temp / is on Nostr

"5119a48d83c8ec0eb9053d1cd313bbbf0f81f57ee586d22df6ce466746c24a8854ff0e57fb79ff9c037c3a2e6f47db8e7788eb4e363d00d0b95ac81709dc6ff4"

Last Notes

2025-05-20 22:46:06

- reply

If you think coordinated harassment and abuse is about outside validation, then we are clearly not on the same page.

2025-05-19 01:17:09

You still attack me on false accusations on my personality while ignoring all my concrete work/results. Again, you *critically depend* on NOT acknowledging domain knowledge and valid results.

2025-05-19 00:52:10

- reply

I strongly suspect we do not agree on the events that have happened. And the amount of unjustified harassment and abuse in the last 20 years.

2025-05-05 21:13:16

- reply

Again, if supposed to be a challenge: the most predominant 'cult' related content I heard from a CBC (The Current?) documentary about Nxium (or smth like that) a few years ago.

2025-05-04 13:16:44

- reply

I recently learned stupid people think they're smart when they break the rules/norms/values by default, because they can find a solution outside of the set restrictions. (I truly hope that's not their interpretation of out-of-the-box thinking.) This apparently reached a point where you're dumb if you find the better solution within the restrictions. And they apparently assume a zero-sum game, which it isn't.
Someone literally could've shown them a more collaborative, beneficial environment and they got rid of him in favor of (almost) literal scum.

2025-05-03 18:01:33

- reply

As someone pointed out: the customer is not always right, but you may not benefit from challenging it.

2025-05-03 07:10:24

- reply

I don't quite get the point you're making.

2025-05-02 18:00:36

- reply

I'm curious about one thing: do you think it's normal for one person to just arbitrarily screw with another's life and that pushing a situation to the point where the only impactful option becomes e.g. violence, is normal/reasonable?

2025-05-02 17:56:53

- reply

But that's a key part isn't it .. "[..] without fear of retribution". There may be reasonable restrictions on matters directly concering another individual, but if it concerns work topics, ideas, objects, etc. one can discuss matters with factual reinforcement.
Why would I be insulted if you argue that a certain idea is problematic and you point out some good reasons to reinforce your argument? I can either agree/accept your arguments or counter or recontextualize/refine. In the end, we can choose to agree or disagree. It doesn't need to be personal or vindictive.

2025-05-02 17:48:07

- reply

It's not that easy. Force and fraud outside of one's control are not one's responsibility. It would be like hitting someone then blaming them for catching their fist.

2025-05-02 17:27:32

- reply

Tell that to the miserable, abusive shits who keep fucking up my life.

2025-05-01 16:27:13

- reply

Thanks. Fwiw, it's nice to read a clear unambiguous message in support for once.
I know saying this now, does not acknowledge plenty of messages in the past that were in support of me, but right now it is nice to read.

2025-05-01 00:53:58

- reply

This is so sad. So, what you're saying is: don't expect your basic human rights to apply? Seriously, even if the advice is meant well, these are huuuuuge flags for unsafe environment of any kind or capacity.

2025-04-30 23:09:01

- reply

Is this a joke? Do you know how many false accusations I have needed to go through that were deliberate misrepresentations of what I never even did wrong? Then, they also don't want to know the truth. The whole shitshow depends on both massive deception and refusing the inconvenient truth.

2025-04-30 09:33:12

- reply

There is this idea of "when I got angry, I cared". I cared a lot, including for other people.
You showed me that most people aren't worth the crap I take in the afternoon.

2025-04-30 08:43:50

- reply

I'm so tired of the "fake wisdom" bullshit. Of cpurse the mind eesponds to outside stimuli. I'm pretty sure you are damn well aware of whst's going on, so let me point out the elephant in the room.
8+ years of continuous, persistent harassment, attacks false accusations, lies, deception, .. pf course will make someone respond. In the same way, simply lying about it makes someone choose to evaluate the message or even just the person in a certain way.
You aren't making much of a point. Especially in massive human-rights-violating situations where you're forcing someone into violence in orde to allow for anything to ever be resolved.
How disturbed do you have to be, to not see that there are many things wrong with that?