Scoundrel

Public Key

npub14pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcspkxw3v

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs2s76q9tqgrjyynww4h48rnu3g0ujhp8f78au70p90r69n3lhmmugpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qz9thwden5te0v35hgar09ec82c30wfjkccteg6tscg

Publishing to

relay.mostr.pub

ditto.pub/relay

Author Public Key

npub14pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcspkxw3v

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-06-03 15:07:32

Why is it that when using Amethyst I can't see the notes I made using Nostrudel? Do I not have enough relays added on Amethyst?

2025-05-25 13:15:21

- reply

I feel like that sentence was a legitimate use of pronouns... In fact, I have decided to remove even more nouns from my sentence.
I am it. (I was drinking it and it went down it.)

2025-05-22 17:44:10

- reply

The units aren't the problem.

2025-05-22 17:42:12

- reply

I never used it anyway! I have actual bookmarks for that! (Also, leaving the browser open for days on end.)

2025-05-22 01:38:23

- reply

Your words are shallow and pointless.

2025-05-18 09:40:16

- reply

Sorry, I re-read my post. I meant the elements are *hashed. Hashing means passing something through a one way function like a message digest. A hash acts as a statistic or code that can be generated given a piece of data, but that cannot be used to figure out the original message. It's similar to encrypting, except that when you encrypt something, you also have a way to decrypt it. In this case, we see if a particular nevent matches by just hashing it and checking to see if the result is the same as what we recorded for an undesirable nevent. Sorry for the typo!

2025-05-18 05:16:39

- reply

Relays should not host media either. They should host text notes only. If you want a media host then upload to Imgr or Youtube or something.

2025-05-18 05:15:12

- reply

Bahahaha! You hear that folks? Nostr isn't about expressing yourself or having interesting conversations! It's a serious website for businessmen and influencers!
Oh man, have I been using Nostr wrong the whole time? I haven't even linked a lightning wallet! It's like my posts aren't even transactional in nature or something! How can 4chan users stand being anonymous all the time? What if someone judges the post itself rather than the person who made it? What a design flaw!
Please tell me, @nprofile…77ep if I am using Nostr wrong then how come I am so oblivious? Shouldn't things be really inconvenient for me, or shouldn't my experiences be failing to meet my expectations? Shouldn't I have noticed something was wrong by now?

2025-05-18 05:02:29

Democrats are trying so hard to make AIs not be racist, but the true battle is convincing them that tucking the homies into bed at night and then giving them a little kiss on the forehead is not gay.
#nevent1q…5fq8

2025-05-18 04:49:45

- reply

I'm just saying it's not a bad deal I mean. Personally I don't think Nostr should host media at all, I don't want it getting a lot of unnecessary attention from federal agents.

2025-05-18 04:47:00

- reply

Plenty of people pay to upload content to 4chan, and 4chan posts get deleted after a set period of time. There are plenty of good places to upload child pornography nowdays, but if there weren't I wouldn't mind paying 10 or 100 sats to upload to Nostr.

2025-05-18 04:40:20

- reply

Not if you implement the list properly.

2025-05-18 04:37:06

- reply

I don't think profiting off of yhe child pornography makes things any better.

2025-05-18 04:32:57

- reply

They aren't advertizing it. The elements of the list are half, meaning that it is impossible to determine what the original nevent or npub was unless you already have them.

2025-05-18 00:31:14

- reply

No shit? What do you do if you have to get work done at the dentist?

2025-05-17 22:29:12

- reply

Is he Catholic?
Damn, maybe I should have gone with "drugs are bad, but drugs aren't bad because they are unhealthy, or because they come from unnatural sources, or because they cause extreme or inherently bad effects, or because they are addictive. Drugs are bad because their effects are false and dishonest."
I swear, I have actively tried to find other people with this belief. Everyone I talk to about this is just confused and doesn't understand. I have found exactly one person post something like this online, but I have no evidence that they apply it equally to alcohol, caffeine, and non-nutritive sweetner like I do.

