moneyball

₿moneyball@twelve.cash

Public Key

npub1ug8c5wp6chs4xessrstq3mj0x0agkttey5xwk26632a2gw22de7qkfd9ry

NIP-05 Address

moneyball@primal.net

NIP-57 Address

moneyball@primal.net

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswyru28qavtc2nvcgpc9sgae8n875t94uj2r8t9ddg4w4y899xulqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdud8e6c3

Publishing to

nos.lol

relay.damus.io

relay.nostr.band

Author Public Key

npub1ug8c5wp6chs4xessrstq3mj0x0agkttey5xwk26632a2gw22de7qkfd9ry

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-05-19 13:48:33

- reply

Bitcoin is already a ubiquitous, great brand. Don't lose it to rebuild another one?

2025-05-19 04:19:40

- reply

Are any of these subunits 8 orders of magnitude different?

2025-05-16 17:46:29

Drop the sats. Just bitcoin. It's cleaner.

2025-05-09 12:53:43

- reply

🙄

2025-05-02 23:58:24

If you want to understand this week's bitcoin drama but don't want to wade through a bunch of craziness on social media or spend hours researching all the nuances, I suggest you listen to the segment starting at the 10min mark from today's PBJ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYbakpGY9Ys

2025-05-02 16:01:58

- reply

Can you help me understand why a new market would develop? Why would this new market not follow the path we've seen others already do such as (a) use inscriptions (b) use services to mine non-standard transactions or (c) use/abuse bitcoin in other ways as brc-20 did?

2025-05-02 15:56:06

easter egg hunt 👀 https://bitcoin.org

2025-03-28 23:16:31

things are cookin’ at Presidio Bitcoin

2025-03-09 21:31:39

- reply

https://bitkey.build/processing-our-processor-choice/

2025-03-08 20:15:01

- reply

How about Goose?

2025-02-14 00:38:36

- reply

We need to launch soon and gain a social media presence 😀

2025-02-10 17:04:59

What will be the initial AI payment use cases that will need bitcoin payments? (as opposed to, say, stablecoin payments)?

2025-01-13 19:30:09

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_uVr-PfKsg

2025-01-06 20:40:33

https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/challenge-covenants-for-braidpool/1370

2024-12-27 01:54:24

- reply

If that’s important to you and you’ve spent the time to educate yourself on properly handling that information then great!

2024-12-27 00:35:39

- reply

Bitkey is a multi-sig setup. I think you mean a DIY multi-sig setup; but Bitkey is for customers who want the benefits of multi-sig without the hassle and risk of DIY.

2024-12-27 00:24:23

- reply

You are likely comfortable handling private key material directly (safeguarding seed phrases), but I suspect most of your friends and family lack the time or interest to properly research and study how to do this. So for them Bitkey is a safer solution than exchanges or self custody wallets with footguns.

2024-12-27 00:21:55

- reply

Are you familiar with the Emergency Access Kit and how it works? It allows a Bitkey customer to transfer their funds to another wallet in the event Block's server and app are no longer available.

2024-12-24 15:21:35

- reply

Use advanced data protection

2024-12-23 23:51:52

My advice to anyone choosing to self custody bitcoin is to only move a small portion of your stack into a new (to you) configuration or a new product. No need to rush into it. Start early but get comfortable over time before moving larger portions of your stack.

2024-12-23 23:27:52

If you are giving Bitkey as a gift to friends and family members, be sure to have them setup a Trusted Contact to protect them in case they happen to lose both their phone and hardware device.

2024-12-15 22:09:01

Spiral Wizards pragmatic proposal to address long term QC threat in the near term. Feedback welcome. https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/8O857bRSVV8/m/4cM-7pf4AgAJ

2024-12-11 17:50:55

- reply

Stablecoins aren't really shitcoins. They're not premined.
Also it turns out there is a customer need to pay for things in dollars.

2024-12-11 09:16:50

- reply

Care to elaborate?

2024-12-11 04:30:21

https://chainfail.substack.com/p/swap-it-like-its-hot

2024-12-09 19:13:48

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-comes-roaring-back-khosla-123000446.html

2024-12-03 18:16:54

bitcoin + FOSS = ₿OSS

2024-11-17 00:16:09

- reply

Well Strike only supports send because it is using LNDK which only supports send currently. Hopefully someone adds receive to LNDK or LND itself supports it next year.

