Annime Wong

https://poa.st/users/Elliptica

"I was a niche micro E-celebrity."

Too retarded for real life - Not retarded enough for welfare.

1a: 2g

Public Key

npub1scqvk3c23vd8mjz6u9y0mxchsalapkggv7uv4mky084t753uz37s8x5d0u

NIP-05 Address

elliptica_at_poa.st@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsgvqxtgu9gkxnaepdwzj8anvtcwl7smyyx0wx2amz8n64l2g7pglgklzc2r

Author Public Key

npub1scqvk3c23vd8mjz6u9y0mxchsalapkggv7uv4mky084t753uz37s8x5d0u

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-08-05 16:02:55

- reply

You're angry cause itty bitty tiddy in a mini's off the job.

2024-07-09 03:23:32

- reply

Still, what advantage does bombing a children's hospital offer? Regardless of who did it, it seems accidental (though I don't know what the US/Ukraine got out of bombing a beach, so who knows.).

2024-07-06 04:27:31

If you speak a non European foreign language, you can speak the truth on reddit.
https://i.poastcdn.org/1f8659bc754d5efeeee24120c3576dab3881f8f7a200665cdf5db2b48890108b.png
https://i.poastcdn.org/2be84c866e16dceccaf0a384feb81f8bbe00bfa2a93af31fe6a39e638519c392.png

2024-07-05 21:24:05

- reply

I have a theory that character creation in video games causes transgenderism and autogynophilia. It lines up with what they say their favorite video games are. It's why so many troons are gamers.
What's funny about this to me is troons push to make everything asexual, meaning that chances of explicit trannyisms might actually decrease the number of trannies created. No longer asking are you a boy or a girl, but asking you to pick "body types" effective neuters the choice. Removing buffs and debuffs for sexes (females are weak but might be better at magic, and vice versa) or removing sex specific plots or items removes the reason to even try to role play as a different sex.
It's like a cycle. Videogames creates troons, troons neuter videogames, no more troons.
https://i.poastcdn.org/fff7e6fb3cad6e965073027e3a04de36523acee830df8cab7e1dd1393453cc3a.jpg

2024-07-05 04:22:43

- reply

Same with schizophrenia. I know from personal experience (I'm not, but I had a close friend who has a sibling who was).

2024-07-02 17:01:53

Why do companies keep doing this? I hate commercials, I hate commercialism, AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
https://i.poastcdn.org/711405b423775b9583c4e31e674ff73891ac20fb6c0a6bf719cbdefa3b9900e9.png
https://i.poastcdn.org/cd0a74fd2bebdf8b7b99cad6facf7dc52a5defa25aaca21a73463fa6dffa5bd2.png

2024-07-01 23:08:11

- reply

It's hard to convince a newbie to do that. "Hey, make your own twitter just for you, and then put up with a bunch of bullshit because you don't know what you are doing and there are people who will try to ruin you over it."

2024-06-30 14:25:50

- reply

Reminder:
https://i.poastcdn.org/302f9bf17740877dcda643a1692f322177771ca3c79d546ece5ecbf12d992d6a.png
https://i.poastcdn.org/be6f903a33e9693281fecd00dc881ea02063ceee6edd71fccf184e6a2a712bd7.png

2024-06-28 23:43:56

RT:
https://mstdn.social/users/stux/statuses/112694456959641859
https://i.poastcdn.org/1f5737fcd22f5c3d8f38bc14fe296e2577824fb75fd6f76640dff90333ee2b19.jpg
#note1a8h…vjzn

2024-06-28 05:41:57

- reply

Buying everyone dinner.

2024-06-28 05:26:14

- reply

I've seen bots says nigger, we need to add another layer of security.

2024-06-28 05:06:23

- reply

I saw the important bits, both support Israel and Ukraine more than the other guy.

2024-06-20 15:36:05

- reply

What are blocking units?

2024-06-17 16:04:26

- reply

https://i.poastcdn.org/12d08a72fc640e617b33d8caebd476377c64d266d38f2dba6429a633e731e7e7.jpg

2024-06-15 17:54:44

- reply

They did this from the start. I think the idea that the press served the public was the bit of propaganda used to justify this behavior.