2025-05-17 02:19:39

- reply

My answer was that kids are hot but he kicked me out anyway. 😔
I didn't think the position was very common tho?🤔

2025-05-16 20:54:30

What's your most controversial take? Is there something you believe that possibly nobody on Earth agrees with?

2025-05-15 04:05:26

- reply

Sorry, *most centralized website OWNERS feel no guilt about being judge jury and executioner. They only see how the posts ruin the vibe of their community, but not how some users might still want to be able to see it on the side.

2025-05-15 03:55:10

- reply

I believe that no user is entitled to having their posts hosted or displayed on another person's platform. However I also believe that no platform owner has the right to prevent two consenting users from seeing eachother's posts. I know if I was a platform owner I would absolutely have to censor my users or it just wouldn't be worth it to me, and that would be my right.
However, Nostr would be a fantastic tool for me, because I absolutely don't want to violate the rights of my users while running my site. Nostr represents a convenient way of creating an uncensorable decentralized backend to a censored and centralized frontend platform; it's an ethical solution to a hard problem. The best way I see for Nostr to grow is if hosts and moderators are allowed to create their own communities however they want to, but also if users are allowed to dip below the veil to interact more freely.
The biggest issue I think is that few Nostr users have an actual problem they need to solve. I think most Nostr users have the solution and are working on finding the problem that it solves. And I also believe that most centralized website users don't agree with the right to connect, or don't feel guilty about making it harder and more unpleasant. I think Nostr has a place in the world, but it's anyone's guess if the protocol will become unusuable before fulfilling the prophecy. Maybe Nostr 2 will be better, who knows?

2025-05-14 20:53:38

- reply

That doesn't sound like a bias, that sounds like a rational justification for these responses!
I can name plenty of cases where personal responsibility is enjoyable and fulfilling even without the presence of freedom. Can you name a situation where personal freedom is enjoyable and fulfilling even without the presence of personal responsibility?

2025-05-14 17:59:29

As time goes on I am becoming more and more convinced that personal responsibility is not a necessary and unfortunate cost in order to achieve a valuable and important freedom. I now believe that having to experience freedom is the unfortunate cost people have to pay in order to be resppnsible for themselves.
Nobody cares about whether they are able to do whatever they want or act apart from society. What REALLY upsets people is when you tell them that they aren't responsible for any of the things that they accomplish or care about.

2025-05-09 19:07:20

- reply

Lmao, this has nothing to do with how real any of these are. What the Y axis actually represents is how mad it makes OP if you believe one of these. (Plus a few miscilaneous ones inserted in there in an attempt to artificially present people as dumber than they are.

2025-05-07 19:09:18

- reply

Are you forgetting about best instance Baraag?

2025-05-07 17:29:53

- reply

Thank you. I don't understand that mentality at all. The things that are important for my own decisions and the things that are important for other people's decisions should always be the same. I see it as a great sign of respect that I'll barge into other people's business even though I have no right to control their life. I want to understand them and I want to make sure I share the perspective I believe is relevant for them.
If I respect other people's thinking the same way I respect my own then what other way is there to respond to a conflict between us? Don't you believe in engagement?

2025-05-06 23:27:59

- reply

What right does everybody on the whole planet have to the deflationary effects of technology? Have all these random people done anything to actually create that value you say they have the right to?

2025-05-06 23:22:33

- reply

Who creates the value? What right does some random degenerate hodler have to the deflationary affects of technology?

2025-05-06 21:36:35

- reply

What, are we going to shut down all insults just because @nprofile…0s8w can't handle them? Nah dude, all insults are fair game do matter who they are from or who they are directed at. If there's some kind of issue with that then just get good.

2025-05-06 21:00:23

- reply

I find anger is great for arguments actually; anger represents surprise and dissatisfaction, which are great reasons to talk with someone. Insults are also a perfectly acceptable in an argument, though I try to be conservative and strategic with my insults when I'm arguing. Personally, I want to be able to argue with anyone, and so I want to avoid any insults that aren't an essential part of the topic at hand.
For example, in this conversation I believe it would be appropriate to say that you are so picky and sensitive that I have a hard time accepting that you are "just looking for a productive argument." Instead it seems much more like you are really just afraid of any argument that might challenge you or make you uncomfortable.
Do you believe it's possible that an insult could be an engaging and meaningful? Can you find any problems with my previous paragraph besides the fact that it was insulting you? How about you? Are you ever surprised or angry by the fact that someone disagrees with you? Do you always come into conversations expecting people might have a reason to disagree with you?

