Yes. No. Maybe. It remains to be seen.
It's complicated.
quoting
naddr1qq…v9dhThe newspaper barons are all into crypto, now
Watching the outsized-impact we crypto enthusiasts (I’m including Bitcoin in that category), had on the 2024 USA presidential election, was a sobering affair. At the moment, our impact is primarily over the voting box, but, already, indirectly, (over Elon Musik, Donald Trump, and Jack Dorsey, etc.) through our sheer wealth (and the ingenuity that brought us that wealth) being able to influence the voting population, by changing/shifting the communications channels and influencing what is written there.
Elon even reached deep into his foreign-learned bag of political tricks and started handing out money, directly, to petition signers.
Survival of the fittest, ongoing
Now, you all know that I have full respect for an expert player, when I see one, so no hating the hustle, from my side. We all play the hand we are dealt, and the political game is now such a pigsty, that you have to get a bit dirty, to have a chance at winning. Trying to stay neat and above the fray cost Republicans the last election.
It was the most dramatic display of the greatest power following the best money, that has been seen, since the Medici family began minting gold coins. The entire world is in shock. Change is upon us.
He who has the best money, makes the rules.
On a smaller, but not insignificant scale, private wealth and access to Bitcoin funding, have allowed quite a few of us Nostriches, to dedicate time and energy toward promoting and developing the New Internet. Whereas, other people’s hobby is increasingly the night shift at the gas station, or doing something mind-numbing, to escape the realities of their current economic misery.
You don’t need money to be here, but you can spend more time here, if you have money. And we are here, writing the rules. We call them NIPs.
Same ole, same ole
But back to us Bitcoiners…
I increasingly don’t see us morally any different than the clever people crowding into any safe asset, during any financial crisis. Like the people who bought agricultural land, gold, and Swiss Francs, before the Reichsmark melted down. The people who had that stuff, mostly managed to keep it, and their children and grandchildren have inherited it. Or they managed to marry back into families, that have done so, by remaining in the same social class, through beauty or talent.
We Bitcoiners have a good narrative to go along with our flight to economic safety, but everyone has that narrative. Humans have a conscience and need to justify their own actions, to themselves. I’m also a goldbug, you see, and a stockholder, and all three assets are rife with the same virtuous narrative.
How do we save our financial behinds, without being evil?
Some people are simply more situationally aware and have more agency, by nature and circumstances, and they adapt faster. It’s not mere intelligence, rather, it also requires a willingness to act and take risks. There’s an element of chance to it, but it’s still always the same types of people ending up with the assets, with the winners slightly shifting with each round, due to evolution and changes in the environment.
Charity was invented, to get such people to willingly share their assets, or the fruits of their assets, for the common good. So, rather than fret over the morality of the asset, itself, the better response is to consider stepping up your charity (effort or payments), to balance out the inevitable negative impact of the coming Age of Bitcoin Inequality.
Coming down from the ATH
Even now, Bitcoin isn’t the only safe asset; it’s just the most-fungible and partitionable one, so that it’s the one most akin to money. And lines are being blurred, as corporations, funds, governments, and insurers discharge dollars and stock up on harder reserve assets, including Bitcoin.
They can hear the money printers rolling out, already, because nobody can print-n-spend, like Trump can. Let’s not forget that the money for the last big bump came from the infamous Trump stimmy checks, that lots of us stacked on crypto.
As Bitcoin flows into such markets, the power will rest with both groups (the direct-hodlers and the title-holders), although the hodlers will initially have the upper hand. I say, initially because many hodlers will need to discharge or invest Bitcoin, to live off of it, but the others don’t need to, so it should eventually even out. It could take dozens or even hundreds of years to rebalance. By then, the world will be a very different place, and we don’t know if Bitcoin will even still be a part of it.
Assets come, assets go, and I’m just glad I didn’t let down my forefathers, by leaving them with the first generation, who failed to adapt. Even if I’m a bit late, to the Bitcoin game, the ball is still in play.
May the best money win. And may it be mine. And may I do good with it.
