npub16uk4yyw47haxwl0klhh7lcx3qatkyqmpc6gc4hwru3qedaeuueeqqkpv7k (npub16uk…pv7k) djsumdog (npub109x…wvvl)
>Those on the right hold the reins of power.
From everything I see, no they don't. Not by a long shot. You're just butt-hurt that it's not the far-left terrorists that hold the rains of power to institute environmental communism. And that is true, they don't, and they never should.
>If you don't consider yourself an environmentalist
A normal person that isn't beholden to a toxic ideology. I'm not limited by your ideology and I'm able to see the truth that nuclear energy was by far our best solution to quickly eliminate fossil fuels from usage and create an environment where it would cheaper, both cost wise and CO2 wise, to develop and deploy other green energy solutions. Nuclear energy was a much more efficient way to reach the future you probably want, but you're too blind by ideology to even see it. How could it be cost-prohibitive when most nuclear plants were constructed in decades past, when technology was far more primitive? How could they be unsustainable when a nuclear plant can have such a long lifetime, and new technologies in the field could recycle and reuse spent fuel rods? And how could the stability of governments be an issue, when again these things have lasted through so many governments, and in East Europe they survived through nations moving away from communism? There's not even any indication that we're facing anything even close to that. The only reason you could possibly think that's a worry is if you yourself want for your environmentalist buddies to overthrow governments and destroy society.
>Right to repair? Definitely
I've yet to see an environmentalist actually do something in that direction. Do you actually support people repairing and using a gas guzzler for decades on?
>Pubtrans? yes!
You ignored my complete statement there, because environmentalists consistently try to force people away from private transport (aka drive their own cars) and only allow them the public transport, usually before actually improving the public transport before hand. This is the thing you people don't get. Normal people want to see public transport improving to the point where governments don't need to threaten us with taxes or other measures into abandoning our cars, but we end up choosing the bus ourselves on the daily basis, because it's simply is easier, more comfortable and more convenient to leave the car in the garage. But don't be mistaken, we still want to be allowed to always have that car in the garage, and be allowed to drive it at any time, to any place, in however way our whim dictates.
>We can prosper using less energy.
No you can't. You can survive using less energy, yes. But prospering implies a growing society. Growth takes more energy. That's fact.
Scarlet :02_dance: /
npub1ze…eanju
2023-09-05 07:30:25
in reply to nevent1q…3vrw
Author Public Key
npub1ze5ngwt4mglwtktdlrryrdvdzjunfrj2x6re9s0h6l5j5xu8sxcsveanjuPublished at
2023-09-05 07:30:25Event JSON
{
"id": "40a64df8b87a37bef2a7189ac6d9eac771bc6d08e5d65a8997379fb35fe24c6e",
"pubkey": "1669343975da3ee5d96df8c641b58d14b9348e4a368792c1f7d7e92a1b8781b1",
"created_at": 1693899025,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d72d5211d5f5fa677df6fdefefe0d10757620361c6918addc3e44196f73ce672",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"794cf315bf4af55256e5608bb370aa00413f515069c3536542b63b3f8b765270",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"2dde2ae210f1bf2d7649fe8f8b9ff5b7180e7e0c464ea129a23ff6cbb7e36550",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c6c1962cf91560ce79fbd578296e1df4857da964115d9183225dff5c317d750e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://bae.st/objects/1625faf4-20bf-4229-92d6-a95efe13d103",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub16uk4yyw47haxwl0klhh7lcx3qatkyqmpc6gc4hwru3qedaeuueeqqkpv7k nostr:npub109x0x9dlft64y4h9vz9mxu92qpqn752sd8p4xe2zkcanlzmk2fcq3pwvvl \n\u003eThose on the right hold the reins of power.\nFrom everything I see, no they don't. Not by a long shot. You're just butt-hurt that it's not the far-left terrorists that hold the rains of power to institute environmental communism. And that is true, they don't, and they never should. \n\n\u003eIf you don't consider yourself an environmentalist\nA normal person that isn't beholden to a toxic ideology. I'm not limited by your ideology and I'm able to see the truth that nuclear energy was by far our best solution to quickly eliminate fossil fuels from usage and create an environment where it would cheaper, both cost wise and CO2 wise, to develop and deploy other green energy solutions. Nuclear energy was a much more efficient way to reach the future you probably want, but you're too blind by ideology to even see it. How could it be cost-prohibitive when most nuclear plants were constructed in decades past, when technology was far more primitive? How could they be unsustainable when a nuclear plant can have such a long lifetime, and new technologies in the field could recycle and reuse spent fuel rods? And how could the stability of governments be an issue, when again these things have lasted through so many governments, and in East Europe they survived through nations moving away from communism? There's not even any indication that we're facing anything even close to that. The only reason you could possibly think that's a worry is if you yourself want for your environmentalist buddies to overthrow governments and destroy society.\n\n\u003eRight to repair? Definitely\nI've yet to see an environmentalist actually do something in that direction. Do you actually support people repairing and using a gas guzzler for decades on? \n\n\u003ePubtrans? yes! \nYou ignored my complete statement there, because environmentalists consistently try to force people away from private transport (aka drive their own cars) and only allow them the public transport, usually before actually improving the public transport before hand. This is the thing you people don't get. Normal people want to see public transport improving to the point where governments don't need to threaten us with taxes or other measures into abandoning our cars, but we end up choosing the bus ourselves on the daily basis, because it's simply is easier, more comfortable and more convenient to leave the car in the garage. But don't be mistaken, we still want to be allowed to always have that car in the garage, and be allowed to drive it at any time, to any place, in however way our whim dictates. \n\n\u003eWe can prosper using less energy. \nNo you can't. You can survive using less energy, yes. But prospering implies a growing society. Growth takes more energy. That's fact.",
"sig": "a277d73c5a0bc92ad0721392fa3d40afc6bbbf732b6db91274ecc65e2728a10ed4ff17ddd5fd58f5704f4a725ef59838c7db262c21ee3ad1d83aceb5f865b03d"
}