📅 Original date posted:2017-04-03
📝 Original message:On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The hard-fork is conditional to 95% of the hashing power has approved the
> segwit2mb soft-fork and the segwit soft-fork has been activated (which
> should occur 2016 blocks after its lock-in time)
>
Miners signalling they have upgraded by flipping a bit in the nVersion
field has little relevance in a hard fork. If 100% of the hash power
indicates they are running this proposal, but the nodes don't upgrade, what
will happen?
For the record, I actually talk a lot about hard forks with various
developers and am very interested in the research that Johnson in
particular is pioneering. However, I have failed to understand your point
about 95% miner signalling in relation to a hard fork, so I am eagerly
awaiting your explanation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170403/daee0659/attachment.html>;
Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1lh…zg7ed
2023-06-07 17:58:51
in reply to nevent1q…malq
Author Public Key
npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7edPublished at
2023-06-07 17:58:51Event JSON
{
"id": "4edeb82313bc6dddb776a63c8bdf1416230028b39a9c0e0e40955928201bbcd7",
"pubkey": "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83",
"created_at": 1686160731,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7011ea91d13433b27ca999be38e11becd970479a19a12ca22f4ebc2ec0d1700f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"85f7980433635d9404177e9060e356753dfe3f9ff3a0ef8228b72bdc2f00b042",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-04-03\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e The hard-fork is conditional to 95% of the hashing power has approved the\n\u003e segwit2mb soft-fork and the segwit soft-fork has been activated (which\n\u003e should occur 2016 blocks after its lock-in time)\n\u003e\n\nMiners signalling they have upgraded by flipping a bit in the nVersion\nfield has little relevance in a hard fork. If 100% of the hash power\nindicates they are running this proposal, but the nodes don't upgrade, what\nwill happen?\n\nFor the record, I actually talk a lot about hard forks with various\ndevelopers and am very interested in the research that Johnson in\nparticular is pioneering. However, I have failed to understand your point\nabout 95% miner signalling in relation to a hard fork, so I am eagerly\nawaiting your explanation.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170403/daee0659/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "d4c5ca609923a53546de770d8c9f8462e2dafb32aa886c0f887820d59cba20091ac5ca99c67e3a6a6a326cd27933d642152e758e73fd4cc93f4c3421ad15621c"
}