2024-11-16 15:35:24

https://stephanlivera.com/episode/616/
@npub1r8l…x5dk @npub1a2c…w83a

2024-11-15 23:29:30

- reply

Even without LND there are 18! And LND users such as Strike are supporting it through the LNDK project.

2024-11-15 23:28:35

- reply

Most yes

2024-11-15 22:20:31

Do I count EIGHTEEN adopters of BOLT 12 now including Phoenix, Ocean, Strike, Zeus, and Boltz?
https://bolt12.org

2024-11-11 17:02:40

- reply

"Bitcoin is incredibly difficult to change by design and consensus is achieved not through hierarchical governance, but through a complex interplay of actions and reactions among stakeholders."

2024-11-08 04:15:36

- reply

Do you have a suggestion for an alternative name?

2024-11-08 03:14:45

- reply

Thank you for letting me know. I’ll look into it!

2024-11-08 02:31:53

Bitcoin is very hard to change, a property that is critical to it having any value at all. But, what exactly prevents it from being changed? Bitcoin is also bigger than ever, so how do improvements get made?
Announcing the open source bitcoin consensus analysis project (BCAP).
Earlier this year, @avichal and I discussed the potential for such a project, and over the past few months, I have been working with @0xren_cf and @LynAldenContact to go from concept to a solid starting point, which can now be found at the link below
https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap
Bitcoin consensus is simply a set of rules codified in software. However, what maintains that consensus and what allows that consensus to change is extremely complex. What roles do each of us play in this consensus? What motivations and powers do each of us have?
This project identifies 6 stakeholder groups that play a role in bitcoin consensus including each group's motivation and powers. It also analyzes how each group’s power shifts over the lifecycle of potential change. https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap#stakeholders
Ultimately, investors have the most power, but their power is often exercised late in the lifecycle of change when bitcoin might be on the brink during a contentious fork. Ideally, we avoid winding up in such a fragile state, so the project explores this dynamic.
The Bitcoin Core project is just one implementation of the bitcoin protocol, but it wields tremendous power given it is the software run by a near-majority of the bitcoin network. It has earned this position by prioritizing security and being conservative on protocol changes.
Historically, changes to bitcoin consensus have been proposed by Bitcoin Core developers and have all been merged into the Bitcoin Core project. Recently, there has been a shift to non-Core developers proposing changes. It is unclear whether this impacts Core prioritizing these.
Often people claim that Bitcoin Core has too much power as a few devs can “change bitcoin.” While this is clearly untrue, the opposite is true in that there is veto-like power to prevent changes.
Thus, alternative consensus clients are an important option. However, they are for extreme situations as it would be very difficult to gain widespread adoption. Low adoption can lead to a fragile network.
The project explores one such scenario in which a change is (partially) activated with miner hash rate but low adoption from nodes. This can lead to a sizable bounty forming tempting miners to create a chain split, and leaving bitcoin in a state of chaos. (let’s avoid this)
If a trading market develops between fork A and fork B, investors determine the value, but it turns out not all investors are equal. Self-custody individual investors have advantages over corporate and institutional investor segments.
There are many other future scenarios, and we’d love to see the project evolve to analyze these as it is intended to be a community project that serves bitcoin well into the future. The project is off to a great start with 2 dozen reviewers spanning all 6 stakeholder groups.
If anyone sees ways to improve this project please file an issue https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/issues, open a PR https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/pulls, or begin a discussion https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/discussions.
There is a PDF version in case that is easier to read or to share with others. https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/blob/main/bcap_v1.0.pdf

2024-10-24 21:38:07

https://m.primal.net/LhCR.jpg

2024-10-21 22:09:08

- reply

Which L2 solution and why shouldn’t it be trusted?

