📅 Original date posted:2013-08-16
📝 Original message:I might agree this would be helpful for the many phones plugged into power
and on wifi for large portions of the day. However that doesn't really
help much when phone IP addresses change often as you move onto different
networks, and currently IP address is the only thing that peers can keep
track of for the goodness of a peer as there is no roaming pseudo-identity
cookie due to separate goal of anonymity? I haven't studied the issue if
would be even possible to have both privacy protection and unique node
identifiers for anti-DoS authentication at the same time.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> The user interface for this stuff is very simple: "How much bandwidth
> will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other
> peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable."
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130816/1ad7034c/attachment.html>;
Warren Togami Jr. [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s5…zxem8
2023-06-07 15:06:04
in reply to nevent1q…yxlu
Author Public Key
npub1s5p2xnl52ksr3a4qfa8re5znmja46ugm3x3ayy0x2c2mqrsw6ewsmzxem8Published at
2023-06-07 15:06:04Event JSON
{
"id": "b25fc1fb26c539e77479c31c5633eadbf611244e76aa78f918a5d4c97f030f01",
"pubkey": "8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d",
"created_at": 1686150364,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5a9ab6946b435e1e53322190b144cf294684f6977db12281caf5c76891efbbe7",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1f808f6b09e5c8cc385c75c7c68422773b6ff2f47db59462117333d37fcd36b6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-08-16\n📝 Original message:I might agree this would be helpful for the many phones plugged into power\nand on wifi for large portions of the day. However that doesn't really\nhelp much when phone IP addresses change often as you move onto different\nnetworks, and currently IP address is the only thing that peers can keep\ntrack of for the goodness of a peer as there is no roaming pseudo-identity\ncookie due to separate goal of anonymity? I haven't studied the issue if\nwould be even possible to have both privacy protection and unique node\nidentifiers for anti-DoS authentication at the same time.\n\nOn Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e The user interface for this stuff is very simple: \"How much bandwidth\n\u003e will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other\n\u003e peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable.\"\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e 000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130816/1ad7034c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c5d4286b6b8cb7b5153b009bd4797eaab795293ab7877bbf51c1c5b1d10e5f0272e506cb2a0c951c8e488045d75ab294df3f769b1b5b720b1df6096e3369a825"
}