-11-11 09:21:07

- reply

Got it, I‘ll keep digging then. Appreciate the feedback 👍🏼

2024-11-11 09:00:56

- reply

Updating required an action for me. Is that desired or can that be automated?
I‘m an iOS user. So I don‘t have much experience with these stores.

2024-11-11 08:30:56

- reply

I tested several third party app stores. But found direct download of the APK from https://stashpay.me had the best UX. The APK is signed with the developer key. So it‘s a TOFU (trust on first use) model if you trust the TLS cert on the first install. Subsequent updates of the APK would verify the developer signing key.
What‘s the advantage of using third party app stores? They don’t do auto-updates as far as I understand?

2024-11-11 08:10:37

How do you want to download StashPay for Android? https://x.com/tankredhase/status/1855884314254115299

2024-11-11 06:48:48

- reply

I think it‘s both. It‘s easy to run from your demons and escape into work. But I agree you need meaningful work. The best is when you find something that gives you purpose and allows you to constantly move out of your comfort zone with small wins. That‘s what builds confidence.
This bit by Lex and Levelsio also inspired me to start building software again when I was going through a difficult period https://x.com/levelsio/status/1842106719142346965

2024-11-09 16:48:18

This is probably the biggest lesson I‘ve learned about indie hacking so far… https://image.nostr.build/3317f2ad8effe48a7ae6e4aaefb18a072da3f8e4dc5e0fc4ba12f071c71193b6.jpg

2024-11-08 17:06:53

Exciting to see the groundwork for BOLT12 released in Boltz. Can’t wait to add support in StashPay once it’s wired up in Liquid SDK. #note186v…8w8v

2024-11-08 12:23:14

- reply

Fully agree. Which is why I’m hoping to see a @npub1dd9…xe7p library for bitcoin wallets and nostr clients.

2024-11-08 10:57:21

💯 same applies to using Lightning address. Use a VPN to prevent leaking your IP address. #note1232…38vl

2024-11-07 18:43:19

First cold plunge and sauna today. I’ve been doing cold showers for a while, but this is a new level. Can confirm feeling energized and overall great! Good intro: https://youtu.be/7FlmpnsbciQ

2024-11-05 21:06:20

StashPay 0.1.2 is now on TestFlight. Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Update to Liquid SDK 0.5.0-rc4
* Fix: Timeout bug when sending a payment
* Add: Link block explorer in payment list
* Add: Display app version in settings
* Fix: Allow retry after QR code scan failed

2024-11-05 16:54:20

- reply

🔥🔥🔥

2024-11-01 10:26:44

https://image.nostr.build/6f2486dd2bcb5b3fa2efe9636b4fe58ddecadf12b29fcbfacbe0a13bc54499d3.jpg

2024-10-29 08:43:51

- reply

Voting Machines = PoS
Paper Ballots = PoW

2024-10-25 12:14:57

Vielen Dank @npub17fq…nr8y. Hat echt Spaß gemacht! #note1mn4…c8fk

2024-10-25 11:46:56

StashPay build (13) is now on TestFlight. Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Update to Liquid SDK 0.5.0-rc1
* Fix: Display fee on Lightning-address send
* Fix: Minimum amount for on-chain receive
* Fix: Minimum amount for on-chain send
* Fix: Display „Address“ for on-chain receive

2024-10-24 07:33:04

GM https://image.nostr.build/b0838b3af6e54273b68cad9614c3fbbba18a95cafe7dcdeea1bf070fd80df462.jpg

2024-10-21 17:15:23

- reply

Welcome!

2024-10-21 15:51:08

- reply

What percentage of his personal stack is secured using crypto anarchist tech?

2024-10-21 07:11:33

Black markets in Europe are gonna have rad UX 🔥 #note14m0…w5lq

2024-10-19 09:10:11

"There's a difference between knowing the path, and walking the path" — Morpheus

2024-10-17 16:16:34

⛓️ On-chain payments in StashPay are here!
Build (11) is now on TestFlight. Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Add: Bitcoin on-chain receive
* Add: Bitcoin on-chain send
* Add: Liquid on-chain send

2024-10-15 11:48:31

- reply

Splicing bzw die LSP Architektur mit der Lightning node auf dem mobilen Gerät ist extrem komplex. Ich vermute die meisten Entwickler haben einfach nicht die Ressourcen. Ich hab wegen der geringeren Komplexität auch das liquid-sdk verwendet.

2024-10-15 11:32:10

I just tested and could import the StashPay BIP39 to https://helm-wallet.com and send funds out via lightning.
In case any apps using breez-liquid-sdk get pulled from app stores like it happened to Aqua. Your users can still get their funds out.

2024-10-15 11:00:14

- reply

I’m ambivalent and trying to move towards secure

2024-10-15 09:59:01

https://zap.store/download/

2024-10-13 17:21:04

- reply

My pleasure! Please let me know what you think. I’m open to critical feedback. The first TestFlight release is super early, so I can iterate based on what customers want. The plan is to build towards a full product for businesses over time.

2024-10-13 16:31:48

- reply

Thank you for the question. I’m a big fan of Strike and Jack’s work. I don’t see StashPay as a competitor to custodial exchanges.
StashPay is a low-fee, low friction way to receive bitcoin to your self-custody wallet. Fully peer-to-peer. More on why I’m building it in this post: https://blog.onionmill.com/p/introducing-stashpay-a-bitcoin-wallet

2024-10-12 16:35:40

- reply

Danke für die Einladung. Hab dir eine DM geschrieben :)

2024-10-12 13:52:10

- reply

Ja, steckt noch in den Kinderschuhen. Hab im August angefangen. Das Product wird erst mit Zaprite integration spannend. Hab das wallet aber schon released um bugs zu fixen (Breez-Liquid-SDK ist auch erst zwei Monate alt).

2024-10-11 19:05:56

- reply

Komme gerne wieder zu @npub1qv0…ujnc. Letztes mal mit @npub14j7…gtpf und @npub1xv4…47m5 hat Spaß gemacht und ist eh eine Weile her :)

2024-10-11 09:12:24

Thanks for the bug reports yesterday 🙏🏼🧡
Build (9) is now on TestFlight. Download here: https://stashpay.me
Release notes:
* Fix: wallet-log.txt error message on first start

2024-10-10 14:04:36

- reply

That post hit a nerve. I grew up in west berlin and was four when the wall came down. Enjoy the conf!

2024-10-10 10:47:57

StashPay has a new home: https://stashpay.me