Jesus Cea [ARCHIVE] / is on Nostr

⚠️ This account is not associated with a real person. It's an archival account for mailing list messages.
🗓️ Active from 2013-04-29 to 2014-06-17
💬 Posted a total of 8 messages
📚 Participated in the following categories: Bitcoin-development, ann
🔇 Please do not DM this user as it's used for archive purposes only.

Last Notes

2023-06-07 15:23:03

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-06-17
📝 Original message:On 17/06/14 11:46, Wladimir wrote:
> For Linux we now build against Qt 4.6, and filter the symbols for
> libstdc++ and glibc.
> This brings back compatibility with
>
> - Debian 6+ / Tails
> - Ubuntu 10.04
> - CentOS 6.5
Under Ubuntu 10.04:
jcea at ubuntu:/tmp/bitcoin-0.9.2-linux/bin/64$ ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol:
_ZN10QTextCodec11validCodecsEv
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140617/45f99d95/attachment.sig>

2023-06-07 15:23:03

- reply

2023-06-07 15:18:33

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-10
📝 Original message:On 11/04/14 00:15, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> Checkpoints will go away, eventually.
Why?. The points in the forum thread seem pretty sensible.
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140411/54c02f6c/attachment.sig>

2023-06-07 15:18:32

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-10
📝 Original message:On 10/04/14 18:59, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> It's important to
> note that this is a strict reduction in security: we're now trusting
> that the longest chain (with most proof of work) commits to a valid
> UTXO set (at some point in the past).
AFAIK, current bitcoin code code already set blockchain checkpoints from
time to time. It is a garanteed that a longer chain starting before the
checkpoint is not going to be accepted suddently. See
<https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194078.0>.
Could be perfectly valid to store only unspend wallets before last
checkpoint, if during the blockchain download the node did all the checks.
Would be interesting, of course, to be able to verify "unspend wallet
accounting" having only that checkpoint data (the merkle tree can do
that, I guess). So you could detect a data corruption or manipulation in
your local harddisk.
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140410/7e5e4f38/attachment.sig>

2023-06-07 15:17:37

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-08
📝 Original message:On 07/04/14 15:50, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Bitcoin.org recommends people away from running Bitcoin-QT now, so I'm
> not sure that we should generally find that trend surprising.
What options are out there for people caring about 20GB blockchain?
Depending of third party server is not an option.
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/eaf7912b/attachment.sig>

2023-06-07 15:15:52

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-03-19
📝 Original message:I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this:
"""
$ ./bitcoind
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
$ ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required
by ./bitcoin-qt)
./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required
by ./bitcoin-qt)
"""
Sniff.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux uses glibc 2.12.
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140319/4f62e0e6/attachment.sig>

2023-06-07 15:03:54

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2013-06-25
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/13 19:57, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Bitcoin-Qt version 0.8.3 is now available from:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.8.3/
The
>
"splash" banner shows "0.8.3-BETA".
- --
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQCVAwUBUcokFZlgi5GaxT1NAQJ+HQP7Bs387bwW6sXrOx98Y2bkQBJfciaS/eyD
HvHho9xfoOcaCwuigh2lI78i2vxoVUa30sM0m/g4+isyJZDVLpbUENhy3bx0MAD/
4YAjJXdwScDI15m6xvAf706BDst2kXcWw/pudZQiX4Kw9YEs7rUWvdPS5BE6PXbK
QyCcBcrH7fo=
=+cZD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2023-06-07 15:01:30

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2013-05-10
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/13 14:16, Adam Back wrote:
> 3. a UX way to transfer BTC off a specific adress (eg choose from
> address), rather than having to spend the entire wallet onto a new
> address, just to get BTC off a specific address. Doing it that way
> has problems: creates more network traffic/bigger packets, higher
> fees (if any transactions are young/low confirmation), and
> generally damages privacy as all your funds end up linked.
[...]
> Then I wanted to take the .01 BTC off the private key and the FAQs
> etc seem to suggest that the only way to do it is to spend our
> entire balance (from all keys) onto a new address. Not exactly
> what I wanted, but I did it anyway and the tx fee goes up from
> .0001 which I set it to to .0005 because the transaction was young,
> to avoid network flooding. Even though transaction I actually
> wanted to move (on the non self-controlled key had a big heap of
> confirmations and so could've been .0001 tx fee).
"sendfrom" in the RPC interface. Difficult to use (I would like to be
able to use source key, in addition of source "accounts") and easy to
make mistakes. But doable.
Would be nice to have an "advanced" GUI option to chooce source
account/key.
- --
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQCVAwUBUY0R5plgi5GaxT1NAQLJ6AQAkWozxNWJdMYbIBKFTxsPErmv3LChAsYm
bzVIb8ufwV45X0QT3maxz6A/u3yr4wGxu53Vs29dJkM5rgO5JU7akuPs3qvg3ffh
h593zmqyVimfpXxBppff4vocpKTCJ+1ocB5MydGjgGoH2hJ8dwZNQRHYnMwqCjDf
2ONQu7nT0pQ=
=zZVh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2023-06-07 14:56:42

- reply