📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02
📝 Original message:Just saying that we can talk in terms of weight alone after segwit. 8 mb
weight is much more clear than 2 mb size to me. 2 mb size seems to
obfuscate the actual new limit with the proposed hf, which simply 8 mb
weight.
On 2 Apr 2017 12:03 pm, "Natanael" <natanael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
> My point, if you missed it, is that there's a mathematical equivalence
> between using two limits (and calculating the ratio) vs using one limit and
> a ratio. The output is fully identical. The only difference is the order of
> operations. Saying there's no blocksize limit with this is pretty
> meaningless, because you're just saying you're using an abstraction that
> doesn't make the limit visible.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/73a2096f/attachment.html>;
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:58:51
in reply to nevent1q…t5vd
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:58:51Event JSON
{
"id": "85f7980433635d9404177e9060e356753dfe3f9ff3a0ef8228b72bdc2f00b042",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686160731,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7011ea91d13433b27ca999be38e11becd970479a19a12ca22f4ebc2ec0d1700f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2cb9a10d97e46cfdead9df7fdb4adc3871cb535682e890ba06e99b560fc0c697",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f14f3c71a4e63a12c842e4a50471263ada4b6cfde093fcb6588693a726b9b018"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02\n📝 Original message:Just saying that we can talk in terms of weight alone after segwit. 8 mb\nweight is much more clear than 2 mb size to me. 2 mb size seems to\nobfuscate the actual new limit with the proposed hf, which simply 8 mb\nweight.\n\nOn 2 Apr 2017 12:03 pm, \"Natanael\" \u003cnatanael.l at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e My point, if you missed it, is that there's a mathematical equivalence\n\u003e between using two limits (and calculating the ratio) vs using one limit and\n\u003e a ratio. The output is fully identical. The only difference is the order of\n\u003e operations. Saying there's no blocksize limit with this is pretty\n\u003e meaningless, because you're just saying you're using an abstraction that\n\u003e doesn't make the limit visible.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/73a2096f/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "16bf36f093aa6b4b4f3a3ae786912f91264fc4f2341e2f2e31dd186393b88a57f17abf4b2d01a6be2d2f2332ef508b5fe041057039a50d7644b45089d4eb4dfb"
}