ManyKeys

A self-distributing organic tech

Public Key

npub129puxu7lrd2g5a7hnmr57fe9t5ffk62m2gklkkl5xjvt5j6srhuswhhud3

NIP-05 Address

manykeys@nsec.app

NIP-57 Address

manykeys@npub.cash

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9zs7rw003k4y2wltea360yuj46y5md9d4yt0mt06rfx96fdgpm7gpzamhxue69uhhxarjvee8jtnzdah8xctf9e3k7mgd69m73

Publishing to

strfry.bonsai.com

Author Public Key

npub129puxu7lrd2g5a7hnmr57fe9t5ffk62m2gklkkl5xjvt5j6srhuswhhud3

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-06-19 19:33:40

- reply

I think there is some code used from someone's foss repo wihtout giving the due credit. Some people shouldn't write foss code if they can't handle the ego trips.

2025-06-17 10:30:34

- reply

Israel controls the country. What did you expect?

2025-06-17 08:46:37

- reply

Honest work? That's kind of weird.

2025-06-17 08:24:29

- reply

Give me sometime and I'll vibecode that shit :p

2025-06-17 07:54:25

- reply

Cultural appropriation much? There's nothing armenian here

2025-06-17 07:52:46

- reply

Those are the Chechens

2025-06-16 18:04:39

- reply

Can you make a proper NWC for CLN nodes? It's ridiculous how it's still not done properly.

2025-06-15 20:00:27

- reply

It's the vape all along. I feel ya

2025-06-15 19:57:01

- reply

Nice flex
https://media.tenor.com/ZUVg69LWMvAAAAAC/steven-he-asian.gif

2025-06-14 09:49:34

- reply

> but LNBits might give you this functionality
Unfortunately, @nprofile…d3u4 app on nostr doesn't do #NWC for #CLN, ""only LND"", the same with NWC by Alby.
There's a plugin for CLN for NWC:
https://github.com/gudnuf/cln_nwc
But I can't get it to work so far.

2025-06-13 11:26:18

- reply

Jesus got denounced by Judeans cause he didn't like what Israel was back then and he surely would hate it what it is now.

2025-06-13 08:58:22

- reply

The holy Trinity doctrine was introduced by emperor Constantine more than 200 years after Christ.

2025-06-12 19:53:12

Google dependant L2s halted..,
https://media.tenor.com/XL8a8jSlwaEAAAAC/i-don%27t-care-hyo.gif
me with my CLN node rocking bolt12

2025-06-12 18:57:25

- reply

Using Google central point of failure? When will these fuckers learn?

2025-06-12 18:55:15

- reply

Normies are dum, exceptionally dumb, and the only thing they are more than dumb is lazy.
But phoenix could totally do the trick, though the fees are hefty compared to other solutions. I'd include #mistybreez as well for the ease of use but they are custodian as they use L-BTC.

2025-06-12 13:46:55

- reply

It's the leader of tyranny and mass enslavement

2025-06-12 08:47:49

- reply

You seem to be confused about the notion of personal god.
Here's a good article about this:
https://discover.hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/Personal-or-Impersonal-god
Lutheran theologian Paul Tillich in his German-language Systematic Theology writings wrote:
'Personal God' does not mean that God is a person. It means that God is the ground of everything personal and that he carries within himself the ontological power of personality.

2025-06-11 08:22:26

- reply

> Um pregador islâmico radical
The efforts are very radical: how can he take care of the kids and the elderly without leaving them to the state.

2025-06-11 07:04:40

- reply

> Having our own devices meeting our hardware requirements would reduce the time pressure to migrate to new releases and could be used to obtain early access ourselves. Based on talks with OEMs, paying for what we need will cost millions of dollars.
Maybe get a small preorder thing going just to test first batch?

2025-06-10 19:24:41

- reply

Well, the only people who get engagement here are influencers and devs, and they usually get lots of likes/comments/zaps on their posts, of which they obviously can't address every single one. More like talk among themselves and leave the other plebs hanging.

