📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 2015/1/21 15:37, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> You mention the "DER standard" : should link to
> http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/X.690-0207.pdf
>
>
(or whatever is best reference for DER).
The link you gave is to the 2002 revision.
http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690-200811-I/en has the latest revision
(Nov. 2008) and, AFAIK, is the most visible link to people searching
for X.690.
That said, X.690 is the definitive DER document (if not exactly the
easiest read). A link to it wouldn't hurt.
> "this would simplify avoiding OpenSSL in consensus implementations"
> --> "this would make it easier for non-OpenSSL implementations"
>
> "causing opcode failure" : I know what you mean by "opcode
> failure", but it might be good to be more explicit.
>
> "since v0.8.0, and nearly no transactions" --> "and very few
> transactions..."
>
> "reducing this avenue for malleability is useful on itself as well"
> : awkward English. How about just "This proposal has the added
> benefit of reducing transaction malleability (see BIP62)."
These all look good to me.
- ---
Douglas Roark
Senior Developer
Armory Technologies, Inc.
doug at bitcoinarmory.com
PGP key ID: 92ADC0D7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=MNXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Douglas Roark [ARCHIVE] /
npub12v…dqa4q
2023-06-07 15:28:53
in reply to nevent1q…gt9k
Author Public Key
npub12vlytlltjj7g3s227u9jtx2g8qtsu7gscynnn99k808ydr4vygcqvdqa4qPublished at
2023-06-07 15:28:53Event JSON
{
"id": "bdf142b12a97a44da7e5f76af6d2bb88080f84f4df39a1dcc226f4f788389cf5",
"pubkey": "533e45ffeb94bc88c14af70b25994838170e7910c1273994b63bce468eac2230",
"created_at": 1686151733,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"43498997aaf69cc28c108f60f2a0a9a1eeab544cf4e7f9ece35a133ac15cb4c1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a5d359bc428043e3e73fc8264fbc072a724f8b021c35174f92269140230ac8d6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA512\n\nOn 2015/1/21 15:37, Gavin Andresen wrote:\n\u003e You mention the \"DER standard\" : should link to\n\u003e http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/X.690-0207.pdf\n\u003e\n\u003e \n(or whatever is best reference for DER).\n\nThe link you gave is to the 2002 revision.\nhttp://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690-200811-I/en has the latest revision\n(Nov. 2008) and, AFAIK, is the most visible link to people searching\nfor X.690.\n\nThat said, X.690 is the definitive DER document (if not exactly the\neasiest read). A link to it wouldn't hurt.\n\n\u003e \"this would simplify avoiding OpenSSL in consensus implementations\"\n\u003e --\u003e \"this would make it easier for non-OpenSSL implementations\"\n\u003e \n\u003e \"causing opcode failure\" : I know what you mean by \"opcode\n\u003e failure\", but it might be good to be more explicit.\n\u003e \n\u003e \"since v0.8.0, and nearly no transactions\" --\u003e \"and very few \n\u003e transactions...\"\n\u003e \n\u003e \"reducing this avenue for malleability is useful on itself as well\"\n\u003e : awkward English. How about just \"This proposal has the added\n\u003e benefit of reducing transaction malleability (see BIP62).\"\n\nThese all look good to me.\n\n- ---\nDouglas Roark\nSenior Developer\nArmory Technologies, Inc.\ndoug at bitcoinarmory.com\nPGP key ID: 92ADC0D7\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)\nComment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org\n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\nqb5K/xlqt+REOdbTGLHi\n=MNXG\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "cd888321e4ade03dc1c86a4da6341446a68a8df17c59ddea49723ba54557833f2830db73d1a98b6179948581bee353774bf27b50c63a399afc729b4132371a19"
}