š
Original date posted:2013-08-16
š Original message:On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> That change was made in response to user complaints. Heck we get complaints
> about battery life and bandwidth impact even with Bloom filtering. We can't
> just randomly start using peoples bandwidth for relaying blocks, especially
> as I guess most SPV nodes are behind NAT.
UPNP seems to work well for the reference client. What's the situation
there on Android?
I leave my phone plugged in and connected via wifi for most of the day;
lots of people do that.
The user interface for this stuff is very simple: "How much bandwidth
will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other
peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable."
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130816/2c2584ac/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 15:06:04
in reply to nevent1qā¦jf2u
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:06:04Event JSON
{
"id": "1f808f6b09e5c8cc385c75c7c68422773b6ff2f47db59462117333d37fcd36b6",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686150364,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5a9ab6946b435e1e53322190b144cf294684f6977db12281caf5c76891efbbe7",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0b64b6f6d853226a4efb1bcb4ef5082556ff2c57f5be469bf1c34da82a9ae679",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-08-16\nš Original message:On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e That change was made in response to user complaints. Heck we get complaints\n\u003e about battery life and bandwidth impact even with Bloom filtering. We can't\n\u003e just randomly start using peoples bandwidth for relaying blocks, especially\n\u003e as I guess most SPV nodes are behind NAT.\n\nUPNP seems to work well for the reference client. What's the situation\nthere on Android?\n\nI leave my phone plugged in and connected via wifi for most of the day;\nlots of people do that.\n\nThe user interface for this stuff is very simple: \"How much bandwidth\nwill you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other\npeers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable.\"\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 198 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130816/2c2584ac/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "c398179093a7142577654973b8890c354840e4e4de828543938a86ca39805ad81036ea2d4f6753b338524d09ce7a91e96f0d41a48b537e73814b8b8fd485f307"
}