Archivist of Your New Year's Resolutions on Nostr: It's similar to a pastor I know about who decided he was going to get a graduate ...
It's similar to a pastor I know about who decided he was going to get a graduate degree in evolutionary biology to learn about the other side and subvert them, so he could show Christians why Creationism is true. He is now one of the biggest proponents of atheistic evolution you'll find. He sounds like the amazing atheist. He went into the lion's den unprepared and arrogant, so he joined them.
The other side never gives ground and are masters of twisting all arguments to fit their narrative, using circular reasoning. If you accept their premises, you'll always lose, because they'll never allow any starting axiom into discussion that defies them.
Their Foundational Premise of their arguments: "Our heresy is correct."
Their Arguments: "Let's discuss how the evidence supports how our arguments are correct."
Their Conclusion: "See! The evidence proves that our arguments are correct."
Published at
2023-09-10 20:01:35Event JSON
{
"id": "6fd196b53d829d0cf87abcd0c5f84bd77ed86f02d0bdb960a673de37bcd90e0c",
"pubkey": "24956f2995137ef806a5f794ade8e860886e35a1f1d28c08caf5aeb4c901d8aa",
"created_at": 1694376095,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"5ee944bf1d4444c1a2230a6b36379cf22897dbae9f58573244b3754e4a24fdd3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"533c2b52e08bb85346b5cfa2fdc3157cc720f8a40ed901a71427a3847fdbc1a5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://poa.st/objects/83232081-d18e-4bc6-94c1-462dd2da3f81",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "It's similar to a pastor I know about who decided he was going to get a graduate degree in evolutionary biology to learn about the other side and subvert them, so he could show Christians why Creationism is true. He is now one of the biggest proponents of atheistic evolution you'll find. He sounds like the amazing atheist. He went into the lion's den unprepared and arrogant, so he joined them.\nThe other side never gives ground and are masters of twisting all arguments to fit their narrative, using circular reasoning. If you accept their premises, you'll always lose, because they'll never allow any starting axiom into discussion that defies them.\n\nTheir Foundational Premise of their arguments: \"Our heresy is correct.\"\nTheir Arguments: \"Let's discuss how the evidence supports how our arguments are correct.\"\nTheir Conclusion: \"See! The evidence proves that our arguments are correct.\"",
"sig": "b7d85ad3eec7d8e7c45c317af8e81a8f606ca7e632ec1fd4feb970d0ac41967aeb9890948bedba7623265a160fa472d68f3c78dd5aa134e813345f993a12c0d6"
}