stevenroose on Nostr: Capitalism is no different though. Likely even more. Socialism has a pretty loose ...
Capitalism is no different though. Likely even more. Socialism has a pretty loose definition, you could probably count many anarchist societies as socialist. It's kinda natural to socialize common resources. But capitalism can really only exist with a government. It's quite unnatural that capital is privately owned and workers have to yield production to supposed owners.
Published at
2024-10-11 00:33:56Event JSON
{
"id": "275f9a7c6b236d70d8527105de4c6a1cfc48d29be906e1ae1f568d274e8cb9bb",
"pubkey": "a9e42a0ca6e4b1208088b68a4fd6407481b12060f915a0fecb4c8874557e3749",
"created_at": 1728606836,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ff1a68c42082105d852c425bcb783c99e3c8fccafa6a93a22f3829e0ec9831cf"
],
[
"e",
"4811a60d15d64fd8598602187e817c87fcf1d671725ab14306239689da25da1e",
"",
"reply"
]
],
"content": "Capitalism is no different though. Likely even more. Socialism has a pretty loose definition, you could probably count many anarchist societies as socialist. It's kinda natural to socialize common resources. But capitalism can really only exist with a government. It's quite unnatural that capital is privately owned and workers have to yield production to supposed owners. ",
"sig": "3b4389e0a8304c3010aeb2a637cd3383133286007c6c74979d180430d03d83e8d6307755b7e8e06d92a8d0cd185cb800e3121558c93472335bbfd3382f8d2b10"
}