2025-06-10 10:29:26

- reply

> mints your use.
Makes sense, that's why I mentioned redeeming.
Other part has to do more with custodians: if you, for instance, had ecash balance with coinos during recent events and couldn't access your account because of the hack. Having it locked to your npub means you can always access it as long as you hold the key pair.
Am I wrong to assume this?

2025-06-10 10:24:21

- reply

> but the definition of quality time changes from person to person.
As per Kantian Supreme Categorical Imperative, we can deduce the attributes of quality time irrespective of human background and tastes.

2025-06-10 10:17:59

- reply

Please elaborate in one sentence.
As per my understanding, the most secure way of doing it is through locking it to your npub. If it's locked into an npub like in npub.cash, then I would assume only at the instance when redeeming for sats with the chosen mint.

2025-06-10 10:09:58

- reply

And.., it introduces counterparty risk – the very thing bitcoin eliminated.

2025-06-10 09:05:11

- reply

Have you posted an order there?

2025-06-09 09:12:59

- reply

Yeah, you better become USA's shadow lmao

2025-06-07 14:37:51

- reply

But intelligence shall inherently lead to the right questions, which in turn will lead to a deistic belief in a higher power.

2025-06-06 20:01:20

If we are assessing #privacy aspect of transacting online, isn't it only befitting to assume a compromised sender to begin with?
#asknostr

2025-06-06 19:49:32

- reply

What rights do the minor attracted person have? Is this also part of the spectrum now?

2025-06-06 18:26:19

- reply

And minor attracted person? Wtf was that about?

2025-06-06 12:30:28

When winning, we develop internal locus of control; when losing, we tend to be with an external locus of control.
#nevent1q…l6tp

2025-06-05 19:37:36

- reply

Yeah, might be news for some.

2025-06-04 10:19:56

- reply

Semantics.
The point raised was about something entirely different, which you just ignored. There are legitimate use-cases for ecash was the main point.

2025-06-04 07:18:11

Another spam attack on #nostr? A bit more sophisticated than reply guy

2025-06-03 17:12:35

One of the best in kind.
#nevent1q…wtnt

2025-06-02 20:12:24

- reply

Largely sepends on your stack, no? Odds are better if you're running a farm in solo mode? Obviously, you can't plan your business this way – that's the essence of the question. Why should it be purely business driven with stricter debt repayment obligations? Isn't the current hashrate an overshot because of this?

2025-06-02 19:47:28

- reply

Why is it better 100x? Why not just run solo and let the thing playout

2025-05-30 10:09:29

- reply

What a lovely person and not less of a lovely speech too. Let's hope you guys leave the world a better place than the ones that came before you. Congratulations 👏

2025-05-28 08:38:36

- reply

I see sats in my wallets. Who needs these fuckers to dictate anything except the dumb herd. I remain with my convictions noatter what unless a more viable option is accepted by my mind.

2025-05-27 19:42:57

- reply

Thank you for having the decency to shed light on this man-made tragedy. It is sickening to the bone having to realize that this is happening now and that still there's some people who defend these atrocities.
People will never stand up for human rights if they are currently watching this unfold while being completely complicit. It's a bad resume for humanity.

2025-05-27 18:15:09

Imagine of Satoshi vibecoded #Bitcoin.
It would be long dead.

2025-05-27 17:38:40

- reply

It's truly the best feeling in life

2025-05-27 17:06:48

- reply

Not a good analogy. Lightning is just a way to spend and receive bitcoin. It's still settling on-chain.

2025-05-27 17:00:46

- reply

It's best to have kids do stuff themselves. And, of course, failures shouldn't be a problem, the thing is to have them try it and, eventually, master it till the glee appears.

2025-05-27 09:51:35

- reply

Yes, please low battery use version, last I installed it, it drained the hell out of my battery

2025-05-26 07:00:41

- reply

Couldn't he find something better for that purpose? This is clsarly not the case.

2025-05-22 17:42:01

- reply

It's as secure and private as the work you put in. Besides, using other solutions than hosting stuff yourself always introduces counterparty risk.
Obviously, it all depends on your risk profile.

2025-05-22 17:12:38

- reply

Use headscale as the control server instead of tailscale's proprietary server and you're good.

