📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02
📝 Original message:On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:49:08PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev wrote:
I think your history of patenting(1) Bitcoin consensus relevant technology is
sufficient by itself to be extremely dubious of any proposals coming from you
or your colleagues; patents on Bitcoin consensus technology are a serious
threat to decentralization. Personally, I'm NACKing this proposal on that basis
alone.
You need to rectify this dangerous and unethical behavior in a convincing,
legally binding way. I'd suggest looking into Blockstream's patent pledges as a
way forward:
https://www.blockstream.com/about/patent_pledge/
I see no reason to have any further discussion of your proposal until this is
rectified.
1) "AsicBoost is a patent-pending method to improve the efficiency and cost of Bitcoin mining by approximately 20%"
http://www.asicboost.com/single-post/2016/03/24/AsicBoost-Press-Release
> Since ScalingBitcoin is close, I think this is a good moment to publish our
> proposal on drivechains. This BIP proposed the drivechain we'd like to use
> in RSK (a.k.a. Rootstock) two-way pegged blockchain and see it implemented
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/e1b2f066/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 17:53:41
in reply to nevent1q…jdwt
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:53:41Event JSON
{
"id": "4964f828001d4668b28f13b669152976f589d56daa634404184f1c9223f5a6ef",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160421,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a0719e105373a31b19331be2ab9915ba509ea0ec8469edd3808978e2d85d8297",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"54c128bb2898adaee080795f6e1040ec241a804b0218a478a65dba2f328d57a5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4b38603408f5be002091210e869a4ca86fc2aa1ffd0871036a0668068ee626ee"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:49:08PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\nI think your history of patenting(1) Bitcoin consensus relevant technology is\nsufficient by itself to be extremely dubious of any proposals coming from you\nor your colleagues; patents on Bitcoin consensus technology are a serious\nthreat to decentralization. Personally, I'm NACKing this proposal on that basis\nalone.\n\nYou need to rectify this dangerous and unethical behavior in a convincing,\nlegally binding way. I'd suggest looking into Blockstream's patent pledges as a\nway forward:\n\n https://www.blockstream.com/about/patent_pledge/\n\nI see no reason to have any further discussion of your proposal until this is\nrectified.\n\n1) \"AsicBoost is a patent-pending method to improve the efficiency and cost of Bitcoin mining by approximately 20%\"\n http://www.asicboost.com/single-post/2016/03/24/AsicBoost-Press-Release\n\n\u003e Since ScalingBitcoin is close, I think this is a good moment to publish our\n\u003e proposal on drivechains. This BIP proposed the drivechain we'd like to use\n\u003e in RSK (a.k.a. Rootstock) two-way pegged blockchain and see it implemented\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/e1b2f066/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "cc47f5e2ef3d48ce8de1567649bec04955cd00fe69ccd19fcd957c863808c851ee01d68beff3f67939e668b00b4b6791c6898f1fc1c461e34dda1fad5ead4d85"
}