I've already explained all this, albeit probably along one of the threads. Because atheism is as old as theism, it's called a belief. This is because, back then, everything misunderstood called upon others to believe. Atheism now simply implies a lack of evidence. Agnosticism, on the other hand, is a refuge for intellectual cowards. The analysis does not account for the lack of evidence correctly or weight it properly against the notion of the obvious fact that humans invented god(s).
{
"id":"efab1a43afe884f590bedb1055ff51497a300c0690c086b5f539509ba16382ef",
"pubkey":"a9b11505c4614118ca65c7438d5f7772b1f23d6d411ed15a1b2683ab2cbbbbca",
"created_at":1699831848,
"kind":1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"1b178a83ed6adc542c56130be0468d5b0106bfa3b4ac36e83ed1a8931f8e07c8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"2eac5c8f1fec2b0f9748350359f4dd81bc7443f2cecec783c5658b2f16d50998",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.party/users/lednabwm/statuses/111400180001319595",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content":"nostr:npub1rvtc4qlddtw9gtzkzv97q35dtvqsd0arkjkrd6p76x5fx8uwqlyq3uta0m \n\nI've already explained all this, albeit probably along one of the threads. Because atheism is as old as theism, it's called a belief. This is because, back then, everything misunderstood called upon others to believe. Atheism now simply implies a lack of evidence. Agnosticism, on the other hand, is a refuge for intellectual cowards. The analysis does not account for the lack of evidence correctly or weight it properly against the notion of the obvious fact that humans invented god(s).\n\nhttps://files.mstdn.party/media_attachments/files/111/400/179/428/806/229/original/d6d55fd25ae14ba7.mp4",
"sig":"94b65f01c119cd881d75f20169ac50bc79ae170fc7973da4021f5721b50c21a9ea71bd0634126ea86fbcf27aa0aca63bd94a95fb3a21739904737002fcd099bf"
}