2024-06-12 03:49:08

-The Nigga Gambit-
>Work at a big company with Black co-workers
>Follow all of them on social media
>Record any instances of them saying "Nigger" or "Nigga"
>Anonymously report this to the company (nothing will happen)
>Record yourself sayings "Nigger" or "Nigga" on social media
>Get fired
>Sue for discrimination
Rosa Parks wanted to sit in the front of the bus, and I want to say the N-word.

2024-06-08 05:15:46

- reply

You'd be surprised. There is still an imbalance, but the gender gap in physics is closing fast. There's inertia from the older guys, but the imbalance in grad schools and younger professors is almost nonexistent.

2024-06-07 23:27:44

- reply

Sorry for the mucho texto. I know you probably do not care, but anyway...
Explaining the specific problem in simple terms, a statistician would probably look at an astronomers paper and think "it's good!" because he doesn't understand astrophysics or instrumentation processes very well. Statisticians may assume they are looking at raw data, which is a mistake. Astronomers have to be critical of their data. The mistake astronomers were basically making in the article is assuming "my data is good", when they know their data had to be refined at some point. Basically they were asking "given my result, what is the chances of it being true?", instead they should have been asking "given my result, what are the chances of it being an artifact of me messing with it, and if it wasn't then what is the chances of it being true?"
Similarly, the sub-field of astrophysics, photometry (literally counting photons over a given period of time), seems like a perfect candidate for something basic like Poisson statistics (counting events over a period). However photon detection may be incredibly rare (a big problem for x-ray astronomy where they count tens of photons over a 24 hour observation). Data reduction techniques may actually make it not a purely Poisson process (basically if a data point survives is subjected to two dice roles now instead of one, one of which has time component, and the other which doesn't), and events may be so infrequent anyway that it forces them to use more advanced techniques like Survival Analysis.
If an astronomer explained his problem simply as "I am counting photons over a period of time", a statistician would say "Oh, yeah, that's Poisson!" Meanwhile, the astronomer may know that his data is more complex than that, but he lacks the experience to know what details are important to tell the statistician, or to even be aware of something fields like Survival Analysis exist. This leads to avoidable mistakes.

2024-06-07 22:42:02

- reply

Doing that for every paper would be impractical. First off, there is a barrier between fields. A mathematician (or as it would be in the case of this paper, a statistician) may not understand the data the astronomer is working with (this can be a big deal because astronomers do a lot of tweaking to extract data from what is basically noise, which skews it's statistical nature). Conversely, Astronomers and physicists tend to have a very poor background in statistical analysis (this actually frustrates me because two of the biggest fields in physics, Quantum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, are really just applications of statistics). Ideally a peer-review process would catch these mistakes, but if no one understands the math behind it well enough, then the "experts" will inevitably make mistakes. But also, that's a lot of papers, it's unrealistic to expect everyone to hire a mathematician to check the most basic aspects of your work. In theory you should be competent enough to do it yourself.
The only way forward is to train astronomers so that they are more well versed with the math they are trying to apply. This means actually teaching them statistics, which they currently do not do to any significant degree.

2024-06-07 22:13:51

- reply

I found the abstract. 30% of papers (out of 75) did their math wrong.
https://i.poastcdn.org/1dcd2f0ad8abaf1749f6807f3e35ce0acee0f21325f5f9a0b169f27892f069e6.png

2024-06-07 22:09:14

I've been at a astrophysics conference for the last week. One of the speakers told a story about how he once published a paper showing that a lot of papers were basically doing math wrong (making up notation, using notation wrong, and then jumping to false conclusions based off that bad notation). He received so much hate that he decided he would never do that again.RT:
https://poa.st/objects/a25eb858-8891-4297-88d9-3036ba354dd8
#note1vj9…4csp

2024-06-07 04:30:29

- reply

In shape, good artist, and he's right about most of the rw sphere being lazy blobs. He's the exception to the rule with Koreans, though he does occasionally have some weird things to say, like how he eats blood because it tastes good (Edit: he didn't say that about blood, I misheard).