📅 Original date posted:2015-01-14
📝 Original message:Sounds like this warrants a micro-BIP just to get everybody on the same
page.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ruben de Vries <ruben at blocktrail.com>
wrote:
> For p2sh multisig TXs the order of the public keys affect the hash and
> there doesn't seem to be an agreed upon way of sorting the public keys.
>
> If there would be a standard (recommended) way of sorting the public keys
> that would make it easier for services that implement some form of multisig
> to be compatible with each other without much hassle and making it possible
> to import keys from one service to another.
>
> I'm not suggesting forcing the order, just setting a standard to
> recommend, there doesn't seem to be much reason for (new) services to not
> follow that recommendation.
>
> Ryan from BitPay broad this up before (
> https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/32092958/) and in
> bitcore they've implemented lexicographical sorting on the hex of the
> public key.
> In a short search I can't find any other library that has a sorting
> function, let alone using it by default, so bitcore is currently my only
> reference.
>
>
> Ruben de Vries
> CTO, BlockTrail
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150114/2468d959/attachment.html>;
Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kf…f3f58
2023-06-07 15:28:31
in reply to nevent1q…gsr5
Author Public Key
npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58Published at
2023-06-07 15:28:31Event JSON
{
"id": "62162cdb74965f851adf6b49f5fe4ef91fc61be90ee01cbf48d0db86542fc6e6",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686151711,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ef9480e99ea56d0362e9d11aa3d3348112e8c8b0adbfbdfee1624a1e22a745a8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2c57e7d4d877bf84ff4d416b77157d80f6ebbeb74d8dcbf1324bd48c67d3e020",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"26f7e62ba6dc9195d80cbebfe2bde09da82ebce54e39e84c507693470894a669"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-14\n📝 Original message:Sounds like this warrants a micro-BIP just to get everybody on the same\npage.\n\n\nOn Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Ruben de Vries \u003cruben at blocktrail.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e For p2sh multisig TXs the order of the public keys affect the hash and\n\u003e there doesn't seem to be an agreed upon way of sorting the public keys.\n\u003e\n\u003e If there would be a standard (recommended) way of sorting the public keys\n\u003e that would make it easier for services that implement some form of multisig\n\u003e to be compatible with each other without much hassle and making it possible\n\u003e to import keys from one service to another.\n\u003e\n\u003e I'm not suggesting forcing the order, just setting a standard to\n\u003e recommend, there doesn't seem to be much reason for (new) services to not\n\u003e follow that recommendation.\n\u003e\n\u003e Ryan from BitPay broad this up before (\n\u003e https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/32092958/) and in\n\u003e bitcore they've implemented lexicographical sorting on the hex of the\n\u003e public key.\n\u003e In a short search I can't find any other library that has a sorting\n\u003e function, let alone using it by default, so bitcore is currently my only\n\u003e reference.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Ruben de Vries\n\u003e CTO, BlockTrail\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150114/2468d959/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f3660ad1982d90c029e5120876602e0b022bea16fcb3bcf1cb8321138c593b26609ad0a71489bb44b04c64647ff0a27a1d949493d81fa9fe774d58ec63b8424a"
}