ð
Original date posted:2016-10-02
ð Original message:Peter, are you really going to try to down vote a decent free and
open-source proposal that benefits all the Bitcoin community including
you and your future children because a personal attack to me without any
logic or basis?
Is that the way you collaborate to improving Bitcoin?
I just can't believe it.
Let's open another thread elsewhere to discuss hardware and software
patents, and that particular one, if you wish, this is NOT the place.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:49:08PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner via
> bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> I think your history of patenting(1) Bitcoin consensus relevant technology
> is
> sufficient by itself to be extremely dubious of any proposals coming from
> you
> or your colleagues; patents on Bitcoin consensus technology are a serious
> threat to decentralization. Personally, I'm NACKing this proposal on that
> basis
> alone.
>
> You need to rectify this dangerous and unethical behavior in a convincing,
> legally binding way. I'd suggest looking into Blockstream's patent pledges
> as a
> way forward:
>
> https://www.blockstream.com/about/patent_pledge/
>
> I see no reason to have any further discussion of your proposal until this
> is
> rectified.
>
> 1) "AsicBoost is a patent-pending method to improve the efficiency and
> cost of Bitcoin mining by approximately 20%"
> http://www.asicboost.com/single-post/2016/03/24/AsicBoost-Press-Release
>
> > Since ScalingBitcoin is close, I think this is a good moment to publish
> our
> > proposal on drivechains. This BIP proposed the drivechain we'd like to
> use
> > in RSK (a.k.a. Rootstock) two-way pegged blockchain and see it
> implemented
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/67b00718/attachment.html>;
Sergio Demian Lerner [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fvâŠ3vq7f
2023-06-07 17:53:41
in reply to nevent1qâŠ0mym
Author Public Key
npub1fvuxqdqg7klqqgy3yy8gdxjv4phu92sll5y8zqm2qe5qdrhxymhqf3vq7fPublished at
2023-06-07 17:53:41Event JSON
{
"id": "ef0127d2d70abd9e9c96d21c0b49aaf0cf1d07425bca94701a96f7fcc593b0da",
"pubkey": "4b38603408f5be002091210e869a4ca86fc2aa1ffd0871036a0668068ee626ee",
"created_at": 1686160421,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a0719e105373a31b19331be2ab9915ba509ea0ec8469edd3808978e2d85d8297",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4964f828001d4668b28f13b669152976f589d56daa634404184f1c9223f5a6ef",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "ð
Original date posted:2016-10-02\nð Original message:Peter, are you really going to try to down vote a decent free and\nopen-source proposal that benefits all the Bitcoin community including\nyou and your future children because a personal attack to me without any\nlogic or basis?\n\nIs that the way you collaborate to improving Bitcoin?\n\nI just can't believe it.\n\nLet's open another thread elsewhere to discuss hardware and software\npatents, and that particular one, if you wish, this is NOT the place.\n\n\n\nOn Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:49:08PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner via\n\u003e bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e I think your history of patenting(1) Bitcoin consensus relevant technology\n\u003e is\n\u003e sufficient by itself to be extremely dubious of any proposals coming from\n\u003e you\n\u003e or your colleagues; patents on Bitcoin consensus technology are a serious\n\u003e threat to decentralization. Personally, I'm NACKing this proposal on that\n\u003e basis\n\u003e alone.\n\u003e\n\u003e You need to rectify this dangerous and unethical behavior in a convincing,\n\u003e legally binding way. I'd suggest looking into Blockstream's patent pledges\n\u003e as a\n\u003e way forward:\n\u003e\n\u003e https://www.blockstream.com/about/patent_pledge/\n\u003e\n\u003e I see no reason to have any further discussion of your proposal until this\n\u003e is\n\u003e rectified.\n\u003e\n\u003e 1) \"AsicBoost is a patent-pending method to improve the efficiency and\n\u003e cost of Bitcoin mining by approximately 20%\"\n\u003e http://www.asicboost.com/single-post/2016/03/24/AsicBoost-Press-Release\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Since ScalingBitcoin is close, I think this is a good moment to publish\n\u003e our\n\u003e \u003e proposal on drivechains. This BIP proposed the drivechain we'd like to\n\u003e use\n\u003e \u003e in RSK (a.k.a. Rootstock) two-way pegged blockchain and see it\n\u003e implemented\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/67b00718/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "064cd4d45dc45e57818625fac57b29c14bc860ebe4ae86d13e861959c943dc9b3632180402c30e4688a280ea91db16a8d0d495c6c25df5d8c3d882fc667bd1bb"
}