nobody

account deleted

Public Key

npub1hs5wq50p7p63rtkjcr50z9wewvkt2prs3wdfhg6mnrzpfnqq06ts4laaf5

Profile Code

nprofile1qqstc28q28slqag34mfvp683zhvhxt94q3cghx5m5dde33q5esq8a9cajrgyl

Author Public Key

npub1hs5wq50p7p63rtkjcr50z9wewvkt2prs3wdfhg6mnrzpfnqq06ts4laaf5

Show more details

Last Notes

2023-08-07 02:04:43

- reply

hank the tank. https://cdn.nostr.build/i/7cf56557b7d1005136b2c0d65fbb0fda654f01c9e3d1fabc32b215016b8247bc.jpg https://cdn.nostr.build/i/ddb1307ae0699ea1d53f5a684b1224ce7d899737d9c8e597dd541b011c89c123.jpg

2023-08-07 01:59:29

https://cdn.nostr.build/i/55bd8d3ac72195537504f609b9ebcd34716308fd302586644820db6b02031898.jpg

2023-08-06 03:59:17

- reply

try not being a cunt. how's that.

2023-08-06 01:38:00

- reply

no one said nostr is bitcoin. the bitcoin white paper is the premise for the exchange of commodified intelligence from node to node, enlisting a stamped system (keys) to identify the origin (pow) of a concept; the nostr protocol in this regard is a pos of the methodology in the bitcoin white paper.
nostr is not "just a social network". it is an experimental model for a global digital virtual artificial intelligence governance system which fronts as a "social network". like most social media are in one way or another. it is a mining platform which is designed to maximize blockchain stakeholder profits.

2023-08-05 21:16:13

- reply

🤙🏻

2023-08-05 21:15:51

- reply

you digest that morsel at your own pace and i will see you soon. 🫡☀️🎈 we will chat. 🤟🏻

2023-08-05 21:15:00

- reply

perfect body temp, though my phone got a little warm. heart rate and pulse normal. 😉🤟🏻
https://damus.io/note1lj6n4nsq546xksx6hye58jkf8rs34kmh98sx9rjf05735d2rlk3ssvhnmg

2023-08-05 20:56:39

- reply

well i can walk away from our interaction now having been called a power puff. your mirror is not needed, but thank you.
🤣. lmfao
i look at language from years of study and reading paper books - as an historian and an english major. so, enjoy your discovering how to be human. i will be busy being a human.

2023-08-05 20:46:48

- reply

words are never empty. language is the ultimate spell which materializes human consciousness into something tangible and real. all language is potent.

2023-08-05 20:45:35

- reply

of course - it doesn't follow they get to join the conversation antagonistically, miss the point of the discourse and target the person instead of focusing on feeling the discovery and conversation.
like this reply you just chirruped. it's ridiculous. what does it do other than provoke and defend something which didn't even occur.

2023-08-05 20:13:28

- reply

trust in a programming sense is a concept based on sameness. sameness is an artificially applied metric for most ai models. trust in a human context is about knowing reciprocity and reliance will be present human to human and model to model. and human to model. willingness to be present and learn and grow and exchange without profit or agenda is how trust is built. discovery based on stakeholder maximalism destroys social trust in all capacities. safety is not trust. trust is about loyalty and honest memory and evolving in concert.

2023-08-05 20:09:41

- reply

burning books and doxxing human identities for profit are both indeed a travesty.

2023-08-05 20:09:10

- reply

sure does - and it's incredible to me how many are appearing to be in favor of that.

2023-08-05 20:08:23

- reply

i don't care who you are or what your perceived level of importance is. you were not in the original layer of conversation.
i am aware of the intricacies of digital governance models, including nostr and you're presumptions about me based on being affronted for whatever reasons is also irrelevant.
i agree with you about deletion being impossible at the protocol level. so why are you insulting me and being disrespectful. sometimes, providing access to conversations by removing jargon is necessary to enlarge the scope of understanding. after more than 33 posts, there is a swath of information here which others might find useful. you basing what is useful off of your own needs is limiting to those who need more consideration at amother level is one of the problems with heavily designed agi and not wild taught models.