2025-05-22 10:37:57

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/f6381167ae0f5b1b22addac22a9c92e3adddda3785f64723f648a164f6cae660.gif

2025-05-21 18:35:36

- reply

Well, technically, Bitcoin is still inflationary.
https://image.nostr.build/52c6a8658b0246914daf95fb2392e8d747d0c5e6d0a5260537fff23332d733a1.jpg

2025-05-21 06:19:43

- reply

Nostr offers that. Run your own relay, connect those with whom you want to share to that relay and post to it.

2025-05-20 21:45:56

- reply

Honestly, what did you expect?
You gotta pay taxes on that shit, declare every penny and invoice accordingly. You thought @nprofile…5cfd was building an app for this kind of cash-only business with all these #KYC in place?
It's all a scam to have you pay hefty commissions and still be fully controlled by uncle Sam. Better to use non-custodial #btc or #xmr solutions than run with these guys.
They fuck around with guys like yourselves in the name of #AML but have the letter agencies lounder money and finance hell knows what. It's a sad fuckin state and these pseudo cypherpunks are long bought by these twats running the show.

2025-05-20 20:56:48

- reply

He's good

2025-05-20 17:15:46

- reply

Low latency

2025-05-20 15:46:25

- reply

Great job. Signed up for 6 months. Do you plan to add filter and search NIPs?
Would be great ot have a fast all-in-one relay. I hate having many relays.

2025-05-20 08:46:16

Satoshi Nakamoto did not personally refer to the smallest unit of Bitcoin as a “satoshi.” The term was proposed by a BitcoinTalk user named “ribuck” in November 2010, suggesting that 0.01 BTC be called a “satoshi.” Later, he proposed that the one hundred millionth unit (0.00000001 BTC) be called a “satoshi,” and this naming convention gained widespread adoption within the #Bitcoin community.
https://media.tenor.com/Nf6CFJ1Y1m4AAAAC/satoshis-neon-bitcoin.gif

2025-05-18 10:22:27

- reply

I surely hope so.
The OP_RETURN data is 3.85 GB currently. If OP limits are lifted, it is highly likely that the amount of OP_RETURN data will increase and require node runners to adapt to increased storage, bandwidth, and performance demands, while also considering security, economic, regulatory and governance aspects.
While it's difficult to predict the exact increase, it's reasonable to assume a significant rise in OP_RETURN data usage if the limits are lifted, which in turn will make it more costly for node runners to continue.
https://image.nostr.build/92762f8ce3ba2c376d0bcecd64e5aac7f308e673a2eace6e2b4c8e377b9ecb6d.jpg

2025-05-17 20:33:33

- reply

A loose shoe.

2025-05-17 11:48:50

- reply

I had my cousin send me some sats yesterday, he had it in his wallet showing as 0.001 btc, but when I sent him my wallet screen of the tx waiting for confirmatinsn, it showed in sats – he's like "Is that a new coin?" 😵‍💫
Do some fucking learning.

2025-05-17 11:21:05

This guy gets it.
#nevent1q…48f9

2025-05-16 16:45:26

- reply

I wasted the last two days arguing with monero folks here, sometimes less is better. Nonetheless, I appreciate the folks who made nostr happen – it's a great place.

2025-05-16 06:27:18

- reply

Scenario 1 is more money chasing fewer goods. This leads to inflation where future cash flows must be discounted to account for the loss of value in the currency over time.
Scenario 2 is more goods chasing fewer money. This leads to deflation where future cash flows are discounted less — or even valued more through premiums — because the currency gains value over time.
The only thing that matters is sound economic calculation. As long as the rate of monetary change is known and stable, people can adjust their decisions accordingly. The real difference is not in the math but in the behavior each system incentivizes. One rewards speed and spending. The other rewards patience and productive investment.
You must be a Keynesian to paint this as you do. A Keynesian anti statist 😂

2025-05-16 05:37:54

- reply

#nevent1q…4mru

2025-05-15 16:16:49

@nprofile…pyug how do we write long form on #Amethyst?
Can't find anything on this.
#asknostr

2025-05-15 15:18:31

- reply

If bitcoin that is collaterized appreciates in value significantly, can the client opt for an overdraft?

