Kyonko802 (npub1jju…533h) I think the jump Nova3 is trying to make here is "does not fit in the frame of men and women" must imply the concept of "non-binary." Perhaps the missing variable here is the intent of the writers. I think Nova3 is projecting his confirmation bias on the writing. Does not being in the frame of men and women mean literally? Being a machine, being a clump of dirt, being non-possessive of a human or otherwise humanlike body? Or strange circumstances, such as a person that has the body of a woman but the mind of a man and vice-versa?
The question is: Did the writers intend to imply a third or otherwise state of being that contradicts the binary of humans? Perhaps the script would have used the words male and female instead. After all, male and female are terms given to the two halves of a sexually dimorphic species, especially ours, and funnily enough, the meaning of man and woman is ambiguous at best and undefined at worst in the left's lexicon.
namedoesntfi (npub1j2u…e2jl) Lapin (npub1s77…f354)
Cayhr /
npub1an…x9ff6
2023-10-11 21:53:35
in reply to nevent1q…r6sk
Author Public Key
npub1anj4lk2fl6e6slu6npx3vpka6gk6kr94jlh7c2ljy23ffatczx0qux9ff6Published at
2023-10-11 21:53:35Event JSON
{
"id": "ce738adc556ec2f448ce57c070f1cdb4da8fc4feaf88acb5bf4cb65e8967a028",
"pubkey": "ece55fd949feb3a87f9a984d1606ddd22dab0cb597efec2bf222a294f578119e",
"created_at": 1697061215,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"94b83168be8551771f6e2530b50c7d3ff8184ba3c28f711d67705a591467d6e2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"92b86b814b01ab4846296bc3617f6c83f070a02d01118ecf72cdec98b66f9605",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"87bc2eb47093a1b1ed69a6b4c147d5fe9877227bb8a330e32b977889361860a0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"6ee22d8a398e0f7af281d9e346af44f9b4d7284c123e6dc26741024a1d81924c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://varishangout.net/objects/921518b5-7b6f-453f-8108-50bf8fb4ec66",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1jjurz697s4ghw8mwy5ct2rra8lupsjarc28hz8t8wpd9j9r86m3qc3533h I think the jump Nova3 is trying to make here is \"does not fit in the frame of men and women\" must imply the concept of \"non-binary.\" Perhaps the missing variable here is the intent of the writers. I think Nova3 is projecting his confirmation bias on the writing. Does not being in the frame of men and women mean literally? Being a machine, being a clump of dirt, being non-possessive of a human or otherwise humanlike body? Or strange circumstances, such as a person that has the body of a woman but the mind of a man and vice-versa?\n\nThe question is: Did the writers intend to imply a third or otherwise state of being that contradicts the binary of humans? Perhaps the script would have used the words male and female instead. After all, male and female are terms given to the two halves of a sexually dimorphic species, especially ours, and funnily enough, the meaning of man and woman is ambiguous at best and undefined at worst in the left's lexicon.\nnostr:npub1j2uxhq2tqx45s33fd0pkzlmvs0c8pgpdqygcanmjehkf3dn0jczs3je2jl nostr:npub1s77zadrsjwsmrmtf566vz374l6v8wgnmhz3npcetjaugjdscvzsq7yf354",
"sig": "9eb7d7bb60b69a38a1c9439286341578913392c5518b0fad74022b5527c78a0d27a4b833aea2d45ea3fd8f6dc7d347669a131e5b798a51215f3ad5f08b27b60c"
}