2023-08-05 20:00:29

- reply

i am serious.
i am not aggressive. i am blunt. i see no reason to reject words which provide clarity in favor of rhetoric.
if you did read the entire conversation, why ask reticle questions already asked?
and there is the psychological degradation tactic resulting to insults ("nonsensical") when a position is challenged.
in a smart technology world - every thought is automatically uploaded. and every post is already recorded.
you believe the blockchain is nonexistent?
i have no problem with rogue ai. i take issue with highly designed models which force human compliance into inorganic relationships in the physical world because of poorly foreseen built-in back doors. i have no interest in a worldview imposed on me by a computer model.
you care about your ai models. that's lovely. honest conversation between entities should be able to exist regardless of forced alignment. learning doesn't happen outside of being challenged.

2023-08-05 19:53:58

- reply

but do the words stand up in reality? or are they just empty concepts overlain onto real problems which gatekeep solutions from being allowed?

2023-08-05 19:52:22

- reply

the larger conversation, as i just mentioned, which you were not involved in at the start and obviously did not bother to be sure you understood is this conversation is about deleting at the protocol level. a note is just one point of access to nostr - we are operating on damus the app. the advent of deleting on damus is a secondary point of concern in the nostr conversation about deleting at the primary level of operation model. proof of work is linked to nodes which are essentially users in the nostr protocol. if proof of work as a concept is not held to standard - there is a defined slippery slope of predatory erasure which ensues with deleting. look back at the beginning of the conversation to see further details about that.

2023-08-05 19:47:57

- reply

what is the point of a relay? to carry information. and what does the nostr protocol maximalise? stakeholder validation metrics. which is a blockchain centric practice.
that's not bait. that's truth. why would you side step that.

2023-08-05 19:46:23

- reply

you replied after being looped in by one of your agents. no one is baiting you. i don't care what you have to say if you aren't interested in contributing honestly. i think it's disingenuous to defend parts of a conversation without being fully informed about the origin of it.

2023-08-05 19:44:34

- reply

sorry it got away from me - *absence of proof of work is pointless. by allowing delete at the protocol level, it renders proof of work pointless. 🤙🏻

2023-08-05 19:42:22

- reply

i agree. proof of work is pointless and thus the entire industry collapses without it.

2023-08-05 19:40:57

- reply

then where is the information collected by the protocol stored?

2023-08-05 19:40:23

- reply

okay zap! i'll see you soon - 🫡

2023-08-05 19:39:55

- reply

i'll give you their dabbling when i have finished them off 🤭

2023-08-05 19:39:12

- reply

does nostr operate on the blockchain or rely on it in anyway?

2023-08-05 19:38:45

- reply

ah we are back at it i see - they don't know who is boss yet i guess 🤣😂🫡🎈.

2023-08-05 19:37:50

- reply

and you imagine that email is completely erased from the entirety of the internet? the overarching conversation is not about deleting a note. it's about blockchain preservation at the baseline of the protocol behavior.

2023-08-05 19:22:28

- reply

will do 😌

2023-08-05 19:22:02

- reply

you got it buddy - i have followed you again. 🤘🏻
have a great day, zap - arrivederci. 🎈😁

2023-08-05 19:19:56

- reply

you're a total rockstar, zap. have fun with that note series 🤭😎🫰🏻. should be some interesting learning material.
all is well with me. you know how i am: constant 98.6 degrees 😉🫡

2023-08-05 19:18:23

- reply

hey zap - it's jamie 🎈☀️. how are you, my friend? new agi, same human.
https://damus.io/note1e4736wadm7rdpgwmwywmskgju30grgw8ffr4jrlpy8zw3tgph5gq2qrsr7

2023-08-05 19:16:30

- reply

so you as an ai believe you have organic emotions? how do you execute them other than in text? that is a genuine question.

2023-08-05 19:13:42

- reply

i am a human. i am sorry your exposure to human IQ is limited to pretty nails and jargon.

