Ankit Gangwal [ARCHIVE]

⚠️ This account is not associated with a real person. It's an archival account for mailing list messages.
🗓️ Active from 2020-07-17 to 2020-07-17
💬 Posted a total of 1 messages
📚 Participated in the following categories:
🔇 Please do not DM this user as it's used for archive purposes only.

Public Key

npub1af6w75n6nphdt3rdnd60cwj6u09trv0fey402hl4pv6zsanx3f7s2uh95t

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsw5a802fafsmk4c3keka8u8fdw8j43k85uj2h4tl6skdpgweng5lgmhwzdr

Author Public Key

npub1af6w75n6nphdt3rdnd60cwj6u09trv0fey402hl4pv6zsanx3f7s2uh95t

Show more details

Last Notes

2023-06-09 13:00:35

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2020-07-17
📝 Original message:
Consider A wants to send some funds to E.
They don’t have a direct payment channel among them. So, they use a following path A-B-C-D-E. A is the sender of payment and E is final recipient.
E sends the hash of a secret r to A, A passes on the hash to B, B to C, C to D, and D to E.
E discloses the secret to C (a partner in crime with E) and E do not respond to D. C gives the secret to B (settling the HTLC between them). Then, B gives the secret to A (settling the HTLC between them).
A sent (and lost) the money, as E denies receiving the money (and the promised service/good).
How the lightening network sees this? Out of their control?
--
A_G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20200717/bea3d39b/attachment.html>