📅 Original date posted:2015-07-26
📝 Original message:
Christopher Jamthagen <cjamthagen at gmx.com> writes:
> When a HTLC's CLTV has expired, the receiver of the HTLC should not be
> able to use the pre-image to spend the output from a commitment
> transaction that has not been invalidated.
> Assume a circuit is established: Alice -> Bob -> Dave
Yes, I assume that the HTLC gets eliminated by a commitment transaction
update at (or before) that time.
We could add an additional delay for this case, but it seems like
overengineering?
Cheers,
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-09 12:43:46
in reply to nevent1q…dfhd
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:46Event JSON
{
"id": "ee16432a32be8cef69b19028827cc3f9213a3b231f704d89aa0cbc2cebcf6e59",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686314626,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"136120fa9d254826614cb6c81e857559ae6ab498d602841cc63c63ab6debd5a9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"58ed74ff6cea88d299e361065557a53977b4fc4334556e118a0a939851275ced",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ccb4cc87c455b74febaee5929cfd0726421b2eea64ad2b16440b68e8c7433211"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-26\n📝 Original message:\nChristopher Jamthagen \u003ccjamthagen at gmx.com\u003e writes:\n\u003e When a HTLC's CLTV has expired, the receiver of the HTLC should not be\n\u003e able to use the pre-image to spend the output from a commitment\n\u003e transaction that has not been invalidated.\n\u003e Assume a circuit is established: Alice -\u003e Bob -\u003e Dave\n\nYes, I assume that the HTLC gets eliminated by a commitment transaction\nupdate at (or before) that time.\n\nWe could add an additional delay for this case, but it seems like\noverengineering?\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "f58ade619a576816acd497ce53233940c364e28902b92f5e64d74395b9e501b658c8ecc09e64d77f12101883395f0e6fcd7c204422cddfdbed1ee1d9181f7305"
}