Richard K Niner / is on Nostr

Yellow duck-tolling retriever (toller dog), web developer and furry from Toronto. He/They. Asexual.

Profile pic is an animation of RK's head, wearing a superhero mark and drooling while hypnotized.

FA: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/rkniner
Weasyl: https://www.weasyl.com/~rkniner
Homepage: https://rkniner.ca/
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/rkniner.ca

Last Notes

2025-04-29 17:40:32

- reply

He would still be PM, although since not having a seat in the house would limit his effectiveness, another conservative MP would probably resign their seat so he could win it in a byelection (usually these are done in safe ridings).
For a similar example, see the current PM, who was sworn into the office in March, but didn't win a seat until last night.

2025-01-10 20:21:04

- reply

From what I can tell, people with egos chased away everyone who was willing to help.

2025-01-10 20:15:50

- reply

Paste it in and test if it works. Would've been very easy
They were perfectly fine implementing the other change in both layouts (contact info).

2025-01-10 20:03:08

- reply

Honestly, I was kinda hoping it was done that way, and only investigated further when nothing changed in classic (after renewing my dislike for the modern layout)

2025-01-10 19:56:53

- reply

I guess I shouldn't have been surprised when they said it was not available on the classic layout.

2025-01-10 19:52:28

- reply

Oh, and the new feature that they implemented? Tag blocking? Turns out all it does is add an attribute to the img element with all of its tags of blocked images (and then use JavaScript & CSS to blur it out)
Would've probably been a copy-paste job to add that to the classic layout. (Actually, given how the rendered HTML code is otherwise identical, I'm surprised it would've even needed that, but the fact that it does means I can't just implement my own version as a userstyle)

2025-01-10 18:59:05

Trying to get used to FA's "modern" theme after they announced they will no longer maintain or include new features in their "classic" theme.
Really not a fan of some of the changes they made, like removing actions from the top of certain pages and only leaving them below the fold (which in turn only seems to be the case because every element has been enlarged).
Sometimes it feels like far too many websites make changes for the sole purpose of having made changes. Even if the old interface wasn't exactly mobile-friendly without zooming in to perform actions.

2024-12-09 20:56:04

- reply

just have to remember to never click another docs link again

2024-12-09 20:41:44

What if, every time you clicked on a google docs link, you TFed into the anonymous animal it used to identify your cursor?
Watching someone become a giraffe, then a capy, then a gator...

2024-12-04 00:29:18

Waking up with antlers and hoof hands? Glowy nose? Urge to give all your friends presents? Sounds like you've come down with Rudolph Syndrome.
Inspired by a pic by & conversation with @npub1r48…7h4t, decided to turn RK into a reindeer again, now with glowing nose.
Pics up in the usual spots:
http://k9r.ca/gal/f/G/rudolph-syndrome.png
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/59052753/
https://www.weasyl.com/~rkniner/submissions/2443407/rudolph-syndrome
#Furry #FurryArt #TF #Reindeer #Transformation
https://cdn.yiff.life/media_attachments/files/113/591/701/618/863/289/original/ae0a8da81ac1f5b4.png

2024-11-19 23:21:43

- reply

Well, they're live action adaptations of a franchise that began on TV, rather than whole-plot remakes of a previous beloved animated movie.

2024-11-19 23:16:31

Seeing a bunch of posts about a live action remake of a DreamWorks Animation film I loved, and I'm kinda disappointed, but not terribly surprised.
Why? Look at the live action remakes Disney has been doing since the 90s, and almost every year since 2015. With only three exceptions (out of 10 releases), every single one made more money at the box office than the original animated film, even after accounting for inflation. Heck, some made multiple times the original's gross.
It seems awfully likely that if you release a "live action" movie, more people are going to see it. And with so many people still out there thinking "animated = only for kids", that makes sense.
Will I watch the live action version of How To Train Your Dragon? Probably not - the original animated film still exists. But DreamWorks & Universal are clearly trying to copy a strategy that's been working for over a decade.