2024-10-03 14:26:22

https://bitkey.build/welcoming-robinhood-to-the-bitkey-ecosystem

2024-09-23 01:11:58

ライトニングサミット

2024-09-16 20:25:59

https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/superscalar-laddered-timeout-tree-structured-decker-wattenhofer-factories/1143

2024-09-11 05:28:13

- reply

https://primal.net/e/note1znm98a3zpawrsqeg0lf25d9mwutqxq679sp8swlasufdz2ll2acsszr4wc

2024-09-01 13:11:50

- reply

If you see any concerns be sure to share

2024-08-31 19:40:35

Lava's loans protocol is perhaps the most sophisticated and novel use of bitcoin script and DLC tech I've seen before. This 10 page paper does a nice job of introducing it. https://github.com/lava-xyz/loans-paper/blob/main/loans_v2.pdf

2024-08-31 14:05:35

- reply

If you install the mobile app then you'll be able to receive bitcoin from zaps

2024-08-29 13:16:00

https://shop.braiins.com/products/building-bitcoin-in-rust
#note10gy…rc70

2024-08-20 23:01:23

running reads

2024-08-15 19:40:47

- reply

There needs to be substance for it to endure

2024-08-14 13:47:13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDXQuEJHa8Q

2024-08-09 05:13:51

- reply

Phoenix, Bitkit, Alby, Zeus…

2024-08-07 17:31:34

- reply

I'd suggest subscribing to our newsletter https://spiral.xyz/blog/spiral-quarterly-update-h1-2024/

2024-07-30 01:53:49

- reply

Of course! They're free for anyone to use.

2024-07-17 21:39:24

What questions would folks like me to ask?
https://m.primal.net/JUUi.png

2024-07-06 15:35:20

- reply

@npub13zr…lmne can speak to his experiences using it

2024-07-06 15:34:41

- reply

For reference https://github.com/lndk-org/lndk

2024-06-15 01:42:41

- reply

@npub1a00…9q3h

2024-06-06 22:53:15

https://m.primal.net/IbNw.png

2024-06-04 21:47:17

5 reasons miners benefit from Stratum v2:
1. Authentication and encryption. Don't let your hash rate be stolen. Even if you aren't concerned about this, your auditors and investors likely will be.
2. Less bandwidth-intensive protocol (binary vs. JSON); reduce stale shares and works better in poor internet situations
3. Ensure your pool isn't inserting transactions and not sharing out-of-band fee payments. It is becoming more topical with the increase in usage of transaction accelerators and non-standard transaction inclusion. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.
4. Ensure you're selecting the transactions that provide the maximum fees. Don't leave it to others who may censor certain high fee transactions. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.
5. Take charge of the bitcoin software you run and consensus rules. Don't leave it to others to determine whether or not to signal for support of a particular change or to take the risk of falling out of consensus. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.

2024-06-04 02:31:49

- reply

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1551

2024-06-03 20:01:11

BIP 353

2024-06-03 03:51:22

- reply

Agree. Thoughts on how to make choosing a mint seamless for users ideally making it a default for them?

2024-05-29 19:45:01

- reply

Oh, well I don't think the point that LN has found product market fit as the open payment protocol has been discussed hardly at all, so I wanted to start the conversation. The fact LN is enabling nostr zaps is super cool but not in and of itself a demonstration of it being the open payment protocol. It is the emergence of Fedimint and Cashu e-cash systems that largely demonstrate that LN is becoming that as well as Ark and statechains support for LN as OPP.

2024-05-28 18:24:39

- reply

I sense from your responses that your hope is LN will offer near-zero fees while also being non-custodial with an economically viable unilateral exit. I understand it was sold this way by some folks but it isn't reality. LN's fees are a function of on-chain fees, which are going to be volatile and will continue to increase over time.
There are efforts to try and share UTXOs with more people which would allow for amortizing these costs over more people. This is awesome R&D, and I hope to see more of it. But so far, I've yet to see a design that doesn't result in some other tradeoff, such as a vastly more expensive unilateral exit or some other trust assumption.
I'm also not sure if you're understanding the point I'm trying to make. I'm saying LN has already succeeded at product market fit, but for something other than what you're imagining. I'm not saying it offers no/low fee non-custodial payments, but I am instead saying it is THE open payment protocol, connecting not only non-custodial LN wallets and custodial LN wallets but also wallets that use entirely different designs such as Fedimint, Cashu, Ark, and statechains. All of these different solutions already support LN as the open payment protocol. There's evidence that indicates LN solves that problem. Hence, product-market fit.
As for bitcoin as p2p currency, you're free to move on, but I'm going to continue working toward that as a north star. Each and every year we'll inch closer toward that, but we also shouldn't shy away from practical, useful products and designs that work today and are moving toward that north star.

