matt on Nostr: SFO has had private security, not TSA, this whole time, and while it’s not wildly ...

SFO has had private security, not TSA, this whole time, and while it’s not wildly better, it’s definitely the best security at a major US airport.

quoting
note1dj3…0zc3

Most folks don't love security theater & everyone has had a bad time at a screening checkpoint.

So, let's think for a second about hypothetical private-#TSA companies.

I'd expect them to gravitate towards AI-assigned individual risk ratings to minimize the cost of hiring & training people to interact with travelers.

To create ratings, I'd expect them to demand & consolidate invasive pools of our biometrics, web browsing, commenting, purchasing, movements & private lives.

Just don't call it a "social credit score"

You can bet they'll pivot to trying to monetize their data.

2026: We're a terminal security company
2029: We're a person rating company

Would these ratings make their way into other parts of our lives & things we want to visit?

And who exactly would stand up for us when the ratings are wrong? Or our data is shipped to foreign buyers.

Who holds #PrivateTSA companies accountable? The US doesn't have strong #privacy protections...

I'm also not optimistic about private sector security companies' ability to stop breaches. History backs me up here.

But I do expect that private-TSA companies could use lobbying to limit oversight & accountability.

That's been the history of other privacy-invasive tech companies.

So, as an airline security privatization conversation kicks off, remember that it can't just be "current thing is bad" but needs to consider what kind of future we're inviting in.