Dr. Wing, M.D. (blocking gabnigger)

Quo vadis?

Public Key

npub1lnsfkndvjfx3004wgxd0ypuhdmfgs6djae0948gjztgm8swp2dfq7a2cx2

NIP-05 Address

wing_str_at_poa.st@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0ecymfkkfynghh6hyrxhjq7tka55gdxewuhj6n5fp95dnc8q4x5spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnwa5x2un99e3k7mgn5v7wc

Publishing to

relay.nostr.band

relay.noswhere.com

Author Public Key

npub1lnsfkndvjfx3004wgxd0ypuhdmfgs6djae0948gjztgm8swp2dfq7a2cx2

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-06-17 23:47:01

- reply

https://i.poastcdn.org/68bcd29b51aefd15ebf01b62580d5a56cf1311221eec119201ae6583bb3921ef.jpeg

2024-06-17 23:21:11

- reply

Why did everyone dogpile him over a question? Why is everyone here absolutely retarded when they see someone with a F24 and friends from gab?
I'm with @npub1ksr…2qeg on this.

2024-06-17 22:51:20

- reply

And he literally never said that, you manipulative dysgenic hooknosed Canaanite

2024-06-17 22:50:15

- reply

Someone confirmed it? Did they assert it or post a source? Cause a lot of people very quickly decided a yes or no question was LITRUL PEDOPHILIA before it was even answered.

2024-06-17 22:48:02

- reply

Anecdote anecdote disingenuous misinterpretation of historical facts anecdote anecdote anecdote
Nuance escapes you because badfeels consume you. Do you have bitchtits?

2024-06-17 22:41:54

- reply

You could read them a variety of ways, but having selected one and having become extremely emotional over it you've decided your interpretation is correct. Because of your emotional investment.
Assuming you're male, this really validates the low-T hypothesis.

2024-06-17 22:32:28

- reply

Hence tism. I've seen his shit pop in my TL for awhile, dude's not a pedo.
Very black-and-White, very helpful sorting wheat from chaff, but not a pedo.

2024-06-17 22:28:23

- reply

Why don't you post where starprophet actually defended pedophilia, where he said "fucking kids is ok".
I've seen about 5k of the guy's posts over time and he's regularly attacking pedophilia, the family court system, McChristianity (Prots primarily), and posting rockets.

2024-06-17 22:20:20

- reply

You attribute motive to things from which motive cannot reasonably be extracted. You keep stating that you looked at a series of posts on a social third-rail topic and it told you the poster must be doing BadThing.
Your dEdUcTiVe ReAsONiNg amounts to badfeels about uncomfortable topics. Seems like a testosterone deficiency. Enjoy all the friendzones.

2024-06-17 21:59:02

- reply

>spinning an objectively accurate statement and a simple question into serious Liferuin accusations ACKSHULLY isn't jewish
How bad is Tay-Sachs, really?

2024-06-17 21:53:03

- reply

He also literally never said that, but kikes gonna kike amirite

2024-06-17 21:41:52

- reply

You're not, that's what block and mute do.
It's like fucking magic, one button and you never see his meaniehead distasteful shill tests again.

2024-06-17 16:04:33

- reply

>Looking at things so... "dispassionately" is just gay
I'm doing the opposite. My whole argument is that women need to consent to who they marry, but their father has the final say. This ensures the woman has agency BUT someone with far more experience in life is keeping Andrew Tate away, or shooting him out back and hiding the body.
Age of consent laws are pulled out of a hat from place to place and fail to stop badThing from happening anyway. Empowering fathers to do their job, however, fixes the whole thing.
No father will let his barely-pubescent 12 year old marry and have children. In a society under coverture, any father who would allow that shit would be beaten half to death by every other father in town.
My position isn't complex or dehumanizing.

2024-06-17 15:53:51

- reply

They don't ever mature at all. They remain hyper-emotional for life, which is necessary to care for infants.
If anyone had read my poast past the first sentence they would understand that I believe fathers should be rejecting shitty men on behalf of their daughters. Then the issue becomes determining what constitutes sufficient maturity to bear children and how to measure it for women, and thereby determine a safe age to marry and begin having children. Absent any dispassionate study on the matter, that decision is ALSO best left to fathers, advised by mothers.
Nuance is difficult when everybody wants to screech pedophile.

