I have a question I haven't been able to find a clear answer to. Most of the guides I've seen about obtaining Anon Sats recommended (strongly) running them through a coinjoin. This makes sense, as it reinforces what could be poor fungibility based on the sender's history. I've also seen (strong) recommendations for executing the same process when moving off exchange. Given the premium involved in the former (particularly regarding ATMs), isn't the latter nothing more than a more efficient (cost-wise) method of obtaining the same outcome? It seems that CoinJoins are really the linchpin in maintaining fungibility rather than the source of the acquisition. Please let me know if I'm misinterpreting or overlooking some aspect of the process.
Would really love to hear some opinions of the most respected voices I know of on this.
GrassFedBitcoin (npub1wnl…n3wr) ODELL (npub1qny…95gx) NVK (npub1az9…m8y8) walker (npub1cj8…rz4u) SeedSigner (npub17ty…3mgl) parman_the (npub1ltt…k97y)
/ Neo Sovereign
npub12j…rfjvu
2024-09-19 18:33:48
Author Public Key
npub12j7w75gg762mdvh5djy6pr0ncuhk2r4hykdwa8v80wajwlrqhfaqfrfjvuPublished at
2024-09-19 18:33:48Event JSON
{
"id": "b1d73c65a642661f6ab4d895db67bbcc9879ce10dc2e30ef1fcbfeee62c0107e",
"pubkey": "54bcef5108f695b6b2f46c89a08df3c72f650eb7259aee9d877bbb277c60ba7a",
"created_at": 1726770828,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"74ffc51cc30150cf79b6cb316d3a15cf332ab29a38fec9eb484ab1551d6d1856",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"e88a691e98d9987c964521dff60025f60700378a4879180dcbbb4a5027850411",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"c48e29f04b482cc01ca1f9ef8c86ef8318c059e0e9353235162f080f26e14c11",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"f2c96c97f6419a538f84cf3fa72e2194605e1848096e6e5170cce5b76799d400",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"fad6540c8f2fd2a16a25d0d82dd95d3bad7890d435d1690848a0a77d2883a447",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "I have a question I haven't been able to find a clear answer to. Most of the guides I've seen about obtaining Anon Sats recommended (strongly) running them through a coinjoin. This makes sense, as it reinforces what could be poor fungibility based on the sender's history. I've also seen (strong) recommendations for executing the same process when moving off exchange. Given the premium involved in the former (particularly regarding ATMs), isn't the latter nothing more than a more efficient (cost-wise) method of obtaining the same outcome? It seems that CoinJoins are really the linchpin in maintaining fungibility rather than the source of the acquisition. Please let me know if I'm misinterpreting or overlooking some aspect of the process.\n\nWould really love to hear some opinions of the most respected voices I know of on this.\n\nnostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u nostr:npub17tyke9lkgxd98ruyeul6wt3pj3s9uxzgp9hxu5tsenjmweue6sqq4y3mgl nostr:npub1ltt9gry09lf2z6396rvzmk2a8wkh3yx5xhgkjzzg5znh62yr53rs0hk97y",
"sig": "62b09ae30d3c08672fe6ef3633bf7800fd35a5061c64a10fe8b666f09abdfb557ff1e37df93f659a8067f97aefdfcbe2cc887da8c7f04400e69554b42a793fa6"
}