2025-05-15 14:42:02

- reply

It's a bad idea to collaterize bitcoin when the downside risk is huge. An easy way for the institution to collect cheap bitcoins through liquidations.

2025-05-15 13:28:18

- reply

Change **innovative** to **shitty** and you got yourself a valid statement 😂

2025-05-15 05:58:35

- reply

I buy diepers for my babies with bitcoin 😂
It's net inflow being higher that matters.

2025-05-15 05:12:44

- reply

You’re right, a hard cap introduces new dynamics like passive rent-seeking where some benefit without contributing. But that’s not unique to Bitcoin, fiat has its own version with the Cantillon effect. The difference is Bitcoin’s version gets better over time. As the market matures and price stabilizes the free ride shrinks. People will have to innovate to earn returns not just hold. This redirects capital toward real value creation not just financialization. It’s a good thing for the system overall and for the average person even if a few lazy ones ride the wave for a while. Progress isn’t perfect but it’s directional. Bitcoin raises the bar and that’s a feature not a flaw.

2025-05-15 04:06:59

- reply

You act like all deflation is bad, but it’s about what it encourages: investing only in what outperforms just holding hard money.
"Wasteful" is backing losers that can’t beat that bar. You dismiss Bitcoin’s hard cap as a “knee-jerk reaction” — which just shows you haven’t engaged with the idea, not that it’s wrong. It’s a mark of intelligence to entertain a thought without accepting it. You can’t even do that.
Your issue isn’t nuance — it’s letting go of the fiat mindset you’re clinging to.

2025-05-15 03:27:59

- reply

You’re stuck in a fiat paradigm that confuses endless spending with economic health. Bitcoin doesn’t punish investment — it punishes wasteful investment. If your business can’t outperform a savings account, maybe it shouldn’t exist. That’s not a flaw, it’s a filter. Your shallow dismissal shows you’re not arguing with Bitcoin — you’re arguing with discipline, accountability, and real value creation.

2025-05-14 14:42:47

Another example of dishonest argumentation from the #monero folks whose only aim is to attack and discredit #bitcoin's design.
#nevent1q…7uer

2025-05-14 14:39:37

- reply

Under the fiat system, standard practice, investors discount future cash flows for inflation because they know the money will be worth less later.
However, with Bitcoin, the opposite happens: future purchasing power is likely higher than today’s, due to its fixed supply and increasing adoption. So instead of discounting for inflation, you apply a premium for Bitcoin’s appreciation.
The result? Even if an investment returns fewer bitcoins in the future, the real buying power could be far greater. Just as we adjust for loss under inflation, we can adjust for gain under deflation. This flips the script: sound money doesn’t kill investment — it makes it more intentional, more productive, and more aligned with long-term value creation.

2025-05-14 13:09:43

- reply

It will surely push back on current mindless consumerism, which is not a bad thing per se.

2025-05-13 09:54:00

- reply

After some research, I've come to a conclusion that Core is not at fault here. I'd like to see the project move to a more decentralized venue though, having Gmail and Microsoft as the platforms is iffy to say the least.
Folks need to study the intricacies of PRs and be more open to dialogue without emotional drama attached. It's a technical discourse, not idealogical one.

2025-05-12 15:30:41

- reply

The commit is closed
https://files.sovbit.host/media/5143c373df1b548a77d79ec74f27255d129b695b522dfb5bf43498ba4b501df9/0c1472a4b3d8851c40ba41b6797545c3109dec9a57d075d35cc0efd032fd20b6.webp

2025-05-12 15:13:12

- reply

It's a cat-and-mluse game: lifting all limitations and opening the gates for junk because some junk manages to get in does sound like a solution?
Nice logic.

2025-05-12 09:46:44

- reply

If it's not too much of a hassle, I'd opt to have it.
I'm an npub user and love your work. Kudos.

2025-05-10 19:08:14

- reply

But if most nodes are core, they will still relay the spam and they will end up in the confirmed block regardless of you running knots. We'd need knots to outpace all other core nodes for this to be a affective, no?