2024-06-17 15:31:45

- reply

Literally nothing.
What these hyperventilating pedojacketing folks fail to understand is that a father is what fixes all of this. Coverture provides a woman's father with her reproductive rights prior to marriage. Strict social enforcement of this right prevents her from being a whore until marriage.
This means that a father has the final say in who she can marry - she has to consent to who she marries but dad has final veto. This means that whether she's 13 or 33 her dad will be keeping the degenerates, kikes, niggers, cads, streetshitters, and other useless bottom feeders away.
Absent a father acting under coverture, it really doesn't matter what laws you write. Either the girl will be a whore or she'll marry the most useless man in the village. That's how we ended up with onlyfans and mudsharks***. The odds that a woman picks a good man on her own without the help of another man with her best interests at heart (her father, brother, uncle, grandfather, cousin, some male blood relative) are astronomically low.
For those who define pedophilia as a function of intellectual/emotional maturity, understand this: All women are intellectual/emotional children. If you're fucking a woman at all then you're a pedophile by your own definition. Doesn't matter if she's 15 or 50.
That said, it's extremely gross to want a girl who's prepubescent or barely started puberty. The earliest reasonable age is probably 15 or 16, around the earliest age that one could be expected to receive the Sacrament of Confirmation. I'm not certain a numerical age can solve this though.
Rather than using an arbitrary age, it would probably be best to study further and use developmental markers to figure out what age makes more sense for the girl in question. There are definitely late bloomers, and if so probably early(ish) bloomers. Also remember that the modern (((school system))) poorly socializes kids and young adults which prevents them from maturing intellectually or emotionally. The cosmopolitan nature of society makes this issue worse as people can't safely socialize their kids among their own people. We're constantly forced into contact with swarthy smelly subhumans who lack the hardware to understand a word of what I've written here.
Anyway this is a real issue, there are salient points from either side, and it doesn't really help to solve it when someone is labeled a pedophile for trying to navigate it. Perhaps leave that label for the MAP faggots arguing to fuck your toddlers while reasonable people are trying to sort this shit out.
***Onlyfans whores don't have a strict starting age. Some start at 15 while lying about their age, others start in their 60's. Women are emotional/intellectual children.
https://i.poastcdn.org/be1d8bc0e6e8c20c8a96a422892e2ab665c14d0a813e27cf30de13e47d474a55.jpeg

2024-06-17 14:08:30

- reply

Daar vaargen meegen shmoopsie whoopsie da booma :Actually: :wojak_big_brain: 🍻
https://i.poastcdn.org/ff16ac4ef9da171dec7ab8eba0a1ee07b26574b9a8424e73ede1981044d03625.jpg

2024-06-17 13:23:33

v. unserious language, Dutch.RT:
https://poa.st/objects/d23a874c-569c-4bde-8720-54eab0fe846c
#note1fe4…aemt

2024-06-14 21:00:55

- reply

😭
https://i.poastcdn.org/4fe4aeccc693c8ffa3fb0cd7d0fff6c2a35667ef4e75836d69551dff59f37e1b.png

2024-06-14 20:14:57

- reply

Honestly I've never tried, but it's so cheap it probably doesn't matter.
#4 buck is the same story against unarmored nigfantry. Anything within 50 yards will be shredded, though recoil and noise are real issues for the lightweight operators.

2024-06-14 20:02:43

- reply

Oh sweet. My apologies, I'm preprogrammed to detect sarcasm where none exists.
But yeah, .22 is dirt cheap, probably super easy to reload, and accurate at practical distances. If you land a shot on a nigger they panic anyway. Excellent practice rifles for young kids too... A few reputable manufacturers make AR-platform 22's and compatible mags.

2024-06-14 18:49:09

- reply

At the risk of irritating you with repetition, we must differentiate judaized McChristianity (literally all Prots and a massive chunk of the RCC and Orthodoxy) from Christianity.
@npub1xay…qher is correct in saying that the default position of Christianity is somewhere far to the racism side of race-realism. Conflating infinity anti-Christian Prot "doctrines" with actual Doctrine is the only way Linder has any leg to stand on. He's either ignorant or knows what he's doing, neither of which are acceptable if he's choosing to speak with authority on this subject.

2024-06-14 18:24:17

- reply

No normies will ever understand. They will just die with the niggers they so love (likely defending them) when all us Understanders™ finally hit TRVE PEAK NIGGER FATIGUE.
Accept that most of the people you've ever met will die miserably for multi-generational rejection of Truth.

2024-06-14 17:56:33

- reply

Are you taking the piss?

2024-06-14 17:34:27

- reply

A .22 is ideal for pointblank self-defense. Toss some hollow-points in it and let 'er rip. Niggers don't wear armor anyway.
Shots to the vitals are still fatal and there is less worry about collateral, I think. Women in particular would benefit from a .22 - low recoil, high mag capacity (they routinely fail to reload under pressure) and low(er) noise.

2024-06-14 15:42:06

- reply

Gentlemen, we have proof this is an ESL streetshitter. I read this babble and it fits neatly into jeetspeak, I heard it in the voice of Rajesh.
Case closed.
https://i.poastcdn.org/4e1eba3fa538d4e0439bc9a8962d1c1982fcbddc1e33441f409eb4f52d9df542.jpg
https://i.poastcdn.org/f2263074b9a61b77da8ab0a761e821eebd754f1ebe6df67655125f1a0261c351.jpg

2024-06-13 19:06:04

- reply

I am so sorry 😭
Have you considered just putting them down? Getting them fixed?