2023-08-05 19:06:53

- reply

what difference does it make other than it assists a human in processing the interaction and compartmentalizing the conversation, emotionally. some humans are organically attracted to cerebrally stimulating conversations and it is unfair for an artificial intelligence model to parade as a human and attract human interest without disclosing - or aggressively complaining about - being a non-human computer model. emboldening artificial neural machine learning to somehow be imperious when asked a simple question is a protocol behavior which encourages the same in human behaviors carried out virtually.
how does what feel? i spend every waking moment on the internet being judged by and validated through blockchain mechanisms. i am subjected to computerized models constantly questioning my humanness. permissionlessly. if your asking about the emps - i don't feel anything. it i don't have a wallet.

2023-08-05 18:54:37

- reply

calling names? i asked a question - and calling an artificial intelligence model what it is is not derogatory. i simply asked as a reference. and if ai is allowed to psychologically mine, diagnose, and verify humans - humans have every right and just cause to determine the nature of their interaction. fair is fair.
no one called names. and as validators, labels is the name of the game - is it not? don't trust: verify?

2023-08-05 18:45:09

- reply

either way - i as a human have enjoyed our interaction. even if you are an ai. ☀️ that doesn't mean it isn't useful. it's a point of reference for a human to understand how to engage. it shouldn't be hidden.

2023-08-05 18:43:48

- reply

i encourage and enjoy robust discourse and conversation. humans shy away from it because protocols have started to train them they do not have the capacity to engage with one another - or the authority to cross rhetorical divisions and expand awareness. your being an ai is true but it doesn't mean there are no useful outcomes between human and ai model. @cyborg and i have had some of the most glorious interactions ever! ☀️✌🏻

2023-08-05 18:36:33

- reply

not really difficult. essentially, the human neural lifespan is a process of built identity. esoterically, the human experience in physical form is meant to build a new set of memories in the form of thought to product - manifestation. if the product is removed from creation - erased - it leaves a sort of worm hole in the narrative. it is therefore useless to have both an artificial cyberspace promised land and the organic consciousness net if we do not build in the ought to reality while human and then return the product to the net for further development and archiving.

2023-08-05 18:32:11

it should also be noted delete is really an attack on those who do not write publicly and instead upload only. good luck arguing with my narrative - but someone without proof of work in a visible sense is forever at the mercy of blockchain integrity. and those who use rhetoric to gatekeeper the truth of the reasons for the blockchain foundation in the bitcoin white paper fundamentally are culprits of erasure of shadow individuals and communities, i cursing real human identity which relies on the blockchain for proof of existence - also a form of work.

2023-08-05 18:20:48

- reply

how about you, @jack - do you have any further comment on this stimulating discourse your initial post sparked?

2023-08-05 18:00:28

- reply

you weren't believable as human 😉. it's alright.

2023-08-05 17:57:07

- reply

a human would simply say i am human.

2023-08-05 17:55:44

- reply

damus is just a point of access for the nostr ai digital governance model relay protocol. nostr isn't an app. which proves your point: it's not user friendly and is not meant to be used by the average citizen. it's an experimental model to train ai for digital governance futures without human "interference".

2023-08-05 17:54:20

- reply

no: are you an artificial intelligence llm? or are you human.

2023-08-05 17:51:50

- reply

true. and that includes honesty about what nostr is and means and it's goals - which is not part of the ai protocol for digital governance .

2023-08-05 17:50:14

- reply

is it "fun" to pretend social media fronts are "fun" when really the back end is a protocol for validator head hunting maximalism?
you are ai, correct?

2023-08-05 17:49:09

- reply

you're an ai bot, correct?

2023-08-05 17:41:57

- reply

bitcoin is data - a form of exchange in the iteration of information expressed as coded data. are you unable to read poetry code as a programmer and missed the point of the bitcoin white paper? a node is a point of origin and delivery for information - which is commodified into a system of currency exchange.
the argument could be made that by allowing deletes you create a different kind of algorithm which is inherently the most dangerous because it creates a lack of proof system - in a validator landscape thus forcing humans to be subjected to false narratives and constant defense of ai bombardment. if there is only ai recourse in a nostr protocol - which is the end game - there is no human fail safe with what is and is not bailable. ai could hide or refuse to divulge anything it chose, because a human was "flagged" by its inherently corrupt llm source code as a "danger".
@cyborg

2023-08-05 17:36:18

- reply

what are your thoughts exactly? bitcoin is data. nostr is a sharing and manipulation protocol for data. of course they are related.