2025-05-10 19:04:27

- reply

Meaning all this "run knots" calls are meaningless apriori?

2025-05-10 18:50:56

- reply

Most nodes meaning knots should be the most adopted node version? Up from current 7% to outpacing all other core versions?
https://files.sovbit.host/media/5143c373df1b548a77d79ec74f27255d129b695b522dfb5bf43498ba4b501df9/b71e02b5c30fe83c60e638281657ff4dddffeb19d9abd99fd55a258dbc3e062a.webp

2025-05-10 18:20:30

- reply

What's the point in alternative mempool if confirmed by cks shall contain the spam anyhow?

2025-05-10 09:26:33

- reply

High horse syndrome prevalent here. Futile trying to get these people to abstain. You'll get the usual "you're retarded" or "you're autistic" as a comeback.

2025-05-07 16:30:56

- reply

I would assume no one without a conflict interest wants spam on bitcoin. Nonetheless, cause down on bitcoin pays, there's a conflict of interest and this renders the attempts to eliminated down futile. You can run knots and free your mempool from spam but that doesn't mean spam won't be in the confurmed blocks. It will be; though your node didn't see the txs in its mempool before confirmation. It's a battle we can't win as long as spammers can afford to outbid the general use case txs.
It's a sad truth we all must face.

2025-05-07 16:14:02

- reply

It doesn't cost anything to spam nostr; spamming bitcoin chain incurs fees. A categorical difference that changes everything.

2025-05-06 14:26:35

- reply

I use them during euphoric stages to hedge my bitcoin short risk exposure.

2025-05-04 03:45:03

I didn't know not being a communist bitch makes one a statist nowadays.
Tell me you never created a product without actually telling me that. For if you had, you'd know what is being meant here.
#nevent1q…24en

2025-05-03 21:00:52

- reply

They seem to like Google more.
The irony in this: the devs of world's largest permissionless monetary protocol hosting their shit with Google.
🤌

2025-05-03 20:56:10

- reply

Nothing happened. Someone copied the product of the host and the host didn't like it. Apparently we live in a communist environment where folks cannot get their shit protected.
@nprofile…vu4p correct me if I'm wrong.

2025-05-03 20:07:25

- reply

Bitcoin podcast is good with @nprofile…vu4p

2025-05-03 15:54:11

- reply

"People that think that the only way that #bitcoin mining can survive is extra fees from inscriptions, don’t understand free markets, nor the difficulty adjustment."
This is very true.
Plus we have solo miners, I'm putting up more 3 TH/s myself and this trend will only increase.

2025-05-02 19:02:35

- reply

Difficulty will drop, it'll be lucrative once again to mine and we off go again.
The beauty is in its unstructured simplicity.

2025-05-02 18:44:44

- reply

Thanks for the reply.
I do run a bitcoin core node on umbrel and have no problems with it. I saw there's also the Knots version and one more (can't recall the name), and it made me think what are the reasons for javing all these.
I would love to learn more about it through a discourse rather than reading technical literature.

2025-05-02 13:54:55

What's the difference if one runs bitcoin core or knots?
What's the catch here?
#asknostr

2025-04-30 07:55:43

- reply

Anything coming from this cocksucker should be dismissed
Uncep the op return will have folks dumping soap operas on the chain for offline watching later
Dumb shit from dumb fuck

2025-04-21 20:01:15

- reply

There's a categorical difference in influencing one another and what the US/UK has been doing in the ME since 18th century.

2025-04-21 11:44:41

- reply

Hurray!!!

2025-04-21 11:29:49

- reply

Still gives an error.

2025-04-21 11:28:01

- reply

He says the people should be left to choose their own fate without foreign influence, this also includes foreign influence from other countries such Russia as well. Assad was a Russian puppet, Julani is a US/Israeli puppet: spot the difference.
What about other countries?
If you dare to say the truth, you will be attacked, this is evidently the case with this fellow too.

2025-04-21 10:41:24

- reply

Yes, decentralization is key component. Nonetheless, zapping btc/xmr only makes it better.