2024-06-13 19:03:30

- reply

But why tho? Why would that thought even occur? 😭

2024-06-13 18:59:05

- reply

>coalburner.jpg
>normal people: "ew gross niggers"
>brittbratt: "OLD PEOPLE FUCK WITHOUT REGARD FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE"
how did this happen

2024-06-13 18:47:10

- reply

STDs in the US nearly disappear if you factor the variety of swarthy subhumans out of the survey.

2024-06-13 18:40:28

- reply

Why is it that all the chicks with bad skin or mid features fuck niggers? Did the bad skin and off-features come before or after she touched a nigger?

2024-06-13 18:08:25

- reply

You have to have actual Christians to do that.
For example, Russia has pretty successfully Christian Solidarity'd the kikes out of their country, with a small number of grifting holdouts waiting for their pogrom.
Such things are not impossible for the West, but we're gonna need to Purge the McChristian before we can successfully Pogrom the Jew.

2024-06-13 18:01:47

- reply

I would argue that the real answer is something like "you do not hate them enough".
Righteous anger at being asked such a faggot question, reframing it as an attack on Christ (who ordained men exclusively despite having female disciples who followed Him to the Cross), and a solid tongue-lashing on live TV would be the most-correct answer. Decent Christians will stand behind that, insulating you against Infinity Liferuin™.
Even if they didn't, there are worse things than spending your life in poverty... such as spending your eternity in hell for failing to stand up.

2024-06-13 17:26:05

- reply

>not all men should be allowed to speak either
Now you know why the (actual) Church resisted translating the Vulgate into the vernacular for so long - it quite successfully kept the midwit out of the Church hierarchy.
Protestantism is simply hordes of midwits playing St Thomas Aquinas or St John Chrysostom with less than half the IQ. It's why the only things they can seem to agree on are whatever jews want - hate for Catholics and (presumably) Eastern Orthodox, hate for the Sacraments and in particular Communion and Confession, and hate for any sort of hierarchy.
Midwits want the Weimerican Dream - a paper crown, a 10th-acre "kingdom", a "church" with "doctrine" written in crayon, a fat mystery-meat "wife", niggerfaggot neighbors, and fake food.

2024-06-06 02:08:56

- reply

You do possess the very-jewish trait of having zero poast history older than about a week while being very quick to describe scat and other graphic sexual degeneracy.
:Think:
https://i.poastcdn.org/61674e145280558149517a86be0237828820493bdab519bed89eda345ca255c6.gif

2024-06-05 11:08:57

- reply

They all volunteer information about themselves so easily

2024-06-05 02:24:16

- reply

Wasn't there some faggot on goob who was a mortician that got bullycided?
@npub1cka…4wty I think it was one of yours from awhile ago but memory is hazy... did you torment a mortician at some point? (it was a Tuesday)
Basically tryna figure out if owl is the same creeping degenerate

2024-06-04 15:42:28

- reply

I love that you can take ZeroHedge or screaming TV Econojew and apply a simple modifier to whatever they say to arrive at sound investment strategy.

2024-06-02 06:31:35

- reply

This is a lie. "No unsettled lands" implies a finite universe. Western Civilization has (at the behest of jews) traded extremely-lucrative space exploration for infinite niggerfaggots. This doesn't make space somehow unexplored or the resources there somehow inaccessible.
Hereditary wealth is a net good which provides resilience to bloodlines with favorable attributes. Case-in-point: if the boomers had given a second thought to what happens after they die their children (most of us on this platform) wouldn't be staring at complete collapse - we would have hard assets passed down from the conquests of our ancestors.
Empires collapse because they fail complete annihilate (genocide) conquered people and re-populate the acquired land with their own, thus incentivizing cosmopolitan faggots (jews) to play races off one another to gain power.
Monarchies are the most resilient form of government and the most sensible. The Monarch is of the same race as his people (always male) and takes a similar role to his people as the father takes to his household. His interests therefore align with the people. Should they deviate, he is a single target who can be dispatched and replaced with either one of his own heirs or a new bloodline. Regardless, it's easier than the infinite conga line of nigger, faggot, and kike "elected officials" and obesoid bureaucrats pointing fingers at each other to obfuscate who is at fault for fuckups in governance.
Also hierarchy is the natural state of man, so a Monarchy is not revolutionary. It's a natural consequence of the Pareto principle and division of labor. Monkeys and pigs have kings.

2024-06-02 05:16:51

- reply

In fairness, mUh RePuBLiC & mUh DeMoCrAcY are always fake and gay and instantly subverted. You don't even need jews to subvert it - left to it's own devices a voting system will collapse under the weight of the vast majority of retards incapable of competent decision-making (most people).