2024-05-28 13:50:31

- reply

Any user of, for example, Phoenix, Mutiny, Cash App, Coinbase, a Cashu wallet, Fedi, etc. can seamlessly pay each other and not even understand each of those represents very different tradeoffs and have completely different designs. What they have in common is using bitcoin as money and LN as the open payment protocol.
If you don't like paying 0.4% fees for a non-custodial mobile LN wallet, then you have the option of using a custodial or e-cash wallet to avoid the fees along with the associated tradeoffs.
Yes, we'd all love a wallet design that supports 8B people, has no fees, is as censorship-resistant and security as on-chain bitcoin, but that doesn't exist today.

2024-05-28 03:29:44

- reply

This https://primal.net/e/note14gy37hq462t07ud60qyt0vd76kntxcthxvuem32unzl6qqq4djlsr4gx2t

2024-05-28 01:39:51

- reply

Impressive. Just the pull-ups alone!

2024-05-27 21:29:33

- reply

😂

2024-05-27 20:04:39

- reply

Yes I've used many and support many who are adopting LDK. I think Phoenix is the best UX with reasonable fees but it is no longer available to me. I like Mutiny as well and it is my preferred non-custodial LN wallet, but they've had problems with their LSP scaling. It is all very early.
Even once all the kinks are worked out, there are fundamental challenges with a LN wallet that make it impractical for small amount spending wallets (eg $20 balance) that are used to zap in nostr or on Stacker News.
There are other solutions such as e-cash that don't have that problem, but e-cash systems make other tradeoffs. Thus back to my original point, which is there's no single solution that serves everyone's payment needs. The good news is there are many solutions in the works, and LN is the open payment protocol connecting them all so users of different systems can seamlessly pay each other. It is quite beautiful.

2024-05-27 18:41:22

- reply

The secret sauce I refer to is LN as the connective tissue or glue between systems. I'm asserting it is unique in its ability to instantly settle payments between disparate systems.

2024-05-27 18:38:00

- reply

I'm not under a rock, and I'm sorry to break it to you, but no cryptocurrency has solved scaling. There's no silver bullet solutions. There are only tradeoffs. LN is _unique_ in that it interconnects these different solutions.
Contrast this with, say, USDC, in which there's no interoperability between the plethora of platforms that support USDC. If you have USDC on Base, try sending it to a Kraken wallet. If you have USDC on SOL in a Phantom wallet, try sending it to a Metamask user.

2024-05-27 18:35:09

- reply

Are you suggesting I don't post my thoughts on nostr? @npub180c…h6w6 seemed happy that I was posting here.

2024-05-27 18:33:36

- reply

There are various solutions all with tradeoffs. The LN interconnects all of them. https://primal.net/e/note14gy37hq462t07ud60qyt0vd76kntxcthxvuem32unzl6qqq4djlsr4gx2t

2024-05-27 16:32:58

- reply

For non-custodial LN wallets, liquidity ads and the LSP spec are liquidity management solutions (realized in code such as https://github.com/lightningdevkit/lightning-liquidity and by services such as Voltage and Olympus).
Ark and statechain-based solutions take different approaches.
Yet other solutions such as Fedimint and Cashu, or Cash App and Coinbase, because they're custodial/pooled funds, avoid those challenges altogether.

2024-05-27 15:59:10

There is yet to be a silver bullet scaling solution for cryptocurrency. Instead, what we have for now, and possibly for a long long time, are many solutions each with distinct tradeoffs that will match different user needs.
The secret sauce to making this all work is LN.
#note1an9…jy4g

2024-05-27 04:11:04

- reply

It really helped shine a light on how LN has become the open payment protocol.

2024-05-27 04:08:03

- reply

Note: I'm re-exploring such dynamics for the first time in 7 years.
Here's the distinction I'm thinking: Investors hold power because they can put their money where their mouth is. They can sell bitcoin if they don't like the direction. They can express intentions for a fork through futures like in 2017 with Bitfinex s2x futures. But investors aren't economic nodes because they aren't receiving bitcoin on a daily basis.
Economic nodes hold power because they're constantly receiving bitcoin and validating the rules. If economic nodes reject blocks mined by miners that is significant. Or, if they don't enforce new soft forked rules for transactions that miners are mining, that creates a precarious situation for anyone locking up funds in such scripts.
Thoughts?