2025-05-05 23:23:44

- reply

Sorry dude, the best browser for privacy is the Tor Browser, and it probably will continue to be the best for a long time to come. Second best is probably the Mullvad Browser. Brave is cool, but its anti-fingerprinting is just not as good as other browsers. Here is the article I used to confirm my preconcieved opinions before making this post: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/brave-is-not-fingerprint-resistant-enough/22775

2025-05-05 03:24:11

- reply

That's a safe assumption. Protonmail doesn't even claim their emails are safe unless you are emailing another Protonmail account. Like, if you email a Gmail user then Google will see your email anyway. Best to just choose a different protocol.

2025-05-01 17:26:14

- reply

To me, zaps seem like that kind of experimental feature. Am I thinking about your point the same way as you?

2025-04-29 21:10:32

- reply

Me neither, this was just a hypothetical.

2025-04-24 21:23:24

- reply

Go watch The Fantastic Four? But I haven't even seen The Fantastic One yet!

2025-04-24 17:13:42

I am convinced that we are living in the dark ages of cryptography. We are no longer just banging rocks together, but we still just don't have a good enough understanding of computation in order to develop tools more sophisticated than trap door functions.

2025-04-24 17:10:17

- reply

No. A good thing is when your product works properly by default. Extensibility is just a subpar compromise for when you've decided to use a product that doesn't actually do what you want. Extensibility is a condescending insult to all the users who would have to use it to get what they want.

2025-04-23 20:35:28

@nprofile…2pgj
Getgle is short for get glad.

2025-04-23 17:16:35

- reply

It's practical if your operating system is any good. Otherwise I wouldn't say so much

2025-04-23 14:34:30

Shell scripting is for insecure losers. "Um, e-excuse me mister operating system... I know it's not really your job, but could you please do this thing for me?"
Nah, real men modify their operating system's source code to do what they want and then recompile it.

2025-04-21 05:28:31

- reply

If you want open source software not to suck then you need to stop pirating it's competition. I don't think you give a shit if a corporation screws you over. It's easier to complain than it is to exercise the tiniest amount of independence and autonomy.

2025-04-20 23:27:08

- reply

Run your own blog. Run your own ActivityPub instance. If all you care about is being able to store your thoughts on an internet box that nobody else will ever visit without specifically looking for it then Nostr provides nothing new.
I don't know why you keep repeating that Nostr allows you to own your own notes. Yes, Nostr is yet another platform that allows this. Why are you picking here and now to emphasize this point? Did I say something to contradict that point? If users are expected to run their own relays then what makes Nostr special?

2025-04-20 18:33:41

- reply

Sorry for the late reply, but if all we care about are users we already know and if we are all willing to run our own relays then there is no difference in censorship resistance between Nostr and Mastadon.
Heck, if you aren't worried about wide availability then you don't need even need it to be a microblogging platform; just use something like Wordpress and make an ordinary blog.
The advantage of Nostr is that the ability to discover and interact with a new user is not up to a third party administrator. It's up to the users themselves being lucky enough to win the relay roulette, choosing a relay that aligns with their values and interests and displays the other's notes. This still is not even close to ideal, but it is currently far better than any other platform when it comes to connecting users and being able to find posts about things you are interested in.

2025-04-15 20:49:47

- reply

Correct, but what if someone sees the posts from the second key-pair first? How would anyone be able to tell which public key is the real one?

2025-04-15 19:03:53

- reply

They could still perform a man in the middle attack, re-signing all of your notes with a new public key.

2025-04-15 04:58:13

- reply

Then it's actually incredibly easy. There's no challenge to it at all.

