chadlupkes on Nostr: With a 20lb sledge hammer, multiple times. Yes, it would cause short term inequality ...
With a 20lb sledge hammer, multiple times.
Yes, it would cause short term inequality to spike, and it would cause hurt to a lot of people while the world adjusted to the new paradigm. It would be worth it.
Whether federal social programs got defunded would be a choice, and I would advocate that they not be ended, but that's just my voice. Taxation would not be impossible, people would just have a clearer understanding of where the money comes from and where the money is going. I personally don't have an objection to sending money to help "those people over there", as long as I know that those people actually need the help.
I don't think you are using the same definition of 'progressive' that I use. I don't know what definition you are using, because a balanced budget and transparent global financial systems that ensure that capital flows towards good causes and wealth/power doesn't get concentrated in fewer and fewer hands has been the entire purpose behind the progressive movement going back to the Magna Carta in 1215.
Published at
2024-10-24 01:42:44Event JSON
{
"id": "ea400218e6285eb1f0bf966555630679780fe022774000ce2c4e070d2abe213e",
"pubkey": "df06d21eca7c19c89d054964b2d9e305a425ebde34403cb0e7966a872b23058f",
"created_at": 1729734164,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c0dab9b98677fb28247a667c11d2884656f20731c1f56c67492b035b35d5993b",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7f34bcc0cfc254a112284bd9def4f0e5b16d1ba2b2115dea6eaf05597c517c63",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d5415a313d38461ff93a8c170f941b2cd4a66a5cfdbb093406960f6cb317849f"
],
[
"p",
"390b5334739c171d82c84fe7c853462d7607537187f2a0695ede3b297a5b988c"
]
],
"content": "With a 20lb sledge hammer, multiple times.\nYes, it would cause short term inequality to spike, and it would cause hurt to a lot of people while the world adjusted to the new paradigm. It would be worth it.\nWhether federal social programs got defunded would be a choice, and I would advocate that they not be ended, but that's just my voice. Taxation would not be impossible, people would just have a clearer understanding of where the money comes from and where the money is going. I personally don't have an objection to sending money to help \"those people over there\", as long as I know that those people actually need the help. \nI don't think you are using the same definition of 'progressive' that I use. I don't know what definition you are using, because a balanced budget and transparent global financial systems that ensure that capital flows towards good causes and wealth/power doesn't get concentrated in fewer and fewer hands has been the entire purpose behind the progressive movement going back to the Magna Carta in 1215.",
"sig": "8c3b6c86597c43c5c5687e50c2d89ca83b5ff50ce432b69c74ec35269df36025beb29bc3ea0f60f2dc9dcffde3116668d54972cc7cf929c63c944085a02e2a14"
}