Darkstar / Darkstar is on Nostr

"4c9710442158e674413dbf5ae810e0c27e32dd4ec0af5fdacded595a18972c6396b15b53ee1ed22c1daf721738e1155b079734e1503fda77bfae04e0414c5b27"

Last Notes

2024-10-14 10:52:37

I strongly agree with ign analysis of the episode "Cent'anni". While the series originally aimed for a more "grounded" approach, the inclusion of certain exaggerations, especially in Sofia's storyline, disrupts the flow that had been carefully built. Arkham has always been a pivotal element in Gotham's universe, and the flashback does add depth to her backstory, but I believe the episode, though interesting on its own, doesn’t quite fit into the broader narrative. The way the flashbacks are handled, with multiple jumps back and forth in time, might help explore details but ultimately harms the continuity of the present storyline.
#note1fgf…cv84

2024-08-31 18:22:57

- reply

The question raised is valid and reveals a potential bias in the application of the law. If Twitter/X weren't so controversial, it's possible that this situation wouldn't have escalated to this point. The decision to specifically target Twitter/X, while other platforms like YouTube and TikTok continue to operate without similar restrictions, suggests that there is more at play than just enforcing the law. TikTok, for example, has been banned in various regions and countries, yet it continues to operate in Brazil without major issues. This raises the suspicion that the focus isn't necessarily on protecting users or fairly applying the rules, but rather on a preference or dislike towards Twitter/X. This selectivity is concerning, as it indicates an arbitrary use of power, which can further erode trust in institutions and the justice system.

2024-08-31 16:22:56

I completely agree with the analysis. Brazil's decision regarding the ban on X is concerning, not only for its content but also for how it was written. The text is extremely vague and broad, leaving room for dangerous interpretations. Imposing personal liability on company presidents, without clearly defining the means they must use to comply with the order, is a classic example of abuse of power. This type of authoritarian and undefined approach undermines the rule of law and puts individual freedoms at risk. No government or authority should have so much power to arbitrarily decide what can or cannot be done on the internet. This sets a dangerous precedent for future interventions and censorship, which is unacceptable in a democracy.
#note1qq7…ysp4

2024-08-31 16:18:49

Olá Brasil

2024-08-31 02:45:46

- reply

wow ign on nostr

2024-08-30 22:41:36

The decision by Minister Alexandre de Moraes to order the shutdown of X (formerly Twitter) in Brazil is alarming and filled with absurdities, as it demonstrates an excessive governmental interference in freedom of expression and the right to information.
Firstly, this measure is a direct attack on the fundamental principle of freedom of expression. Blocking such a broad communication platform like X is an extreme action that silences millions of voices at once. This creates a dangerous precedent where the government can unilaterally decide what can or cannot be discussed online, paving the way for arbitrary censorship.
Another absurdity is the economic and social impact of this decision. Millions of Brazilians rely on X for business, networking, and personal communication. The sudden shutdown of the platform not only affects people’s lives but also undermines international investors’ confidence in Brazil. The country’s digital economy, already fragile, could suffer even more from this authoritarian move.
Furthermore, while the justification of combating misinformation and hate speech is important, it cannot be used as an excuse for such drastic measures. There are other ways to address these issues without resorting to mass censorship. The solution should focus on strengthening digital education, encouraging transparency, and improving content moderation, rather than simply flipping the switch on a platform.
In summary, the order to shut down X in Brazil is absurd, as it harms freedom of expression, damages the digital economy, and sets a dangerous precedent for state censorship. It is essential that civil society, businesses, and the international community take a stand against this measure to protect fundamental rights and ensure that Brazil remains a country where debate and the exchange of ideas are free and accessible.

2024-08-30 22:41:06

A decisão do ministro Alexandre de Moraes de ordenar a derrubada do X (antigo Twitter) no Brasil é alarmante e cheia de absurdos, pois evidencia uma interferência governamental desmedida na liberdade de expressão e no direito à informação.
Primeiramente, essa medida é um ataque direto ao princípio fundamental da liberdade de expressão. Bloquear uma plataforma de comunicação tão abrangente como o X é uma ação extrema que silencia milhões de vozes de uma só vez. Isso cria um perigoso precedente, onde o governo pode decidir unilateralmente o que é ou não permitido ser discutido online, abrindo caminho para uma censura arbitrária.
Outro ponto absurdo é o impacto econômico e social dessa decisão. Milhões de brasileiros dependem do X para negócios, networking e comunicação pessoal. O bloqueio repentino da plataforma não só afeta a vida das pessoas, mas também mina a confiança dos investidores internacionais no Brasil. A economia digital do país, já fragilizada, pode sofrer um golpe ainda maior com essa atitude autoritária.
Além disso, a justificativa de combater desinformação e discurso de ódio, embora importante, não pode ser usada como desculpa para medidas tão drásticas. Há outras formas de combater esses problemas sem recorrer à censura em massa. A solução deveria focar em fortalecer a educação digital, incentivar a transparência e aprimorar a moderação de conteúdo, em vez de simplesmente desligar o interruptor de uma plataforma.
Em resumo, a ordem de derrubar o X no Brasil é um absurdo, pois fere a liberdade de expressão, prejudica a economia digital e abre um precedente perigoso para a censura estatal. É essencial que a sociedade civil, empresas e a comunidade internacional se posicionem contra essa medida para proteger os direitos fundamentais e garantir que o Brasil continue sendo um país onde o debate e a troca de ideias sejam livres e acessíveis.

2024-08-30 22:40:02

Shocking decision to block Elon Musk's X in Brazil! This move undermines free speech and sets a dangerous precedent for censorship. We should be defending open dialogue, not stifling it. Absurd and unacceptable. #FreeSpeech #Censorship

2024-08-30 22:37:21

- reply

Isso é surpreendente. Vamos monitorar como isso se desdobrará nos próximos dias.

2024-08-30 22:06:16

Can someone send me an Alby (lightning wallet) invite code pretty please 🙏
#Bitcoin #lightning #zapp #wallet #Nostr

2024-08-30 21:32:48

- reply

nem que tu disse olha oque acabou de acontecer com o x e com as vpns

2024-07-20 16:36:43

testando
https://m.primal.net/JXrb.jpg