Two significant-ish "akshually"s but also a DEFENSE of OpenSats (npub10pe…n34f) in regards to SeedSigner (npub17ty…3mgl).
On Rabbit Hole Recap (npub10ut…xdlq) #320, ODELL (npub1qny…95gx) said:
"There's multiple conspiracies with OpenSats and two of the key ones is Knots and SeedSigner. And neither have submitted applications. If you're a developer or a contributor working on either of those things, opensats.org/apply"
Akshually:
1.) SeedSigner DID submit an OpenSats application for the project as a whole. The application languished for months (perhaps 6mo to a year?) and was ultimately declined with the explanation that it was easier/preferable to support individual devs than whole projects.
2.) Based on that feedback, I submitted an OpenSats application to fund just me specifically. That was also declined. BUT the rationale was because HRF (npub17xv…c9as) had just announced a 6mo grant for me. I was encouraged to reapply to OpenSats before that HRF funding expired.
The delays around 1.) were totally understandable. OpenSats is a VOLUNTEER effort and had even fewer human resources at that time. But also: they don't owe us a f'n thing!! They're under no obligation to say "Yes" nor should we ever have the arrogance to think we deserve to demand a "Yes"!
BUT the delays to get to ANY answer were VERY frustrating and likely added to some of the bad blood in the water amongst those watching the project closely. Eventually each "later, soon..." response was received with increasing cynicism and creeping conspiracy theories.
The "No" was totally reasonable. Getting to "No" faster would have been better.
The "No" on 2.) was also totally reasonable. No complaints from me whatsoever. I also strongly believe that THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN A "YES" had the HRF funding not come through.
I consider O'Dell a friend and an ally. When I saw him in Nashville I gave him a hug and said, "I appreciate you."
I'm not about drama.
Not here to start any shouting matches.
Just trying to paint a clear picture about what was good and what was bad throughout our interactions with OpenSats thus far.
And full disclosure: I'm prepping a new grant application for myself for OpenSats. So, sure, I have personal reasons for not wanting to burn this bridge.
But the reality is that there was just nothing outrageous or awful or controversial about our interactions. Circumstance and timing weren't right for attempts 1.) and 2.). Crossing my fingers for upcoming 3.).
Conspiracy theories are dumb.
KeithMukai / Keith Mukai
npub1tv…77wn2
2024-09-06 17:52:55
Author Public Key
npub1tv8gmfhalwnxxquxjzeh6gtdsdz6vg7vx0s3rt7s7uuw6aujh32qn77wn2Published at
2024-09-06 17:52:55Event JSON
{
"id": "16c99f945dea8c7f8a6a2a647115e692ece7f7a7bd2246f1b139e0d2adb6af8b",
"pubkey": "5b0e8da6fdfba663038690b37d216d8345a623cc33e111afd0f738ed7792bc54",
"created_at": 1725645175,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"320"
],
[
"p",
"787338757fc25d65cd929394d5e7713cf43638e8d259e8dcf5c73b834eb851f2",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"f2c96c97f6419a538f84cf3fa72e2194605e1848096e6e5170cce5b76799d400",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"7f177706ad6e0aea75a9e3345d9ffdae67676faff249be657b596375e1ced391",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"f1989a96d75aa386b4c871543626cbb362c03248b220dc9ae53d7cefbcaaf2c1",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Two significant-ish \"akshually\"s but also a DEFENSE of nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f in regards to nostr:npub17tyke9lkgxd98ruyeul6wt3pj3s9uxzgp9hxu5tsenjmweue6sqq4y3mgl.\n\nOn nostr:npub10uthwp4ddc9w5adfuv69m8la4enkwma07fymuetmt93htcww6wgs55xdlq #320, nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx said:\n\n\"There's multiple conspiracies with OpenSats and two of the key ones is Knots and SeedSigner. And neither have submitted applications. If you're a developer or a contributor working on either of those things, opensats.org/apply\"\n\nAkshually:\n1.) SeedSigner DID submit an OpenSats application for the project as a whole. The application languished for months (perhaps 6mo to a year?) and was ultimately declined with the explanation that it was easier/preferable to support individual devs than whole projects.\n\n2.) Based on that feedback, I submitted an OpenSats application to fund just me specifically. That was also declined. BUT the rationale was because nostr:npub17xvf49kht23cddxgw92rvfktkd3vqvjgkgsdexh9847wl0927tqsrhc9as had just announced a 6mo grant for me. I was encouraged to reapply to OpenSats before that HRF funding expired.\n\nThe delays around 1.) were totally understandable. OpenSats is a VOLUNTEER effort and had even fewer human resources at that time. But also: they don't owe us a f'n thing!! They're under no obligation to say \"Yes\" nor should we ever have the arrogance to think we deserve to demand a \"Yes\"!\n\nBUT the delays to get to ANY answer were VERY frustrating and likely added to some of the bad blood in the water amongst those watching the project closely. Eventually each \"later, soon...\" response was received with increasing cynicism and creeping conspiracy theories.\n\nThe \"No\" was totally reasonable. Getting to \"No\" faster would have been better.\n\nThe \"No\" on 2.) was also totally reasonable. No complaints from me whatsoever. I also strongly believe that THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN A \"YES\" had the HRF funding not come through.\n\nI consider O'Dell a friend and an ally. When I saw him in Nashville I gave him a hug and said, \"I appreciate you.\"\n\nI'm not about drama.\n\nNot here to start any shouting matches.\n\nJust trying to paint a clear picture about what was good and what was bad throughout our interactions with OpenSats thus far.\n\nAnd full disclosure: I'm prepping a new grant application for myself for OpenSats. So, sure, I have personal reasons for not wanting to burn this bridge.\n\nBut the reality is that there was just nothing outrageous or awful or controversial about our interactions. Circumstance and timing weren't right for attempts 1.) and 2.). Crossing my fingers for upcoming 3.). \n\nConspiracy theories are dumb.",
"sig": "3306742d836351a183191ae3d4e9cc87127198a61a7a4893fb13bab6e434bf72f23642304f89481fb2d4df842bf95ff36b8236ae6ec24956c38bc17a0f9e4266"
}