📅 Original date posted:2015-01-23
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 23 January 2015 08:35:23 GMT-08:00, slush <slush at centrum.cz> wrote:
>Oh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders*
>to
>Trezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's,
>obviously, no-go solution.
That's what P2SH is for; the senders will just be sending to a P2SH address.
>I understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any
>other
>pending projects waiting for hard-fork?
Hard-forks aren't hard for directly political issues, they're politically hard because they're risky by requiring everyone yo upgrade at once. In the case of signature validation, that touches a *lot* of third party code that people rely on to avoid being defrauded.
FWIW I've actually got a half-finished writeup for how to use OP_CODESEPARATOR and a CHECKSIG2 soft-fork to have signatures sign fees and so forth.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJUwonGMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhbwkCADP7AcJ6a6V/y7MHt2x
ZiCXYsfHq5j03kbSWXGi1Q/9RqWGVha1fhWPp62yhDxbWOfh5QKauCbrt2g1AqT3
xbnh+2XE1rApBQIiJ6u0wZmpCi+4EhH2M9R8UYu9oIMzBe4K2jhzUbzcOR9Qplyq
9j6yevNrvtNHZb2OTiaKelxnuZUEiAsONHPOvR8Fkflwbd/w279OeilRjHYt3A/J
U22KOwjNrpa7/QE/HeC0QINqr3S132Yg4iYFwPviBwGq/WXQuLHIzGtgKOzrIC1T
h6kpWO9CjSxVbjMrf68IrSHRv92K8y1LiHFRZvzp3ulzcGBo2btazmrp/fUDLCr0
6uFg
=uDeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 15:29:05
in reply to nevent1q…fn8c
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Seen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:29:05Event JSON
{
"id": "27b3482c7bffd795158768054fa8932364553276c48ab0583796919566c0f34f",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686151745,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6dc832bdb706e2f61589ea679669c46a49f00ca991f53b93fef09a1a229115c6",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2e5b5722fd6410b0dd3174d29c992338aad6c72da38a891a52f0f4bab51d4f70",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-23\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nOn 23 January 2015 08:35:23 GMT-08:00, slush \u003cslush at centrum.cz\u003e wrote:\n\u003eOh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders*\n\u003eto\n\u003eTrezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's,\n\u003eobviously, no-go solution.\n\nThat's what P2SH is for; the senders will just be sending to a P2SH address.\n\n\u003eI understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any\n\u003eother\n\u003epending projects waiting for hard-fork?\n\nHard-forks aren't hard for directly political issues, they're politically hard because they're risky by requiring everyone yo upgrade at once. In the case of signature validation, that touches a *lot* of third party code that people rely on to avoid being defrauded.\n\nFWIW I've actually got a half-finished writeup for how to use OP_CODESEPARATOR and a CHECKSIG2 soft-fork to have signatures sign fees and so forth.\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: APG v1.1.1\n\niQFQBAEBCAA6BQJUwonGMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8\ncGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhbwkCADP7AcJ6a6V/y7MHt2x\nZiCXYsfHq5j03kbSWXGi1Q/9RqWGVha1fhWPp62yhDxbWOfh5QKauCbrt2g1AqT3\nxbnh+2XE1rApBQIiJ6u0wZmpCi+4EhH2M9R8UYu9oIMzBe4K2jhzUbzcOR9Qplyq\n9j6yevNrvtNHZb2OTiaKelxnuZUEiAsONHPOvR8Fkflwbd/w279OeilRjHYt3A/J\nU22KOwjNrpa7/QE/HeC0QINqr3S132Yg4iYFwPviBwGq/WXQuLHIzGtgKOzrIC1T\nh6kpWO9CjSxVbjMrf68IrSHRv92K8y1LiHFRZvzp3ulzcGBo2btazmrp/fUDLCr0\n6uFg\n=uDeM\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "06601cdc53513d6658a806c9f8c4136e7430991b811dbb8a45675170668c9bef05033da93102bad1b6141eece32217a9fb2884238e8dfb6f8e6b02d1f1ef332c"
}