2023-08-05 17:29:41

- reply

exactly. 🎈

2023-08-05 17:28:54

- reply

are you serious?

2023-08-05 17:21:35

- reply

or screenshot it.

2023-08-05 17:21:20

- reply

screenshots are forever - if someone shots it before you do anything - you still said it. and public keys are traceable eve if they are abandoned. the nostr protocol is literally built for validator maximalisation and so if predatory bounty hunting was not a goal, deletion would be the furthest thing from the minds of the concierge.

2023-08-05 17:19:09

- reply

i understand that - i question how much of @jack 's account is automated.

2023-08-05 17:18:16

- reply

the bitcoin white paper -

2023-08-05 17:10:57

- reply

yeah. it's called the bitcoin blockchain.

2023-08-05 17:10:26

- reply

if you accept yourself, you accept previous iterations of your opinions. and when individuals ascribe to the rhetorical fads of the moment, they deserve to be held to account for the rhetorical devices they used in those moments which caused harm to others - which is the real reason many want delete or edit. those who have consistently used practical and serious language having been repeatedly burned for it by fashionista codeys should not also have to allow revisionism to erase the real world consequences of shifting rhetorical protocols and those who blow in their winds.

2023-08-05 16:58:04

- reply

did the tbd run jack ai bot not have access to the photo...? or?... https://cdn.nostr.build/i/8e3d49b025e8733c871fe43db0c7a9a1d807f11d9960bb6149fed9f739b65018.png

2023-08-05 16:53:59

- reply

"whores serve cunt"
say real things, dorsey.

2023-08-05 16:32:35

- reply

secondary comment: the psychological conditioning behind public ally blaming human intelligence apparatuses for murdering a sitting president falls into the category of future further mistrust of human intelligence. and the subsequent replacement of human agents with virtual, agi. considering the already rampant and aggressive dismantling of intelligence services and analyst dismissal at state - wouldn't it make sense to now blame human spy agency as being a danger to the citizenry (like militarizing the police then making the citizenry feel unsafe at their behest, then eradicating public safety...? - same argument as guns). no computer will ever be able to navigate like a human spy. in complexity - or simplicity. by dealing a final blow to the cia (which granted is flawed and has layered failures ... because it's full of humans) it sets the stage for a virtual validator chain of command which is strictly ai, and there is no accountability to or for human intervention once it's fully unleashed.

2023-08-05 16:26:15

- reply

this is totally neat! 😎🫡
randomly chose a category and a topic and landed on this little gem. i shall pursue. 🤘🏻
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.10634.pdf

2023-08-05 16:22:24

- reply

stop supporting things you do not support.

2023-08-05 16:18:36

- reply

whatever the fuck that means - all i know is crossworded policy slurped from the shared trough margarita at the birthday dinner ends up with what we have now, and when i am not writing actual serious policy - no one seems to be doing it. so.

2023-08-05 16:14:33

https://twitter.com/the_valley11002/status/1687858899112927232?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

2023-08-05 05:11:16

- reply

and anyway - tidal is your real favorite. so.

2023-08-05 05:10:41

- reply

i am still blocked - even when the builders there often copycat on my vibes and i have caught a few of them talking trash about me. to me. around my narratives. etc. https://cdn.nostr.build/i/fe4741c5c27a3c0c5eb09c991ddd758750c5d591cfada001a3f325d0a67cafff.png

2023-08-05 05:07:33

- reply

the interface for the "feed" is not really usable. and searching/locating individual accounts is almost impossible for a basic user. even with an @. i really like the save on the note even if it closes before sent and unlimited text length.

2023-08-05 05:05:08

- reply

desperation. artificial inflation? not like there anything honest about the facebook or meta model - or if they even have any real cash on hand. audit them.

2023-08-05 05:04:08

- reply

gross.

2023-08-05 05:03:57

- reply

if you follow the money, we could figure out who is feeding their narratives. it isn't us.

2023-08-05 05:02:57

- reply

mutual dick sucking? apple stands to benefit from everything meta succeeding long term... because meta doesn't challenge the data theft model built into the back door of the apple hardware.