2024-05-27 04:02:46

- reply

I made a silly typo in this note. Please refer to this one 😉 https://primal.net/e/note1an99hwm4lgpesgmvl0jn7zf55z2tamyq8vg758rgy2h4l6ydrkkseejy4g

2024-05-27 02:06:39

Bitcoin governance is fascinating. There are 4 main actors each with unique powers: miners, developers, investors, and economic nodes. For now, economic nodes are largely exchanges although this will grow in the future as payments take off (merchants, e-cash mints, LN routers).

2024-05-27 00:43:04

Lightning Network has product-market fit as the open payment protocol

2024-05-27 00:42:19

Lightning Network has product-market fit as the open monetary protocol

2024-05-11 17:37:39

"I like what Steve said, the Team Slow & Steady. Very conservative. Slow & steady development. And iterate over time." - Odell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKX6d2nPSkE&t=690s
h/t to AJ Towns for his thought leadership here https://www.erisian.com.au/wordpress/2024/04/20/team-slow-and-steady

2024-05-10 00:34:54

- reply

Physical stickers exist too!

2024-05-08 18:06:52

- reply

1.6.7

2024-05-08 17:15:53

- reply

@npub12vk…pugg on iPhone. I see it double posted too. Maybe user error but I don't think so.

2024-05-08 13:16:26

- reply

I'm curious if you learned more? Is there anything published?

2024-05-07 15:59:04

I recommend AJ's framing of slow and steady
#note1f4w…023v

2024-05-07 15:58:04

🔥
#note1nr6…ycfh

2024-05-02 20:32:34

- reply

Similar in spirit, but Ocean does not support Stratum v2 yet.

2024-05-02 20:31:49

Jack answers "“Why the hell are you all spending so much time on bitcoin?”" in Block's shareholder letter.
https://s29.q4cdn.com/628966176/files/doc_financials/2024/q1/Shareholder-Letter_1Q24_Block.pdf

2024-05-02 03:49:41

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/demand-pools-ceo-says-the-time-to-decentralize-bitcoin-mining-is-now

2024-04-29 14:14:22

- reply

Are you using the lightning-liquidity crate or equivalent to offer mobile wallets functionality they need? If not then you're just proving Matt's point.

2024-04-28 05:23:24

- reply

If things haven't changed from a year ago then I don't think it is a practical solution as it doesn't scale and is a massive regulatory target. I do think it has several innovative technical concepts that are interesting. I've heard there are improvements to liquidity requirements though which I hope is true and would love to learn more.

2024-04-27 11:00:13

- reply

Looking forward to hearing if the unscalable liquidity requirements have been solved

2024-04-23 16:26:47

New 3nm bitcoin mining chip incoming. Let's shake up the mining industry and give Bitmain some competition! https://www.mining.build/latest-updates-3nm-system/

2024-04-17 18:15:33

Worrisome centralization
#note1qck…0jz3

2024-04-15 22:46:24

Please come tomorrow night if you're in the Bay area! https://www.meetup.com/SF-Lightning-Devs/events/300294136/

2024-04-11 14:15:31

- reply

This is a good metric to track but not the most important metric. More important metrics:
1. Wallets supporting BOLT 12 Pay
2. Wallets supporting Lightning Address BOLT 12 DNS Pay (with LNURL fallback)
3. Wallets supporting Lightning Address BOLT 12 DNS Receive (with LNURL fallback)
4. LSPs supporting BOLT 12 (blinded paths and onion messages)
5. Wallets supporting BOLT 12 Receive
6. Wallets supporting async payments protocol
7. LSPs supporting async payments protocol

2024-03-31 20:29:10

- reply

It isn't opaque as the source code is published and supports reproducible builds as independently verified here https://walletscrutiny.com/android/world.bitkey.app

2024-03-24 23:52:35

- reply

That is not correct

2024-03-24 18:37:12

- reply

That doesn't work reliably