2025-04-14 21:54:58

- reply

It's very very close to impossible without exchanging bitcoin for fiat every once in a while. Otherwise you can pretty much give up on ever recieving any utilities.

2025-04-13 04:11:09

- reply

You should watch mononiggatorori (it gets good after the 7th season)

2025-04-13 04:08:54

- reply

If Nostr ever gets a good Linux desktop client then I'll show up more often on the weekends.

2025-04-13 04:05:33

Money laundering and cyber-crime is a cat and mouse game, where the mouse does whatever the fuck it wants to all the time, and the cat stands in the corner tearing up the houseplant because nothing it does could ever catch the mouse.
Some people may say that it's all about balancing the need to catch criminals against the need for privacy, but why would it matter if you make an effort to be gentle when raping people's privacy if none of the laws ever effected the criminals in the first place?

2025-04-09 20:49:54

I'm reading my phone's EULA right now. It says that my phone may display 3rd party materials. It also says that I must agree not to distribute these third party materials. If I choose to interpret a meme as one of those third party materials, then the EULA seems to be saying that I am not allowed to share any memes I download on my phone.
I am not happy with this wording. It isn't very transparent to me, and that irritates me. In the future I will make sure that any phone I get has a EULA that I can understand better, or I'll probably just get a different phone.

2025-04-08 02:01:31

Just watched a severely allergic Burger King customer suffocate to death right in front of an employee who even as the customer lay dying refused to give up the recipe for the secret sauce. These guys are very hardcore 10/10 highly recommend

2025-04-07 22:17:39

#nevent1q…cjm6
God damn, this is too hot...

2025-04-07 20:34:49

Babies are complete drama queens; being stuck in a hot car for an extended period of time isn't really a big deal. They have nothing to complain about.

2025-04-06 02:59:51

- reply

Insecurity, shame, is there a distinction you can make between them?

2025-04-04 19:07:58

- reply

Yeah, but I'm talking about OUR opinion police. Obviously North Korea's opinion police are tyrannical since they judge our opinion police poorly. Also, if our opinion police have changed over time then I am referring specifically to the latest opinion policemen in your specific jourisdiction. We can go all the way down to an individual officer if need be.
If you were that officer, would be confident enough to arrest anyone who disagreed with you? Do you tend to be especially insecure in your beliefs by any chance?
Also, is it still fanaticism if someone is right? What specifically are you trying to say is the problem here?

2025-04-04 17:12:44

- reply

That's a losing argument. Any example you give I'll just side with the opinion police on. You've got to come up with something better than that. My argument works really well for example because even if all of someone's opinions are correct, acting ashamed of them would still be bad. Shoot, it might even be WORSE to act ashamed of correct opinions.
Can you come up with a reason why it would be bad for the opinion police to access someone's data, even if the opinion police have good intentions?

2025-04-04 14:36:47

- reply

I dunno, that all sounds real sus. If you have good opinions then why are you trying so hard to hide them from the opinion police?

2025-04-03 17:21:33

- reply

Lmao "individual sovereignty"
Dude you are paying a subscription for your ability to program...

2025-04-03 17:19:07

- reply

Sounds like he has Trump Derangement Syndrome Derangement Syndrome. Good on you for not holding it against him and trying to help him with his security problem anyway. That's the right way to treat people with wrong beliefs.

2025-04-03 17:09:33

- reply

I have avatars disabled anyway. If their posts themselves aren't AI generated then I want to retain the opportunity to roast them.

2025-04-01 20:56:54

- reply

So women would be attracted to them, dummy. The truth is that while both sexes are objectively hot, homosexuality just isn't. The best way to appreciate the attractiveness of little boys is to let yourself get cucked by some wench.

2025-03-31 21:09:58

- reply

By the way, my web browser is broken on this device so I haven't been able tk visit your website.

