Bitcoin didn’t change—your relationship to it did.
Now you either accept the truth… or try to rewrite it.
Let’s be honest about what’s really happening right now.
Bitcoin broke $100,000—and something shifted.
Not in the protocol.
In the psyche.
People who dismissed it at $20k, laughed at it at $40k, or ignored it at $60k—
Now feel permanently priced out.
A full coin has become mythical.
Out of reach.
Untouchable.
And instead of accepting that, instead of stacking sats with humility,
they propose this:
Let’s rename the units. Let’s call sats “Bitcoin.”
Let’s pretend there are 2.1 quadrillion Bitcoin.
But here’s the thing—
None of them were saying this when Bitcoin was $30k.
Or $50k.
This isn’t about user experience.
It’s about unit envy dressed up as design thinking.
If they were honest, they’d just say it:
“Bitcoin got too expensive. We’re late.
So let’s change the narrative to make ourselves feel early again.”
But they won’t say that.
Because they don’t want Bitcoin to humble them.
They want to reshape Bitcoin to protect their ego.
Bitcoin doesn’t bend.
It doesn’t get rewritten because you missed the bus.
It rewards discipline—not revisionism.
Sats exist for a reason.
They allow anyone to accumulate Bitcoin—without deluding the message.
You don’t get to rename the ledger because you’re uncomfortable.
You get to stack. Or you get to cope.
That’s Bitcoin.
And that’s the truth they’re running from.
