📅 Original date posted:2015-01-23
📝 Original message:Oh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders* to
Trezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's,
obviously, no-go solution.
I understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any other
pending projects waiting for hard-fork? Maybe we should join our effort in
some way.
M.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Alan Reiner <etotheipi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am happy to entertain other ideas that achieve our goals here, but I'm
> fairly confident that the new SIGHASH type is the only way that would
> allow devices like Trezor to truly simplify their design (and still work
> securely on 100% of funds contained by the wallet).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150123/be814f81/attachment.html>;
slush [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ad…gl2p6
2023-06-07 15:29:05
in reply to nevent1q…jcu0
Author Public Key
npub1ad7209g90jnu400x74quws0xv8gpxs2fxnjexnpwqnrxwa39exdq5gl2p6Published at
2023-06-07 15:29:05Event JSON
{
"id": "2e5b5722fd6410b0dd3174d29c992338aad6c72da38a891a52f0f4bab51d4f70",
"pubkey": "eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a",
"created_at": 1686151745,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6dc832bdb706e2f61589ea679669c46a49f00ca991f53b93fef09a1a229115c6",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a8a2fa5b9a431f2831ce62a82c85ee7432a662f12f647bb34a37aadd60caaa96",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"86f42bcb76a431c128b596c36714ae73a42cae48706a9e5513d716043447f5ec"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-23\n📝 Original message:Oh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders* to\nTrezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's,\nobviously, no-go solution.\n\nI understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any other\npending projects waiting for hard-fork? Maybe we should join our effort in\nsome way.\n\nM.\n\nOn Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Alan Reiner \u003cetotheipi at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e I am happy to entertain other ideas that achieve our goals here, but I'm\n\u003e fairly confident that the new SIGHASH type is the only way that would\n\u003e allow devices like Trezor to truly simplify their design (and still work\n\u003e securely on 100% of funds contained by the wallet).\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150123/be814f81/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "0809ba28f2267ba4537a72d527e67c8b298c76f637f82c6161362d39956b896c4cbdb817c65f5fa21661454535e8ed611b9dfb63258135612374ce8aee461b5e"
}