Note edit maximalist

Public Key

npub1lessedcc9zt482gwvtuq4twr9kqgqgf3mq2u83rpn2qmz3zxrqgq6v0tkl

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0ucgvkuvz396n4y8x97q24hpjmqyqyycas9wrc3se4qd3g3rpsyqpdyz9w

Author Public Key

npub1lessedcc9zt482gwvtuq4twr9kqgqgf3mq2u83rpn2qmz3zxrqgq6v0tkl

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-03-11 00:58:42

- reply

That's fun to think about, but I think it's more in line with the nostr way to build a system where the humans are the algorithm. The existing reaction kind should be enough as long as there is a standardized way to up and down vote, like '+' and '-'.
With that standard in place, my client can then show me the top voted suggested edit, with votes filtered through my web of trust.

2024-03-11 00:47:14

- reply

What would it take to build something like community notes around kind 1010 edit events? A simple way to up or downvote perhaps?

2024-03-11 00:42:32

- reply

I can see your point now

2024-03-11 00:41:28

- reply

Lol don't be mad because you don't get to dictate the direction of this protocol

2024-03-11 00:40:14

- reply

Let's take long form content for example. Aren't the replies to that kind 1 events?

2024-03-11 00:26:59

- reply

I respect what you're doing Vitor. Bleeding edge freedom tech, it's a beautiful thing to see.
Edits have the potential to unleash a decentralized army of fact finders.
I'm less convinced on the rationale behind changing kind 1 in the protocol. Why not keep kind 1 for all reply events?

2024-03-11 00:23:45

- reply

Spelling nazi 🫡😂

2024-03-10 19:22:28

- reply

You're nagging voice in my head while I chug the note edit koolaid 😁

2024-03-10 18:54:03

- reply

I'm digging the discussion here. Why not have one kind as a universal reply kind, but have top level "tweets" as their own event kind?

2024-03-10 18:45:59

- reply

Glad to see people using this feature