Jackkluz on Nostr: First off, it has been theorized that quantum computing could exist, yet no one has ...
First off, it has been theorized that quantum computing could exist, yet no one has proven any meaningful computation. It’s a speculative guess of what might be possible from the limited understanding of QM; I’m calling BS on that claim. It’s a larp until proven meaningfully.
And in bitcoin you know the state of every single utxo by the presence of a block; but this is always a past state; all UTXOs exist in past blocks as “unspent/0” and if they are in the latest block they are “spent/1”, by seeing what’s in the block you know the state of everything else by deduction. But you never know the present state because the state is always dictated by a block, there’s no “present block” it’s only ever a past verifiable state.
UTXOs are entangled in they can be split infinite ways, spent to infinite addresses and can interact with UTXOs from any block. Do you really believe that if satoshis UTXO from Block 1 was to move that would not have an impact on future UTXOs? Is that what you are saying?
Yes the entropy is zero but it’s past state is preserved in for future transformations, the link is between the destruction of past UTXOs and the creation of new UTXOs, they are all entangled…..full history from the creation of the UTXO. What do you mean?
Please show me UTXOs that have become decoherent. I think your definition is wrong.
Published at
2025-03-02 00:58:58Event JSON
{
"id": "412a641c4a732325201ab1a054389918d6e1884f909b90cd79376b6b2adad606",
"pubkey": "3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77",
"created_at": 1740877138,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8faf325ce5e0939bd5cc8775d146f69d57d5b0752922ab67ee0dc89115af6f07",
"wss://a.nos.lol",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"aa9efc1e04b2dd2c1f2477fbdf199134cd584cff00dd5e0ae07fa7998ded3d56",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://image.nostr.build/ff300e5d7f1733f1775a99b56a5059df7676742204e143418aa86673750571d6.jpg",
"blurhash e14.9:-;WB_3IUWB%MWBofxu4nRjRjWBof_3%Mt7RjWBIUj[ayRjt7",
"dim 1332x376"
],
[
"p",
"ccd794bebd86528b3fd4dcdc4bfcb1a26df01f0447a156c057c68b991c26b385"
],
[
"r",
"https://image.nostr.build/ff300e5d7f1733f1775a99b56a5059df7676742204e143418aa86673750571d6.jpg"
]
],
"content": "First off, it has been theorized that quantum computing could exist, yet no one has proven any meaningful computation. It’s a speculative guess of what might be possible from the limited understanding of QM; I’m calling BS on that claim. It’s a larp until proven meaningfully.\n\nAnd in bitcoin you know the state of every single utxo by the presence of a block; but this is always a past state; all UTXOs exist in past blocks as “unspent/0” and if they are in the latest block they are “spent/1”, by seeing what’s in the block you know the state of everything else by deduction. But you never know the present state because the state is always dictated by a block, there’s no “present block” it’s only ever a past verifiable state.\n\nUTXOs are entangled in they can be split infinite ways, spent to infinite addresses and can interact with UTXOs from any block. Do you really believe that if satoshis UTXO from Block 1 was to move that would not have an impact on future UTXOs? Is that what you are saying?\n\nYes the entropy is zero but it’s past state is preserved in for future transformations, the link is between the destruction of past UTXOs and the creation of new UTXOs, they are all entangled…..full history from the creation of the UTXO. What do you mean?\n\nPlease show me UTXOs that have become decoherent. I think your definition is wrong. https://image.nostr.build/ff300e5d7f1733f1775a99b56a5059df7676742204e143418aa86673750571d6.jpg ",
"sig": "89e61a34392a6a79347433ec4fe1d3406720b0685984a63b329a5ab65b695b53b6c064f52963c1a1073926af4b07c2c6548b0f4af86354cf9e18677cece6d7d8"
}
