Fine you fucking dickhead I'll waste more time and energy going into more detail
0 blades - no spin, too focused on saving material
1 blade - sacrifices some material to add spin, good trade
2 blades - sacrifices more material to add more spin and a lot more balance, good trade
3 blades - sacrifices more material to add more spin and balance, usually good trade
4 blades - sacrifices material to take away balance and potentially take away overall lifetime spin, usually bad trade
5 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, doesn't really help improve lifetime performance over 3 blades, always (almost always?) a bad trade
6 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, number of the beast, potentially good trade
7 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, lucky number, superstitious choice
8 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, number reminds me of Digit because she was Digit#8888 on Discord at one point, so this is the ideal number of blades and always the best overall choice
9 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, too many blades, usually a bad trade
10 blades - possibly an order of magnitude better than 1 blade but does that really make it a good idea?
11 blades - too many blades from an aesthetic standpoint, ugly, probably worse than 3 blades in every way
whoeverlovesDigit / 🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit
npub1wa…6u3l2
2025-04-23 13:43:20
in reply to nevent1q…rj47
Author Public Key
npub1wamvxt2tr50ghu4fdw47ksadnt0p277nv0vfhplmv0n0z3243zyq26u3l2Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2025-04-23 13:43:20Event JSON
{
"id": "40ba3a91871812f8d9fca2ce9848af388b112ddcdcf999849196c1a34f8aa1f4",
"pubkey": "7776c32d4b1d1e8bf2a96babeb43ad9ade157bd363d89b87fb63e6f145558888",
"created_at": 1745415800,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"8888"
],
[
"e",
"d7046a0f24e126aef856c4e0655bea8f809ae3ee36fd5f6897731a37a7b015d9",
"",
"root",
"7776c32d4b1d1e8bf2a96babeb43ad9ade157bd363d89b87fb63e6f145558888"
],
[
"e",
"0d52e237bcc3b3847c2cb1141329d61598a3f912417ff677d1c2d6d7242a05a6",
"wss://nos.lol/",
"reply",
"faafb1f49a72d9bbe60e7539ce9d643fa76fb8e63cd279ad4128a067a28fc51a"
],
[
"p",
"4564d670cc2b516c0173a27814abe5d8ca60abc8f883ac82b47b5c980877484b"
],
[
"p",
"d28413712171c33e117d4bd0930ac05b2c51b30eb3021ef8d4f1233f02c90a2b"
],
[
"p",
"faafb1f49a72d9bbe60e7539ce9d643fa76fb8e63cd279ad4128a067a28fc51a"
],
[
"client",
"jumble"
]
],
"content": "Fine you fucking dickhead I'll waste more time and energy going into more detail\n\n0 blades - no spin, too focused on saving material\n\n1 blade - sacrifices some material to add spin, good trade\n\n2 blades - sacrifices more material to add more spin and a lot more balance, good trade\n\n3 blades - sacrifices more material to add more spin and balance, usually good trade\n\n4 blades - sacrifices material to take away balance and potentially take away overall lifetime spin, usually bad trade\n\n5 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, doesn't really help improve lifetime performance over 3 blades, always (almost always?) a bad trade\n\n6 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, number of the beast, potentially good trade\n\n7 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, lucky number, superstitious choice\n\n8 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, number reminds me of Digit because she was Digit#8888 on Discord at one point, so this is the ideal number of blades and always the best overall choice\n\n9 blades - sacrifices a lot of material, too many blades, usually a bad trade\n\n10 blades - possibly an order of magnitude better than 1 blade but does that really make it a good idea?\n\n11 blades - too many blades from an aesthetic standpoint, ugly, probably worse than 3 blades in every way",
"sig": "e27b991e30719beb9a02231a235feb74b8255fedf329cf08f1d33be096f1e8becc00e659b467c554e9d6567a679000de04e11ae3bee7ed9baf662da63af6600d"
}