📅 Original date posted:2015-07-11
📝 Original message:I think a compromise will be somewhere in the middle. I think most people
would be OK with TXs that don't have enough fees for P2P transfer to stay
in deadmans land. Most people are stuck in a situation where they payed
enough to get it into (and keep it in) the pool, but not enough to get it
out.
If we could get CPFP that only worked on TXs that met the minimum threshold
for peer propagation, then I think we would be in much better position to
battle this spam flood.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Micha Bailey <michabailey at gmail.com> wrote:
> Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are
> evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for
> relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol
> doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol
> message to signify that they should be evaluated together.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150711/9ba24f71/attachment.html>;
Dan Bryant [ARCHIVE] /
npub1h0…c9su0
2023-06-07 15:41:54
in reply to nevent1q…ah6h
Author Public Key
npub1h0jpmhuc5ufwtzz92ut7erelpzfu2vrfntc2nr97smq27qfckfwsyc9su0Published at
2023-06-07 15:41:54Event JSON
{
"id": "c72417b2e99c50d2a77b2eecaf8093f0d9d28a521a23530c39240fc71c598f08",
"pubkey": "bbe41ddf98a712e588455717ec8f3f0893c530699af0a98cbe86c0af0138b25d",
"created_at": 1686152514,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bfd4714bb94a189208ff2ce68134800f654e20d12d58c5096abb21e63eaebf75",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"537d13593ecc53e5f7d73e050a726ca0ac727d2e53cbf823fc9b0272ae63713a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"417cca0d748239d44acfc6578b0ef7d8e376e5a7e558ecd2d9006f9f13255a13"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-11\n📝 Original message:I think a compromise will be somewhere in the middle. I think most people\nwould be OK with TXs that don't have enough fees for P2P transfer to stay\nin deadmans land. Most people are stuck in a situation where they payed\nenough to get it into (and keep it in) the pool, but not enough to get it\nout.\n\nIf we could get CPFP that only worked on TXs that met the minimum threshold\nfor peer propagation, then I think we would be in much better position to\nbattle this spam flood.\n\nOn Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Micha Bailey \u003cmichabailey at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are\n\u003e evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for\n\u003e relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol\n\u003e doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol\n\u003e message to signify that they should be evaluated together.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150711/9ba24f71/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "265a103e5ad00d9b3dbab5400b9ef0be55ba25eee54c1c6fd7910aac02028e7df0bc9b0a0068dfb273bc9cb4427cdfd4d04303fde709b0f66bc1284e044f3d73"
}