2025-03-31 21:08:06

- reply

I don't interpret you as saying we should choose platforms without user control. I interpreted you as trying to coerce existing platforms with tyrannical owners into giving up some of their control to their users. It sounds to me like the idea of people growing a spine and leaving these platforms is so upsetting to you that you would rather put enormous effort into plugging up every new and creative way that these shitty platforms can come up with to continue screwing over theur users. Is any of this accurate?
When you said that we should "campaign" for these rights I got the strong impression that you meant that you believed governments should be involved. I suppose it's possible that someone could "campaign" for a private actor to do something, and it's possible that you don't see the same danger I see in asking the government for anything, but that's not the impression I got. The impression I got is that you want the government to "create" rights for us. My impression is that you have a very low view of individual choice as a force for solving problems and improving society, and my impression is that you don't particularly care about how dangerous petitioning the government might be, nor do you particularly mind or disagree with the narrative that we would have only succeeded because of government intervention. Is any of my intuition wrong? How would you phrase your position?

2025-03-31 17:26:30

- reply

That's gay bullshit. You want the government to take credit for and tax us for the freedom we only obtained through our own hard work? You want people who don't give a shit about freedom to not only mooch off of us, but hate us for slightly inconveniencing them in their shallow, irresponsible hedonism? Is the thought of people just growing a spine and leaving an abusive platform so terrifying that you would rather put enormous effort into plugging up every new and creative way that shitty organization can come up with to continue being shitty?

2025-03-28 16:32:07

- reply

What's IP2?

2025-03-28 16:28:09

- reply

Don't bother. If you ever hit this loser with a really difficult question he'll just mute you and try to forget about it. That's what he did with me.

2025-03-28 16:18:28

- reply

Based. Gnoobs are getting way too uppity nowdays.

2025-03-25 23:38:04

- reply

Lmao, imagine believing an AI without external verification. You are a real loser for that.

2025-03-17 21:44:18

- reply

No thanks. All the people where I live are sane, intelligent, and well adjusted, and that's boring. I'd much rather get to know people on Nostr. Like you!
Also, I don't know if you are aware, but there is grass outside. If I followed your advice I'd be risking coming into contact with it.
Seriously though, the internet is far better in a lot of ways for having conversations. It's worse in other ways, but the optimal strategy is to talk both online and in real life. Zaps are not optimal in any way though, except for consooming content and getting excited for product.

2025-03-17 19:09:35

- reply

You and I are not influencers. We are people. I don't want to consume content. I want to talk. It doesn't matter how decentralized you make a relationship if it's transactional at its core. Currency, no matter how its delivered would just undermine our relationship.

2025-03-17 14:38:21

- reply

Fun idea in theory, but in practice it doesn't work like that. I can prove it by making it easier for you. If you give me 1 sat I'll change my mind on this and you will prove me wrong. You can't do it.

2025-03-17 14:35:19

- reply

You're wrong. I'm the one being paid to read their thoughts in that scenario. That's completely different.

2025-03-15 21:08:24

- reply

You aren't the only one who does that. Nothing you say is going to convince me to unmute the 500 news bots poluting the general feed though.

2025-03-15 20:57:05

- reply

Is that what you believe? That Nostr users shouldn't use zaps?

2025-03-15 20:49:22

- reply

Damn, so you actually unmuted me?
I really appreciate that, but I also can't help but admit that it would be really funny if you turned around and muted me again.

2025-03-15 20:44:23

- reply

The people I talk with aren't performing a service, they are having a conversation. A waiter SHOULD change their behavior just to get more tips. They SHOULD need a financial incentive to perform a job. There is no authenticity to undermine because I am just there for service, not conversation. Quite unlike a Nostr discussion.

2025-03-15 02:01:17

- reply

You are correct. The vast majority of things in one's life are just as worthy of your time (if not more worthy) when the people providing these things are motivated by financial return. And yes, this principle applies to the quality of online content as well.
However I do not use Nostr to view that sort of content; I use Nostr to talk with people. I want to try to understand every belief and learn every relevant perspective. These matters of perspective are the exception to the rule. Motivations of possible financial return undermine the authenticity of the conversation and make it less worthy of a person's time.
The value of things like conversation and friendship are not things that can be objectively measured by the person receiving them. I believe Nostr should be partially unpleasant. I want to interact with the jerks. If I didn't believe in the importance of treating jerks with respect and fairness then I wouldn't have choosen the username "Scoundrel" to use when presenting and defending my beliefs.

