Matt Blaze on Nostr: I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single ...
I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single frame with the wider-angle 23mm, except that the 23 doesn't have a large enough image circle to accommodate the vertical shift needed to keep the vertical lines from converging. The 32 has a much larger image circle, and so stitching with it yields a wider angle of view than I can get with the 23. More pixels, too.
Published at
2024-02-09 21:36:27Event JSON
{
"id": "be7320b134c6e87061ef2b99129573a18a64f0f286703cb34111e4772e2239fe",
"pubkey": "6f9089e5e6810f9514a501f04b94466f7473f4db7fb0e9e389966dc7cfb76251",
"created_at": 1707514587,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"569b9078e8dff07b5beea186c29acdb803690ddc949ee74af12940433241ef46",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://federate.social/users/mattblaze/statuses/111903676001225797",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single frame with the wider-angle 23mm, except that the 23 doesn't have a large enough image circle to accommodate the vertical shift needed to keep the vertical lines from converging. The 32 has a much larger image circle, and so stitching with it yields a wider angle of view than I can get with the 23. More pixels, too.",
"sig": "d849a57c99344535965ff6184b5a7efc86e536aaaff97027e8e8f94537ee7ab76b305835214aab91dc2bd071bf882fde18d063da0ea576335e51cfe433183c4b"
}
