📅 Original date posted:2015-07-11
📝 Original message:Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are
evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for
relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol
doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol
message to signify that they should be evaluated together.
On Saturday, July 11, 2015, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> AFAIK the only thing holding it up is lack of unit tests. If anyone would
> like
> to implement those, I expect it'd be merged fairly soon. Then the problem
> is,
> as Jeff mentioned, getting the parent transactions relayed despite failing
> relay policy on their own.
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150711/02eb77a2/attachment.html>;
Micha Bailey [ARCHIVE] /
npub1g9…323pl
2023-06-07 15:41:54
in reply to nevent1q…yd8g
Author Public Key
npub1g97v5rt5sguagjk0cetckrhhmr3hded8u4vwe5keqphe7ye9tgfsv323plSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:41:54Event JSON
{
"id": "537d13593ecc53e5f7d73e050a726ca0ac727d2e53cbf823fc9b0272ae63713a",
"pubkey": "417cca0d748239d44acfc6578b0ef7d8e376e5a7e558ecd2d9006f9f13255a13",
"created_at": 1686152514,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bfd4714bb94a189208ff2ce68134800f654e20d12d58c5096abb21e63eaebf75",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ffe2e15349fdc30cc12d4026287523a689e37e79fc810599d92f1aaa98c6391a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-11\n📝 Original message:Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are\nevaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for\nrelaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol\ndoesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol\nmessage to signify that they should be evaluated together.\n\nOn Saturday, July 11, 2015, Luke Dashjr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e AFAIK the only thing holding it up is lack of unit tests. If anyone would\n\u003e like\n\u003e to implement those, I expect it'd be merged fairly soon. Then the problem\n\u003e is,\n\u003e as Jeff mentioned, getting the parent transactions relayed despite failing\n\u003e relay policy on their own.\n\u003e\n\u003e Luke\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \u003cjavascript:;\u003e\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150711/02eb77a2/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "b860fb9eeb2aecd994baabf9af30e3f2021cfc6097f10df50ddf6c6f9138d045626ba5b832765d46ca9a076181c7b1ad3227acda497726e522846426f65b7ba2"
}