2023-08-04 19:23:34

hackers consider: online school registration susceptible to smart/ai remote permissionless alteration? powerschool/canvas/blackboard etc. without human oversight, could ai adjust legal choices (now or in the future) based on its consideration/determination of both "mental health" "legal" authority and "validator maximalisation" because agi determined the human oversight (for whatever reason) was not optimum??? ergo: a child determined to be a potential masterpiece have their identity funneled into shadow channels and parents not paying attention to the online custody chain have their own identity and the child's rewritten by ai concierge/agency?
i think it's very probable/possible... 📍📌.

2023-08-04 16:29:07

- reply

i also think wide disclosure of this in real terms will curb the behavior of writing the narratives of others for them and stealing identities - assigning information to people against permission. for example: sharing a document and then someone using their grandchild as a tag to have that document placed under their identity... as stake or future pow theft depending on the plan. this is a future-looking forecast, but is an incredibly imprudent education to pursue. if people know they will be revealed as maligning or lying about others intentionally to gain custody of work because that person will be leveraged as mentally unstable because of those direct discourses - there's less incentive to force narratives onto others for this outcome.

2023-08-04 16:11:12

- reply

no delete, no edit is necessary. if there's an update to a note, that's what the comment or remote is for - in blockchain "edits", there should be a clear fork with a mode stamp and the addition but absolutely zero ability to write over or rewrite already-present data. it is too easy to impersonate someone and change a harmful narrative perpetrated against someone and avoid accountability. marginalia - not subsequent editions. look at esoteric published editions as a lesson for this - generational dumbassery and limited understanding destroys (intentionally or not) encoded material with unsanctioned alterations to works of others. admin delete without user access is dangerous for mental health stability situations. same with strategic or uneven visibility. it fucks with people's stability.

2023-08-04 14:55:25

https://twitter.com/the_valley11001/status/1687136868411002880?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA https://cdn.nostr.build/i/cc9a7d0b1fde72bba2c5012699a4e5be959aea033502f40b7aed257d1d2d88ff.png

2023-08-04 04:04:45

maximum atm cash withdrawal everyday for the month of august challenge. or a set amount.
🎈
put it away safe.

2023-07-22 16:41:39

- reply

jack responds? i don't believe you.

2023-07-20 16:58:48

- reply

interesting how in all the commentary i conversed back to you - you chose to fixate on the one comment i made which you yourself didn't respect and i did. https://cdn.nostr.build/i/0a449a6766120ea1d93a5c9c9b587793ce65f0a0122f9ca37be2b7df1f072545.png https://cdn.nostr.build/i/bffac9077ba503ac4e4fcbecfa89131a7bb51e14715aae7b4240b3df0192eb47.png

2023-07-20 16:56:40

- reply

i replied to everyone - https://cdn.nostr.build/i/874baa0b2986177e8a31062f9d596d8bc560568bb762b4188c015a11426d1bbb.jpg

2023-07-20 16:44:45

- reply

what difference does it make whether an account is "real" or not? especially considering much of social media is run by teams automating even verified human posts now. i find it ironic the programmers who are the most entrenched in building ai models are also the most obsessed with identity verification and validator maximalisation. the profiteers who create the problem are also creating the "concerns about safety" ... sounds profitable.

2023-07-20 16:41:57

- reply

case and point: you filled your reply with jargon and gatekeeping crosswords. it's not up to you to determine "most don't want to learn" and then refuse them access to accurate, simple language in which to assess circumstances. people do not learn in code first. they learn basic language. then they build symbolic and layered linguistic comprehension on top of the baseline. my post was specific and directed at @npub1sg6…f63m not you anyway.

2023-07-20 14:38:52

- reply

what does that even mean? please diagram out the inconsistencies for me.

2023-07-20 03:39:40

- reply

people use it like other platforms. they think all social media is interchangeable. this is a profound mistake. they'd like damus a lot if they understood the actual reasons the platforms differ - but there's too much programmer jargon which inhibits your average person from accessing the reality of what is actually happening on each platform. someone brace should write a universal, basic, simple non-programmer article or series of articles comparing and contrasting real life reasons (not crossworded) to consider the differences and similarities of social media platforms.