đź“… Original date posted:2015-01-15
đź“ť Original message:In BIP45 it mentions "lexicographically sorting the public keys".
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0045.mediawiki#Address_Generation_Procedure
On 15 January 2015 at 03:32, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> Sounds like this warrants a micro-BIP just to get everybody on the same
> page.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ruben de Vries <ruben at blocktrail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> For p2sh multisig TXs the order of the public keys affect the hash and
>> there doesn't seem to be an agreed upon way of sorting the public keys.
>>
>> If there would be a standard (recommended) way of sorting the public keys
>> that would make it easier for services that implement some form of multisig
>> to be compatible with each other without much hassle and making it possible
>> to import keys from one service to another.
>>
>> I'm not suggesting forcing the order, just setting a standard to
>> recommend, there doesn't seem to be much reason for (new) services to not
>> follow that recommendation.
>>
>> Ryan from BitPay broad this up before (
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/32092958/) and in
>> bitcore they've implemented lexicographical sorting on the hex of the
>> public key.
>> In a short search I can't find any other library that has a sorting
>> function, let alone using it by default, so bitcore is currently my only
>> reference.
>>
>>
>> ​Ruben de Vries
>> ​CTO, BlockTrail
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
>> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
>> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
>> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150115/b521875e/attachment.html>;
Jonathan Brown [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mr…qxpes
2023-06-07 15:28:31
in reply to nevent1q…v4zu
Author Public Key
npub1mrjg709rr764tt202mzxj9cy5d064kcdaukdve53yggfzha0tk4q4qxpesPublished at
2023-06-07 15:28:31Event JSON
{
"id": "462ece01d8465897b46be7a2f0a587887ef97af3c18b9ad35fcf6f595441a246",
"pubkey": "d8e48f3ca31fb555ad4f56c4691704a35faadb0def2cd666912210915faf5daa",
"created_at": 1686151711,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ef9480e99ea56d0362e9d11aa3d3348112e8c8b0adbfbdfee1624a1e22a745a8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"62162cdb74965f851adf6b49f5fe4ef91fc61be90ee01cbf48d0db86542fc6e6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-15\n📝 Original message:In BIP45 it mentions \"lexicographically sorting the public keys\".\n\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0045.mediawiki#Address_Generation_Procedure\n\nOn 15 January 2015 at 03:32, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Sounds like this warrants a micro-BIP just to get everybody on the same\n\u003e page.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ruben de Vries \u003cruben at blocktrail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e For p2sh multisig TXs the order of the public keys affect the hash and\n\u003e\u003e there doesn't seem to be an agreed upon way of sorting the public keys.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e If there would be a standard (recommended) way of sorting the public keys\n\u003e\u003e that would make it easier for services that implement some form of multisig\n\u003e\u003e to be compatible with each other without much hassle and making it possible\n\u003e\u003e to import keys from one service to another.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I'm not suggesting forcing the order, just setting a standard to\n\u003e\u003e recommend, there doesn't seem to be much reason for (new) services to not\n\u003e\u003e follow that recommendation.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Ryan from BitPay broad this up before (\n\u003e\u003e https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/32092958/) and in\n\u003e\u003e bitcore they've implemented lexicographical sorting on the hex of the\n\u003e\u003e public key.\n\u003e\u003e In a short search I can't find any other library that has a sorting\n\u003e\u003e function, let alone using it by default, so bitcore is currently my only\n\u003e\u003e reference.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ​Ruben de Vries\n\u003e\u003e ​CTO, BlockTrail\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e Jeff Garzik\n\u003e Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\n\u003e BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150115/b521875e/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "56696877fdb0d8e4cbad1f95eea7914ecbab549d30870a64e59ca2a993bf46979c60d77eb5c99348753c40852ace205344f3b419cacee4a33341ebcdef6e7360"
}