2025-03-15 00:52:32

- reply

You are correct. All the downsides of zaps only arise when they are implemented and used.
I don't understand why zaps are implemented and used. Why would I need a financial incentive to post my thoughts? And why would I want to read a person's thoughts if they are only posting them because they are being paid to?

2025-03-14 23:51:24

- reply

Sorry, I just want some clarification. Do you agree with Derek's statement that Nostr users aren't meant to create notes to get zapped? Also, do have a more direct response to my earlier questions?

2025-03-14 21:52:48

- reply

Thanks for the response, but I'm still not sure I understand. If zaps aren't supposed to matter then I guess it's not a big deal, but if it's kind of a feedback loop then doesn't that mean that the zaps are incentivizing people to make posts that they otherwise wouldn't have? Isn't the whole point of zapping someone's post to create some kind of meaningful effect?

2025-03-14 21:37:02

- reply

I don't understand zaps. Why would I need a financial incentive to post my thoughts? And why would I want to read a person's thoughts if they are only posting them because they are being paid to?

2025-03-13 23:05:19

- reply

The government doesn't give a shit what the supreme court thinks, just like I don't give a shit what the government thinks. I'm asking what the supreme court has actually said in these cases, not what the rest of the government has actually said or done.

2025-03-13 17:16:18

- reply

It should render as a URL. Then you can read it, copy and paste it, and click it. Just don't embed the original post and you're good.

2025-03-13 17:09:22

- reply

Wait, according to the supreme court, can I advocate for terrorism in other countries? Like, is that considered first ammendment protected speech?
To be clear, I don't take the law into consideration when choosing what to say; I'm just curious.

2025-03-13 00:02:55

- reply

Oh jeez, what relay am I missing to not be seeing this note? Can you broadcast it please?

2025-03-10 21:35:00

What is an object? Recently I tried to come up with a definition of it. It's not yet perfect, but here's what I have so far: an object is a region of space whose potential effects only become more difficult to understand when you subdivide it.
The effects of throwing a rock at someone are relatively easy to describe. The effects of throwing two halves of a rock simultaneously and perfectly fused together at that same trajectory is much more difficult to describe. In the second case you have to start describing the interactions between the rocks, whereas if you look at the rock as a whole, you would realize that those interactions can be mostly simplified away.
Same thing with a person. A person's body is covered with skin, which makes for a really good cutoff point between what counts as them and what doesn't count as them. I know some people try to say that their true identity is their brain, or even just the conscious and intelligent part of their brain, but once you start trying to separate a person like that, you end up with a much larger and more complicated surface area for interactions to occur on. Me personally, I like to say that I'm all of me. It's much simpler that way, even if it means I have to take responsibility for subconscious and reflexive actions.
#philosophy

2025-03-10 02:28:17

- reply

Yes, I know. I'm just trying to understand, if that's the case then where exactly do you get the idea that it's up to the kid?

2025-03-09 18:58:13

- reply

Is it up to the kid? What if the parents never chose to send their kid to that school in the first place? What would you have done in the parents' shoes if you thought there was a chance the school would treat your kid in a way that you viewed as manipulative and harmful?

2025-03-09 17:03:41

- reply

It's very simple. If the person I'm talking with has used the word first, then I don't define "man" at all. They do.
If the common definition of "man" was "any adult who 'identifies' as male" then would you accept the definition? If so, then I think you would be an idiot. People shouldn't let common definitions decide for them what ideas they are thinking and communicating.

