kravietz 🦇 (npub1vz5…qdta) npub12wfyg7nljr8h25apv0c2fvqd2l5dcmdymc9d3x7zdy2xtzztaysq7f8kwl (npub12wf…8kwl) npub199wcwgvkde7wnu22asa9qlg7wzlj4ff6s3qkmvsmgkffaep24nhqq6n803 (npub199w…n803) npub1llzxpc6c3w92hczu49dsxcfqkp5tl9f5e30urrgf2v8tqnu7pkgsww08cq (npub1llz…08cq)
One more thing on the topic of process: IIUC (based on excerpts) eIDAS only provides for a procedure to dispute validity of individual certs, but not of a CA. Currently, CAB forum does distrust CAs if they repeatedly misissue certificates, esp. if that happens after they claim to have fixed the problem that later causes misissuance. Also, this is not only important when it happens, but even when it doesn't happen the possibility shapes CAs' behaviour.
npub1v6…s9004
2023-11-11 18:38:41
in reply to nevent1q…pvg9
Author Public Key
npub1v67gmn7f4vlg3fcrk8up3p08rkmqqaxmw0he3hf9f8h09jre332qds9004Published at
2023-11-11 18:38:41Event JSON
{
"id": "2eed73261f450e733c1ea6ead4e80559f41120c99f8bc7dca20221279f752f71",
"pubkey": "66bc8dcfc9ab3e88a703b1f81885e71db60074db73ef98dd2549eef2c8798c54",
"created_at": 1699727921,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"60a94a39eef05a48fcb0b214f57ecd9c81ffd70bd7beaa274732ae7ae7dcf0ea",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5392447a7f90cf7553a163f0a4b00d57e8dc6da4de0ad89bc2691465884be920",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"295d8721966e7ce9f14aec3a507d1e70bf2aa53a84416db21b45929ee42aacee",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"ffc460e3588b8aabe05ca95b036120b068bf9534cc5fc18d09530eb04f9e0d91",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3ef68672b5a78c720e038b657bcd213f2e1a41d2d272dd48836c701e3d8e4e13",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"16c19e6e50f04807261ee4ea3c3410f6ffd65cbb122e2d7e150c1b4ad98439be",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"ff941f32190d7b997560f178c1c4c705b6668a40473a057474ba590ebd85744f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"323fa7aec748a899625e4295fdcbb3bc895a3fa1dbf2fa9b2ff0018a1b4c97ae",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://qoto.org/users/robryk/statuses/111393369032651750",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1vz555w0w7pdy3l9skg202lkdnjqll4ct67l25f68x2h84e7u7r4qmrqdta nostr:npub12wfyg7nljr8h25apv0c2fvqd2l5dcmdymc9d3x7zdy2xtzztaysq7f8kwl nostr:npub199wcwgvkde7wnu22asa9qlg7wzlj4ff6s3qkmvsmgkffaep24nhqq6n803 nostr:npub1llzxpc6c3w92hczu49dsxcfqkp5tl9f5e30urrgf2v8tqnu7pkgsww08cq \n\nOne more thing on the topic of process: IIUC (based on excerpts) eIDAS only provides for a procedure to dispute validity of individual certs, but not of a CA. Currently, CAB forum does distrust CAs if they repeatedly misissue certificates, esp. if that happens after they claim to have fixed the problem that later causes misissuance. Also, this is not only important when it happens, but even when it doesn't happen the possibility shapes CAs' behaviour.",
"sig": "511d1ecb72a571bdbc79669946dac51668b9468572bb68a27a428e22d8b1ae6454bbebf62236e319c86dfa451525022543fed2b47a5d7388d8215a139ec21cec"
}