Matt Blaze on Nostr: I'm not dunking on Signal here (though there *are* some features and usability quirks ...
I'm not dunking on Signal here (though there *are* some features and usability quirks I dislike). It's probably the best designed and implemented secure messaging platform *for general use* that we've got. I use and rely on Signal quite a bit myself.
But it's simply not designed for, or suitable for, classified national security communications.
Published at
2025-04-09 18:16:14Event JSON
{
"id": "28cc9bed41e8a1d8de54d41a48ba05412c6ba094c386e2db4fbe4c9f935e64cf",
"pubkey": "6f9089e5e6810f9514a501f04b94466f7473f4db7fb0e9e389966dc7cfb76251",
"created_at": 1744222574,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3e828137d7049afdebc73addd4e7ca5448e70d8c793aa91fda6612c6a06b809e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://federate.social/users/mattblaze/statuses/114309370664210708",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "I'm not dunking on Signal here (though there *are* some features and usability quirks I dislike). It's probably the best designed and implemented secure messaging platform *for general use* that we've got. I use and rely on Signal quite a bit myself.\n\nBut it's simply not designed for, or suitable for, classified national security communications.",
"sig": "04760a2e52e3269cb9237db33e787e4adb7d30dcae36accd5f1bc4fd51f8a81c729801f2afb9270ed12b2133e462f31423afd7c2fc635062d16bf7bad1d53e73"
}