2025-03-09 00:50:10

- reply

I appreciate that you are taking the time to argue with a pedophile who advocates for treat children like objects in certain circumstances. I think it's very confident of you, and I am interested in your perspective.
Yes, there's homeschool, private school, and it is also possible to take one's kids to a different public school. I know that many parents care quite a bit about their kids education, to the point where they will move to a different school district if they think it will mean their kids get a better education.
In this court case, the parents sent messages to the school ahead of time requsting them not to provide mental health treatment without approval, they were willing to sue the school, and yes, they almost certainly withdrew their kid from the school. Because of cases like these, how many other transphobic parents chose not to send their kids to public schools in the first place?
You say that the policy is sustainable and that the child's autonomy is what's most important, but in this case it seems pretty clear to me that it wasn't. There were numerous information leaks, including one of the teachers snitching completely. You say that the school is just respecting a student with abusive parents, and that the parents are already not giving their kid any leway, but the end result is that the student ends up with more supervision less progressive teachers. If the goal was to increase the kid's autonomy, then trying to provide it by exploiting the parents' trust seems like it had the opposite effect. If you don't consider that to be "less leway" then I'm curious to hear what term you'd use.
If the hope is that the parents will be total pushovers then I think the school shouldn't have been so afraid to rub it into the parents' faces that they were using different pronouns with the kid. If the kid agrees to the whole scenario then that's what I would have done in the school's shoes. It's not snitching if the kid knows the parents will find out and chooses to ask for it anyway.

2025-03-07 22:45:00

- reply

That's below the height of consent. You are going to jail.

2025-03-07 22:41:21

- reply

Is your bitch wife an actual child? If so you should be putting on Cocomelon for your child bride, not Lolita you sick fuck!

2025-03-07 22:16:32

- reply

She wishes she was still a loli.

2025-03-07 18:27:12

- reply

I don't have "pedophilic tendencies." I'm a pedophile. There's a difference. I have free will. Every action I have ever taken has been my own. Everything I will ever do will be because I willed it.
You dodged my question earlier when I asked whether the school's protocol is sustainable, and now you dodge a question again, this time about exactly what would have happened if the parents didn't give so much leway to their kid and the school.
You said that the school's actions aren't punishing parents for giving their kid too much freedom, and now you say that kids aren't a toy you can have dibs on. If you really believe these things then are my questions not relevant to this discussion? If a school's actions aren't punishing parents for giving their kid too much freedom then what would happen if they stopped sending their kid to this school? If you really believe children aren't objects then what would happen if a parent really did try to call dibs?
Have you even considered the child's own autonomy when hearing these questions? Do you think the kid even has free will? Do you believe that the parents have free will? Yes, yes, I hear you, the parents aren't victims. But are the parents so incapable of critical thought that the school never has to worry about the parents withdrawing their kid? Are you unable to think of alternatives, or do you genuinely believe that my questions aren't worth answering?

2025-03-07 12:53:59

- reply

Isn't it? The parebnts from this case wanted to control the pronouns that were used to refer to their kids. They chose to let their kid go to this school. Would the parents have gotten what they wanted if they HADN'T made that choice? If they hadn't given their kid enough leway to have a life outside of their knowledge?

2025-03-07 00:15:37

- reply

Lost technology...

2025-03-06 23:37:46

- reply

Also, nobody has a real reason to hurt me. I'm awesome. I deserve to be praised, not hurt.

2025-03-06 23:36:26

- reply

Yes, they would be willing to become targets. And I would let them make themselves targets. It's not real love if I don't at least respect them that much. Similarly, I really would feel genuinely upset if an internet friend started hurting me the way they sometimes say they would. I don't want to be friends with someone who is actually harming me. The only reason I'm friends with those types on the internet is because they are physically unable to hurt me.
I'm not friends with Mental Outlaw. I've never talked with him.

2025-03-06 23:30:23

- reply

Also, trolling somebody by copying them is no good unless you can add a good twist. I'm not a big fan of no-you's.
Er, I mean, wow you really got me good with that one!

2025-03-06 23:27:52

- reply

No I'm not. I'm arguing for schools to obey the parents' requested pronouns for their kids, or for schools to expell kids to avoid having to engage with abuse outside their control, or for schools to warn children not to request pronouns they don't want shared with their parents (and then don't mention to the parents if a kid was planning on making that kind of request and changed their mind.)
Or I'm advocating for kids to find their own way to escape abusive parents for good and without having to punish their parents for giving them too much trust and freedom.